Children in remote communities denied seats on near-empty ‘Indigenous-only' charter flights
The Albanese government will review charter flight arrangements for students living in remote outback communities after claims non-Indigenous students were prevented from boarding planes because they were not ABSTUDY recipients.
Derek Lord, a father of two boys living in the far north west Queensland town of Normanton about five hours north of Mt Isa and eight hours west of Cairns in the Gulf of Carpentaria, said his sons faced a 'six-day ordeal' to get home after they were not allowed to purchase seats on a nearly empty, taxpayer-funded flight.
Mr Lord, who is the Air Traffic Services Reporting Officer at the tiny Normanton Airport, said he regularly sees 20-seat planes arriving with fewer than half the seats occupied.
But he claims his two sons, who board at school in Charters Towers, 90 minutes southwest of Townsville, have been turned away from those same flights because they're not ABSTUDY recipients.
'My boys have been left sitting at the airport, bags packed, because they weren't allowed on a plane with empty seats,' Mr Lord said in a statement via Katter's Australian Party (KAP) Leader and Member for Traeger, Robbie Katter.
'We'd gladly pay for those seats — anything to avoid the six-day ordeal we have to go through with commercial flights to get them home for the holidays when roads were cut off due to flooding.'
ABSTUDY, introduced in 1969, is a federal government scheme for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people that offers education-related financial assistance, including course fees and travel costs for students who study away from home.
Mr Katter has slammed the new school charter flight arrangement as fundamentally flawed and unfair, describing it as a system that fosters division and fails to meet the needs of remote communities.
'This is not an Indigenous problem. It's a remote living problem,' Mr Katter said.
'When you've got families living in the same town, sending their kids to the same school, but being treated differently — that's wrong. It risks creating division in communities where it doesn't exist.'
Mr Katter said the situation had been made worse by the government's decision to hand the contract to a UK-based operator with no local experience, replacing long-time provider Volantair.
'We had a capable, locally based operator with 20 years' experience and regional knowledge,' he said.
'Now we've got a foreign company charging up to $1781 per ABSTUDY seat — almost triple what a regular flight costs — and delivering a shambolic service.'
The new operator, Air Charter Services, was appointed last year by Corporate Travel Management (CTM), which is responsible for the ABSTUDY charter contract.
Air Charter Services and CTM have been contacted for comment.
Since the change, according to Mr Katter, planes had shown up without passengers to collect, flights had gone unused, and single-engine aircraft without weather radar had been deployed into some of Queensland's toughest flying conditions.
'Kids are being left stranded, rural and remote families are being ignored,' Mr Katter said.
'It's time these services were made available to any child living remotely — not just those eligible under a narrow government program — and returned to experienced local operators who know the land, know the people, and care about the outcomes.'
Speaking to 2GB's Ben Fordham on Tuesday, Mr Lord said he had even tried paying for seats on the planes but his sons were denied 'because they don't fall under ABSTUDY'.
'The carrier even agreed to take our money but the booking company that now does it, which is overseas, refused to allow our children to get on because they don't meet the criteria,' he said.
'We don't understand it either. It's taxpayer-funded. Even if we weren't willing to pay, the plane is coming here, it's being paid for by everyone's taxes whether you're Indigenous or non-Indigenous, the kids are from the same town.'
Mr Lord noted 'we're in the middle of a flood crisis and we couldn't get in our out', recounting the tortuous journey home for his sons.
'So there was no way to get our kids home unless it's on a private charter ourselves, or through Rex, and Rex can be up to two, three weeks waiting for a seat,' he said.
'We would have to bus them down to Townsville and then either bus them or plane them up to Cairns, and then they'd have to sit in Cairns over the weekend because there's no Rex flights, and then they'd have to fly home on Rex if we could get a Monday or Tuesday flight, and that's a big if.'
He said 'even Indigenous leaders here don't understand it'.
