California farm groups look to stabilize workforce amid crackdown on illegal immigration
The administration's vows of mass raids targeting undocumented immigrants, combined with its new tariff-induced trade wars, have farmers and labor groups united behind the need for legislation that ensures the U.S. continues producing an ample food supply and has sufficient workers to tend its crops.
But beneath that shared goal a rift has opened around a singular question: Which workforce should be prioritized? Should farming interests push to protect and retain the undocumented workers who have toiled in the country's fields for years and who, in many cases, have families and community roots? Or should they focus on solidifying the foreign guest worker program that provides a legal channel for importing seasonal laborers on a temporary basis, but offers no path to legal residency and has proved vulnerable to exploitation?
The issue is crucial in California, which grows more than one-third of the country's vegetables and more than three-quarters of the nation's fruits and nuts. Although a growing number of the state's 162,000 farmworkers are hired temporarily through the cumbersome H-2A visa program, at least half are undocumented immigrants and many have been in the country for more than a decade, according to a January 2022 report prepared for the U.S. Department of Labor.
It has been nearly 40 years since federal lawmakers passed a comprehensive immigration reform bill. The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 strengthened border security and introduced civil and criminal penalties for employers who knowingly hired undocumented workers. But it also paved the way for nearly 3 million immigrants in the country without authorization to gain legal status.
Many major farm interests think it's time for another such reset. But immigration remains one of the most charged topics in the nation's Capitol, and any agricultural labor bill would need to garner support in a Republican-controlled Congress and White House.
The California Farm Bureau, which advocates for farmers and ranchers, and the influential United Farm Workers union have for years called for reforms that would strengthen the legal pipeline for importing a temporary seasonal workforce and also provide a pathway to legal residency for undocumented laborers already in the U.S.
They supported the Farm Workforce Modernization Act, a bipartisan bill that has twice passed the House before stalling in the Senate. The measure, written by Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat, and Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington state, included a pathway to legal residency for farm laborers who have been working in the U.S. for an extended time period and who pass criminal background checks. It would have amended the agricultural guest worker visa program to streamline the hiring process, improve the availability of decent worker housing and establish a mandatory E-Verify system through which agricultural employers would electronically verify eligibility of their workers.
Though billed as a compromise, the legislation was ultimately sidelined by concerns from the powerful American Farm Bureau Federation and a faction of Republican lawmakers over a provision they feared could expose H-2A employers to lawsuits by workers. There were also concerns that a mandatory E-Verify provision would have significant impacts for farmers.
But with the Trump administration intent on upending the existing immigration system, leaders of California-based farming groups said the timing may be right for getting a comprehensive immigration measure passed. The bill's lead authors say they expect to reintroduce a version of the bill soon.
'Sometimes, it's these kinds of widespread concerns that open the door for an opportunity to fix the issues that just truly haven't been dealt with for many decades,' said Ryan Jacobsen, chief executive of the Fresno County Farm Bureau.
Read more: Kern County immigration raid offers glimpse into new reality for California farmworkers
Meanwhile, the National Council of Agricultural Employers — which advocates for farmers and ranchers involved in labor-intensive agricultural production, and represents about 95% of employers using the H-2A program — has drafted legislation that aims to make the visa program more efficient, according to President and CEO Michael Marsh. It doesn't provide a pathway to legal status, but Marsh said such a component could potentially be added in upcoming negotiations.
The legislation proposes to expand the types of labor covered under the visa program and allow for year-round employment of H-2A workers, according to a summary shared with The Times. It would eliminate a controversial minimum hourly wage structure for guest workers laid out under the current program unless the Government Accountability Office finds that the employment of H2-A workers undermines the domestic workforce. It would provide over $1 billion for construction and repair of farmworker housing.
It's intended as a 'marker bill,' Marsh said, meaning it contains policy ideas that could be folded into larger pieces of legislation.
The challenge, Marsh said, is to craft a bill that meets the needs of employers, encourages workers already in the country illegally to come out of the shadows — and can earn enough Republican votes to pass out of Congress.
