logo
In his sole full day at the NATO summit, Trump faces an alliance further shaped to his liking

In his sole full day at the NATO summit, Trump faces an alliance further shaped to his liking

Washington Post5 hours ago

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — President Donald Trump on Wednesday will meet with members of a NATO alliance that he has worked to bend to his will over the years and whose members are rattled by his latest comments casting doubt on the U.S. commitment to its mutual defense guarantees.
Trump's comments en route to the Netherlands that his fidelity to Article 5 'depends on your definition" are likely to draw a spotlight at the NATO summit, as will the new and fragile Iran-Israel ceasefire that Trump helped broker after the U.S. unloaded airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.
At the same time, the alliance is poised to enact one of Trump's chief priorities for NATO: a pledge by its member countries to increase, sometimes significantly, how much they spend on their defense.
'NATO was broke, and I said, 'You're going to have to pay,'' Trump said Tuesday. 'And we did a whole thing, and now they're paying a lot. Then I said, 'You're going to have to lift it to 4% or 5%, and 5% is better.''
Spending 5% of a country's gross domestic product on defense is 'good,' Trump pronounced, adding, 'It gives them much more power.'
The boost in spending follows years of Trump complaints that other countries weren't paying their fair share for membership in an alliance created as a bulwark against threats from the former Soviet Union. Most NATO countries, with the key exception of Spain, are preparing to endorse the 5% pledge , motivated to bolster their own defenses not just by Russian President Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine but also, perhaps, to placate Trump.
As a candidate in 2016, Trump suggested that he as president would not necessarily heed the alliance's mutual defense guarantees outlined in Article 5 of the NATO treaty. In March of this year, he expressed uncertainty that NATO would come to the United States' defense if needed, though the alliance did just that after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
On Tuesday, he told reporters aboard Air Force One on his way to The Hague for the summit that whether he is committed to Article 5 'depends on your definition.'
'There's numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right?' Trump said. 'But I'm committed to being their friends.' He signaled that he would give a more precise definition of what Article 5 means to him once he is at the summit.
Trump also vented to reporters before leaving Washington about the actions by Israel and Iran after his announced ceasefire. He said, in his view, both sides had violated the nascent agreement.
After Trump arrived in the Netherlands, news outlets, including The Associated Press, published stories revealing that a U.S. intelligence report suggested in an early assessment that Iran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months by weekend strikes and was not 'completely and fully obliterated,' as Trump had said.
The White House called the report 'flat-out wrong,' and Trump posted in all-caps on social media early Wednesday that any reporting that the strikes weren't 'completely destroyed' was an attempt to 'demean one of the most successful military strikes in history.'
The White House has not said what other world leaders Trump would meet with one-on-one while in The Hague, but he said he was likely to cross paths with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Workers in UK need to embrace AI or risk being left behind, minister says
Workers in UK need to embrace AI or risk being left behind, minister says

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Workers in UK need to embrace AI or risk being left behind, minister says

Workers in the UK should turn their trepidation over AI into 'exhilaration' by giving it a try or they risk being left behind by those who have, the technology secretary has said. Peter Kyle called on employees and businesses to 'act now' on getting to grips with the tech, with the generational gap in usage needing only two and a half hours of training to bridge. Breakthroughs such as the emergence of ChatGPT have sparked an investment boom in the technology, but also led to forecasts that a host of jobs in sectors ranging from law to financial services will be affected. However, Kyle said: 'I think most people are approaching this with trepidation. Once they start [using AI], it turns to exhilaration, because it is a lot more straightforward than people realise, and it is far more rewarding than people expect.' Kyle spoke after meeting tech company bosses to discuss a new government-industry drive to train 7.5 million UK workers – a fifth of the overall workforce – in AI by 2030, with the help of firms such as Google, Amazon and BT. He said: 'There's no one in employment at the moment that is incapable of gaining the skills that will be needed in the economy in the next five years. 'That is the optimistic way of saying, act now, and you will thrive into the future. Don't, and I think that some people will be left behind. And that's what worries me the most.' Kyle said there appeared to be a generational gap in AI, with over-55s using AI half as much as over-35s. Closing this gap would take two and a half hours of training, he said. 'People don't need to get trained in quantum physics,' Kyle said. 'They need to get trained in the basics of how AI works, how to interact with it, and to explore all of the potential it has for you as an individual in the workplace.' Keir Starmer acknowledged this week that people were 'sceptical' about AI and worry about it taking their job. Speaking at London Tech Week, the prime minister said the government would attempt to prove that technology can 'create wealth in your community … create good jobs [and] vastly improve our public services'. People in English-speaking countries including the UK, US, Australia and Canada are more nervous about the rise of AI than those in the largest EU economies, according to polling data shared with the Guardian last week. Forecasts about the impact of AI on jobs vary, with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development warning the technology could trigger job losses in skilled professions such as law, medicine and finance. The International Monetary Fund has calculated 60% of jobs in advanced economies such as the US and UK are exposed to AI and half of these jobs may be negatively affected. However, the Tony Blair Institute, which has called for widespread adoption of AI in the public and private sectors, has said potential UK jobs losses in the private sphere will be mitigated by the technology creating new roles. Kyle said he was ready for a reset in the debate over AI and copyright after opposition to the government's proposed overhaul of copyright law in the House of Lords ended. The data bill, a vehicle for peers' opposition to proposals to let AI firms use copyright-protected work without permission in order to develop their products, finally passed this week after lords did not submit further copyright-related amendments. 'I'm acting with humility and self-reflection about the things I could have done better in that process,' he said. 'And I've made promises to move forward with a reset and a refocus on what will deliver the rights remuneration and opportunities for creatives in the digital age that they have enjoyed for generations in the analogue age – whilst travelling on that journey with the AI industry alongside.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Florida approves cruel 'Alligator Alcatraz' in Everglades. Gators want no part of it.
Florida approves cruel 'Alligator Alcatraz' in Everglades. Gators want no part of it.

