logo
Starmer retreats on key element of PIP reform legislation

Starmer retreats on key element of PIP reform legislation

The Bill passed its second reading by 335 votes to 260, with Labour's majority of 165 slashed to just 75 - the biggest rebellion of Sir Keir's time in office.
Scottish Labour MPs Irene Campbell, Tracy Gilbert, Brian Leishman, Euan Stainbank were among the 49 backbench rebels who voted against the legislation.
The four also backed an unsuccessful amendment to halt the legislation.
READ MORE
The decision to effectively scrap the central element of the legislation that ministers have spent weeks defending as necessary came after Labour whips realised defeat was possible.
Details of the eleventh-hour concessions were announced in the Commons just 90 minutes before MPs were due to vote.
It was the second u-turn on the welfare reforms in a matter of days.
Last week, 126 Labour MPs backed an amendment that would have effectively derailed the Bill.
No 10 saw that off by promising to apply the new stricter regime for PIP only to new claimants from November 2026.
However, that promise — made last Thursday — led to confusion and claims of a two-tier system, where the level of benefit changed depending on someone's date of birth.
The latest concession abandons that plan entirely. The Government will now wait for the conclusions of a review into how people are assessed for PIP, led by Sir Stephen Timms, the Minister for Social Security and Disability.
That review will be "co-produced" with disabled people.
Currently, the assessment judges an applicant's level of illness or disability by 'scoring' them on their ability to perform certain tasks.
The higher the total score, the more disabled they are considered to be — which affects whether they receive a payment and, if so, at what level.
Under the Government's initial proposals, new applicants would have had to score four points in one category, as well as reaching eight points across all categories.
Previously, they needed to score two points in each of four categories.
There were fears this would mean, for example, that people unable to wash or dress below the waist could lose their benefits.
Sir Stephen told MPs: 'We have heard those concerns, and that is why I can announce that we are going to remove the clause five from the bill at committee, that we will move straight to the wider review, sometimes referred to as the Timms review, and only make changes to PIP eligibility activities and descriptors following that review.
'The Government is committed to concluding the review by the autumn of next year.'
Rebel ringleader Rachael Maskell said the Bill was now 'a complete farce'.
The chaos in the Commons comes just days before the first anniversary of Labour's victory in last year's general election.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall insisted the party was '100%' behind the Prime Minister, but acknowledged there were 'lessons to be learned' after the rebellion.
'Welfare reform is always really difficult, perhaps especially for Labour governments.
'It's something we care passionately about.'
But she added that MPs had shown significant support for 'the principle of the welfare state' that those who can work should do so, while those who were unable should be protected.
SNP Westminster Leader, Stephen Flynn said Labour owed an apology to disabled people.
"Their daily lives have been subjected to a cruel Westminster political game.
"The final u-turn they deserve tonight is an apology from the Prime Minister and for this shambolic bill to be scrapped.
"The only option left for the Labour Party is to stop their attack on disabled people, remove the threat of a two-tier disability system and for them to finally scrap this bill."
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch accused the Government of 'utter capitulation'.
She said: 'They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern.'
The legislation was unveiled by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall as part of a package aimed at saving up to £4.8 billion a year.
This was reduced to £2.3bn when the Bill was first watered down last week.
It is not yet clear what difference the latest changes will make, but the proposed tightening of eligibility was the main cost-saving measure in the package.
The IFS suggested removing Clause 5 could make no savings and even cost £100 million.
PIP has mostly been devolved to the Scottish Government, which began replacing it with Adult Disability Payment (ADP) in 2022. While the SNP had ruled out copying the reforms, any change in PIP spending would have had an impact on the block grant.
READ MORE
Charlotte Gill, head of campaigns and public affairs at the MS Society, said the changes did not go far enough: 'We thought last week's so-called concessions were last minute. But these panicked 11th hour changes still don't fix a rushed, poorly thought-out Bill.'
Jon Sparkes, chief executive of learning disability charity Mencap, welcomed the concession: 'The last-minute change relating to the review Sir Stephen Timms is leading sounds positive and we are pleased that the Government has listened.'
He added: 'Disabled people should not have to pay to fix black holes in the public finances.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

French action ‘has prevented nearly 500 small boat crossings this year'
French action ‘has prevented nearly 500 small boat crossings this year'

South Wales Guardian

time25 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

French action ‘has prevented nearly 500 small boat crossings this year'

