
China's household brands battle economic uncertainty, fierce foreign competition
Beijing
China's consumer goods industry is facing mounting pressures due to declining domestic demand and economic uncertainties. Once a booming sector driven by rapid urbanization and increasing purchasing power, the market has now slowed as consumers cut back on discretionary spending. Major players, like China Mengniu Dairy, are witnessing sharp revenue declines, forcing them to explore international markets for growth. However, overseas expansion is proving to be a complex challenge, as price-dumping concerns and regulatory scrutiny threaten their ability to establish a strong global presence.
China's post-pandemic economic slowdown has led to weaker consumer confidence, driving a 3.5 percent decline in FMCG (fast-moving consumer goods) sales in the third quarter of2024. Reduced household spending, stagnant wages, and shifting consumer priorities have impacted sectors ranging from dairy to household products.
While companies like Mengniu Dairy are looking outward, their exports face EU trade barriers and anti-dumping investigations, reminiscent of past restrictions on Chinese solar panel exports. Additionally, fierce competition with established foreign brands further complicates their overseas ambitions. If domestic consumption remains subdued, Chinese firms will struggle to sustain profitability both at home and abroad.
China's consumer spending downturn is also tied to shifting demographic trends and weakened investor confidence. As the population ages, demand for premium and convenience-oriented products is declining, while younger consumers focus on savings due to economic uncertainty. Additionally, property market instability, a pillar of household wealth, has led to tightened budgets for discretionary spending. The government's stimulus measures, including interest rate cuts and consumption incentives, have yielded limited results, failing to restore robust demand.
International brands operating in China have adjusted forecasts downward, reflecting concerns over long-term market stagnation. Meanwhile, e-commerce sales, once a key driver of FMCG growth, have plateaued due to regulatory pressures and reduced consumer engagement.
As businesses struggle to navigate these challenges, reliance on overseas markets is increasing; yet global trade barriers and pricing scrutiny further complicate expansion strategies, leaving Chinese firms vulnerable to prolonged financial strain.
To counter domestic losses, Chinese consumer goods firms are aggressively targeting foreign markets. However, this approach is filled with challenges as governments and trade regulators in Europe and North America scrutinise Chinese exports for price manipulation. Many nations argue that Chinese companies sell products at artificially low prices to gain market dominance, undermining local competitors.
Similar accusations were made against Chinese solar panel manufacturers in the early 2010s, leading to EU-imposed tariffs that significantly restricted exports. A similar pattern is emerging in food and household goods, with European regulators investigating Chinese dairy and packaged food exports for unfair pricing practices.
Additionally, Chinese brands face tough competition from well-established local players who benefit from consumer trust and strict safety standards. Many consumers in the US and EU prefer domestic brands due to concerns over product quality and national economic stability. Despite aggressive pricing strategies, Chinese firms struggle to capture significant market share amid regulatory barriers and consumer skepticism.
Governments across the globe are imposing stricter regulations on Chinese imports, aiming to counter concerns over unfair competition and state-backed subsidies. Both the EU and US have already enforced trade restrictions on Chinese goods, and similar measures could soon extend to food and household products, making market access more challenging for Chinese firms.
A precedent was set by the EU's anti-dumping actions against Chinese solar panels, which resulted in a 30 percent export decline within two years. If comparable tariffs target consumer goods, China's overseas revenue could see significant losses. The US is also assessing duties on Chinese dairy imports, citing risks of market distortion and unfair pricing strategies.
The broader economic downturn in China has significantly affected stock performance, with consumer staples experiencing one of the weakest sales periods in recent years. The MSCI China consumer staples gauge is facing its worst sales underperformance in two years, reflecting investor concerns over declining consumer demand. Major retailers, including Li Ning and Alibaba, have lowered their revenue projections, underscoring persistent uncertainty in the sector.
Additionally, Chinese companies are grappling with rising operational costs. Inflation, supply chain disruptions, and heightened regulatory compliance expenses are squeezing profit margins.
Mengniu Dairy, a leading player in the industry, saw its profit margin plummet to just 0.1 percent in 2024, compared to 5 percent in 2022. This sharp decline highlights the financial strain many firms are enduring as they navigate economic challenges. The growing pressure on consumer goods companies suggests a prolonged period of instability, forcing businesses to re-evaluate their strategies for sustaining profitability in both domestic and global markets.
While overseas expansion remains a viable strategy, Chinese companies must navigate complex trade policies and shifting consumer preferences. Strengthening domestic demand through innovation and policy support could offer a more sustainable path forward. Otherwise, the reliance on foreign markets may expose them to further economic and political risks.
To remain competitive, Chinese firms must invest in product innovation, branding, and quality improvements. Simply relying on low prices will not be enough to sustain growth in foreign markets. Additionally, government support in the form of subsidies and trade negotiations could help mitigate some of the challenges posed by international trade restrictions.