'I don't think it's about reconciliation, I think it's more about that the system is broken,' he said.
'The gap is not a gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous per se, it's regional versus non-regional. If you actually compared the two I think you'd find many of the non-Indigenous kids and families have the same disadvantages as Indigenous people in rural or remote communities.'
Mr Lord added that son's girlfriend was Indigenous and 'the first time this happened, she got on one flight and he had to get on the other'.
Fordham said it was 'absolutely mad'.
'Just put the kids on the same damn plane,' he said.
A spokeswoman for Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek told news.com.au the matter was being reviewed.
'The ABSTUDY program was introduced in 1969 by Liberal National Prime Minister John Gorton to help Indigenous students from very remote communities get access to education,' she said.
'Charter flights are only used where it is the cheapest or most cost effective alternative, from very remote communities. The allocation of spare seats is a matter for the charter company. The government agrees that empty seats should be made available for other students or community members to purchase where safe and practical to do so. The Minister will request updated advice from her department on this issue to ensure charter fees reflect value for money.'
The Department of Finance, which manages all the whole of Australian government travel contract, has previously clarified that CTM has no exclusive agreements with charter companies and will choose charter providers for the ABSTUDY program based on the needs of ABSTUDY travellers.
'CTM has encouraged competition through the expansion of charters available to be booked for the government, including the ABSTUDY program,' a spokeswoman for the department told Cairns Post last year.
'They have also recently included an additional 12 new charter service providers to the program, including two Indigenous businesses.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
30 minutes ago
- ABC News
Queensland public drunkenness law reversal will bring racial profiling, elders warn
A proposal to make public drunkenness illegal in Queensland would lead to police racially profiling Indigenous people, elders warn. It comes after Queensland Police Minister Dan Purdie flagged the state government was considering making public drunkenness illegal again, less than a year after decriminalising it. Mr Purdie said the former Labor government's decision to remove public drunkenness as an offence made it hard for police to do their jobs properly. "The Crisafulli government is listening to communities who are alarmed that Labor's watering down of the laws has led to more anti-social behaviour and crime on our streets," Mr Purdie said. "Our government is working with the Queensland Police Service to ensure they have the laws and resources they need to keep people safe." At a snap community meeting in Musgrave Park, Brisbane, elders warned the reversal would create "open season" for police to target Aboriginal communities. Brisbane Murri Action Group organiser Adrian Burragubba said such laws had historically given police the discretion to arrest people they deemed were behaving drunkenly. He claimed these discretionary powers had disproportionately been used on homeless and Aboriginal communities. Mr Burragubba said these laws had previously not been applied equally in party destinations such as Fortitude Valley and Surfers Paradise on the Gold Coast. "These laws will criminalise our people again and our human rights will be denied, as the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody found over 30 years ago." In 1991, the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody recommended decriminalising public drunkenness, but Queensland was the last state to do so in late 2024. Queensland Council for Civil Liberties president Michael Cope said this reversal would take civil rights back 34 years. Mr Cope said Queensland police could already detain drunk people if they were violent, threatening, or a risk to their safety or the safety of someone else. "Alcoholism and alcohol abuse should be dealt with via health and social support systems, rather than in the criminal justice system," Mr Cope said. Marjorie Nuggins told the meeting she feared the proposed laws would be used to target homeless people in public spaces. Ms Nuggins said this would address the symptoms, but not the cause of alcoholism in Aboriginal communities. "I believe the Indigenous custodial people of this land need to make a stand now," she said. "There're so many injustices going on around this place. "It needs to stop and we need to come together in unity and love."

