logo
Uttarakhand Panchayat Chunav 2025: Big Relief For Govt As High Court Allows 3-Tier Election

Uttarakhand Panchayat Chunav 2025: Big Relief For Govt As High Court Allows 3-Tier Election

News1827-06-2025
Last Updated:
The Nainital High Court lifted the stay on Panchayat elections in Uttarakhand, directing the government to address constitutional issues within three weeks
The Nainital High Court on Friday cleared the path for Panchayat elections in Uttarakhand by lifting the interim stay it had earlier imposed, offering a much-needed breather to the Pushkar Singh Dhami-led state government and the state Election Commission. After examining the petitions and the documents submitted by the state in a key meeting on Friday, the high court granted interim relief to the government, allowing it to proceed with the much-anticipated three-tier panchayat elections. However, the court's decision also comes with caveats that may continue to complicate the electoral timeline in the state.
The decision to lift the earlier stay order issued on June 23 was delivered by a division bench comprising Chief Justice G Narendar and Justice Alok Mahara, which is currently hearing a clutch of over three dozen petitions filed against the reservation framework for the panchayat elections. The bench, while vacating the interim ban, directed the government to respond to the serious constitutional and procedural issues raised in the petitions within three weeks.
At the heart of the legal battle is the controversial reservation roster issued by the state government, which many petitioners argue disproportionately benefits certain categories while consistently marginalising others. Specifically, concerns have been raised over underrepresentation of certain classes in critical posts such as block pramukh and district panchayat president, allegedly in violation of Article 243 of the Constitution, which governs panchayat-level governance, and contrary to several rulings by the Supreme Court.
The petitioners argue that several reserved categories have repeatedly been allotted the same seats over multiple election cycles, effectively violating the principle of rotational reservation. This, they say, undermines both equity and constitutional intent.
In defence, Advocate General SN Babulkar and Chief Standing Counsel CD Rawat asserted before the court that the previous reservation roster could not be used for the upcoming elections. They cited a report from the National Commission for Backward Classes, which, according to them, rendered the earlier roster void and necessitated the issuance of a fresh reservation list. This revision, they contended, was both legal and essential to ensure compliance with broader national guidelines on backward class representation.
The legal turbulence came to a head earlier this week, when the High Court, on June 23, issued a stay on the panchayat elections, even though the State Election Commission had already notified the poll dates and schedule. The Commission had previously declared that the elections would take place in two phases, on July 10 and July 15. Following the court's stay, that schedule was immediately scrapped.
Now, with the stay lifted, the High Court has allowed the Election Commission to release a fresh poll schedule, extending the earlier timeline by three days. However, the Commission has stated that it will wait to receive a formal copy of the court's order before proceeding. State Election Commissioner Sushil Kumar has assured that the new election dates will be announced shortly, likely pushing the panchayat polls further into July.
While the judicial nod to resume electoral proceedings offers a measure of clarity, it does not close the chapter. The High Court has not yet ruled on the constitutional validity of the June 9 rules and the June 11 government order that underpin the election process. The state now has three weeks to submit its response to the multiple concerns raised in the petitions.
First Published:
June 27, 2025, 15:41 IST
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brazil's former president Bolsonaro temporarily leaves house arrest for medical exams
Brazil's former president Bolsonaro temporarily leaves house arrest for medical exams

Indian Express

time10 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Brazil's former president Bolsonaro temporarily leaves house arrest for medical exams

