logo
Buying Canadian at the supermarket? It might be more complicated than you think

Buying Canadian at the supermarket? It might be more complicated than you think

CBC06-03-2025

Donald Trump's trade war against Canada has been inspiring patriotic stances among customers at grocery stores — but choosing to buy only Canadian goods isn't as easy as looking for a maple leaf.
Jim Kreski of Windsor, Ont. found that out during a recent visit to a FreshCo location.
"I happened to pick up a can of soup, and I saw that even though they had red maple leaves on everything, the product was actually made in the U.S.A.," Kreski told CBC Windsor. "That was stated right on the can."
FreshCo is among the supermarket chains that has undertaken a policy of highlighting Canadian goods — adding maple leaf logos to certain shelf labels.
But Kreski noticed that the pro-Canadian symbols were also on shelves stocked with items that were actually American products — such as Campbell's soup and Betty Crocker cake mixes.
Kreski said that after he discovered the apparent mislabelling in multiple aisles, he asked a staff member about it. "She said that if it was a Canadian company that had purchased the goods... they put the maple leaves."
The maple leaf symbol is also bestowed upon products "prepared in Canada" from imported goods.
"I understood what she was saying, but I think it's deceptive," Kreski lamented. "To me, it's not right."
Meanwhile, FreshCo has been incorporating "Buy Canadian" rhetoric into its advertising. A promotional email reminds the public that FreshCo — a subsidiary of Sobeys — is "a proudly Canadian company."
Other promotional copy encourages customers to "Spot and shop Canadian products in-store and in our flyer — Look for the maple leaf on shelf."
When contacted about Kreski's concerns, a spokesperson for Sobeys said that their parent conglomerate — Empire Company Limited — "has responded quickly to Canadians' desire to buy Canadian."
According to the spokesperson, the corporation is "committed to clear and accurate labelling," and products are continually reviewed to ensure they meet CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency) definitions for Canadian products.
"While labelling is a manual process and occasional discrepancies may occur, we have steps in place to identify and correct them promptly," Sobeys stated.
Mike von Massow, a professor with the Ontario Agricultural College at the University of Guelph and an expert on food economics, feels it shouldn't be a surprise that choosing Canadian goods can be a complicated matter.
"It's sometimes difficult to define what Canadian is," von Massow explained. "Each of us has to sort of create our own line as to what is acceptable."
For example, oranges can't be grown in Canada — but there are Canadian companies that make products out of imported orange juice concentrate. "Is that a Canadian product?" von Massow asked.
On the other hand, Canada produces plenty of pigs — but the processing of those pigs into consumable pork products is typically done in the U.S. "We have a lack of processing capacity in eastern Canada," von Massow said. "So there are these nuances... in the middle space of absolutes."
Making the issue even more murky is the fact that there are U.S. retailers operating in Canada — such as Walmart and Costco — that are selling Canadian-made products.
von Massow is also aware of what he describes as "Canada-washing" — food retailers using patriotism as a marketing strategy while they're being less-than-forthcoming about the origins of items for sale.
It can all make "buying Canadian" as tricky as politics. "Ask questions at the grocery store," von Massow advised. "Check the labels. Look at the regulatory websites to see what the different wording means, and inform yourself.
"It's more work. But if it's important to you, you can figure it out."
von Massow has been trying to practice what he preaches: He's stopped buying Cheerios (his favourite cereal) because he learned that General Mills, a U.S. company, only manufactures them in the U.S.
Carol Kreski, Jim's wife, said she's found online help with Canada-conscious buying decisions. She joined a Facebook group called "Made in Canada — Canadian Products."
"When I shared it at the time, there were 74,000 members on this page. I forwarded it to all my friends and family," Carol recalled. "As of today, it's at 1.2 million people, all following this page of alternatives to U.S. products."
Despite Jim Kreski's distrust of FreshCo's shelf labels, he said he's not giving up. He'll continue to try to make Canadian choices when he does his shopping, and avoid U.S. imports when possible.
"One person may not make a difference on buying Canadian, but if 50 per cent of us do it, it could make a huge difference," he reasoned.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As U.S. Uncertainty Sparks Travel Boom in Canada, RVezy Urges Canadian RV Owners to Cash In on Soaring Demand Français
As U.S. Uncertainty Sparks Travel Boom in Canada, RVezy Urges Canadian RV Owners to Cash In on Soaring Demand Français

Cision Canada

time29 minutes ago

  • Cision Canada

As U.S. Uncertainty Sparks Travel Boom in Canada, RVezy Urges Canadian RV Owners to Cash In on Soaring Demand Français

