How fast is Olympia growing? Residents raise concerns about rising middle housing
However, some residents are raising concerns about code amendments that address the size of the city. The larger the city, the more units can be developed on a single lot.
Most code revisions address requirements set by House bills 1110 and 2321 which were passed by the state legislature.
HB 1110 was passed in 2023 and requires cities to allow middle housing in areas that typically have only single-family homes. Middle housing includes duplexes, triplexes, townhomes and more. The bill also limits how cities can regulate middle housing, lowers parking requirements and includes resources to streamline design review processes.
HB 2321 was passed in 2024 and addresses minimum residential density, exemptions for critical areas, creation of new lots through lot splitting, and encourages dense building near major transit stops.
According to city documents, Tier 1 cities have a population of 75,000 or more. Tier 2 cities have a population of 25,000 to 75,000. Olympia is a Tier 2 city currently, with a population of about 55,400, but by 2030, Olympia and its urban growth area are projected to meet the Tier 1 population threshold.
To avoid revising code once the city reaches 75,000 people, the city plans to meet Tier 1 requirements now. This means the number of units allowed on a lot will increase from two to four. Near major transit stops, or when at least two affordable housing units are provided, the number will increase from 4 to 6.
The city has heard from residents about the changes during public comment before the Planning Commission and in writing. So far, comments have only trickled in and none were completely in favor of all the amendments.
At the April 21 Planning Commission meeting, Bob Jacobs said the proposed policy amendments would have a very significant impact on the Governor Stevens historic neighborhood.
He said revising code to meet the standards of a Tier 1 city and allowing more units per lot retroactively is jumping the gun.
He said Olympia won't meet the Tier 1 population threshold of 75,000 by 2030 as predicted, unless the city moves forward with annexing its entire Urban Growth Area. Without doing that, he said it would take Olympia 20 years to reach 75,000 people.
Sandy Novack wrote to the city that she strongly objects to the housing code amendments. She said allowing up to six units per lot would allow the city to succeed 'in packing as many people as you can together.'
'Most of us, even the poor or middle would like to walk a short distance to see a forest or a tree or a bit of sky,' she said. 'People are happier and better adjusted when they can do that. I suggest affordable housing go up but have space around it that is not developed.'
She said if developers can't afford to build smaller, they should subsidize the building of smaller houses or build public housing. Novack also argued against upping the size of ADUs to 1,000 square feet.
Lorie Hewitt wrote to the city that her concerns are related to preserving the historic heritage and character of the South Capitol Neighborhood, while allowing some proportional increased density needed for housing.
Hewitt echoed Jacobs' concerns regarding making Olympia a Tier 1 city. She said there's no guarantee Olympia will actually be a Tier 1 city by 2030.
'I have lived here 40 years and seen many population projections come and go and not ever materialize,' she said.
Hewitt said she doesn't see the benefit of redefining the city limits by including the UGA.
'Why intentionally reduce the flexibility to design a program for a Tier 2 city and see how it works before jumping right into Tier 1 requirements from the State?' she said. 'Many regulations benefit from adjustments in a 5 year timeframe, which should not be overly onerous as far as staff time. Just review the regulations in 2030 and amend them, if needed.'
Hewitt said increasing unit density for neighborhoods within half a mile from a 'frequent transit route' would entirely encompass the South Capitol Neighborhood.
'Has anyone actually looked at our neighborhood lots?' she said. 'Fitting six units on them will certainly not allow for design standards that respect the historic nature of our streets and houses.'
Hewitt also raised concerns about selling individual units on a lot to other owners. She said if a development is approved on a parent lot, the amendments allow for the individual units to be sold independently of each other.
She asked what provisions are in place to make sure each of these units isn't bought and used primarily for business purposes.
'Unfortunately, when that happens it's likely they will frequently be left vacant due to absentee ownership,' Hewitt said. 'And when owners are present and properties are used for business purposes, parking can become an issue on congested SCN streets. The SCN already has a large share of houses whose owners are operating businesses and leave them vacant for most of the year.'
Transit stops
Near major transit stops, or when at least two affordable housing units are provided, the number will increase from 4 to 6. There aren't any major transit stops in Olympia under the state's definition. Instead, Olympia code is being proposed using 'frequent transit routes' for transit stops that have four or more stops per hour for 12 or more hours per day.
The geographical range for areas considered near frequent transit routes — the areas that could see the 4-to-6 unit increase — would increase to half a mile from the current quarter of a mile.
The city's amended codes would not require off-street parking as a condition of permitting middle housing within half a mile walking distance of a frequent transit route.
ADUs
Under the state regulations, cities can choose whether to count Accessory Dwelling Units in the Unit Lot Density allowed. The most allowed on one lot would be a six-plex or a six-plex and two ADUs.
Cities also can no longer adopt a size limit for ADUs that's less than 1,000 square feet. Olympia code will have to be updated to increase the maximum size from 850 square feet.
The city isn't allowed to impose setback requirements, yard coverage limits, tree retention mandates, restrictions on entry-door locations, aesthetic requirements or requirements for design review for ADUs that are more restrictive than those for the principal unit.