Yvette Cooper told MPs nearly 500 crossings had been 'prevented' by the French police, with 385 reaching British shores. Speaking in the Commons, Ms Cooper told MPs the Government had five tactics to address small boat crossings, including strengthening the border and clamping down on illegal working. Her statement came days after the Government secured a new agreement with France over returning migrants who had arrived on small boats. She said: 'French actions have prevented 496 boat crossings this year, but 385 boats have crossed. 'And criminal gangs are operating new tactics, increasing the overcrowding of boats so that more people arrive, and loading them in shallow waters, exploiting the French rules that means their authorities have not been able to intervene in the water.' It is unclear whether the figure refers to small boat crossings being stopped before or during attempts to leave the coastline, or by other means such as seizing boats from warehouses. The Home Secretary referred to 'appalling scenes' of people clambering onto crowded boats in shallow waters, and said French police had faced 'disgraceful violence' from gang members behind the crossings. She continued: 'We cannot stand for this. That is why the new action agreed with France includes establishing a new French Compagnie de Marche of specialist enforcement officers, with stronger public order powers to address increases in violence on French beaches and prevent boat launches before they reach the water.' Some 22,492 people have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel, according to latest Home Office figures. This is up 57% on this point last year (14,291) and 71% higher than at this stage in 2023 (13,144), according to PA news agency analysis. Last week's agreement saw a deal struck for a one in, one out system that would see a small boat migrant exchange for a legal asylum seeker. No details have been given about how many people will be covered by the scheme, but reports from France have indicated it could initially be limited to around 50 a week – a small fraction of the weekly average this year of 782. Priority will be given to people from countries where they are most likely to be granted asylum as genuine refugees, who are most likely to be exploited by smuggling gangs and also asylum seekers who have connections to the UK. The accord came at the end of a state visit by French President Emmanuel Macron to the UK. Ms Cooper said: 'The new agreement reached at the summit last week means stronger partnership working with source and transit countries to prevent illegal migration.' Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp rubbished the idea that progress had been made on the issue, and said statistics showed small boat crossings had risen under Labour. Mr Philp said the 12 months since Labour's election last July had seen a 40% rise year-on-year in terms of crossings. He said: 'The Home Secretary comes here today sounding rather pleased with herself. I'm afraid she has no reason to. 'A year ago, she promised to smash the gangs, she said again and again that was her plan, indeed it was her only plan. Yet today, there is no mention of what was once her favourite catchphrase. 'That's because her claim to smash the gangs has become a joke, an embarrassment to her and to the Government.' He added that rather than closing asylum hotels, there were 3,000 more people in them than last year. 'She is setting records, just all the wrong ones,' he said. Ms Cooper replied: 'This crisis, the small boats chaos, went on for 340 weeks under the Tories, a period in which when he was immigration minister, overall migration near trebled and small boat crossings increased tenfold when he was the immigration minister in charge.' She later said the Government's plan would involve greater co-operation with other governments, rather than 'standing at the shoreline shouting at the sea'. Ms Cooper said: 'We will best strengthen our border security by working with countries on the other side of those borders who face exactly the same challenges far better than just standing at the shoreline shouting at the sea.' Conservative former minister Andrew Murrison asked the Home Secretary to respond to the idea that the UK was 'perceived as being attractive to illegal migrants'. She replied: 'I do think frankly it has been too easy to work illegally in this country for too long, and we know that one of the things that the criminal gangs say to people is, 'it will be easy to get a job'. 'They will even give people discounts if they can come and work for those same criminal gangs operating in the UK.'

Rachel Reeves makes promise on tax rises - as she vows not to repeat last Budget
Rachel Reeves makes promise on tax rises - as she vows not to repeat last Budget

Daily Mirror

time39 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Rachel Reeves makes promise on tax rises - as she vows not to repeat last Budget

Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces a battle to fill the black hole in her spending plans after U-turns on winter fuel and disability benefit cuts wiped out most of her headroom Rachel Reeves has insisted ordinary workers won't be clobbered by higher taxes - and she has no plans for another mega tax-raising Budget. The Chancellor faces a battle to fill the black hole in her spending plans after U-turns on winter fuel and disability benefit cuts wiped out most of her £10billion headroom. And speculation is mounting that she will be forced to put up taxes to balance the books. ‌ Senior Labour figures including ex-leader Neil Kinnock have floated the idea of a wealth tax on the mega-rich. Ms Reeves has refused to rule out the idea, saying she would not be drawn into speculation months ahead of the next Budget. ‌ But speaking to the Mirror today that she would keep her manifesto pledge to protect the payslips of working people. Asked who was covered by the definition of 'working people', the Chancellor said: "You can see what we mean by the manifesto commitments we made, and we said, no increases in income tax, national insurance or VAT on working people, and we stuck to that in the Budget last year. "It was a tough budget last year, we raised £40billion worth of tax, but we did that by asking the wealthiest and businesses to pay more to sort out the problems with our public finances that we inherited from the Tories, but also to put £29billion extra a year into the National Health Service. We did that without increasing any of those taxes, those key taxes that working people pay." ‌ She added: "I don't think we need to define more than that, really. We made a commitment in our manifesto to not increase those taxes. We didn't last year. It remains our commitment for this Parliament." Ms Reeves said previously she had no intention of doing another Budget on that scale again. Asked if the commitment remains, she said: "Yes. Last year, I had to deal with the inheritance that I faced, which included a £22billion black hole in the public finances." She said the cash from the Budget was vital to put public services on a firmer footing after years of Tory neglect, including work to begin driving down NHS waiting lists. ‌ She said: "Everyone can see that in the last year, the world has changed, conflicts in the Middle East, worries about security in Europe, disruptions to trade." But she added: "We're a strong economy. We can weather those storms." Ms Reeves visited Westleigh Methodist Primary School, in Leigh, on Monday, as she unveiled a £500million Better Futures Fund to help get cash to schemes for at-risk children. It comes as the Government faces pressure from its own backbenchers to do more to tackle child poverty. ‌ The Tory two child benefit limit is shaping up to be another flashpoint between MPs and the Government, which would cost around £3.5billion a year to scrap. Asked if axing it was still on the table after the disability cuts U-turn, she said: 'I'm not wedded to any particular policy. I absolutely share the desire to lift kids out of poverty and you can see in the budget and the spending review that we've already done, my commitment to that." Ms Reeves said driving down poverty was personal to many members of Keir Starmer's Cabinet, as a number of top ministers grew up in difficult circumstances. Pointing to the Better Futures Fund, she said she saw this as part of a "down payment" made to help struggling kids, including the recent expansion of free school meals provision. She said: "[Reducing] child poverty is about putting more money in the pockets of families. This is about expanding the opportunities, the horizons, the ambitions of young people. It's about improving school attendance and school attainment. ‌ "It's about putting kids in touch with different opportunities in the local community... to give children opportunities to do things that they might not otherwise get the chance to do. "Today, I was in a learning through play session with children, and some of these kids have not got toys at home. Certainly, they don't have the opportunities that my children or that any of us would want our children to have." ‌ She added: "We know there's loads of children who turn up at school when they're four or five for reception and they're not ready for school, not potty trained, can't sit in a chair, can't eat with a knife and fork, don't recognize letters, don't recognize numbers. "All of this is about not just ensuring that parents have more money in their pockets, but that is really important to me... it's also about expanding the opportunities, and that means working individually with children and families to extend and expand their opportunities and life chances." She added: "I got involved in politics in the first place because I wanted more children from ordinary backgrounds and from some of the poorer backgrounds as well, to get a good start in life. Where you start shouldn't be your destiny."

Ukraine's Zelenskiy taps deputy PM Svyrydenko for prime minister
Ukraine's Zelenskiy taps deputy PM Svyrydenko for prime minister

Reuters

time40 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Ukraine's Zelenskiy taps deputy PM Svyrydenko for prime minister

KYIV, July 14 (Reuters) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy asked First Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko on Monday to lead a new government, setting the stage for a political reshuffle as prospects for an end to Ukraine's war with Russia grow dim. The nomination, which requires parliamentary approval, comes as diplomatic efforts to end the war, now in its fourth year, have stalled and as Ukraine seeks to revive its cash-strapped economy and build up a domestic arms industry. "We ... discussed concrete measures to boost Ukraine's economic potential, expand support programs for Ukrainians, and scale up our domestic weapons production," Zelenskiy wrote on X. "In pursuit of this goal, we are initiating a transformation of the executive branch in Ukraine," he said, adding that he had proposed that Svyrydenko lead the government and "significantly renew its work". Svyrydenko, 39, is an economist by training and has served as first deputy prime minister since 2021. She played a key role in recent negotiations for a minerals deal with the United States. Ukraine relies on financial aid from its Western allies to finance social and humanitarian spending as the bulk of state revenues go to fund the army and domestic weapons production. Ukrainian officials have also urged Kyiv's partners to help finance the country's arms industry, including through joint defence projects. Writing on X, Svyrydenko said she would pursue deregulation, cut back bureaucracy, protect business and reduce non-critical expenditure to achieve the "full concentration of state resources" for defence and post-war recovery. "The state apparatus has no right to waste the resources and potential of our country," she said. "Ukraine deserves to be among the strongest economies in Europe." Ukraine's current prime minister, Denys Shmyhal, has held the post since March 2020, making him the longest-serving head of government since the country gained its independence from Moscow in 1991 amid the collapse of the Soviet Union.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store