Colin Pitchfork could be back on the streets by Christmas as child killer makes a new bid for freedom
Pitchfork was jailed for life in 1988 after raping and strangling two 15-year-olds, Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth, in Leicestershire in 1983 and 1986.
Then aged 27, he became the first man to be convicted in the UK using DNA profiling and was handed a minimum jail term of 30 years, later reduced to 28 years.
Pitchfork, now 64, was initially released from prison in September 2021, but was back behind bars two months later after breaching his licence conditions when he approached a lone woman while litter-picking.
He is now set to tell a Parole Board panel of experts that he is no longer a risk to the public when he pleads his case in October, The Mirror reported.
If successful, the convicted killer could be freed within a matter of weeks.
His upcoming hearing was delayed from last year and will be held at a date in October.
Pitchfork previously lost a High Court bid to challenge Parole Board decisions over an allegation that he sexually assaulted another prisoner.
Barbara Ashworth, 79, mother of his victim Dawn said she would not be attending this latest hearing.
She said: 'I've always attended parole hearings but I can't do it this time. I've spent too long getting angry about Pitchfork. I can't keep living with it.
'It was Dawn's birthday at the end of June and it's nearly the anniversary of her death on July 31. I can't tell you how difficult it is to deal with.
But I'll say what I always say: he should die in prison, they need to throw away the key. He's a danger to the public, he always will be.'
The latest hearing, due to take place in private, is expected to last three days.
In June last year, the Parole Board found the decision to recall Pitchfork to prison was flawed and said his detention was no longer necessary for public safety.
But this ruling was blocked by then-justice secretary Alex Chalk as he called for the decision to release Pitchfork to be reviewed.
Although Pitchfork lost his latest bid for freedom in December, earlier this year he successfully challenged the ruling to keep him behind bars.
It means this upcoming parole hearing, which was originally due to be held in public, will decide if he can be freed from jail.
Parole Board hearings are typically conducted behind closed doors but can, in certain circumstances, take place in public following changes in the law in a bid to remove the secrecy behind the process.
According to a document outlining the decision to have Pitchfork's case heard in public, the Parole Board said he had changed his name by deed poll a number of times since his conviction due to an apparent 'desire to protect his identity given the public reaction to his offences and his potential release'.
The name he is currently using has not been disclosed.
Pitchfork's first application for parole was rejected after it emerged that he had been loitering in forests and parks, even approaching lone women during his spell of freedom.
He had been released under ultra-strict licence conditions in June 2021 before being recalled to prison just three months later in September that year.
The killer became eligible for release again in June 2023 but the decision was blocked by the government after pressure from MP Alberto Costa, who represents South Leicestershire where the vile crimes were committed.
The double child-rapist and murderer successfully appealed the December 2023 decision to keep him behind bars triggering a fresh parole hearing this summer.
Mr Costa previously wrote to Parole Board chair Caroline Corby calling for the hearing to be held in public due to his concerns about how the Parole Board has handled Pitchfork's case.
During the Parole Board hearing last year, in which Pitchfork's bid for release was rejected, previously unknown details about why he had been recalled to prison came to light.
After his release in a town on England's south coast, on one occasion the monster was spotted by his parole officer approaching a lone female - a direct contravention of his licence term - in the car park directly outside his parole office.
On a different occasion Pitchfork shouted at a parole officer after trying to cheat a polygraph test by controlling his breathing.
During the December hearing the Parole Board was told that prior to Pitchfork's arrest in 1987 he held 'deviant fantasies', felt entitled to sex where and when he wanted, and enjoyed sexual violence against women.
The board's decision to deny his release was because of a lack of information about Pitchfork's current attitudes towards sex and 'protracted and inconsistent explanations from the killer as to why he was recalled to prison'.
Pitchfork killed Lynda in Narborough, Leicestershire, in November 1983, and Dawn in the nearby village of Enderby in July 1986.
Lynda was brutally murdered as she made her way home from babysitting in Narborough.
Dawn disappeared three years later while on a short walk to her home in Enderby.