Code amendments also would allow ADUs to be converted from existing structures, including but not limited to detached garages, even if they violate current code requirements for setbacks or lot coverage.
Code also would be updated to keep building height maximums at 35 feet, but allow three stories instead of two, in residential zoning districts that allow 12 or fewer units per acre.
Joyce Phillips, long-range planning manager, said comments are being taken on the draft amendments until May 15. A public hearing could occur as soon as July or August, and the City Council is expected to make a decision by the end of the year.
To receive notice of public hearings or when the new draft is out, you can submit an email to middle@ci.olympia.wa.us and ask to become a party of record.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Intercept
4 minutes ago
- The Intercept
Amid DSCC Pressure, Democratic Populist J.D. Scholten Exits Iowa Senate Race
Democrat J.D. Scholten, a two-term Iowa state House representative and former candidate for Iowa's first congressional district, announced Monday that he intends to withdraw from the Iowa Senate primary, ending his race only a few months after launching his campaign. The withdrawal announcement follows a push from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, or DSCC, to recruit and clear the field for fellow state House member Josh Turek, whom Scholten plans to officially endorse at a rally Monday night. Turek's recent entrance and Scholten's sudden withdrawal indicates the DSCC, an organ of the Democratic Party establishment, is taking a more active role in key primaries this year as the party mounts a longshot bid to retake the upper chamber. Two sources close to Scholten's campaign, who requested anonymity to protect their livelihoods in Democratic politics, told The Intercept last week he has faced increasing pressure in recent weeks to end his bid and back Turek, who announced his candidacy earlier in August. Scholten discussed the race with DSCC officials in early August before Turek announced his bid, according to one of the sources. In an interview with The Intercept last week, Scholten directly denied plans to drop out and endorse Turek. He also denied receiving pressure from national Democrats to end his candidacy. In a follow-up phone call Sunday night, Scholten changed his tune. 'This wasn't true last week, but I am dropping out, and I am endorsing Turek,' he told The Intercept. 'It's not because of pressure from the DSCC, though,' he added unprompted. It is unclear why the DSCC maneuvered to back Turek over Scholten. Both have strong electoral records, and Scholten has already been vetted by a high-profile national race. (The DSCC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.) 'The DSCC's corporate donors won't let them support the candidate who can win.' Scholten has in the past spurned national Democrats, rejecting help in the general election from the House Democrats' Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in his failed 2020 House bid after receiving a small amount of support in 2018. He did not say whether he would have accepted the national party's support in the Senate primary election. The Senate party committee, helmed by New York Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand and Chuck Schumer, has already drawn criticism this cycle for taking a more aggressive approach than usual in clearing the primary fields in key states on behalf of candidates seen as friendly to corporate interests. Among Schloten's allies, the consternation was palpable. 'We have a candidate with name recognition with a track record of connecting with rural Iowa voters on one of the most important, unifying messages there is: corporate power is destroying America,' Max Miller, a former Federal Trade Commission official and friend of Scholten's, told The Intercept. 'And yet, the DSCC's corporate donors won't let them support the candidate who can win.' Scholten rose to national prominence in 2018 during an unexpectedly strong challenge to Republican former Rep. Steven King, who faced several controversies over his ties to white nationalists. Though King ultimately won, his narrow margin led House Republicans to back another candidate, Randy Feenstra, the following cycle in a rematch against Scholten. Scholten overperformed a second time in 2020 but still fell short in the race, laying the groundwork for his election to the Iowa state house in 2022. In 2024, he comfortably held his Sioux City-based seat even as Kamala Harris lost the district in her presidential bid. During each of his campaigns, Scholten has embraced a populist, anti-establishment message that emphasizes taking on corporate interests. Scholten's endorsement provides a substantial boost to Turek, whom several sources in Iowa politics confirmed was recruited to run by the DSCC. Turek is also starting his second term in the Iowa state House after winning a seat that voted for Donald Trump last year. Those sources say Turek's electoral performance and biography made national Democrats hopeful he could turn incumbent Republican Sen. Joni Ernst's recent Medicaid cut gaffes — she mocked concerns people would die by saying, 'We all are going to die' — into a defining issue of the race. (Turek was born with spina bifida and has championed Medicaid coverage during his brief tenure in the Iowa legislature.) Turek's broader views, and especially his views on corporate interests and the national party's establishment class, remain vague. Scholten told The Intercept his decision to endorse Turek stems from the friendly relationship the two have formed while serving together in the state house. Scholten also acknowledged that Turek's views on the issues the former has championed are unclear, but expressed a desire to push him to take a more populist approach, especially on corporate power in the state's crucial agriculture sector. (Turek's campaign did not immediately respond to a request to comment.) Despite Scholten's sudden exit from the race, Turek still faces a field with several high-profile Democratic primary challengers. Iowa state Sen. Zach Wahls, who gained national attention for his advocacy for gay rights in the early 2010s, announced his candidacy in June. Des Moines School Board chair and former chief of staff to First Lady Michelle Obama Jackie Norris joined the field in early August. And, while Scholten's exit provides a critical boost to Turek, it also potentially leaves the populist lane in the primary open to Nathan Sage, a first-time candidate from Indianola who announced his run in April of last year. Sage's biography and aggressively anti-corporate and anti-establishment campaign platform echoes the formula Dan Osborn used last cycle in neighboring Nebraska, where he overperformed Kamala Harris by more than any other candidate across the country in his challenge to Republican Sen. Deb Fischer. Osborn, however, like Scholten, ended up ultimately losing the race.