However, if current trends continue, China's consumer goods sector may face long-term stagnation, with companies struggling to maintain profitability both at home and abroad. The next few years will be crucial in determining whether Chinese firms can adapt to the changing global trade landscape or if they will continue to face declining revenues and market share.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Qatar Tribune
43 minutes ago
- Qatar Tribune
Trump targets tariff evasion, with eye on China
Agencies As the United States ramps up tariffs on major trading partners globally, President Donald Trump is also disrupting strategies that could be used—by Chinese companies or others—to circumvent them. Goods deemed to be 'transshipped,' or sent through a third country with lower export levies, will face an additional 40-percent duty under an incoming wave of Trump tariffs Thursday. The latest tranche of 'reciprocal' tariff hikes, taking aim at what Washington deems unfair trade practices, impacts dozens of economies from Taiwan to India. The transshipment rule does not name countries, but is expected to impact China significantly given its position as a manufacturing powerhouse. Washington likely wants to develop supply chains that are less reliant on China, analysts say, as tensions simmer between the world's two biggest economies and the US sounds the alarm on Beijing's excess industrial capacity. But 'it's a little more about the short-term effect of strengthening the tariff regime than it is about a decoupling strategy,' said Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council. 'The point is to make countries worried about it and then have them err on the side of not doing it, because they know that Trump could then jack up the tariff rates higher again,' he added, referring to tariff evasion. The possibility of a sharply higher duty is a 'perpetual stick in the negotiations' with countries, said Richard Stern, a tax and budget expert at the conservative Heritage Foundation. He told AFP that expanding penalties across the globe takes the focus away from Beijing alone. Experts have noted that Vietnam was the biggest winner from supply chain diversions from China since the first Trump tariffs around 2018, when Washington and Beijing engaged in a trade war. And Brookings Institution senior fellow Robin Brooks pointed to signs this year of significant transshipments of Chinese goods. He noted in a June report that Chinese exports to certain Southeast Asian countries started surging 'anomalously' in early 2025 as Trump threatened widespread levies. While it is unclear if all these products end up in the United States, Brooks cast doubt on the likelihood that domestic demand in countries like Thailand and Vietnam rocketed right when Trump imposed duties. 'One purpose of the transshipment provisions is to force the development of supply chains that exclude Chinese inputs,' said William Reinsch, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'The other purpose is to push back on Chinese overcapacity and force them to eat their own surpluses,' he added. But Washington's success in the latter goal depends on its ability to get other countries on board. 'The transshipment penalties are designed to encourage that,' Reinsch said. Lipsky added: 'The strategy that worked in the first Trump term, to try to offshore some Chinese manufacturing to other countries like Vietnam and Mexico, is going to be a much more difficult strategy to execute now.' Lipsky noted that Beijing could see the transshipment clause as one targeting China on trade, 'because it is.' 'The question is, how China takes that in the broader context of what had been a thawing relationship between the US and China over the past two months,' he added. While both countries temporarily lowered triple-digit tariffs on each other's exports, that truce expires August 12. The countries are in talks to potentially extend the de-escalation, although the final decision lies with Trump. It will be tough to draw a line defining product origins, analysts say. Customs fraud has been illegal for some time, but it remains unclear how Washington will view materials from China or elsewhere that have been significantly transformed. The burden lies with customs authorities to identify transshipment and assess the increased duties. 'That will be difficult, particularly in countries that have close relations with China and no particular incentive to help US Customs and Border Protection,' Reinsch added.