USA Today

time25 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Florida approves cruel 'Alligator Alcatraz' in Everglades. Gators want no part of it.

This sinister attempt to assist the Trump administration's already cruel mass deportation effort leans heavily on the grotesque stereotype that we alligators are vicious killers. Dear American humans: As a proud reptile and founding member of the Consortium for Responsible Alligator Publicity, I would like to express my community's umbrage over the state of Florida's plan to put a migrant detention facility in the ecologically sensitive Everglades under the offensive name 'Alligator Alcatraz.' This sinister attempt to assist the Trump administration's already cruel mass deportation effort leans heavily on the grotesque stereotype that we alligators are vicious killers and dangerous creatures to be feared. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier shared a video on June 20 boasting about Alligator Alcatraz, and it showed one of our consortium members sticking out from the water while the attorney general said: 'If people get out there's not much waiting for them other than alligators and pythons. Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide.' First off, Mr. Uthmeier, the gator you showed is a respected community member, an avowed pacifist and a longtime ovo vegetarian. She's less likely to eat a fleeing migrant than you are. She enjoys poetry and has formed a close friendship with a local wood stork. Furthermore, you have some gall suggesting we alligators are scary and would act as the Department of Homeland Security's perimeter-enforcing beasts. How many alligators have you seen wearing masks and grabbing hardworking migrants out of Home Depot parking lots? How many of my reptilian brothers and sisters have been caught on video ripping mothers from their children or trying to deport the spouses of military veterans? Who's scary now, Mr. Uthmeier? 'Human waste, sewage needs, water supply needs' Apparently, the federal government has already signed off on this invasive Everglades facility, with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis enthusiastically supporting the construction of a 5,000-bed detention facility on 39 square miles of our land. Migrants will be housed in tents in the swampy summer heat on an old landing strip. Opinion: Trump lied about LA protests to deploy the National Guard. He wants violence. One of our human friends, Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades, told The Washington Post: 'If you get a thousand-bed prison in there, whether it's supposedly temporary or not, you're going to have impacts related to human waste, sewage needs, water supply needs, ancillary development.' We're about to be swimming in human waste, and you all want to make us sound like the bad guys? C'mon, humans. The whole idea for this place, from the Alligator Alcatraz name to the suggestion that our presence will make it all seem ultra-cruel and terrible, is offensive and species-ist. Despite common media portrayals, we alligators are naturally fearful of humans and do our best to avoid you all. The more we watch the way the Trump administration is dehumanizing immigrants and tearing families apart, the more we think our fear is justified. Opinion: Manufacturing down, food expensive and ICE is deporting moms. Happy now, MAGA? Alligators aren't interested in biting any fleeing migrants. ICE agents, on the other hand ... Which is scarier: An alligator hanging out in the Everglades water, opportunistically hoping a tasty fish comes along? Or a bunch of brutish Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers hopping out of an unmarked car and grabbing a day laborer so they can send him to a place called Alligator Alcatraz? Alex Howard, who was a DHS spokesperson under President Joe Biden, told the Miami Herald: 'Turning the Everglades into a taxpayer-funded detention camp for migrants is a grotesque mix of cruelty and political theater.' And we gators, quite frankly, won't be party to this evil. Keep your detention facility out of our territory. And trust us, we aren't interested in biting any migrants who try to flee your clutches. You all, on the other hand? We may be fearful of humans, but you ICE lot are starting to look downright tasty. CHOMP! CHOMP! 😡 — Phineas Alligatorius, Consortium for Responsible Alligator Publicity Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at

