logo
NSW faces constitutional showdown as parliament's push to expel convicted rapist Gareth Ward delayed by supreme court

NSW faces constitutional showdown as parliament's push to expel convicted rapist Gareth Ward delayed by supreme court

The Guardian17 hours ago
New South Wales politicians are facing a potential constitutional showdown with the state's supreme court over parliament's attempt to expel local MP and convicted rapist Gareth Ward.
The Minns government was seeking an urgent hearing in the supreme court on Tuesday with a view to lifting an ex parte injunction granted the previous day to Ward. It prevented parliament, for now, from moving to expel the member for Kiama.
Ward commenced the proceedings on Monday night via his lawyers from Silverwater jail, where he has been remanded pending sentencing in September.
Ward has said he will appeal his July criminal convictions on three counts of indecent assault and one for sexual intercourse without consent involving two young men in incidents that occurred in 2013 and 2015.
The leader of the Legislative Assembly, Ron Hoenig, told reporters that the government did not believe the court had the constitutional power to restrain the parliament or any member from moving a motion in the lower house.
However, 'out of respect for the court,' the parliament would apply for a more urgent hearing date, when it would seek to have the injunction lifted.
Justice Deborah Sweeney, the duty judge in the supreme court, granted Ward an urgent application for the injunction on Monday night after the government notified the MP and his lawyers of Tuesday's proposed motion to expel him.
He was invited to submit any arguments he wished to make.
The government did not have an opportunity to make submissions to the court on Monday night.
Hoenig said the government's position was that the orders 'have no effect [and] are not binding on the house'.
'The house has an inherent power, in accordance with the constitution, unconstrained by any order. However, because the order has been made by the supreme court of NSW, I have instructed the crown solicitors to approch her honour as soon as possible to reconsider the orders she has made to allow the house to conduct its business … as it has for 169 years,' the leader of the house said.
'The issue is of considerable significance. The house needs to be able to make its [expulsion decision] to protect itself, and we will be making an approach to the judge as early as today.'
Hoenig said the scheduled hearing on Friday was too late, as the parliament was due to rise on Friday and would need to be recalled if Ward's injunction was not dealt with more swiftly.
The NSW premier, Chris Minns, has made it clear he wants Ward to resign – or the government would remove him via an expulsion motion.
'We've got a week of parliament to sit, and I think that most people would appreciate, it's an unconscionable situation to have someone who's currently sitting in jail in Silverwater, convicted of serious sexual offences, who is demanding to remain a member of parliament and continue to be paid,' Minns told 2GB radio on Tuesday.
Sign up to Morning Mail
Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Ward's conviction has plunged the NSW parliament into uncharted territory.
As an independent member, he has not been under the usual pressure to resign from a political party. Therefore, the parliament is having to rely on a little-used inherent power to protect itself if the conduct of a member would damage the integrity of the parliament and endanger its proper functioning.
The government had planned to begin moves to expel him on Tuersday with a vote expected on Wednesday.
The opposition leader, Mark Speakman, said the Coalition would support the government seeking Ward's expulsion.
'Every day he clings to his seat from a jail cell, taxpayers are footing the bill, and the people of Kiama are left voiceless. It's not just wrong, it's offensive,' Speakman said on Tuesday.
In 2021, Ward left the Liberal party and moved to the crossbench after identifying himself as the state MP under investigation by the child abuse and sex crimes squad of the NSW police force.
When charges were laid in March 2022, the then NSW premier, Dominic Perrottet, called for his resignation. Later that month, Ward was suspended after a motion unanimously passed the Legislative Assembly. In August 2022, Ward was committed to stand trial.
But Ward's voters in the south coast state seat of Kiama re-elected him in March 2023 and he returned to Macquarie Street.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HMRC plans new private school tax grab
HMRC plans new private school tax grab

Telegraph

time21 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

HMRC plans new private school tax grab

The Government is preparing a fresh tax grab on private school parents after Britain's richest families paid hundreds of millions of pounds of fees early to avoid VAT. HMRC will target schools where families paid several years' school fees in advance ahead of the 20 per cent levy coming into force on Jan 1 2025, meaning the payments were not taxed. Officials believe they will be able to claim that flaws in some of the advance schemes will mean tax is due after all. It comes after The Telegraph revealed on Monday that there was a surge in pre-paid fees at the top 50 private schools last year, up to £515 million, up from £121 million in 2023. Government sources said that HMRC would now 'carefully scrutinise' pre-payments amid concerns that some schools may have abused them to avoid VAT. Internal Treasury communications obtained by The Telegraph show the Government expects lengthy legal battles between HMRC and private schools as a result. A briefing note sent by Treasury officials to the Chancellor's team last summer said that 'the more egregious the [prepayment] scheme, the more easily we would expect HMRC to be able to recoup the revenue'. Private schools were deluged with fee pre-payments last year after Labour confirmed in its election manifesto that it would charge VAT on fees for the first time.