Her body was discovered dumped in the corner of a field hidden under branches.
Pitchfork was arrested on September 19 1987 and sentenced to life imprisonment the following January after pleading guilty to both murders, with the judge giving him a 30-year minimum term, later reduced to 28 years on appeal.
He was also convicted of having sexually assaulted two more girls, including a 16-year-old who he threatened with a screwdriver and a knife.
The Parole Board has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Taser trial for prison staff to tackle violence behind bars
Specially trained staff in male prisons in England and Wales will be issued with Tasers as part of a new trial to clamp down on pilot comes as new figures obtained by the BBC show more than £20m has been paid out in damages over five years to staff and prisoners who have been say they will look at whether the electric stun guns should be more widely used after the trial this Prison Officers' Association (POA) said the cost of the "intolerable" levels of violence was an issue the government needed to tackle with a sense of urgency and the use of Tasers was long overdue. Speaking after watching a demonstration of the technology at a training facility in Oxfordshire, Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the government would not allow jails to be controlled by fear or disorder."We're already rolling out protective body armour and by trialling Tasers we're making sure staff have the tools they need to keep themselves safe." Mark Fairhurst, national chairman of the POA, said: "Prisons have been overcrowded for decades, which leads to a lack of activity spaces for prisoners leading to boredom, drug abuse and violence."Staff must be equipped with the personal protective equipment they need to quell violence and prevent life-changing injuries."The Tasers will be issued to a specialist national unit, which will respond to complex and serious incidents in men's prisons where there is a risk to safety, including hostage situations and riots. Severe PTSD after attack The intervention follows an attack on three prison officers in April at HMP Frankland in County officer Claire Lewis, who is still affected by severe PTSD after being stabbed by a prisoner 15 years ago, is welcoming the Taser roll-out in limited said: "Tasers are a great piece of kit, however, only in an environment whereby it's a planned extraction or if there's an assault on a wing." Ms Lewis, who also worked at HMP Frankland, is campaigning for all officers to have stab-proof vests. "If I'd have got a vest on when I was attacked, I would not have received the serious injury I did to my back - it narrowly missed my spinal cord." The latest Ministry of Justice figures showed the number of staff assaulted in adult prisons across England and Wales hit a new peak last 2020 and 2024 there were 334 compensation claims for prisoner-on-prisoner assaults, 232 prisoner-on-staff cases and 104 claims of staff assaulting inmates, according to a BBC freedom of information - not her real name - a former prison worker in south-east England, said: "They used to use snooker balls in socks, now they use full cans of drinks in socks to attack each other,"They make knives out of tuna cans. I did see an officer get kettled, which means hot water thrown over him."The Prison Service says it is also ramping up the number of full lockdown searches in high-security jails to stop more of the contraband which fuels violence behind month anti-drone measures such as new netting and reinforced windows were announced. President of the Prison Governors' Association Tom Wheatley backed the Taser trial for specialist officers, but not a wider roll-out to staff."If they were issued to all officers on a daily basis, it could carry additional risk," he said."Certainly not issued more generally, because they form a threat item, so if somebody managed to get a Taser off a member of staff, that would be a real concern to us."