How Bombing Iran May Have Made Nuclear Diplomacy Much Harder
How Bombing Iran May Have Made Nuclear Diplomacy Much Harder

Time​ Magazine

time26 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

How Bombing Iran May Have Made Nuclear Diplomacy Much Harder

What began as a military campaign against Iran's nuclear infrastructure may have given way to a more enduring crisis: the collapse of decades-long efforts to contain nuclear proliferation through diplomacy. After days of escalating airstrikes between Israel and Iran that killed hundreds in Iran and dozens in Israel—and the United States' decision to involve itself—one of the most lasting, and difficult to quantify, losses may be the fragile framework of international nuclear cooperation. Read More: Trump Brokers Ceasefire to End '12 Day War' Between Israel and Iran While the full scope of physical damage to Iran's nuclear facilities remains unclear, analysts warn that the attacks may have pushed Iran to the brink of abandoning the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), the foundational agreement designed to limit the spread of nuclear weapons and promote peaceful atomic energy that Iran has been a party to for five-and-a-half decades. Iran is now 'quite likely' to withdraw from the NPT under which it pledged not to develop a bomb, warned Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group. Outlining 'worst-case scenarios' in an essay for TIME, Vaez suggested: 'Over time, Iran's regime could attempt to reconstitute its nuclear activity from the rubble, only with an explicit aim of fashioning a weapon in the shortest possible time as a means of deterrence in the future.' Read More: Where Iran's Nuclear Program Goes From Here Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute in Washington, D.C., said in a post on X that Iran's nuclear program 'has at best been set back, but certainly not destroyed, while dramatically increasing Tehran's determination to achieve nuclear deterrence.' He added that Iran having a damaged but not fully dismantled nuclear program makes any future peace between Iran and Israel even more precarious. Israel, which is believed to have its own clandestine nuclear weapons program and is not a member of the NPT, has stated that it cannot allow nations hostile to it to develop a nuclear weapon. 'While Trump may have genuinely envisioned a one-and-done,' Parsi said, U.S. intervention at the request of Israel has signaled that, should Israel or Iran choose to reignite the war, Israel will have 'succeeded in trapping him in a long, if not a forever, war.' Read More: In Bombing Iran, Trump Looked Past 80 Years of U.S. Regime Change Mistakes For diplomacy to resume, he argues, 'Trump's only exit out of this is to discard the Israeli red line of zero-enrichment and return to the American red line of no weaponization.' A blow to non-proliferation diplomacy The diplomatic fallout is already materializing in Tehran. Iran's parliamentary national security committee passed the outline of a bill on Monday to suspend Tehran's cooperation with the United Nations' nuclear watchdog—the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)—so long as Iran's nuclear sites remain vulnerable to military attack. Committee spokesperson Ebrahim Rezaei reportedly told semi-official Tasnim news agency that the bill would mean a suspension in installing surveillance cameras, inspections, and submitting reports to the IAEA. Mohammad Eslami, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, said the government is planning to restore its nuclear program as it evaluates what damage has been done. 'Preparations for recovery had already been anticipated, and our plan is to prevent any interruption in production or services,' Eslami said in a statement reportedly carried by government-affiliated Mehr News. Iran's envoy to the IAEA, Reza Najafi, told reporters on the sidelines of an emergency IAEA board meeting on Monday that U.S. involvement in the strikes had 'delivered a fundamental and irreparable blow to the international non-proliferation regime conclusively demonstrating that the existing NPT framework has been rendered ineffective.' Scope of physical damage to Iran's nuclear facilities remains unclear The breakdown in diplomacy is unfolding as questions hang over just how significant the physical damage is to Iran's nuclear infrastructure—an element that may carry long-term consequences for non-proliferation efforts. After the U.S. dropped 30,000-pound bombs on three of Iran's key nuclear facilities and risked a wider war, President Donald Trump declared from the White House that 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' 'THE NUCLEAR SITES ARE COMPLETELY DESTROYED!' President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social on Tuesday. Earlier the same day, he posted: 'IRAN WILL NEVER REBUILD THEIR NUCLEAR FACILITIES!' But Iran's nuclear program has at most been set back a few months, according to a reported initial assessment by U.S. intelligence. A leaked Defense Intelligence Agency preliminary report, which members of the Trump Administration have claimed is wrong, found that Iran's nuclear