logo
Ministers urged to give pensions to retired police dogs

Ministers urged to give pensions to retired police dogs

Yahoo05-06-2025
Ministers are being urged to fulfil their 'ethical and moral obligation' to provide pensions for police dogs when the animals retire.
Charity the Thin Blue Paw Foundation said it has provided grants of £380,000 to owners since it was set up in August 2020 to cover vet bills, because the animals are often left with health issues after working hard physically during their careers.
Chairman Kieran Stanbridge said: 'Police dogs give the best years of their lives to the job.
'They throw themselves into dangerous situations without a second thought, they show unwavering loyalty to their handler and their job, and they give so much to help fight crime and keep the public safe.
'During their careers they receive the very best care and support from the force they serve with but, as soon as they hang up their harness, they're on their own, and the responsibility for their often-expensive care falls to their ex-handler or new owner.
'We believe that the Home Office, who allocate funding to police forces nationally, have an ethical and moral obligation to these dogs and shouldn't turn their backs on them when it's time to pay them back for everything they've done.'
There are around 1,700 serving police dogs in the UK, according to the foundation, and around 100 retire each year.
It has launched a petition to push the Government for a ring-fenced budget to provide support for the owners of retired police dogs.
Mr Stanbridge added: 'Police dogs lead physically demanding lives and, when they retire – whether due to injury or age – they often have health problems as a result of their career, which can require expensive medication, therapy and management throughout their retirement.
'Taking on any dog is a responsibility, but taking on an older retired police dog with health problems is a huge commitment, particularly during the current cost of living crisis.
'We need to ensure that there is support in place for these heroic police dogs so that people aren't put off the idea of rehoming them when they retire and so that owners are never faced with the heartbreaking decision of having them put to sleep because they can't afford their treatment.'
Conditions such as arthritis can mean bills of up to £2,400 per year for pain medication, the charity said, and because these are pre-existing medical complaints they would not be covered by pet insurance.
Police Scotland dog handler Julie Roy was faced with large vet bills caring for retired German shepherd Keach, who worked for West Midlands Police before moving north of the border.
Keach has arthritis in her spin and knee, and the Thin Blue Paw Foundation pays for her pain medication.
Ms Roy said: 'Vet bills are expensive and our dogs have worked hard in their working life, putting extra strain on the joints and the body.
'These dogs deserve to have ongoing support when they retire, so they can access the medication and treatment they need having served their communities for so long.'
Fellow dog handler Claire Bird, form West Sussex, adopted Belgian Malinois Fiji, who worked for Surrey Police.
She has required two operations, one for an infection of the uterus and a gastric procedure, and needs regular medication for allergies. So far the foundation has paid £10,000 for her care.
Ms Bird said: 'I've kept all of my working dogs when they retire and, as any dog owner knows, taking care of them is expensive.
'But I couldn't turn my back on them after everything they've given.
'I believe that there should be more support in place for these incredible heroes when they retire.
'They do so much for us while they're serving and yet when they retire, the Government and the police turn their backs on them.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Booze, Bubbles, and Blood Sugar Trouble
Booze, Bubbles, and Blood Sugar Trouble