'How do we thread the needle, so that we can make sure that we retain the existing workforce in some type of status that is not offensive to those folks who think it's just amnesty, but at the same time allow farmers and ranchers in the United States to maintain a workforce and still produce food here?' Marsh said.
An H-2A-focused bill might be a palatable solution in states that are less reliant on undocumented workers and already more dependent on the visa program. But in California, rumblings of such a bill have stirred opposition.
Under H-2A, agricultural employers can hire workers from other countries on temporary permits, so long as they demonstrate an inability to find a sufficient number of available U.S. workers. The employer is required to provide imported workers with food, housing and safe working conditions.
Although the Golden State had among the highest number of certified H-2A workers in 2022, many California growers say the costs of providing housing and a required wage of nearly $20 an hour make the program economically unfeasible in its current form.
Farmworker advocates have also called for changes, saying the program is ripe for exploitation — because a worker's permission to be in the country is tied to the employer — and should be bolstered with additional protections.
Manuel Cunha Jr., president of the Fresno-based Nisei Farmers League, said he would 'heavily' oppose an H-2A-focused bill if it doesn't also provide a path to legal residency for longtime farmworkers, including those who were deemed essential amid the pandemic.
'If you were to say you're going to do a guest worker bill before you take care of the people that are here… I will fight that to the bitter end,' he said. 'I'll join the advocacy groups. I'll even join the UFW.'
Farming and labor groups say they are still formulating their strategies for pushing significant legislative changes.
The Times was unable to reach several members of Congress who represent communities in California's agricultural heartland. Spokespeople for Rep. David Valadao (R-Hanford) and Doug LaMalfa (R-Richvale) did not respond to requests for comment; a spokesperson for Rep. Vince Fong (R-Bakersfield) said he was unavailable for an interview due to his schedule.
Rep. Adam Gray, a Democrat from Merced, said he supports the Farm Workforce Modernization Act and would like to see a pathway to citizenship for agricultural workers. At the same time, he said, he would be open to working on a bill that reforms the H-2A visa program.
'We need to progress on this issue,' he said. 'I think a lot of those strident positions that you see in Washington are not reflected when you go out in the real communities. I think you find a lot more Americans on both sides of the aisle that say, 'Look, get something done.''
This article is part of The Times' equity reporting initiative, funded by the James Irvine Foundation, exploring the challenges facing low-income workers and the efforts being made to address California's economic divide.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
6 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Nebraska announces plan for immigration detention center dubbed the ‘Cornhusker Clink'
LINCOLN, Neb. — Nebraska announced plans for an immigration detention center in the remote southwest corner of the state as President Trump's administration races to expand the infrastructure necessary for increasing deportations. The facility will be dubbed the 'Cornhusker Clink,' a play on Nebraska's nickname of the Cornhusker State and an old slang term for jail. The alliterative name follows in the vein of the previously announced 'Alligator Alcatraz' and 'Deportation Depot' detention centers in Florida and the 'Speedway Slammer' in Indiana. Republican Gov. Jim Pillen said Tuesday he and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had agreed to use an existing minimum security prison work camp in McCook — a remote city of about 7,000 people in the middle of the wide-open prairies between Denver and Omaha — to house people awaiting deportation and being held for other immigration proceedings. It's expected to be a Midwest hub for detainees from several states. 'This is about keeping Nebraskans – and Americans across our country – safe,' Pillen said in a statement. The facility can accommodate 200 people with plans to expand to 300. McCook is about 210 miles west of Lincoln, the state capital. 