Qatar Tribune
an hour ago
- Qatar Tribune
Trump says pharma, chips tariffs incoming as trade war widens
Agencies U.S. President Donald Trump signaled that fresh tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals and semiconductors could be unveiled within the coming week, in his ongoing push to reshape global trade. Trump made his latest comments in an interview on CNBC days before a separate set of tariff hikes come into effect on dozens of economies later this week. His sweeping plans have sparked a flurry of activity as governments seek to avert the worst of his threats -- with Switzerland's leaders heading to Washington on Tuesday in a last-minute push to avoid punitive duties. But he appears set to further widen his trade wars. The U.S. president told CNBC that upcoming tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals could reach 250 percent, while adding that he plans for new duties on foreign semiconductors soon. 'We'll be putting (an) initially small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year, one-and-a-half years, maximum, it's going to go to 150 percent,' Trump said. 'And then it's going to go to 250 percent because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country.' Trump also said that Washington will be announcing tariffs 'within the next week or so.' He added: 'We're going to be announcing on semiconductors and chips.' Trump has set out varying tariff rates for dozens of economies after imposing a 10-percent levy on almost all trading partners in April. But these broad duties taking effect Thursday exclude products like pharmaceuticals, steel, aluminum and lumber, which are being separately targeted by sector. This means that although the 39-percent tariff Swiss leaders seek to avoid come Thursday excludes pharmaceuticals, Trump's plans for a steep levy on such imports will likely remain a point of contention in any talks. Pharmaceuticals represented 60 percent of Swiss goods exports to the United States last year. Outside of Switzerland, most products from the European Union face a 15 percent tariff starting Thursday, after Washington and Brussels struck a deal to avoid higher levies. But Trump warned Tuesday that the EU could see its tariff level surge again if it did not fulfill obligations under their recent pact. Besides probing pharmaceuticals and chips imports, Trump has already imposed steep duties of 50 percent on steel and aluminum, alongside lower levels on autos and parts. In the same CNBC interview, Trump said he expects to raise the U.S. tariff on Indian imports 'very substantially over the next 24 hours' due to the country's purchases of Russian oil. This is a key revenue source for Moscow's military offensive on Ukraine. His pressure on India comes after signaling fresh sanctions on Moscow if it did not make progress by Friday towards a peace deal with Kyiv, more than three years since Russia's invasion. Moscow is anticipating talks this week with the U.S. leader's special envoy Steve Witkoff, and the Kremlin has criticized Trump's threat of raising tariffs on Indian goods. Weak employment data last week pointed to challenges for the U.S. economy as companies take a cautious approach in hiring and investment while grappling with Trump's radical -- and rapidly changing -- trade policy. The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Trump sees as putting U.S. exporters in a stronger position while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out foreign imports. But the approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy.


Qatar Tribune
a day ago
- Qatar Tribune
From nose to tail, how China is reshaping the aviation supply chain
Agencies While its home-grown airliners bring China the most attention in the complex, lucrative field of aviation, the country is also making strides in an equally important realm: the many components necessary to ensure the safe, smooth operation of jets and other aircraft. Recent developments in a number of areas show Beijing is continuing to reduce its reliance on foreign parts, close long-standing technological gaps and assert itself as a major player in civil aviation at all levels of the supply chain. We have gathered some of them below. During an interview on state broadcaster CCTV, Zhang Yanzhong of the Chinese Academy of Engineering offered a rare public update on one of the country's most closely watched aviation projects: the CJ-1000A, a domestically produced large commercial jet engine. Designed to power the Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China (Comac) C919 – China's answer to the Boeing 737 and Airbus A320 narrowbody aircraft – the CJ-1000A is seen as paramount to the country's efforts to limit its reliance on foreign aerospace technology. Zhang said the engine's development is progressing smoothly and remains on schedule. 'All I can say is that our engine is progressing as planned, and the current progress is very positive. As for when it will be installed on Chinese aircraft – just wait for the good news,' he told CCTV. The Aero Engine Corporation of China (AECC), the CJ-1000A's developer, has said their product will perform on par with CFM International's LEAP-1C engine, currently installed in C919 models flying commercial routes. A successful roll-out of the Chinese company's engine would represent a major leap forward in the country's campaign for aviation self-sufficiency. In July, Beijing's chief aviation regulator, the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC), approved the manufacture of SINOPEC AEH I – a domestically developed aviation-grade fire-resistant hydraulic fluid. Manufactured by the China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation (Sinopec), it is the first home-grown product of its kind to receive official airworthiness approval. The certification paves the way for its use in civil aviation, and makes China the third country in the world capable of producing this specialised class of phosphate ester-based hydraulic fluid, critical for aircraft safety and performance. On June 5, China's AES100 turboshaft engine received a production licence in Hunan province and signed its first commercial sales contract. The AES100, also produced by AECC, is a 1,000-kilowatt-class advanced turboshaft engine tailored for civil aviation. Its manufacturer has touted its high safety standards, strong fuel efficiency, ease of maintenance and adaptability across various environments. It is designed to power twin-engined and single-engine helicopters as well as tilt-rotor aircraft, typically used for transport, sightseeing, emergency rescue and utility operations. As with the CJ-1000A, mass adoption of the engine would be a major step forward in China's efforts to source its aircraft propulsion systems locally after decades of relying on foreign suppliers. On average, lightning strikes a commercial airliner once a year. While rarely catastrophic, these incidents can pose serious risks, especially as traditional lightning protection systems struggle to keep up with the demands of high-speed, high-altitude flight. At a July 29 showcase at the National Communication Centre for Science and Technology in Beijing, Hefei Aerospace Electro-Physical Technology unveiled a new protection system to guard against this risk. Pan Yuan, also of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, said the event that lightning protection is critical for guaranteeing flight safety in complex weather. The technical challenge, he noted, lies not only in shielding the aircraft from direct lightning strikes but also in mitigating secondary effects, such as electrical surges that can damage on-board systems. Particularly complex is the protection of fuel systems, where failure could lead to disaster. The new system, if proven effective in commercial application, would grant Chinese-made aircraft a stronger reputation for safety and improve their case for overseas certification, an essential step for the country's jets to enter the global market.