Medscape

time4 hours ago

  • Medscape

Booze, Bubbles, and Blood Sugar Trouble

Understanding how malt, brewing methods, and a beer's glycaemic index (GI) affect the body is crucial for anyone monitoring blood sugar levels. Craft and specialty beers are becoming increasingly popular, but their effects on glucose levels are often overlooked. Even nonalcoholic beer, commonly considered a 'healthier' choice, can carry hidden risks. A closer look at what is in the glass reveals the gap between perception and reality. Alcohol and GI Controlling blood glucose levels is essential for individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Alcohol can affect glucose metabolism in several ways. It inhibits gluconeogenesis and the production of new glucose in the liver, which can lead to hypoglycaemia, particularly in patients taking glucose-lowering medications, such as insulin or secretagogues. Many alcoholic beverages also contain carbohydrates that increase blood sugar levels. The carbohydrate content of beer varies according to its type, brewing method, and alcohol content. Light lagers and pilsners contain up to 3.5 g/100 mL. A 0.5-L glass delivers roughly 12-18 g, similar to a small slice of bread. Wheat beers can contain up to 4.5 g/100 mL. This is due to the type of malt, the top-fermentation process, and the richer sugar content of the original wort, the sweet liquid extracted from malted grains before fermentation. Therefore, a standard pint can deliver more sugar than expected from a 'light' beer. Jever Pilsener, a classic German pilsner, contains 4.9% alcohol. According to the manufacturer, 100 mL of this beer provides 157 kJ (40 kcal), 0 g fat, 1.1 g carbohydrates (of which sugars are less than 0.5 g), less than 0.5 g protein, and 0.02 g salt. The combination of alcohol and rapidly absorbed carbohydrates can be potent. Blood glucose levels increase rapidly, triggering insulin release. Insulin drives glucose into muscle, liver, and fat cells. These levels can drop sharply, sometimes below normal, causing fatigue, irritability, poor concentration, and food cravings. Nonalcoholic Beer Nonalcoholic beer (≤ 0.5% alcohol) does not cause alcohol-induced hypoglycaemia. However, many varieties contain 4-6 g of carbohydrates per 100 mL. In stopped fermentation, one method of producing nonalcoholic beer, fermentation is interrupted early. This leaves more fermentable sugars, such as glucose, fructose, and maltose, which are normally converted to alcohols. These sugars rapidly increase blood glucose levels. Nonalcoholic beers often have a high GI because short-chain sugars are rapidly absorbed. GI measures how quickly and strongly a carbohydrate-containing food raises blood glucose levels compared with pure glucose (GI = 100). Clausthaler Original, one of Germany's most widely exported alcohol-free beers, provides 108 kJ (26 kcal), 0 g fat, and 5.6 g carbohydrates (including 2.8 g sugars) per 100 mL, less than 0.5 g protein, and less than 0.01 g salt, according to the manufacturer. Beer and Maltodextrin Nonalcoholic beer often contains maltodextrin to improve mouthfeel, stabilise foam, or enhance body and viscosity despite the absence of alcohol. Its sweetness is low (less than 20% of that of sucrose), but its GI is high because amylases in the small intestine rapidly break it down into glucose. Low-carbohydrate beers are brewed to ferment almost all sugars, leaving only small amounts of dextrins or other nonfermentable carbohydrates. This results in a lower glycaemic load and usually avoids additives such as maltodextrin. Maltodextrin is often used in nonalcoholic beers to improve texture but can raise blood glucose quickly. Low-carbohydrate beers tend to have a higher alcohol content and a drier and sometimes bitter taste. Alcohol inhibits gluconeogenesis in the liver, an effect that is important for insulin-dependent diabetes, as it can increase the risk for low blood sugar overnight. In the EU, food labelling rules do not require maltodextrin to be listed as 'sugar' because it is chemically a polysaccharide. It usually appears on labels simply as 'maltodextrin,' and when used as a technical additive, it may not appear at all. Alcohol-free beers can be marketed as 'low in sugar' while still raising blood glucose significantly. Conclusion Therefore, individuals with T2D should consume beer with caution. Alcoholic beer can trigger hypoglycaemia by affecting liver glucose production, particularly in patients taking glucose-lowering medications. Both alcoholic and nonalcoholic varieties may contain rapidly absorbed carbohydrates. Nonalcoholic beers made with stopped fermentation or maltodextrin may have a high glycaemic load despite being marketed as healthy. Low-carbohydrate beers generally have a lower glycaemic load but usually contain more alcohol than regular beers. The effects vary depending on an individual's metabolic status.

Breaking My Silence: A 56-Year Secret That Saves Lives
Breaking My Silence: A 56-Year Secret That Saves Lives