With 300% increase in U.S. travelers to Canada, RV rental platform RVezy calls on Canada's 2 million RV owners to list their vehicles and earn thousands this summer OTTAWA, ON, June 10, 2025 /CNW/ - Political instability south of the border is fueling a surge in Canadian travel—and RV owners have a golden opportunity to cash in. RVezy, Canada's leading peer-to-peer, RV rental platform, is reporting a 300% year-over-year spike in bookings from American travelers, along with a major increase in interest from overseas visitors. As international and domestic demand hits record levels ahead of the summer season, the company is issuing a national call to action: RV owners, list your RV now and earn thousands this summer. "With over 2 million RVs sitting idle across Canada and demand hitting all-time highs, we need more RV owners to list—today," said Michael McNaught, CEO of RVezy. "This isn't just about travel—it's about helping Canadians earn meaningful income while supporting our national and local tourism economy." Big Earnings, Big Impact: Renting Pays Off RV owners on RVezy earn an average of over $10,000 per year, with many earning significantly more during the peak summer months. Yet most RVs sit unused for 11 months of the year. With rising prices and economic pressures affecting households across the country, renting out an RV is an easy, practical way to generate additional income. And because travelers spend on average $300 per day in local communities, every RV trip fuels spending at local shops, restaurants, campgrounds, and small tourism operators. "We're seeing this incredible wave of interest in Canada—not just from Americans, but from international visitors looking for safe, scenic, flexible travel," added McNaught. "Every RV rental helps support Canadian families—on both sides of the keys." No Worries, Full Protection: RVezy's All-Inclusive Approach For RV owners concerned about liability or damage, RVezy provides full insurance coverage that protects the entire value of the RV. Every rental includes 24/7 roadside assistance and is backed by a dedicated Host Experience team to guide owners through every step of the process. RVezy is a proudly Canadian company— founded by Canadians, operated by Canadians, and located in Canada, RVezy is committed to building a stronger local travel economy. Call to Action: List Your RV Before Peak Season Hits With unprecedented traveler demand and limited vehicle availability, RVezy urges RV owners across the country to list now—especially in popular gateway regions like British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes. Whether you're an occasional camper or a seasoned RV enthusiast, listing your RV this summer could make a serious difference.

War is in the air
War is in the air

Winnipeg Free Press

time2 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

War is in the air

Opinion 'There is a clear, present risk, particularly as Vladimir Putin does see himself as being at war with the West. The homeland is again (in peril)… Air and missile attacks will potentially cause civilian casualties (in the United Kingdom) in very large numbers.' Therefore, concludes Gen. Sir Richard Barrons, the U.K. needs to bring back air-raid sirens and air-raid drills. I'm not making this up. Barrons, a former deputy chief of the defence staff who retired from the British Army in 2016, is not just an aging military fantasist longing to relive the Blitz he was too young to experience first time around. He co-wrote the British government's Strategic Defence Review, published last week, and the government adopted it wholesale. It's not just the U.K. In only four months, the NATO countries of Europe have managed to talk themselves into the belief that their continent is on the brink of war. Almost the entire Russian army has been bogged down in Ukraine for three years and there is no other military threat in sight, yet the rhetoric suggests that Armageddon is just around the corner. This is yet another consequence of that highly infectious disease, Trump Derangement Syndrome. The American president's penchant for making random radical comments, often just for the hell of it, has a way of panicking other countries into making policy decisions that are premature or just plain wrong. For example, the European members of NATO are now convinced that the United States is cancelling its eight-decade commitment to the defence of Europe. In particular they think that the U.S. is ending its guarantee of nuclear retaliation against a Russian attack, which enabled all of them (except Britain and France) to avoid getting nuclear weapons of their own. They are right to be concerned about all that, because that is certainly being considered by some factions in the Trump circus. But it is far too early to base policy on these concerns, because Trump himself has no idea where he is going with all this. Could the United States end up in a de facto alliance with Russia when the dance ends (or at least pauses for a while)? Unlikely but possible, given Trump's highly personalistic style and his bizarre but undeniably very close relationship with the Russian leader. What would become of the existing Russian-Chinese alliance in such a case? Hard to say, but Putin might prefer an American alliance that would deliver Ukraine into Russia's hands. That would be a more equal partnership (assuming continuing American decline) than Russia's current precarious alliance with a Chinese giant that has aspirations on Russian territory. Does that then leave China free to join with Europe and the more or less free-trading countries of Asia in an effort to preserve or restore the rules-based, law-abiding world order that is under attack by Russia and the United States? The possible permutations and combinations are almost endless. It is unfortunately true that flurries of last-minute changes in alliances often happen just before the great powers go into a great war, but that is another reason not to rush into radical changes now. This will require a high tolerance for make-believe on the part of Europe, but wait-and-see is probably the continent's least bad strategy for the time being. The European members of NATO should do everything possible to sustain Ukraine's resistance even when Trump cuts it off again, and rebuild their own defensive capabilities as fast as possible in case Trump does take the Russian option. But there's no need to practise bleeding, as the soldiers say: try to sustain the fiction of a united NATO as long as possible. And if you're in need of consolation as the talk of war swamps the news, remember that the only genuinely revisionist great power at the moment is Russia. People will tell you China is revisionist too, but that is untrue apart from Taiwan. Beijing believes it can overtake the United States by economic means alone, and with Trump's help it may be right. Gwynne Dyer's new book is Intervention Earth: Life-Saving Ideas from the World's Climate Engineers.

