VFACTS April 2025: Australian new vehicle deliveries drop
April was a disappointing month for new car sales, with drops across every state and territory and for private, business and government sales.
A total of 90,614 new vehicles were delivered in April 2025, representing a drop of 6.8 per cent on the same month last year.
Hybrids – after months of double-digit year-on-year growth – finally hit a wall. A total of 14,288 were delivered, down 6.0 per cent on April 2024's tally.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
Plug-in hybrids (PHEVs) continued to record YoY growth with 2601 deliveries in April representing an upsurge of 95.4 per cent. However, the end of the Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) exemption from April 1 likely explained why overall PHEV deliveries slumped from 6932 deliveries in March.
Electric vehicle (EV) sales fell 3.0 per cent in April to 6010 deliveries, with an influx of affordable options – primarily from China – offset by a huge drop in Tesla deliveries.
Complicating sales reporting is the lack of a unified platform for publishing vehicle deliveries.
Tesla and Polestar ceased sharing their figures for the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries' monthly VFACTS report midway through last year.
They now report their figures to the Electric Vehicle Council, whose report is usually published one working day prior to the FCAI's.
Of course, even when these brands did report to the FCAI, the overall delivery tallies weren't 100 per cent accurate. That's because Mahindra has never reported in VFACTS, and it's now been joined by – at least for now – brands such as Cadillac, Deepal, Smart and Xpeng.
Brands
Toyota kept its vice grip on the top spot despite a 6.7 per cent decline compared with last April, with 19,380 deliveries. That was more than second- and third-place finishers Ford and Mazda combined.
Toyota had a range of models that were down, including some of its hybrid-only vehicles like the Camry sedan (down 55 per cent YoY) and Corolla small car (down 20.8 per cent YoY).
The Ford brand was down 15.2 per cent thanks to drops for the Ranger ute and the related Everest SUV, while Mazda was down 10.0 per cent in part due to lower sales of its most affordable models, the Mazda 2 light car and CX-3 light SUV.
Compared to April 2024, almost every top 10 brand was down.
Exceptions included Hyundai, which was up 7.0 per cent on the back of strong Venue, Kona and Santa Fe SUV sales, as well as Nissan which was up 27.0 per cent thanks to increases for the X-Trail mid-size SUV, Navara ute and Patrol upper-large SUV.
Chinese brands generally had a good month, with seventh-placed GWM up 16.3 per cent despite drops for larger models like its Cannon ute and Tank 500 large SUV.
BYD only just squeaked into the top 10, but with 3207 deliveries it was up 127.4 per cent YoY year thanks to new models like the Sealion 6 and Sealion 7 medium SUVs and the Shark 6 ute.
Chery posted the biggest year-over-year increase at 290.9 per cent, putting it in 14th place. Polestar also recorded a significant jump with deliveries up 102 per cent.
Meanwhile, the likes of Volvo, Skoda, KGM SsangYong and Peugeot all posted declines of more than 40 per cent year-over-year.
Tesla had them beat, however, with an alarming 75.9 per cent YoY drop.
Models
The Toyota HiLux reclaimed the title of Australia's favourite new vehicle in April, posting 4121 deliveries – just 90 units ahead of the Ford Ranger.
However, the Toyota is still behind the Ford in terms of year-to-date figures, sitting at 15,120 units against 17,257 for the Ranger.
Ford did sell exactly one more Everest (2234) than Toyota did of its Prado (2233), though in the large SUV segment it's the Toyota substantially ahead in year-to-date deliveries (10,674 versus 7220).
Toyota still had Australia's best-selling SUV with the mid-size RAV4, posting 3808 deliveries, and the best-selling passenger car with the Corolla, notching 1660 deliveries.
There were some top-10 models from outside the Ford and Toyota brands, of course. The Kia Sportage took seventh with 1701 deliveries, with the Nissan X-Trail in ninth with 1615 and yet another medium SUV, the Mazda CX-5, in 10th with 1607.