Buzz Feed

time8 hours ago

  • Buzz Feed

Breaking My Silence: A 56-Year Secret That Saves Lives

'If your period is late, here's what you do: Boil up half a bottle of red wine and drink it while it's hot. Then stand on a chair and jump off several times. That should take care of it.' It was March 1957, and I'd just finished packing my trunk. I would be leaving the next day to sail from England to the United States, where I would marry Ezra, my soldier-fiancé. Those were my mother's final words of advice. Not 'never go to bed angry,' or 'pick your battles,' but how to abort a fetus. Her recommendation was unusual. Knitting needles were the instrument of choice for many British women trying to abort. Fewer Americans are knitters, so before Roe v. Wade made abortion legal in 1973, many women in the United States — or individuals from whom they sought assistance to end their pregnancies — used wire coat hangers. My mother believed her alternative method was a safe one. I smiled to myself, for I was pretty sure her instructions were useless. Only married women had access to contraception in the United Kingdom, so I planned to be fitted with a diaphragm as soon as I arrived in America. I was confident I would be able to avoid any unplanned pregnancies. The day after I landed, I looked up 'obstetricians and gynecologists' in the yellow pages and found a doctor nearby. I was disappointed when she refused to fit me, telling me I should come back after I was married. Just like in Britain, the United States only provided contraception to married women at that time. My wedding was two weeks away. What did this doctor think was going to happen on my honeymoon? Our first child, Ruth, was born after we'd been married for two years — just as Ezra and I planned. Dan was born 21 months later. Although I was often exhausted, I found taking care of two little children exhilarating. Watching their development was an unfolding miracle. Then, three and a half years later, when we were living in Palo Alto, California, I discovered I was pregnant again. While I was still in the throes of morning sickness, Ruth and Dan both came down with German measles, aka rubella. Everyone knew if you caught it when you were pregnant, especially in the first trimester, the baby was at high risk for serious birth defects like deafness, cataracts, heart malfunctions, developmental disabilities, and liver and spleen damage. The baby might also be stillborn. I asked my obstetrician what he would do if I contracted rubella. 'Nothing,' he replied with a shrug. A pregnant friend got rubella from one of her children and received the same answer from her doctor. She attempted suicide because of it and spent the rest of her life in a vegetative state. After our third child, Jonathan, was born, we moved to Berkeley, where I was fitted with an IUD. Ezra's architectural practice was thriving, and he was teaching at UC Berkeley. His work involved frequent travel to the East Coast, and he was away for weeks at a time. I was being pulled in many different directions by three children with very different needs. I began to feel inadequate as a parent — out of my comfort zone and overwhelmed. I struggled to hold things together for five years. When Jonathan entered kindergarten in 1969, I was thrilled to be able to return to my studies at the University of California. Kindergarten was half a day, and I was able to coordinate my classes with his. Life finally took on a comfortable rhythm. One morning in October that year, I woke up feeling the familiar signs of early pregnancy. At first, I denied the possibility. Abortion was illegal, so I continued to rely on my IUD, considered the safest form of birth control available at the time. I had been told they were 99% effective, which meant I was now part of the unlucky 1%. The thought of a baby growing together with the IUD was terrifying. What damage could that cause? But, more than that, I knew I couldn't handle taking care of another baby. Life was just beginning to feel normal. The prospect of dealing with a fourth child filled me with dread. I made an appointment with my obstetrician, who confirmed I was pregnant. 'I suppose I'll have to resign myself to having another baby,' I said, my eyes stinging with tears. 'We thought our family was complete. I don't know how I'm going to manage. I'm afraid it'll push me over the edge.' 'It sounds as if you might not want another baby,' my doctor said. 'No. I really don't. I'm stretched so thin already.' 'Go home and talk to your husband. If the two of you decide you definitely don't want to continue the pregnancy, here's what you'll do,' he told me. 'Call my office and tell them you are having a lot of bleeding. They will tell you to go to the emergency room, and I'll meet you there.' I had been looking down into my purse, groping for a tissue. I felt my jaw drop as I raised my eyes to meet his. He was smiling and nodding slowly as he spoke. In his subtle, gentle way, he was offering me a choice — one I'd never anticipated would be possible for me. A sense of relief washed over my entire body. I had thought I was trapped, and I had been offered a way out. When Ezra and I talked after dinner, there were no doubts — neither of us wanted more children. The next day was Saturday. I called my doctor's office and lied to the receptionist about bleeding heavily. Ezra drove me to the hospital, where we met the doctor. The two men shook hands, and the doctor told my husband, 'Not to worry — I'll take good care of her.' As I was wheeled into the operating room, the nurse walking beside the gurney squeezed my hand. 'You'll be fine,' she said. That's the last thing I remember about the procedure. When I awoke from the anesthesia, I got dressed and waited for Ezra and the children to pick me up in the hospital lobby. They arrived in the late afternoon. They'd gone to a football game, and the children were still excited about it. That evening, Ezra and I hugged and shared our thoughts about how relieved we were. He was particularly attentive and brought a stool so I could put my feet up. After he washed the dishes, he slipped out and came back with a tub of butter pecan ice cream — my favorite — our special way of marking important occasions. I didn't mention the experience to any of my friends. I had broken the law, and if word got out about my doctor's willingness to perform this procedure, his life could be ruined. The threat of legal action scared me into silence. I've maintained that silence until now. What would I have done if my doctor hadn't opened up this window of opportunity? Friends were going to Mexico for abortions, but the status of medical care in that country was a mystery to me. I could have ended up with a botched procedure, as often happened with the illegal abortions that were performed in so-called back alleys in the United States. Or what if I didn't have access to health care in the first place or the money to pay for the procedure, as many other women and families did — and do — not have. I also believed only a properly trained obstetrician could be trusted to remove the IUD nestling in my uterus beside my growing baby. Its removal was another opportunity for mistakes to be made. I am risk-averse and would have probably turned down these choices and carried the fetus to term. I would have been an angry, depleted mother to all my children. Today, at the age of 92, my reproductive years are far in the past, but old age doesn't temper the anger I feel towards the legislators who exercise their power to order a woman to carry her pregnancy to term whether she wants to or not. Women seeking abortions are often portrayed as foolish teenagers, but thousands of mature women with families are being put in this position just like I was. Our current legislators believe a few fertilized cells are more important than a woman's quality of life — a quality of life that ripples through her existing family. Right-to-lifers scream about 'partial birth abortions' while women who have suffered and wept through such rare procedures because of serious health issues are viewed as murderers. I'm telling my story now because maybe it will help wake us up to the nightmare we've created. Had I been forced to have a fourth child, the impact would have been devastating — not only for me, but for my family. We have failed the many women who find themselves in the same position I was. I was afraid to speak up back then. I am speaking up now. We are back in the days before Roe v. Wade, a time when women are being denied control of their own bodies. Doctors are understandably afraid to follow my obstetrician's example. Miscarriages are looked on with suspicion and without sympathy for a woman's grief when she experiences one. Women with dangerous pregnancy complications are told to wait for 'nature to take its course,' which puts their lives at risk. Many have died. Stories about women who spend their lives regretting their abortions and dreaming about the child-who-might-have-been spread throughout antiabortion communities. My post-abortion experience was the opposite. It enabled us to have the family we wanted. I've had no regrets. I will always be grateful to my obstetrician who was willing to risk imprisonment and the loss of his career to perform my illegal abortion. Now that we've gone back in time, women who don't want to bear a child will still find ways to abort a fetus just as they did before abortions became legal. They'll just be forced to do it in unsafe and potentially deadly ways. We are going back to the days of coat hangers and knitting needles. Cynthia Ehrenkrantz is a writer and storyteller. She was born in Britain and immigrated to the United States in 1957. Her memoir, 'Seeking Shelter: Memoir of a Jewish Girlhood in Wartime Britain,' is available wherever books are sold. She lives in Westchester County, New York.