'If you are in America illegally, you could find yourself in Nebraska's Cornhusker Clink. Avoid arrest and self deport now using the CBP Home App,' Noem said in a separate statement. Noem's agency posted a picture on social media showing ears of corn wearing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement hats, standing in front of a prison fence. The governor said later at a news conference in McCook that the center will have the advantage of being located at an existing facility and near a regional airport. He told reporters he didn't know if the center would house women as well as men or if children could be held there. He said he first learned the federal government was interested in the facility on Friday. Pillen also announced he would order the Nebraska National Guard to provide administrative and logistical support to Nebraska-based immigration agents. About 20 soldiers will be involved. And he said the Nebraska State Patrol would allow six troopers to help federal immigration agents make arrests. The Trump administration is adding new detention facilities across the country to hold the growing number of immigrants it has arrested and accused of being in the country illegally. ICE centers were holding more than 56,000 immigrants in June, the most since 2019. The new and planned facilities include the remote detention center in the Florida Everglades known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' which opened last month. It's designed to hold up to 3,000 detainees in temporary tent structures. When Trump toured it, he suggested it could be a model for future lockups nationwide. The Florida facility also been the subject of legal challenges by attorneys who allege violations of due process there, including the rights of detainees to meet with their attorneys, limited access to immigration courts and poor living conditions. Critics have been trying to stop further construction and operations until it comes into compliance with federal environmental laws. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis announced last week that his administration is preparing to open a second facility, dubbed 'Deportation Depot,' at a state prison in north Florida. It's expected to have 1,300 immigration beds, though that capacity could be expanded to 2,000, state officials said. Also last week, officials in the rural Tennessee town of Mason voted to approve agreements to turn a former prison into an immigration detention facility operated by a private company, despite loud objections from residents and activists during a contentious public meeting. And the Trump administration announced plans earlier this month for a 1,000-bed detention center in Indiana that would be dubbed 'Speedway Slammer,' prompting a backlash in the Midwestern state that hosts the Indianapolis 500 auto race. Corrections director Rob Jeffreys said the 186 inmates currently at the McCook work camp will be transferred to other state facilities over the next 45 to 60 days. The repurposed facility will be run by the state but will be paid for by the federal government. He said it's already set up and accredited to hold prisoners, so detainees won't be housed in tents or other temporary quarters. In a video posted to social media, state Sen. Megan Hunt, an independent, blasted a lack of transparency about plans for a detention center, citing her unfulfilled request to the governor and executive branch for emails and other records. She urged people to support local immigrant rights groups. 'The No. 1 thing we need to do is protect our neighbors, protect the people in our communities who are being targeted by these horrible people, these horrible organizations that are making choices to lock up, detain, disappear our neighbors and families and friends,' Hunt said. Around a half-dozen protesters sat in the hallway outside the governor's office Tuesday afternoon making signs that said, 'No Nazi Nebraska' and 'ICE = Gestapo.' Maghie Miller-Jenkins of Lincoln said she doesn't think an ICE detention center is a good idea, adding the state should tackle problems like child hunger and homelessness. 'This state has numerous things they could focus on that would benefit the constituents,' she said. Funk writes for the Associated Press. AP reporters Steve Karnowski in St. Paul, Minn., Jack Dura in Fargo, N.D., and Scott McFetridge in Des Moines, Iowa, contributed to this story.