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
These are the most common holiday scams you need to look out for - and how much money you could LOSE
With the summer holidays in full swing and millions of Brits preparing to head away, there's certain scams tourists keep on falling for. From being overcharged in taxis to making bookings on websites that aren't legit, travellers overseas are often swindled out of money during their trips. Research conducted by Compare the Market has identified the top tricks to look out for, and calculated how much money is at risk. The number one scam that keeps catching holidaymakers is overpriced taxi rides. Almost a third (32 per cent) of travellers fall victim to being charged too much for a lift abroad. Nearly £17 is lost per journey, on average, and it is recommended to book in advance, – through a hotel if possible – to avoid paying the top rate. Another money-draining scam to look out for is street sellers attempting to entice tourists into purchasing fake or inflated products, which places second. This can involve the trader insinuating the item is 'free' but once the tourist accepts it, demands money. Another example is selling products that claim to be real leather or silk, and not being legitimate. Some 20 per cent of holiday-goers surveyed by Compare The Market admitted to falling for the trick, with an average of £17.39 lost each time. The third most common issue is restaurants overcharging and inflating the final bill for a meal. A fifth (18 per cent) of Brits surveyed say they have experienced this and 25% of those hit with an overpriced meal contested it and paid less, However, 54 per cent ended up paying the full amount, and on average lost more £22.58 the last time it happened. Another problem people have faced is fake booking websites swindling tourists out of cash and pretending to be real companies. One in 10 (12 per cent) of holidaymakers have fallen victim to this trick, and have lost an average of £113.30. Phishing scams also cause issues for travellers, ranking fifth, and 11 per cent of those surveyed admitted to clicking on a hoax email before their trip. It can involve a scammer pretending to be a hotel and requesting money from the recipient. The common trick has cost tourists £75 on average. While the sixth most common scam is money exchange tricks, which can happen when a tourist uses an unofficial money exchange service. They can be hit with poor rates, short-changed from a vendor or have their card skimmed by an ATM. One in ten of those surveyed admitted to falling victim to this, losing £28 on average. Travel insurance expert Guy Anker urged holiday-goers to 'remain vigilant' during their travels. He said: 'With nearly one in three (30 per cent) Brits noting an uptick in the number of potential scams they're coming across when travelling abroad, it's more important than ever that holidaymakers remain vigilant to protect themselves against any potential losses. 'The traditional holiday scams are still coming up time and time again, be that overpaying for a taxi or paying inflated prices to street sellers in tourist hot spots. 'The average amounts lost on these are generally smaller, while the amounts lost to phishing attempts and fake booking websites – though less common – are much larger, with some unlucky travellers claiming to have lost thousands. 'There are ways you can protect yourself against travel-related purchases such as paying on a credit card if you can, as it may offer additional protection if something goes wrong with a purchase. 'Travel insurance won't typically cover online fraud, but it is still highly important as it could cover a multitude of other issues.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
'Death is part of your daily life': Ex-homicide detective reveals what it's REALLY like to discover a dead body - and why it's not like Silent Witness
Investigating grisly crime scenes on a notorious strip dubbed 'Murder Mile' would be a baptism of fire for most trainee detectives. But for Damian Allain, the scourge of knife crime and shootings in Peckham, south-east London, in the late 1980s was what spiked his interest in becoming a homicide detective for Britain's biggest police force. Having served 31 years in the Metropolitan Police, the former detective chief inspector has been confronted with harrowing crime scenes that most of us will never face in a lifetime. It's a far cry from what you see on BBC hit drama Silent Witness, he admits, joking that you wouldn't have a pathologist, in this case actress Emilia Fox, 'running around trying to investigate the murder'. From finding a bloodied woman beaten and strangled to death in the shower cubicle of an office to staring down at the disfigured face of a man who was burned alive in the boot of a car in a twisted revenge plot, Mr Allain has seen it all. 'Death is part of your daily life,' he tells MailOnline in the brutally honest assessment you would expect from a hardened detective who has worked on the frontlines of homicide crime for three decades. It is clear that having worked on hundreds of murder cases, attending countless crime scenes and post-mortems, Mr Allain has become astonishingly desensitised to seeing dead bodies. 'It's obviously quite shocking,' he concedes. 