Forbes
5 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump-Zelenskyy Meeting: Trump Says ‘I Don't Think You Need A Ceasefire' (Live Updates)
President Donald Trump told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during their meeting Monday at the White House he doesn't think Russia and Ukraine need a ceasefire agreement repeating a stance he adopted after his meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 18: U.S. President Donald Trump greets Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on August 18, 2025 in Washington, DC. President Trump is hosting President Zelensky at the White House for a bilateral meeting and later an expanded meeting with European leaders to discuss a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. (Photo by) Getty Images Trump told Zelenskyy he would give Ukraine 'very good protection and very good security' when asked about security guarantees for Ukraine during his meeting with Zelenskyy on Monday afternoon, a key demand Zelenskyy is seeking in exchange for an agreement to end the war with Russia. Trump also said he would speak with Putin when the meeting with Zelenskyy was over. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte will also meet with Trump and Zelenskyy after their sitdown. The meeting comes after Trump's sitdown with Putin in Alaska on Friday ended without a ceasefire agreement. Trump and Putin offered minimal details of their discussion, though Trump said Saturday on Truth Social he is now calling for a 'peace agreement' to end the war 'and not a mere Ceasefire.' Trump softened his rhetoric toward Putin after their meeting Friday, expressing support for Putin's preference to end the war instead of a ceasefire. Trump also walked back his promise for 'severe consequences' if Putin didn't agree to end the war, telling Fox News he did not think sanctions were necessary. Trump's meeting with Zelenskyy comes after their last Oval Office sitdown devolved into a shouting match between the Ukrainian leader and Trump and Vice President JD Vance, who accused him of being ungrateful for U.S. support and 'disrespectful' to Trump. Further Reading Trump And Zelenskyy Set For High-Stakes White House Meeting Monday: Here's What To Know (Forbes) Trump Says 'No Deal' With Putin Following Meeting In Alaska (Forbes) Trump Will Meet Zelensky In D.C. Monday After Alaska Meeting With Putin (Forbes)
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Democrats say they will return to state once session ends, California unveils retaliatory map
Texas House Democrats who left the state in protest of proposed congressional redistricting said Thursday they will return to the state after the Legislature adjourns Friday and California's state lawmakers introduce a retaliatory redistricting map in their state assembly. In a statement, members of the minority party said their lawyers had advised them to return 'to build a strong public legislative record for the upcoming legal battle' against the proposed reconfiguration of Texas' congressional districts. The new map, stalled since dozens of Democrats left the state Aug. 3, is designed to net the GOP five additional seats in the U.S. House. President Donald Trump pressured state leaders to undertake the effort mid-decade — a rarity — as the GOP tries to hold onto its thin majority in Congress. Gov. Greg Abbott, who has asked the state's Supreme Court to remove House Democratic Caucus leader Gene Wu from office, said earlier this week he would continue calling special legislative sessions — starting Friday after both chambers of the Legislature adjourn. House Speaker Dustin Burrows said he would gavel out for the session if the lower chamber continued to lack a quorum, or the minimum number of present members required to conduct business. The House, which needs 100 of its 150 members present to establish a quorum, has not reached that threshold since most of the chamber's 62 Democrats left the state for Chicago, Massachusetts and New York in an effort to stop the proposed redistricting. Democratic lawmakers say the new map is an attack on the representation of minority voters in the districts being redrawn, while Republicans have defended their right to redraw district lines for partisan gain whenever they want. 'Texas House Democrats broke quorum and successfully mobilized the nation against Trump's assault on minority voting rights," Wu, D-Houston, said in a statement. 'Facing threats of arrest, lawfare, financial penalties, harassment, and bomb threats, we have stood firm in our fight against a proposed Jim Crow congressional district map.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday called a special election for a ballot measure to ask voters to approve a new congressional map to counter Texas' effort. Earlier this week, Politico reported that California Democratic leaders said they had sufficient votes to pass the amendment. 'Trump's election rigging comes to an end now,' Newsom said in a social media post. 'California won't stand by and watch Trump burn it all down — we are calling a special election to redraw our Congressional maps and defend fair representation. This is a five alarm fire for Democracy.' Disclosure: Politico has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. More all-star speakers confirmed for The Texas Tribune Festival, Nov. 13–15! This year's lineup just got even more exciting with the addition of State Rep. Caroline Fairly, R-Amarillo; former United States Attorney General Eric Holder; Abby Phillip, anchor of 'CNN NewsNight'; Aaron Reitz, 2026 Republican candidate for Texas Attorney General; and State Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.