
9 candidates vie for 4 seats on Rich Township District 227 Board
Nine candidates, including three incumbents, are seeking election to four 4-year seats on the Rich Township High School District 227 Board April 1.
With proficiency scores across the district consistently below the state average, according to the Illinois State Board of Education, academic improvement is a top priority for many candidates.
Board member Tiffany Taylor, seeking a second term, said the district has provided great facilities for students over the past several years.
After announcing in 2019 it would close Rich East High School in Park Forest, the district poured millions of dollars into renovating its other two schools. The former Rich South, located in Richton Park, reopened as the Fine Arts and Communications Campus, and the former Rich Central in Olympia Fields is now the STEM, or science, technology, engineering and mathematics, campus.
'We're focusing now on the academic side,' Taylor said Monday.
Taylor said the district has made slow progress on academics over the past several years. Between 2020 and 2024, the percentage of ninth graders on track to graduate jumped from 76% to 89%, according to data from ISBE. The 4-year graduation rate also rose from about 82% to 85% during the same period.
The district lags in proficiency scores for English/language arts, math and science, which are assessed each year.
Last year, 10% of Rich Township 227 students were assessed to be proficient in English/language arts, compared to 39% of students across Illinois. In math, about 4% of students were proficient, compared to 28% statewide, and in science, 26% were proficient compared to 53% statewide, ISBE reported.
'We are making strides,' Taylor said. 'It's a slow motion type of thing. It's not something that's going to happen overnight.'
Taylor is running as part of a slate that includes board members Andre Allen and Mia Carter as well as former board member Cheryl Monique Coleman. Taylor said Coleman's former seat was up for election two years ago, but Coleman chose not to seek reelection for personal reasons.
Others seeking election this year include Petrina Bennett-Wilkins, Mason B. Newell, Jasmin S. Ford, Shagmond Lowery and Marla D. Johnson.
Lowery said he is running after a unsuccessful bid to bring a fresh perspective. A Rich Township High Schools alumnus and retired teacher, he said as a board member he would better engage the community in helping students succeed.
Lowery said he worked with neighboring schools to prevent bullying, fighting and school threats via an alert system he developed, MyPAL Schools, to share data on reported incidents. He said he also visits area districts to mentor students and prevent violence.
'The culture has to be changed,' Lowery said about District 227. He said as someone who lives in the community and is active at school events, he believes he has the respect and admiration of many students that will serve him well.
'I'm coming to keep these babies safe — I'm coming to make a difference with school safety,' Lowery said.
Petrina Bennett-Jackson, an alumae, also looks to improve safety and test scores. Bennett-Jackson said Tuesday the board has misplaced priorities and electing her would help fix the district's 'horrible reputation.'
'I would love to have better communication,' Bennett-Jackson said. 'I would love for more people to attend the meetings and speak up on what's going on in the schools and in the community and what we can do to collaborate, to work together.'
Bennett-Jackson said working as a finance director for Cook County puts her in an especially strong position to abate property taxes that have soared to record highs in the south suburbs.
'Our taxes are high, and it's getting out of control,' Bennett-Jackson said. 'You have people moving out of the community. You have businesses moving out of the community, and we need to bring those businesses back.'
She said she would work to get more community grants and bonds to cover district projects rather than relying on homeowners in the community.
Lowery also said he wants to lower taxes for homeowners, and as board member would leverage business partnerships he has developed through MyPAL Schools to bring funding in without relying on homeowners.
Lowery also wants to partner with businesses rather than out-of-state vendors to revitalize and, in turn, benefit the schools.
Taylor said the district has saved homeowners $23 million through state property tax relief grants, which abate $2.5 million each year.
She said as overall costs and worker salaries increase, taxes inevitably go up as well. She said it's important the district continues to be fiscally responsible in order to minimize that extra burden.
Besides Lowery and Bennett-Jackson, district alumni running for board seats are Newell and Ford. The two candidates are running together with goals to similarly foster community engagement, minimize taxes and boost academic achievement.
'We are proud products of this community, and we are deeply invested in its success,' their website states. 'Our unique blend of expertise in education, health care and mental health equips us to tackle the challenges facing our district … Together, we can create a district that reflects the strength and potential of our community.'