facilities were damaged, but not severely degraded, and that Iran still has the ability to enrich uranium. Earlier damage assessments by U.S. and Israeli militaries using satellite images of Fordow also suggested that the site had not been obliterated. Read More: Democrats in Congress Fume as Iran Strike Briefing Is Abruptly Cancelled Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said at a news conference on Sunday that the country is 'calculating the damages' from the strike. IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi told the U.N. Security Council that there are visible craters at Fordow, and that entrances to tunnels used to store enriched uranium appeared to have been hit at Isfahan. But he also cautioned that 'no one, including the IAEA, is in a position to assess the underground damage.' Some observers believe Iran may have preemptively moved enriched uranium to undisclosed locations. The IAEA confirmed last week it was unable to track Iran's stockpile amid the ongoing bombardment. Iran had previously warned the IAEA that its stockpile, which is typically secured at Isfahan, could be moved in the event of an Israeli attack. Grossi said after the U.S. strikes that 'Iran has informed the IAEA there has been no increase in off-site radiation levels at all three sites,' suggesting that the strikes may not have hit uranium stores directly. Still, he urged Iran to disclose the new location of any relocated nuclear material and reaffirmed Tehran's obligations under the treaty. Read More: Breaking Down the Environmental Risks From Strikes on Iran's Nuclear Enrichment Sites Iran's legislative response suggests a hardening stance. 'Iran has no plans for non-peaceful activities, but the world witnessed clearly that the IAEA has not honored any of its commitments and has turned into a political instrument,' parliamentary speaker Mohammed-Bagher Ghalibaf said during Monday's session. 'This war makes it more, not less, likely that the Iranian government will eventually build a nuclear weapon,' argues Sara Haghdoosti, executive director of Win Without War, a progressive Washington, D.C.-based advocacy group. 'Israeli—or even U.S.—airstrikes cannot wipe out the knowledge behind the nuclear program or reliably destroy all centrifuges and uranium in a country over twice the size of Texas.' Iran more likely to withdraw from nuclear diplomacy Whether Iran was actively pursuing a nuclear weapon remains in dispute. U.S. intelligence concluded earlier this year that the country had no plans to develop a nuclear weapon, while Trump and Israeli officials have insisted it did. Iran has maintained that its uranium enrichment is in line with its right to peaceful enrichment for energy purposes under the NPT. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian reiterated that view on Tuesday, reportedly telling regional officials that Iran is interested only in pursuing its 'legitimate rights' and has no ambitions 'to acquire nuclear weapons.' Iran and the U.S. had been in the midst of protracted talks centered on Iran's nuclear program when Israel launched its surprise attack on Iran. The war put a halt to further talks with the U.S.—although Iran continued talks with European officials—and it is unclear whether they will begin again. Several agencies and countries, including the European Union and Grossi, have urged Iran to return to the negotiating table. But Iran's envoy to the U.N. Ali Bahreini said on Sunday that it can't return to something 'it never left.' He said the NPT has been 'manipulated into a political weapon' and 'exploited as a pretext for aggression and unlawful action.' Read More: A New Middle East Is Unfolding Before Our Eyes Iran ratified the treaty in 1970, and signed another deal with former President Barack Obama in 2015 agreeing that its nuclear program will be exclusively peaceful in exchange for the relief of economic sanctions. Trump exited the deal in 2018 during his first term, reimposing heavy sanctions on Iran, which pushed Iran to restart some nuclear operations. Foad Izadi, a professor at the University of Tehran, told Al Jazeera that Iran's collaboration with the IAEA as a member of the NPT has clearly not benefited or protected Tehran. 'Iran doesn't have to be there,' Izadi said, 'given the fact that Iranian nuclear sites that were under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency, that were under the monitoring of [the IAEA], were attacked.' Haghdoosti, the Win Without War activist, tells TIME that the airstrikes on Iran, which the Trump Administration has framed as part of a deliberate strategy to pursue 'peace through strength,' will erode diplomatic efforts around nuclear programs for all countries now and in the future. 'The lesson of this war for the Iranian government and any other government contemplating acquiring nuclear weapons is that even if the U.S. is negotiating with you to end that pursuit, it will still support—and even join—a war against you,' Haghdoosti says. 'That's a strong incentive for governments to skip diplomacy entirely and go straight to getting a nuclear weapon.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store