USA Today
6 minutes ago
- USA Today
Jack White, White House trade jabs over Trump's Oval Office decor
Less than a year into Donald Trump's presidency, he's overhauling not just some of the nation's laws, but the house from which he signs them − and musician Jack White has some thoughts. Amid Trump's White House makeover, which thus far has included a paving over of the famous Rose Garden and bedecking some of its historic rooms in gold, White blasted the changes as "vulgar" and "gaudy." In an Aug. 19 Instagram post, the lead singer of the White Stripes critiqued an image of Trump, 79, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy sitting in the newly gold-drenched Oval Office. "Look at how disgusting Trump has transformed the historic White House. It's now a vulgar, gold leafed and gaudy, professional wrestler's dressing room," White, 50, wrote. "Can't wait for the UFC match on the front lawn too, he's almost fully achieved the movie 'Idiocracy.'" Jack White threatens to sue over Trump campaign staffer's use of White Stripes song "Look at his disgusting taste, would you even buy a used car from this conman, let alone give him the nuclear codes?" he continued. "A gold plated trump bible would look perfect up on that mantle with a pair of trump shoes on either side wouldn't it?" White is seemingly referring to several money-making ventures from the president, who has long demonstrated a propensity for selling merchandise with his name on it. "What an embarrassment to American history," White concluded, before lauding Zelenskyy as "a REAL leader" in "a black suit." Notably, when Zelenskyy visited the White House earlier in Trump's presidency, he was critiqued by Trump-friendly reporters and the president himself for wearing army fatigues rather than a suit. White, now a solo artist, once owned a furniture business, while Trump, a real estate magnate, has long been known to favor a flashy, Rococo aesthetic. The pair's divergence on matters of style may come as no surprise, as the singer's sartorial choices have traditionally leaned into a more cool-toned emo look. When reached for comment, White House communications director Steven Cheung called White "washed up" and defended the Oval Office's new ornate look. "Jack White is a washed up, has-been loser posting drivel on social media because he clearly has ample time on his hands due to his stalled career," Cheung wrote. "It's apparent he's been masquerading as a real artist, because he fails to appreciate, and quite frankly disrespects, the splendor and significance of the Oval Office inside of 'The People's House.'" The Oval Office, and the White House itself, shapeshift with each incoming administration, as staff work to transform the historical home to match the preferred aesthetic of the new first family. That Trump's choices tilt toward a brash, Waldorf-Astoria style baroqueness slots neatly into a lifetime of building designs that reflect Gilded Age sensibilities.

USA Today
6 minutes ago
- USA Today
Voters split on Trump's DC police takeover, National Guard deployment, new poll
The poll by progressive outfit Data for Progress also said only 11% of voters think President Donald Trump will limit Guard deployment just to DC WASHINGTON – A slight majority of voters – 51% – oppose the Trump administration taking over the DC, police force and deploying the National Guard in the nation's capital, according to new data released Aug. 20 from a progressive polling firm. The poll by Data for Progress also said only 11% of voters think that President Donald Trump's National Guard deployment will be limited to DC. A majority believes Trump will deploy the National Guard to 'many' (39%) or 'a few' (35%) additional cities, according to the Aug. 15 to Aug. 18 survey of 1,127 likely U.S. voters. Trump announced on Aug. 11 that he would deploy National Guard troops to Washington to crack down on crime. Trump initially deployed around 800 National Guard troops to the streets of Washington and ordered the Justice Department to take over the district's Metropolitan Police Department. Since then, six additional governors have promised to send additional National Guard troops from their states to assist with Trump's efforts. 'Broadly, these findings indicate that a majority of voters oppose Trump's National Guard deployment in D.C, and view it as authoritarian,' Data for Progress said. 'Voters also think Trump will deploy the National Guard to additional cities and would oppose a deployment in their community.' More: National Guard from Republican states heading to DC: What you need to know Although Trump declared that crime was "out of control" in Washington, advocates, lawmakers and many residents have pushed back on that characterization, which defies crime data. A majority of voters polled agree that 'Trump is being authoritarian' (57%) and that 'Trump is just doing this to distract from other issues' (51%) as it relates to the situation in DC, Data for Progress said in a news release about the new poll. More than half of voters (51%) also agreed that 'Trump is doing what's necessary to crack down on crime,' though voters were closely divided, with 46% disagreeing with that statement. Data for Progress describes itself as 'a progressive think tank that conducts research, polling, and data analysis to produce strategic insights, inform policymaking, and equip movements with the tools needed to advance a more just, equitable future.' The sample was weighted to be representative of likely voters by age, gender, education, race, geography, and recalled presidential vote. Trump has publicly suggested sending the National Guard to other U.S. cities, including New York City, Chicago, Baltimore and Oakland. When asked if they would support or oppose Trump deploying the National Guard to address crime in their communities, the pool of all likely voters said they would oppose this effort by a −9-point net margin.