Newell, Ford, Coleman, Johnson, Carter and Allen did not respond to requests for comment by the Daily Southtown.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wisconsin Republicans cheer Trump's military parade but do not plan to attend
WASHINGTON – Wisconsin's top Republicans on Wednesday expressed support for President Donald Trump's planned military parade in the nation's capital this weekend that will feature tanks, troops and warplanes to celebrate the U.S. Army's birthday — and Trump's own. Some members of the state's Republican delegation suggested the event, which the administration has said could cost as much as $45 million, could boost military recruitment. Though none appeared to be planning to attend. 'It's a good celebration to have,' said U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, who noted he'd be in Wisconsin during the parade. 'We should commemorate these types of moments.' 'I'm a pretty frugal guy,' Johnson added, when asked about the price tag, 'but when we're celebrating the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, of fighting for this nation, it's not a bad time to splurge.' Wisconsin's House Republicans had similar responses to the parade that will snake through downtown Washington and the National Mall. U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden, a Navy SEAL veteran, said he had an event in his district this weekend that would prevent him from attending. But he added: 'You cannot put a price tag on patriotism.' 'We have the greatest army that has ever existed in the history of the world,' Van Orden told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. 'The reason we're speaking English is because of that, and they should be honored.' U.S. Reps. Glenn Grothman and Scott Fitzgerald suggested the parade could boost the U.S. Army's recruiting numbers. Still, both men said they would be at events in their districts this weekend. The event, set for Saturday, marks the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army and will feature tanks, helicopters, warplanes and thousands of troops on the streets of Washington. The parade also falls on Trump's 79th birthday. A reviewing stand is being erected for Trump south of the White House. Administration officials have said the parade could cost as much as $45 million in taxpayer dollars — a figure that includes the cost of repairing the streets that could be torn by tank treads. There are no planned parades for the U.S. Navy, which celebrates its 250th anniversary in October, and the Marine Corps, which has its 250th anniversary in November, also appears to have no parade scheduled. Democrats, including those in Wisconsin, have panned the weekend's plans as fanning Trump's ego. Some have suggested the administration is choosing to celebrate the Army's anniversary simply because it coincides with the president's birthday. Asked this week about the parade and its projected cost, Wisconsin Democratic U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin responded: 'We should be using those resources differently. More of Trump behaving like a king or a dictator.' Democratic U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan said 'we should always honor our military, but a far more significant way would be to spend the $45 million that the parade will cost and put that into childcare or housing or benefits for our troops.' 'The fact that Donald Trump did this on his birthday is just one more sign of the pathetic, wannabe-King-attitude that Donald Trump shows every single day,' Pocan said. And while a handful of Republicans in both the House and the Senate have balked at the parade's cost, Wisconsin's Republicans largely shrugged it off. 'I think in any business, it's up to the boss to make — you want to give your employees a chance to show off, and you want to keep our recruiting numbers high,' Grothman said. Spokespeople for U.S. Reps. Tom Tiffany and Tony Wied said the congressmen would also not attend the parade. A spokesman for U.S. Rep. Bryan Steil did not respond to a request for comment. Fitzgerald, who served in the U.S. Army Reserve for 27 years, said the parade was part of the Department of Defense's efforts to 'raise the profile and bolster the idea that the military is strong and people should be joining.' Still, Fitzgerald was unaware of the price tag associated with the event. When a reporter told him the estimated cost, Fitzgerald responded: 'That's a lot of money.' This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Wisconsin Republicans don't plan to attend Trump's military parade
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia come knocking for Imanol Alguacil
Imanol Alguacil's future, the former coach of Real Sociedad, seems to be moving further and further away from Spain. Saudi Arabia has burst into the bidding for his services, and Al-Shabab is shaping up to be his next destination after a key meeting in Riyadh. The coach from Orio, who seemed destined to join Sevilla, has received a millionaire offer that makes him rethink his future. Sources close to the Saudi club confirm that Alguacil spent about six hours at Al-Shabab's facilities, known as the 'White Lions', where he not only discussed the attractive economic offer but also the team's ambitious sports plans. Advertisement From Riyadh, local media report that the agreement is closed, although in Sevilla they insist that the Basque coach has not yet made a final decision. Sevilla has lost ground in his signing. Not even the arrival of Antonio Cordón as sports director has accelerated the negotiations, leaving the Andalusian club with almost no options. This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇪🇸 here. 📸 Juan Manuel Serrano Arce - 2025 Getty Images
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Council tax bills set to rise at fastest rate for two decades, economist warns
Council tax bills are set to rise at their fastest rate for two decades in the wake of Rachel Reeves' spending review, according to the head of the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Paul Johnson said that local government in England did 'perhaps a little bit better than it might have expected' out of the Chancellor's statement on Wednesday, but the 'sting in the tail' is the assumption that 'council tax bills will rise by 5% a year' as part of the funding. The core spending power of councils is set to increase by 2.6% a year from next year, and 'if English councils do choose 5% increases – and most almost certainly will – council tax bills look set to rise at their fastest rate over any parliament since 2001-05', Mr Johnson said on Thursday. On Wednesday, Ms Reeves said that ministers will not be 'going above' the 5% annual increases in council tax. She told ITV: 'The previous government increased council tax by 5% a year, and we have stuck to that. We won't be going above that. 'That is the council tax policy that we inherited from the previous government, and that we will be continuing.' The biggest winner from Wednesday's statement was the NHS, which will see its budget rise by £29 billion per year in real terms. Ruth Curtice, the chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, has said that Britain is turning into a 'National Health State'. Overnight, the think tank said Ms Reeves' announcements had followed a recent trend that saw increases for the NHS come at the expense of other public services. Ms Curtice said: 'Health accounted for 90% of the extra public service spending, continuing a trend that is seeing the British state morph into a National Health State, with half of public service spending set to be on health by the end of the decade.' Defence was another of Wednesday's winners, Ms Curtice said, receiving a significant increase in capital spending while other departments saw an overall £3.6 billion real-terms cut in investment. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) made similar arguments about 'substantial' investment in the NHS and defence coming at the expense of other departments, although Mr Johnson warned on Wednesday the money may not be enough. In his snap reaction to the review, Mr Johnson said: 'Aiming to get back to meeting the NHS 18-week target for hospital waiting times within this Parliament is enormously ambitious – an NHS funding settlement below the long-run average might not measure up. 'And on defence, it's entirely possible that an increase in the Nato spending target will mean that maintaining defence spending at 2.6% of GDP no longer cuts the mustard.' Ms Curtice added that low and middle-income families had also done well out of the spending review 'after two rounds of painful tax rises and welfare cuts', with the poorest fifth of families benefiting from an average of £1,700 in extra spending on schools, hospitals and the police. She warned that, without economic growth, another round of tax rises was likely to come in the autumn as the Chancellor seeks to balance the books. She said: 'The extra money in this spending review has already been accounted for in the last forecast. 'But a weaker economic outlook and the unfunded changes to winter fuel payments mean the Chancellor will likely need to look again at tax rises in the autumn.' Speaking after delivering her spending review, Ms Reeves insisted she would not have to raise taxes to cover her spending review. She told GB News: 'Every penny of this is funded through the tax increases and the changes to the fiscal rules that we set out last autumn.'