'But you're there to do a professional job and you put any anxieties aside. You've got to crack on and just investigate the circumstances. There's a great sense of professional pride that takes over.' Seeing murder victims is something detectives just get used to, he says, adding: 'You're immersed in that environment. You go to post-mortems and crime scenes and see death as part of your daily life.' The harder part, Mr Allain admits, is meeting the victims' grieving families and supporting them when they see the beaten or burned bodies of their loved ones. He says in the past 'you would actively dissuade families to view the remains', but the 'culture has changed' and relatives often want to see the remains to 'see their loved one for the last time'. Mr Allain added: 'No two people grieve the same way, you do get different reactions... I've had every emotion in front of me from families being perfectly lucid - not visibly distressed - through to people flailing around on the floor in grief.' 'Sometimes there's even anger directed towards you because they see you as the authority.' His first homicide case, in 1991, was a 'nasty' murder in Peckham where an old man was queuing up in a benefits office when three men dragged him into a disused warehouse and beat him to death. 'This guy was clubbed to death and then they set the whole building on fire,' he recalled. 'This poor guy's remains were found and I was the exhibits officer on that case which was quite unusual for a trainee detective back then.' Mr Allain, now a lecturer in policing, criminology and the criminal justice system at Brunel University of London, tells MailOnline about three memorable cases that have stuck with him throughout his career and beyond his retirement in 2017. The first case that sticks in Mr Allain's mind was finding the beaten and strangled body of New Zealander Cathy Marlow, who was murdered in her office block in Vauxhall by her ex-colleague Matthew Fagan, in 2007. Ms Marlow was killed after a cruel quirk of fate put them in the same place at the same time. She had come into work on the weekend only to find Fagan, who had been fired from the company, stealing computers. Ms Marlow's body was found in a shower cubicle at her office after she was tied up and throttled with her own scarf at the offices of market research company Research Now. Mr Allain was met with a grisly scene, where the walls and floor of the office were smeared with blood. 'She suffered a really significant head injury, there was lots of blood. And there were drag marks in blood down a corridor into a shower room and she was found slumped. in a shower room. The actual cause of the death was strangulation.' Mr Allain said he 'vividly' remembers Ms Marlow's family coming over from New Zealand after her death. 'Just imagine that you live on the other side of the world, and you get a call to say she's been murdered in her office block in the way that she had been,' he said. 'I just remember them being very lost really. They were in shock and didn't know where to turn and of course they were in a foreign country.' The detective also managed to piece together how the murderer proceeded to then steal the laptops as they found his blood - indicating there had been a struggle - under the desks where he had gone to disconnect the cables. The murderer had tried to claim he was mugged in Peckham at the time the attack took place in a bid to provide a false alibi. However, CCTV showed him going to and from the premises and when he was eventually charged and his name released to the public, someone called to say he had sold them the laptops on the following Sunday. Mr Allain admitted that forensic evidence is absolutely crucial when first approaching a crime scene as it brings the 'scene to life to determine what's happened' which can help you start to identity lines of investigation. Another case which sticks in the mind of Mr Allain after all these years is the grisly love triangle murder of a TV executive in February 2012. Gagandip Singh, 21, was bundled into the back of a boot before the vehicle was set on fire in Blackheath, south-east London. Harinder Shoker, 20, was sentenced to life with a minimum of 22 years for murder, while Darren Peters, 20, was jailed for 12 years for manslaughter. Mr Singh was murdered in a cold-blooded revenge plot after he allegedly attempted to rape 20-year-old Mundill Mahil. Mahil, who lured Mr Singh to her university house in Brighton, was jailed for six years for causing grievous bodily harm. The victim was unaware that Shoker and Peters were waiting for him in the bedroom and they violently attacked him, wrapped him in a duvet and put him in the boot of his Mercedes before taking the car to Blackheath and burning it. Mr Singh was still alive when the car went up in flames and died of breathing in toxic fumes. Recalling the gruesome case, Mr Allain said: 'When he arrived, he goes in there and he's basically battered with a camera tripod and he's bundled into his own Mercedes and then driven up to Blackheath, where they torched the car.' He continued: 'Obviously, we've got a situation where there's disfigurement of the body. It obviously makes life slightly more difficult. 'When you've got fire involved, of course that destroys any potential often for forensic evidence as well. 