Segments
Micro cars: Kia Picanto (491), Fiat/Abarth 500 (28)
Light cars under $30,000: MG 3 (568), Mazda 2 (387), Toyota Yaris (260)
Light cars over $30,000: Mini Cooper (138), Hyundai i20 (84), Mini Aceman (65)
Small cars under $45,000: Toyota Corolla (1660), Hyundai i30 (790), Mazda 3 (696)
Small cars over $45,000: MG 4 (363), Volkswagen Golf (210), BMW 1 Series (191)
Medium cars under $60,000: Toyota Camry (843), BYD Seal (325), Mazda 6 (144)
Medium cars over $60,000: Tesla Model 3 (220), BMW 3 Series (170), Mercedes-Benz C-Class (91)
Large cars under $70,000: Skoda Superb (7)
Large cars over $70,000: Mercedes-Benz E-Class (78), BMW 5 Series (55), Porsche Taycan (17)
Upper large cars: Porsche Panamera (8), Mercedes-Benz S-Class (5), Lexus LS/Rolls-Royce sedan range/BMW 7 Series (4 each)
People movers under $70,000: Kia Carnival (811), Hyundai Staria (92), Ford Tourneo (72)
People movers over $70,000: Volkswagen Multivan (27), Mercedes-Benz V-Class (26), Lexus LM (23)
Sports cars under $90,000: Ford Mustang (566), Subaru BRZ (66), Mini Cabriolet (49)
Sports cars over $90,000: BMW 2 Series coupe (88), Mercedes-Benz CLE (78), BMW 4 Series coupe and convertible (49)
Sports cars over $200,000: Porsche 911 (42), Ferrari two-door range (13), Aston Martin two-door range (11)
Light SUVs: Mazda CX-3 (1053), Toyota Yaris Cross (834), Suzuki Jimny (685)
Small SUVs under $45,000: Hyundai Kona (1605), MG ZS (1587), GWM Haval Jolion (1423)
Small SUVs over $45,000: BMW X1 (571), Volkswagen T-Roc (375), Kia EV3 (336)
Medium SUVs under $60,000: Toyota RAV4 (3808), Kia Sportage (1701), Nissan X-Trail (1615)
Medium SUVs over $60,000: BMW X3 (497), Lexus NX (462), Mazda CX-60 (377)
Large SUVs under $80,000: Ford Everest (2234), Toyota Prado (2233), Isuzu MU-X (1223)
Large SUVs over $80,000: BMW X5 (393), Land Rover Defender (350), Range Rover Sport (194)
Upper large SUVs under $120,000: Toyota LandCruiser (1022), Nissan Patrol (541), Land Rover Discovery (37)
Upper large SUVs over $120,000: BMW X7 (116), Lexus GX (91), Lexus LX (71)
Small vans: Volkswagen Caddy (56), Peugeot Partner (26), Renault Kangoo (14)
Medium vans: Toyota HiAce (972), Ford Transit Custom (208), Hyundai Staria Load (178)
4×2 utes: Toyota HiLux (612), Isuzu D-Max (455), Ford Ranger (255)
4×4 utes: Ford Ranger (3776), Toyota HiLux (3509), Isuzu D-Max (1652)
Large pickups: Ram 1500 (226), Chevrolet Silverado 1500 (156), Chevrolet Silverado HD and Toyota Tundra (76 each)
Sales by category
Includes Tesla and Polestar sales.
Top segments by market share
Includes Tesla and Polestar sales.
Sales by region
Excludes Tesla and Polestar sales.
Sales by buyer type
Excludes Tesla, Polestar and heavy commercial sales.
Sales by fuel or propulsion type
Excludes heavy commercial sales.
Sales by country of origin
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
This man made $10.5 billion last year from keeping a close eye on Americans
Karp was in second place in last year's report with nearly $US1.1 billion in gains, trailing Elon Musk, the Tesla CEO, who gained $US1.4 billion. Musk's name is absent from the top-paid lists this year, but he has been fighting in the courts to retain a past, gargantuan pay package that a judge in Delaware has voided twice. The Tesla shares in that contested pay package were worth more than $US98 billion at the end of May, according to Courtney Yu, director of research at Equilar. Musk funnelled $US250 million into President Donald Trump's campaign efforts and was behind the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Facing declining sales at Tesla, he has left the White House for renewed work at his companies, which also include SpaceX, a rocket company and military contractor; X, a social media platform; and xAI, an artificial intelligence company. Classic compensation There's another important way to look at executive compensation: the estimated value of a pay package when it was originally granted. This annual snapshot must also be disclosed by corporations, thanks to government requirements that were tightened under Dodd-Frank. This more traditional approach, which the Times has covered regularly with the help of Equilar since 2012, tends to produce smaller figures for CEO compensation than the 'compensation actually paid' approach. But the numbers are still enormous, compared with the earnings of most working people. It, too, is being reevaluated by the Trump administration. The biggest payday in corporate America last year, using this traditional measure of executive compensation, went to Peter Gassner of Veeva Systems, a cloud-computing company focused on the life sciences, with a total compensation of $US172.4 million, nearly all from stock options and awards. The median employee at the company earned $US137,866. It would take a worker at Veeva Systems 1251 years to earn what Gassner did in 2024. Motivating executives is one thing. Rewarding them like absolute monarchs is another. In a statement, Veeva said Gassner's compensation reflected a stock option grant that depended on the company's share performance and 'is intended as Mr. Gassner's only equity compensation through 2030.' The company said his $US475,000 salary is 'one of the lowest' for CEOs at publicly traded companies. Right behind Gassner on the top-pay list was Patrick W. Smith, aka Rick Smith, who was a founder of Axon Enterprise. It was previously called TASER International and was named for what is still Axon's