Canada Post, union trade shots Monday as progress stalls
Canada Post, union trade shots Monday as progress stalls

Toronto Star

time4 hours ago

  • Toronto Star

Canada Post, union trade shots Monday as progress stalls

After talks last week aimed at paving the way for binding arbitration, Canada Post and the union representing its 55,000 employees were back trading public potshots Monday, with both sides accusing the other of not negotiating seriously. Monday afternoon, the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) blasted the Crown corporation, saying it was counting on government action to force an end to the dispute. 'CUPW's ultimate goal in returning to the bargaining table remains new negotiated ratifiable collective agreements,' CUPW said in a written statement. 'However, Canada Post's actions suggest it does not want to negotiate. It wants to rewrite our agreements — and is seeking to use government interference to further its goals.' The union pointed to Canada Post's request to federal jobs minister Patty Hajdu late last month to order a vote on its 'final' contract offer, as well as then-federal labour minister Steven MacKinnon's decision last December to 'pause' a 32-day strike by creating an Industrial Inquiry Commission run by veteran arbitrator William Kaplan. 'The historic rights and benefits our union has gained for our members — and for Canadian society — such as maternity leave have been won through our collective bargaining rights,' CUPW added. 'The attempt to trample over them should send a chill through the labour movement. CUPW will be standing against a forced vote — and for collective bargaining rights.' In a written statement Monday, Canada Post said two days of talks last week to set the terms for arbitration didn't result in any progress. The Crown corporation also said the union still hadn't provided an official response to its final offer. It also suggested Kaplan's report should be part of the terms of reference for any arbitration. 'The final report of the Industrial Inquiry Commission clearly outlines the critical issues we face and the immediate actions that need to be taken. It should therefore be the foundational document that guides any discussions about Canada Post's path forward. The union's refusal to recognize the IIC report and its recommendations in their proposed terms of reference for arbitration is unacceptable,' Canada Post said. 'After 18 months we urgently need a fair resolution that begins to address our challenges while respecting the important role our employees play, and the voice they have in our future.' A spokesperson for Hajdu said the minister was still reviewing Canada Post's request for a vote on the 'final offer,' and urged the two sides to get back to the bargaining table. 'Last week Minister Hajdu asked the parties to return to the negotiating table with federal mediators to do two things: to seek to negotiate terms for an arbitration process to conclude this round of bargaining, and to have the union table its response to Canada Post's last global offers,' said Hajdu spokesperson Jennifer Kozelj. 'Canadians expect the parties to resolve this dispute. Both parties must meet and pursue these paths with urgency.' Labour experts say it's unclear exactly how the impasse can be resolved. Both sides, suggested University of Toronto professor Rafael Gomez, could be waiting for clearer signals from the federal government on whether it will act on Kaplan's recommendations. 'If the government hems and haws, then of course the parties aren't going to negotiate strongly,' said Gomez, director of U of T's Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources. 'If they said 'here's what we're doing about the report. We're implementing everything Kaplan has said,' that would move the needle.' While a full-blown strike might be another option for the union to try and force the issue, it's not clear if it would work, argued Stephanie Ross, a labour studies professor at McMaster University. The union doesn't have nearly as much leverage as it did last winter, Ross said, because it's not nearly as busy a time of year for parcels, but also because Kaplan's report was largely in line with the Crown corporation's arguments for restructuring. 'It's not clear how much pressure a walkout is going to put on the employer right now,' Ross said. Earlier this month, Canada Post rejected the union's request for binding arbitration, saying it would take too long, and could exacerbate their financial struggles. On May 28, Canada Post made what it called its 'final' contract offer, which includes a 13 per cent wage increase spread over four years, as well as a $1,000 signing bonus. Two days later, it asked Hajdu to order a vote on the offer, a request blasted by CUPW.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store