Brazil's Former President Jair Bolsonaro temporarily left house arrest Saturday to undergo medical exams in Brasilia, after a judge authorized him to spend six to eight hours at a hospital. Doctors at DF Star hospital said Bolsonaro was admitted for evaluation of fever, cough, persistent gastroesophageal reflux and hiccups. Tests revealed residual signs of two recent pulmonary infections, as well as persistent esophagitis and gastritis. He was discharged later in the day and will continue treatment with medication. He has been hospitalized multiple times since being stabbed at a campaign event before the 2018 presidential election. His most recent surgery was in April, for a bowel obstruction. Bolsonaro is on trial at the Supreme Court over his alleged attempt to remain in power after losing the 2022 election to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. A five-justice panel is expected to deliver verdicts and sentences on five counts against him between Sept. 2 and denies any wrongdoing. The far-right leader has been under house arrest since August. 5. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who oversees the case, said Bolsonaro violated precautionary measures by spreading content through his three lawmaker sons. A small group of fewer than 20 people gathered outside DF Star hospital Saturday, claiming Bolsonaro is a victim of political persecution. Some thanked US President Donald Trump, who has called the prosecution a 'witch hunt' and linked his decision to impose a 50% tariff on Brazilian imports to Bolsonaro's legal troubles.

PM to inaugurate projects worth ₹11,000 crore to boost Delhi's connectivity today
PM to inaugurate projects worth ₹11,000 crore to boost Delhi's connectivity today

The Hindu

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

PM to inaugurate projects worth ₹11,000 crore to boost Delhi's connectivity today

Prime Minister Narendra Modi will inaugurate two major national highway projects worth ₹11,000 crore in Rohini on Sunday. The projects — the Urban Extension Road-II (UER-II) and the Delhi section of the Dwarka Expressway — aim to decongest the Capital and improve connectivity, the Prime Minister's Office said in a statement. Chief Minister Rekha Gupta termed UER-II a 'historic gift' for the city and said that it would not only move Delhi closer to becoming traffic-free but also strengthen connectivity across the National Capital Region. Ms. Gupta inspected the venue in Rohini Sector 37, where the inauguration is scheduled to take place. She said the UER-II would reduce the travel time from the Singhu border, which connects Delhi with Haryana, to the IGI Airport from two hours to around 40 minutes. Meanwhile, the Congress hit out at the BJP-led Centre over the 'high' toll tax on the UER-II. Delhi Congress spokesperson Naresh Kumar claimed that the toll tax in Delhi is higher than in the neighbouring States of Haryana and Uttar Pradesh. He demanded a reduction of toll charges by at least 50%.

SC cannot intervene until ‘Bill' becomes law after Governor's assent: Puducherry
SC cannot intervene until ‘Bill' becomes law after Governor's assent: Puducherry

The Hindu

time40 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

SC cannot intervene until ‘Bill' becomes law after Governor's assent: Puducherry

Union Territory of Puducherry has seconded the Presidential Reference, saying a Bill does not become law until the Governor or the President assents. Puducherry's affidavit, signed by Chief Secretary Sharat Chauhan, said judiciary should not get entangled at the stage of Bill and intervene in inchoate legislative policymaking. The Union Territory agreed with the Centre that the President and Governors have discretionary powers under Article 201 and 200 while dealing with the question of approval of State Bills. These discretions were not justiciable. The 63-page affidavit disagreed with the April 8 judgment of the apex court in the Tamil Nadu Governor case fixing timelines for the President and the Governors, noting the Constitution did not fix any specific time limits for them. 'The silence of the Constitution was conscious and purposeful, intended to uphold the institutional discretion, dignity and gravitas of the offices of President and Governor… It is worth noting that the judiciary cannot usurp the role of the legislature and decide as to which Bill is to be passed or within what timeframe the Bill would come into effect. It is wholly, completely and unambiguously, a legislative function under the purview and ambit of the legislature and such functions cannot be exercised by the courts,' Puducherry pointed out. The Union Territory argued that judicial review could take place only after a Bill became law. The Supreme Court cannot assume the powers of the President and Governors and grant 'deemed assent' to State Bills. This would only lead to the court becoming a judge in its own case later on when the constitutionality of the law came to be challenged in court. 'In case of such deemed assents through use of Article 142, not only would the legislative domain be breached but the courts would become a judge in their own cause, if those laws were to be challenged judicially or taken up for judicial review,' the Union Territory reasoned. eom

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store