Stables boss who had sex with underage girl ‘offered her family £50k to drop charges'
Stables boss who had sex with underage girl ‘offered her family £50k to drop charges'

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Stables boss who had sex with underage girl ‘offered her family £50k to drop charges'

An equestrian boss who had sex with an underage girl offered her family £50,000 to drop the charges, a court heard. Guy Simmonds, 37, and fellow rider Lauren Jarvis, 26, plotted the threesome with the schoolgirl. The pair then agreed to a 'pact of silence' about the sex session, which took place after horse-riding lessons. Cardiff Crown Court heard the pair had 'no doubt at all' that the schoolgirl was under 16 – and vowed to keep it secret. James Hartson, prosecuting, said: 'At all times, he knew how old she was and so did Jarvis. The victim told him herself in one of the very first messages she sent him. 'They didn't care about her age when they were planning and engaging in a so-called threesome with the victim. 'They also knew what they did was wrong and they agreed a pact of silence when they got wind she had started to talk about it.' The court heard Simmonds bragged he was a 'top showjumper' after targeting the underage girl on Facebook. Mr Hartson said there was a 'clear element of grooming behaviour' from Simmonds before the sex took place in Jarvis's home in January last year. In one message read to court, the girl asked Simmonds what he would make her do and he replied: 'You will both do what daddy says. It will be fun.' Simmonds later messaged Jarvis saying: 'Hey, I have a feeling that she has said about us. If anyone asks, for sake of both of us nothing ever happened that night xx.' Jarvis replied: 'Hey, who's she told? Oh god has she really, what's she trying to do, make our lives hell? Of course I will xx.' The court heard Simmonds told police he did not have any form of sexual contact with the victim. But he made calls to his mother from prison instructing her to pay the victim's 'fickle' family £50,000 to drop the charges. He said: 'There is £20,000 in my account. Just f-----g give it to them. I don't care. £20,000 now and then £10,000 a year for three years.' Simmonds claimed he had been given permission to 'stray' from his partner Rebecca Dimes, 34, on the condition she 'did not want to know anything about it'. Jarvis claimed any messages about a threesome were 'banter and a wind-up'. Simmonds, of Undy, Gwent, and Jarvis, of Newport, were both found guilty by a jury of sexual activity with a child. Simmonds was found not guilty on five other charges of sexual activity with a child relating to the same victim. Judge Lucy Crowther adjourned the case for sentencing on Sept 29.

Bill and Hillary Clinton subpoenaed in Jeffrey Epstein probe
Bill and Hillary Clinton subpoenaed in Jeffrey Epstein probe

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Bill and Hillary Clinton subpoenaed in Jeffrey Epstein probe

The US House Oversight Committee has issued subpoenas for depositions with former president Bill Clinton and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton relating to the sex trafficking investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The Republican-controlled committee also subpoenaed the Justice Department for files relating to the paedophile financier, as well as eight former top law enforcement officials. Donald Trump has denied prior knowledge of Epstein 's crimes, claiming he ended their relationship a long time ago. The US president has repeatedly tried to draw a line under the Justice Department's decision not to release a full accounting of the investigation, but politicians from both major political parties, as well as many in Mr Trump's political base, have refused to drop their interest in the Epstein files. Epstein died in a New York jail cell in 2019 awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, and since then, conspiracy theories have swirled about what information investigators gathered on him and who else may have been involved in his crimes. Republicans on the House Oversight Committee initiated the subpoenas for the Clintons last month, as well as demanding all communications between former president Joe Biden's Democrat administration and the Justice Department about Epstein. The committee previously issued a subpoena for an interview with Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, who had been serving a prison sentence in Florida for luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein. She was recently transferred to another facility in Texas. Mr Clinton was among those acquainted with Epstein before the criminal investigation against him in Florida became public two decades ago. He has never been accused of wrongdoing by any of the women who say Epstein abused them. Mr Clinton previously said, through a spokesperson, that while he travelled on Epstein's jet, he never visited his homes and had no knowledge of his crimes. It is rare for congressional oversight to subpoena a former US President David Blevins US correspondent @skydavidblevins The subpoenaing of former president Bill Clinton is an escalation, both legally and politically. Historically, it is rare for congressional oversight to demand deposition from former presidents of the United States. Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend and accomplice, had already been summonsed. But the House Oversight Committee has now added Bill and Hillary Clinton, several former Attorneys General and former FBI directors to its list. It signals bipartisan momentum – Democrats voting with Republicans for transparency. The committee will now hear from several people with known ties to Epstein, his connection with Bill Clinton having been well-documented. But the subpoenas set up a potential clash between Congress and the Department of Justice. Donald Trump, the candidate, had vowed to release them. A government led by Mr Trump, the president, chose not to. If Attorney General Pam Bondi still refuses to release the files, it will fuel claims of a constitutional crisis in the United States. But another day of Epstein headlines demonstrates the enduring public interest in this case. The subpoenas give the Justice Department until 19 August to hand over the requested records. The committee is also asking the former officials to appear for depositions throughout August, September and October, concluding with Hillary Clinton on 9 October and Bill Clinton on 14 October. Although several former presidents, including Mr Trump, have been issued congressional subpoenas, none has ever appeared before members under compulsion. Last month, Mr Trump instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to release information presented to the grand jury that indicted Maxwell for helping Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store