'You've got little or no chance of getting any sort of DNA or any other trace evidence, and you've obviously got the added where you've got to identify who the victim is, because visual identification is often impossible. 'You've got to manage the family as well in terms of do they want to see their loved one? We would never accept a visual identification, but obviously, once we know who the victim is, either through odontology or through DNA, the family may well want to view the body and that happened in this case. 'The mother and her daughter [Gagandip's sister] were insistent on seeing him which is difficult to manage.' The victim's sister, Amandip Kaur Singh, previously relieved the harrowing moment on 5Star, saying: 'Having to see the burnt body is something I can't believe, I don't know how we got through that. 'There was no skin, he had gone charcoal colour. His eyes had sunk in. He didn't even look like a human. It was scary, but he was my brother so I had to go.' Mr Allain said the case was 'memorable in a number of ways'. 'I think we picked that job up on a early Saturday morning, and by Wednesday we charged three people with murder and it was quite fast moving investigation.' Despite the fast investigation, the detective also encountered stumbling blocks that could have hampered the investigation. There were five students living in the house, none of whom contacted the police and left the address, while a neighbour subsequently told police they saw two men carrying a 'bulky object covered in a duvet' to the boot. He took down the number plate but only told police when they carried out house to house inquiries. Mr Allain explains: 'So you've got five medical students there who know something really bad has happened there. They don't contact the cops. 'And obviously you've got someone down the street who's seen something suspicious and didn't call the cops, which is fine, but it's a good example of the fact that don't assume that because someone's seen or heard anything that they are going to contact you.' The third case he recalls investigating was the gruesome murder of George Francis, a career criminal who was linked to the £26million Brinks-Mat heist. Mr Francis, 63, was shot four times at his haulage firm in Bermondsey, south London, by contract killers in 2003. Terence Conaghan, from Glasgow, and John O'Flynn, from Cheshunt, Hertfordshire, were convicted of murder. Mr Francis was savagely shot in the face, back, arm and finger after he tried to collect a £70,000 debt from a business contact, his Old Bailey trial heard at the time. The gangster was found slumped in the front seat with his legs hanging out of the front passenger door after he was gunned down while collecting a newspaper from his car. Mr Francis, described by prosecutors as a 'career criminal' with a 'chequered history' is believed to have played a role in helping to dispose of a large part of the Brinks-Mat gold bullion heist in 1983. Adding to the 'Brinks-Mat curse', he was the ninth man linked to the robbery to be killed Recalling the case, Mr Allain told MailOnline: 'That was quite an interesting case. It was challenging in a number of ways, because it cut across not just homicide, but organised crime.' In grisly detail, he revealed: 'It was an execution style shooting as well. The guy just turned up for work and he was just shot point blank range in the head. He was shot four times. 'It's quite chilling to think that the guy's just driving to work and then, all of a sudden, he's been shot in quite a cool and collected fashion.' Mr Allain explained how one of the first decisions to make in this case was whether you are going to 'extricate the body from the vehicle or take the vehicle with the body inside to a sterile location where you can conduct forensic work'. Mr Allain and and his team were able to snare the killers after a pair of glasses and a cigarette left at the scene showed traces of O'Flynn and Conaghan's DNA. Despite working on some horrific murder cases, the former detective is incredibly matter of fact when it comes to discovering dead bodies. He tells MailOnline: 'I think your initial feeling is dependent on the circumstances. You can be shocked in terms of how that person has died. With Cathy Marlow, she's died in her office block in quite an horrific attack... that does make you stop and think and it is quite shocking. 'But then there's a great sense of professional pride that takes over and think in terms of the mindset of just as horrific as this is, it is now my job to try and unpick what's happened and how it's happened, and start to bring offenders to justice.' The former detective says while he enjoys the odd investigative drama, his real obsession is true crime. He explains: 'It's interesting when you watch Silent Witness because you see the pathologist running around trying to investigate the murder, which obviously doesn't happen... it's totally in the world of fiction. 'There is a balance to be struck in making entertaining television to the public and having some level of continuity about policing practice.' 'Some of these dramatized murder series are pretty true true to life, and others go off on a bit of a fictional tangent sometimes, with a view to entertaining the public. 'I do watch occasionally some of these dramatized programs. But I also watch quite a lot of true crime,' he said.