best-known product: Tasers. The company says its product line also includes 'body cameras, in-car cameras, cloud-hosted digital evidence management solutions, productivity software and real-time operations capabilities.' Loading Smith's total compensation in 2024, using traditional accounting, was $US164.5 million. In a statement, the company said that number reflected 'a long-term, performance-based equity award,' which he would receive only 'over seven years, contingent on Axon meeting ambitious performance goals.' The median Axon employee was paid $US205,322 in 2024, handsome wages compared with salaries at most companies. Even so, because Smith's compensation package was so big, it would take an Axon employee 801 years to earn Smith's pay for just one year. And, using the compensation-actually-paid metric, he earned vastly more: $US385 million in 2024. Gassner at Veeva Systems raked in $US284 million using that measure. The big picture Corporate compensation filings are tedious reading, but they are a trove of information. That may be why they have never been uniformly popular in corner offices and why the Trump administration is beginning a process that could lead to the curtailment or demise of some of these disclosure requirements. In my view, that would be a shame. I would hate to lose access to any of the details being revealed by public corporations. Consider some of the highlights from this year's disclosures, compiled by Equilar. All told, for the 100 highest-paid CEOs of publicly traded companies in 2024, the median CEO compensation, much of it from stock options, was $US37 million, using the traditional accounting metric. That is a big number. Comparing it with what corporate employees make is revealing. The median worker at these companies was paid $US110,125, which is an astonishingly big pay gap. It would take the median employee — the one right in the middle of the income distribution — 357 years to earn what the median CEO earned in just one year. And using comparable, historical data that excludes the compensation at private equity firms, the pay ratio at publicly traded companies is almost 350-to-1, or, simply, 350, which is more than ever before. As I've pointed out before, pay disparities of this magnitude reflect levels of income inequality that were considered repugnant 50 years ago. The American social structure was flatter and CEO-to-worker pay ratios were lower then. Motivating executives is one thing. Rewarding them like absolute monarchs is another. Through the 1970s, one study found, the pay ratio for big companies was less than 20. In the 1980s, Peter F. Drucker, the economist and Wall Street Journal columnist, said it felt 'about right' when CEOs received 10 to 12 times what workers earned. Loading Yes, it's better to be the boss. Anybody in the workforce already knows this without seeing any of these details. But the details matter. Happily, for investors and for rank-and-file workers, we now have considerable information on exactly how well CEOs are paid — and how much more money they receive than everybody else. The Securities and Exchange Commission will convene later this month for a formal discussion about whether to change the rules about what companies need to reveal about CEO pay. Many companies would like less public disclosure. But after 15 years of looking at this issue, I think we need much more.
7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Elon Musk's dad reveals reason for public spat with Donald Trump
The row between Donald Trump and Elon Musk was triggered by months of intense stress on both sides, and the public battle between the US president and the billionaire donor needs to stop, Musk's father says. Trump and Musk began exchanging insults last week on social media, with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO describing the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination'. Asked whether he thought his son had made a mistake by engaging in a public row with the president, Errol Musk said people were sometimes unable to think as clearly as they should 'in the heat of the moment'. 'They've had five months of intense stress,' Musk told Reuters at a conference in Moscow organised by conservative Russian tycoons. 'With all the opposition cleared and two people left in the arena, all they have ever done is get rid of everything and now they are trying to get rid of each other - well that has to stop.' Asked how it would end, he said: 'Oh, it will end on a good note - very soon.' Neither the White House nor Musk could be reached for comment outside normal US business hours. Trump said on Saturday his relationship with Musk was over and warned there would be 'serious consequences' if Musk decided to fund US Democrats running against Republicans who vote for the tax and spending bill. Musk bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. Trump named Musk to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. Musk's father told reporters he was standing by his son. 'Elon is sticking to his principles but you cannot always stick to your principles in the real world,' Musk's father said. 'Sometimes you have to give and take.' Speaking beside sanctioned Russian businessman Konstantin Malofeyev, Musk's father praised President Vladimir Putin as a 'very stable and pleasant man'. He accused 'fake media' in the West of projecting 'complete nonsense' about Russia and of casting it as an enemy.
