Sri Lanka Supreme Court Stops Land Grab From War-Affected Tamils
Sri Lanka's top court halted Friday a government move to acquire land in northern regions still reeling from the consequences 16 years after the end of a decades-long civil war.
Sri Lanka's north bore the brunt of the conflict in the 37-year-long Tamil separatist war, which was brought to a bloody conclusion in May 2009.
Many among the Tamil minority lost their land title deeds during the years of displacement, and the area was also hit by the 2004 Asian tsunami.
The Supreme Court order concerning nearly 6,000 acres (2,428 hectares) of land came a day after UN human rights chief Volker Turk ended a three-day visit, during which he urged the authorities to return private lands still occupied by troops.
The UN estimates that at least 100,000 people died in the war, and that 40,000 of them from the Tamil minority were killed by troops in the final months of the conflict.
Turk also asked Sri Lanka to investigate allegations of war crimes and punish the perpetrators.
Successive Sri Lankan governments have refused internationally-backed investigations, and there has been no credible local accountability mechanism.
Former Tamil legislator M.A. Sumanthiran, who petitioned the court, said it has stopped a land grab.
"The government promised three months ago not to go ahead with acquiring these private lands, but never took any action," Sumanthiran told AFP. "That is why I went to court."
Sumanthiran said security forces in the northern Jaffna peninsula still occupied about 3,000 acres.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
15 minutes ago
- News18
Uttarakhand Panchayat Chunav 2025: Big Relief For Govt As High Court Allows 3-Tier Election
Last Updated: The Nainital High Court lifted the stay on Panchayat elections in Uttarakhand, directing the government to address constitutional issues within three weeks The Nainital High Court on Friday cleared the path for Panchayat elections in Uttarakhand by lifting the interim stay it had earlier imposed, offering a much-needed breather to the Pushkar Singh Dhami-led state government and the state Election Commission. After examining the petitions and the documents submitted by the state in a key meeting on Friday, the high court granted interim relief to the government, allowing it to proceed with the much-anticipated three-tier panchayat elections. However, the court's decision also comes with caveats that may continue to complicate the electoral timeline in the state. The decision to lift the earlier stay order issued on June 23 was delivered by a division bench comprising Chief Justice G Narendar and Justice Alok Mahara, which is currently hearing a clutch of over three dozen petitions filed against the reservation framework for the panchayat elections. The bench, while vacating the interim ban, directed the government to respond to the serious constitutional and procedural issues raised in the petitions within three weeks. At the heart of the legal battle is the controversial reservation roster issued by the state government, which many petitioners argue disproportionately benefits certain categories while consistently marginalising others. Specifically, concerns have been raised over underrepresentation of certain classes in critical posts such as block pramukh and district panchayat president, allegedly in violation of Article 243 of the Constitution, which governs panchayat-level governance, and contrary to several rulings by the Supreme Court. The petitioners argue that several reserved categories have repeatedly been allotted the same seats over multiple election cycles, effectively violating the principle of rotational reservation. This, they say, undermines both equity and constitutional intent. In defence, Advocate General SN Babulkar and Chief Standing Counsel CD Rawat asserted before the court that the previous reservation roster could not be used for the upcoming elections. They cited a report from the National Commission for Backward Classes, which, according to them, rendered the earlier roster void and necessitated the issuance of a fresh reservation list. This revision, they contended, was both legal and essential to ensure compliance with broader national guidelines on backward class representation. The legal turbulence came to a head earlier this week, when the High Court, on June 23, issued a stay on the panchayat elections, even though the State Election Commission had already notified the poll dates and schedule. The Commission had previously declared that the elections would take place in two phases, on July 10 and July 15. Following the court's stay, that schedule was immediately scrapped. Now, with the stay lifted, the High Court has allowed the Election Commission to release a fresh poll schedule, extending the earlier timeline by three days. However, the Commission has stated that it will wait to receive a formal copy of the court's order before proceeding. State Election Commissioner Sushil Kumar has assured that the new election dates will be announced shortly, likely pushing the panchayat polls further into July. While the judicial nod to resume electoral proceedings offers a measure of clarity, it does not close the chapter. The High Court has not yet ruled on the constitutional validity of the June 9 rules and the June 11 government order that underpin the election process. The state now has three weeks to submit its response to the multiple concerns raised in the petitions. First Published: June 27, 2025, 15:41 IST
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Sri Lanka court stops state land grab from Tamils
Sri Lanka's top court halted Friday (June 27, 2025) a government move to acquire land in northern regions still reeling from the consequences 16 years after the end of a decades-long civil war. Sri Lanka's north bore the brunt of the conflict in the 37-year-long Tamil separatist war, which was brought to a bloody conclusion in May 2009. Many among the Tamil minority lost their land title deeds during the years of displacement, and the area was also hit by the 2004 Asian tsunami. The Supreme Court order concerning nearly 6,000 acres (2,428 hectares) of land came a day after U.N. human rights chief Volker Turk ended a three-day visit, during which he urged the authorities to return private lands still occupied by troops. The U.N. estimates that at least 100,000 people died in the war, and that 40,000 of them from the Tamil minority were killed by troops in the final months of the conflict. Mr. Turk also asked Sri Lanka to investigate allegations of war crimes and punish the perpetrators. Successive Sri Lankan governments have refused internationally-backed investigations, and there has been no credible local accountability mechanism. Former Tamil legislator M.A. Sumanthiran, who petitioned the court, said it has stopped a land grab. "The government promised three months ago not to go ahead with acquiring these private lands, but never took any action," Mr. Sumanthiran told AFP. "That is why I went to court," he said. Mr. Sumanthiran said security forces in the northern Jaffna peninsula still occupied about 3,000 acres.
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Supreme Court says Maryland parents can pull their kids from public school lessons using LGBTQ books
The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that Maryland parents who have religious objections can pull their children from public school lessons using LGBTQ storybooks. The justices reversed lower-court rulings in favor of the Montgomery County school system in suburban Washington. The high court ruled that the schools likely could not require elementary school children to sit through lessons involving the books if parents expressed religious objections to the material. The decision was not a final ruling in the case, but the justices strongly suggested that the parents will win in the end. The court ruled that policies like the one at issue in the case are subjected to the strictest level of review, nearly always dooming them. The school district introduced the storybooks, including 'Prince & Knight' and 'Uncle Bobby's Wedding,' in 2022 as part of an effort to better reflect the district's diversity. In 'Uncle Bobby's Wedding,' a niece worries that her uncle won't have as much time for her after he gets married to another man .The justices have repeatedly endorsed claims of religious discrimination in recent years and the case is among several religious-rights cases at the court this term. The decision also comes amid increases in recent years in books being banned from public school and public libraries. Many of the removals were organized by Moms for Liberty and other conservative organizations that advocate for more parental input over what books are available to students. Soon after President Donald Trump, a Republican, took office in January, the Education Department called the book bans a 'hoax' and dismissed 11 complaints that had been filed under Trump's predecessor, President Joe Biden, a Democrat. The writers' group Pen America said in a court filing in the Maryland case that the objecting parents wanted 'a constitutionally suspect book ban by another name.' Pen America reported more than 10,000 books were banned in the last school year. Parents initially had been allowed to opt their children out of the lessons for religious and other reasons, but the school board reversed course a year later, prompting protests and eventually a lawsuit. At arguments in April, a lawyer for the school district told the justices that the 'opt outs' had become disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction in Montgomery schools that students can be excused from, lawyer Alan Schoenfeld said. The case hit unusually close to home, as three justices live in the county, though they didn't send their children to public schools.