More checks, tests and scans to be offered out of hours at local health centres
More checks, tests and scans to be offered out of hours at local health centres

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

More checks, tests and scans to be offered out of hours at local health centres

Patients in England can get checks, tests and scans done out of hours at 100 community-based diagnostic centres which are now open 12 hours a day seven days a week, it has been announced. Extending the opening hours for Community Diagnostic Centres (CDCs) is increasing access to health services and speeding up diagnosis for thousands of patients, according to the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) Some 7.2 million CDC tests and scans have been delivered since July 2024. Shopping centres, community hospitals and university campuses are among the venues closer to people's homes where the centres are based and open out of hours for health appointments. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said the Government is 'determined to offer healthcare that fits around working people's lives and not the other way around'. He added: 'From early morning MRI scans to late evening blood tests, we're meeting patients where they need it most by extending the operating hours for community diagnostic centres and putting patients first.' The NHS delivered more than 1.6 million more tests and scans from July 2024 to June 2025 and there were 218,463 people who had cancer ruled out or diagnosed within 28 days, the DHSC said. Improved performance on the faster diagnosis standard means that nearly 97,000 more people had cancer diagnosed or ruled out within 28 days between July 2024 and June 2025, compared to the same period last year. At Oldham CDC in Greater Manchester, extended opening hours have cut lung cancer diagnosis times from 42 days to just 18.8 days, while Queen Victoria Hospital CDC in East Grinstead, West Sussex, is recording five times more respiratory patient interactions per session, with 92% avoiding the need for hospital outpatient appointments. Patients can be referred to CDCs through their GP or hospital-based clinical teams. Mr Streeting said the Government's 10-year health plan is 'revolutionising how healthcare works' and the measures are helping to bring care closer to the community. Professor Meghana Pandit, NHS England national medical director, said: 'We know people are living incredibly busy lives and it's vital NHS care reflects that. 'The services provided by Community Diagnostics Centres enable people to receive the all-clear or a diagnosis at a time and location that suits them, whether before a school drop off or after a work shift, and extending their opening hours means more people are being seen more quickly.' CDCs can provide a range of tests including MRI and CT scans, echocardiography and phlebotomy services. Wayne Rowlands, who visited the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Community Diagnostic Centre for an emergency CT scan, described it as a 'pleasant experience' in a setting that was 'very bright and not at all like a hospital'. The Government's plan for change is backed by more than £6 billion of additional capital investment to improve capacity for elective, diagnostic, and urgent care services over five years, with more than £600 million capital funding committed for 2025/26 to transform diagnostic services. This includes funding up to five additional CDCs in 2025/26 and extending opening hours for all CDCs at evenings and at weekends. Laura Challinor from the Blood Cancer UK charity welcomed the move but said more must be done to tackle regional variation and speed up testing. She said: 'It's imperative that everyone affected by blood cancer can readily access the diagnostic tests and appointments they need. 'With blood cancer being the UK's third biggest cancer killer and survival lagging behind countries of similar wealth and health, doing all we can to turn that tide is critical.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store