Sydney Morning Herald
8 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The Wall Street CEO who made $10.5 billion last year
Karp was in second place in last year's report with nearly $US1.1 billion in gains, trailing Elon Musk, the Tesla CEO, who gained $US1.4 billion. Musk's name is absent from the top-paid lists this year, but he has been fighting in the courts to retain a past, gargantuan pay package that a judge in Delaware has voided twice. The Tesla shares in that contested pay package were worth more than $US98 billion at the end of May, according to Courtney Yu, director of research at Equilar. Musk funnelled $US250 million into President Donald Trump's campaign efforts and was behind the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Facing declining sales at Tesla, he has left the White House for renewed work at his companies, which also include SpaceX, a rocket company and military contractor; X, a social media platform; and xAI, an artificial intelligence company. Classic compensation There's another important way to look at executive compensation: the estimated value of a pay package when it was originally granted. This annual snapshot must also be disclosed by corporations, thanks to government requirements that were tightened under Dodd-Frank. This more traditional approach, which the Times has covered regularly with the help of Equilar since 2012, tends to produce smaller figures for CEO compensation than the 'compensation actually paid' approach. But the numbers are still enormous, compared with the earnings of most working people. It, too, is being reevaluated by the Trump administration. The biggest payday in corporate America last year, using this traditional measure of executive compensation, went to Peter Gassner of Veeva Systems, a cloud-computing company focused on the life sciences, with a total compensation of $US172.4 million, nearly all from stock options and awards. The median employee at the company earned $US137,866. It would take a worker at Veeva Systems 1251 years to earn what Gassner did in 2024. Motivating executives is one thing. Rewarding them like absolute monarchs is another. In a statement, Veeva said Gassner's compensation reflected a stock option grant that depended on the company's share performance and 'is intended as Mr. Gassner's only equity compensation through 2030.' The company said his $US475,000 salary is 'one of the lowest' for CEOs at publicly traded companies. Right behind Gassner on the top-pay list was Patrick W. Smith, aka Rick Smith, who was a founder of Axon Enterprise. It was previously called TASER International and was named for what is still Axon's best-known product: Tasers. The company says its product line also includes 'body cameras, in-car cameras, cloud-hosted digital evidence management solutions, productivity software and real-time operations capabilities.' Loading Smith's total compensation in 2024, using traditional accounting, was $US164.5 million. In a statement, the company said that number reflected 'a long-term, performance-based equity award,' which he would receive only 'over seven years, contingent on Axon meeting ambitious performance goals.' The median Axon employee was paid $US205,322 in 2024, handsome wages compared with salaries at most companies. Even so, because Smith's compensation package was so big, it would take an Axon employee 801 years to earn Smith's pay for just one year. And, using the compensation-actually-paid metric, he earned vastly more: $US385 million in 2024. Gassner at Veeva Systems raked in $US284 million using that measure. The big picture Corporate compensation filings are tedious reading, but they are a trove of information. That may be why they have never been uniformly popular in corner offices and why the Trump administration is beginning a process that could lead to the curtailment or demise of some of these disclosure requirements. In my view, that would be a shame. I would hate to lose access to any of the details being revealed by public corporations. Consider some of the highlights from this year's disclosures, compiled by Equilar. All told, for the 100 highest-paid CEOs of publicly traded companies in 2024, the median CEO compensation, much of it from stock options, was $US37 million, using the traditional accounting metric. That is a big number. Comparing it with what corporate employees make is revealing. The median worker at these companies was paid $US110,125, which is an astonishingly big pay gap. It would take the median employee — the one right in the middle of the income distribution — 357 years to earn what the median CEO earned in just one year. And using comparable, historical data that excludes the compensation at private equity firms, the pay ratio at publicly traded companies is almost 350-to-1, or, simply, 350, which is more than ever before. As I've pointed out before, pay disparities of this magnitude reflect levels of income inequality that were considered repugnant 50 years ago. The American social structure was flatter and CEO-to-worker pay ratios were lower then. Motivating executives is one thing. Rewarding them like absolute monarchs is another. Through the 1970s, one study found, the pay ratio for big companies was less than 20. In the 1980s, Peter F. Drucker, the economist and Wall Street Journal columnist, said it felt 'about right' when CEOs received 10 to 12 times what workers earned. Loading Yes, it's better to be the boss. Anybody in the workforce already knows this without seeing any of these details. But the details matter. Happily, for investors and for rank-and-file workers, we now have considerable information on exactly how well CEOs are paid — and how much more money they receive than everybody else. The Securities and Exchange Commission will convene later this month for a formal discussion about whether to change the rules about what companies need to reveal about CEO pay. Many companies would like less public disclosure. But after 15 years of looking at this issue, I think we need much more.