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Sweeteners for first homebuyers but otherwise little relief in Queensland's 2025-26 budget
From his family home in Logan, near Brisbane, father-of-two Stephen Coles was pessimistic about what the most recent Queensland budget — the first for the LNP state government — would do for his family. "There's probably not a lot in it, to be honest," the data analyst said. "Most of the big-ticket items have been taken away … there's not much in it for this family." Mr Coles, who lives in Yarrabilba with his wife and two daughters aged 13 and 10, said it had been disappointing to have lost the $1,000 energy bill rebate brought in by the former Labor government in its final budget last year. "I think most people are struggling with the cost of living at the moment," he said. The signature cost-of-living measure of the budget was a $100 voucher for families with school-aged children, but for Mr Coles, who has one primary school-aged child, that didn't offer much more than groceries for half a week. "In fact, it probably covers our dog food for the week — that's as far as it's going to go," he said. And while the lack of support didn't weigh too heavily on him, he acknowledged that other families may have expected more from the government. He said many of his friends were experiencing rental stress and couldn't afford the homes they were in, and he would have liked to have seen more done to relieve that pressure. For the Queensland Council of Social Service (QCOSS), the cost-of-living measures on offer in the budget appeared "sensible." The existing electricity rebate scheme for vulnerable households, including seniors, pensioners, and concession card holders, will increase by $14 to $386. QCOSS CEO Aimee McVeigh said the "devil [was] in the detail" when it came to the continuation of that more targeted measure. "We don't know exactly where [the] government is targeting," she said. "We know the cost of energy is going to continue to increase in Queensland, and those concessions which have been in place have made a real difference to families on low incomes." Fifty-cent public transport fares and $200 sport vouchers were also included among cost-of-living measures. In Rockhampton, about eight hours north of Brisbane, pensioner Jean Robinson was disappointed more hadn't been offered for older Queenslanders. Ms Robinson, president of the Rockhampton Seniors Citizens Club, said she came across many people who could not afford to feed themselves. "Pensioners need more than a rebate — you can't eat electricity," she said. University of Queensland economics professor John Quiggin described the budget as "restrained" for an incoming state government. "They haven't made a big change or big cuts the way, for example, the Newman government did when it came in," he said. But he said he wouldn't characterise the $100 vouchers as "targeted" relief, as Treasurer David Janetzki had yesterday. "Everybody gets it whether they need it or not," he said. "It is not enough to make a difference to people who are struggling, but it is a nice handout for well-off people who have a few kids at school." But Professor Quiggin said cost-of-living relief like energy rebates were not a "sensible way of doing things". "What matters is whether people's wages can cover what they need to buy," he explained. In Ipswich, west of Brisbane, it was a promise of more help for first homebuyers that caught the attention of newlyweds Zinclaire and Jake Patroni. From July 1, a shared ownership scheme will mean people who meet certain income thresholds with as little as a 2 per cent deposit can be supported to buy a home. The government will guarantee 30 per cent equity for new builds and 25 per cent for existing homes, up to a home value of $1 million. It will cost $165 million over two years. The couple has been renting for four years from Mr Patroni's parents and, until yesterday, home-ownership had felt both a "bit far-fetched" and "disheartening". She said the Boost to Buy equity scheme made the dream of buying a house — ideally one with a bay window and enough room for a games room and children — feel a little more achievable. "I guess I would stay on the safe side and go for, like, a minimum affordable house, but it will definitely make it very possible," she said. The $30,000 first home owner grant will also be extended for 12 months through this budget. CEO of the Real Estate Institute of Queensland (REIQ), Antonia Mercorella, described the scheme as both realistic and pleasing. "It's good to see Queensland coming out with one of the most generous shared equity schemes in the country," she said. "Setting that price threshold at $1 million … reflects the median property prices that we are seeing here in the sunshine state." Ms Mercorella said the income thresholds were also "realistic" in a state that she said had the lowest proportion of home ownership in the country. And although she acknowledged concerns about an "inflationary" impact, Ms Mercorella said the numbers of applicants for the scheme were so small they would be unlikely to "distort the market in a material way". Professor Quiggin characterised the scheme as similar to "a hundred" others that had been put in place around the country over the years. "They are essentially misconceived," he stated. "The problem in the housing market isn't first home buyers, the problem is the difficulty [for] renters and the continuation of policies that favour existing homebuyers by keeping prices high." Meanwhile, the government has forecast the state's debt to remain at record levels, likely eclipsing $205 billion by the 2028-29 financial year. That deficit is smaller than had been projected in the January mid-year update but larger than Premier David Crisafulli had promised ahead of the election. The government has blamed GST reductions and declining coal royalties for that difference. But the opposition has repeatedly accused the government of "juicing the books". Speaking to the media yesterday, shadow treasurer Shannon Fentiman said the government had played politics with the budget, which had cost Queenslanders millions.

ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Queensland Treasurer David Janetzki aims for hope amid uncertain times in ambitious state budget
Hope in uncertain times is the takeaway in the budget handed down on Tuesday by Queensland's newly minted treasurer David Janetzki. On the hope side of the ledger: the "Boost to Buy" shared equity scheme to allow young Queenslanders to buy a property worth up to $1 million on a deposit as low as 2 per cent. The $165 million for up to 1,000 people is an arguably modest start, but Mr Janetzki hopes it's just the beginning and that he will tip more money into the bucket if it's fully taken up. "I want 'Boost to Buy' to drive home ownership in Queensland," he said. "The government wants you to have hope to own a home." There is also extra money committed to build more social housing, amid the acknowledgement that it simply cannot address the extent of the problem when 52,000 Queenslanders are already on the social housing wait list. The treasurer says he thinks the gap will need to be met with community housing purchases but adds that he's not the housing minister. Cost-of-living relief, in the treasurer's own words, is "modest and targeted". Two of the measures are directed at helping families with school-aged children. Another is to revive CPI indexation on electricity rebates, lifting it next year from $372 to $386 for an estimated 600,000 Queensland households classed as "vulnerable". There's no across-the-board electricity rebate like last year. And it's underpinned by the aforementioned uncertainty when revenue is already taking a dive. Credit rating agency S&P Global notes "a sharp deterioration in the state's finances". It says the risk to Queensland's AA+ credit rating "remains elevated". Premier David Crisafulli says Queensland is getting a "kick in the pants" on GST, expecting it to fall $2.29 billion in 2025-26. With coal royalty revenue also falling and government costs rising 5.34 per cent, the budget will remain in deficit for at least another four years. Total debt is predicted to hit $205.7 billion by 2028-29. But Mr Janetzki admits these figures could blow out further under the influence of the deteriorating situation in the Middle East. Queensland's $8.6 billion budget deficit for 2025-26 is even worse than predicted in Mr Janetzki's mid-year review. The hope is that this will be pulled back to just over $1 billion by 2028-29. There were numerous questions asked of the government in the budget lock-up over discrepancies between Labor's last budget and the debt and deficit figures now being quoted. Mr Janetzki says it's because the previous government simply had not budgeted for many significant commitments, citing $638 million for the new Springfield Mater Hospital as one example. A 10 per cent boost to health spending in this budget comes amid a vow from the treasurer that the LNP will invest more in health, education, transport and housing than Labor. Asked why anybody should trust any of it when the budget transition has felt so rubbery, the premier acknowledged the need for a parliamentary budget office and committed to having one in place by this time next year. A budget office was an LNP election promise to deliver "independent policy and budget analysis". There is no small degree of hope being invested in the new Queensland Government Consulting Services agency, now locked in and due to start work from July 1. A new agency means hiring more staff. Because sometimes you have to spend money to save money. At its core, this agency is intended to cut $6.8 billion from the growth in external consultant hiring and instead have more work done in-house. Mr Janetzki says he remains very confident the new agency will hit that mark. Of course, there are also wage negotiations underway with nurses, teachers and police. It's too early to say how these will affect the bottom line. Mr Janetzki says he is ambitious for the future of Queensland. Hope springs eternal.