
Ukraine-Russia war latest: Trump says Ukraine may be Russian someday while demanding $500bn rare earth deal
Donald Trump said Ukraine may or may not lose its sovereignty to Russia while claiming that the war-hit nation had 'essentially agreed' to a rare earth minerals deal with the US.
"They may make a deal. They may not make a deal. They may be Russian someday, or they may not be Russian someday.
'But we're going to have all this money in [ Ukraine ] and I say, I want it back," the president said in an interview with Fox News.
"I told them that I want the equivalent of like $500 billion worth of rare earths, and they've essentially agreed to do that.'
His remarks came as Russian deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov said it would not be possible to reach a peace deal if Mr Trump undermined Mr Putin's fundamental aims.
'Without solving the problems which were the root causes of what is happening, it will not be possible to reach an agreement,' he said.
'So variations and half-measures are not the path we are prepared to go along.'
What happened to the North Korean troops fighting Ukraine on the frontline?
North Korean troops pulled from Ukraine war front line – what happened?
Kim Jong Un sent roughly 11,000 soldiers to join Vladimir Putin's troops in November last year
Alexander Butler11 February 2025 11:30
Mapped: Where are Ukraine's rare earth mineral resources and why does Trump want them?
Mapped: Where are Ukraine's mineral resources and why does Trump want them?
More than 50 per cent of Ukraine's critical rare earth mineral resources are in regions illegally annexed by Vladimir Putin and partially occupied by his forces
Alexander Butler11 February 2025 11:00
The defenders of Kyiv using World War Two-style machine guns on farm trailers
The defenders of Kyiv using World War Two-style machine guns on farm trailers
Swarms of Iranian-made Russian Shahed unmanned drones target Ukraine almost every night – it is up to these men and their World War Two-style machine guns to shoot the UAVs out of the sky. World Affairs Editor Sam Kiley reports from the Kyiv region
Alexander Butler11 February 2025 10:30
The fatal lengths North Korean soldiers will go to to avoid capture by Ukraine
The extraordinary lengths North Korean soldiers will go to avoid capture in Ukraine
The North Korean troops fighting for Russia are highly trained and will stop at nothing to avoid surrender, Ukrainian sources tell Sam Kiley, The Independent's World Affairs Editor, in Sumy
Alexander Butler11 February 2025 10:00
Emergency restrictions in Ukraine after Russia pounds gas infrastructure
Ukraine's energy minister has introduced emergency restrictions after Russia hit gas infrastructure overnight.
"Another attack on Ukraine's energy system is under way," German Galushchenko said in the early hours of the morning.
"At night, the enemy attacked the gas infrastructure. As of this morning, the energy sector is still under attack."
Russia has consistently targeted Ukrainian energy infrastructure in a bid to economically cripple Kyiv and bring down morale.
Alexander Butler11 February 2025 09:00
Ukraine's leading rapper is now leading drone warfare against Russia
Ukraine's leading rapper is now leading drone warfare against Russia
Ukraine's $1.3bn drone war is now being led by a rap artist who has been fighting on the frontline – and in his music - since the start of the war, Sam Kiley reports
Alexander Butler11 February 2025 08:37
Trump aides to visit Ukraine for first time, Zelensky says
"Serious" members of Trump's team will travel to Ukraine for the first time this week, Volodymyr Zelenskyy said late last night.
He also confirmed plans to meet Vice President JD Vance at the Munich conference, which begins on Friday.
Zelenskyy said his team were attempting to organise a meeting with Trump.
"This week, some people from the Trump team, serious ones, will be in Ukraine - even before the Munich conference," he said.
Alexander Butler11 February 2025 08:35
Poland activates aircraft after Russian strikes on Ukraine
Polish and allied aircraft were activated early on Tuesday to ensure safety in areas bordering the threatened zones after Russia launched air strikes on Ukraine, the Operational Command of the Polish armed forces said.
"The Operational Command of the Armed Forces is monitoring the current situation, and its forces and resources remain in full readiness for immediate response," the Command said on X.
Alexander Butler11 February 2025 08:07
Trump says 'Ukraine may be Russian someday'
Donald Trump has said Ukraine may or may not lose its sovereignty to Russia.
The US president has also repeated his pitch for compensation from the war-hit country in return for the aid provided by the US, irrespective of how the war ends.
"They may make a deal. They may not make a deal. They may be Russian someday, or they may not be Russian someday. But we're going to have all this money in (Ukraine) and I say, I want it back," Mr Trump said in an interview with Fox News's Bret Baier.
Arpan Rai11 February 2025 07:40
Trump says Ukraine 'essentially agrees' to rare earth deal worth billions
Donald Trump has claimed that Ukraine has "essentially agreed" to a $500b resource deal.
"I told them that I want the equivalent of like $500 billion worth of rare earth (minerals), and they've essentially agreed to do that," the US president said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump suggests US would strike again if Iran rebuilt nuclear programme
THE HAGUE, June 25 (Reuters) - Asked if the United States would strike again if Iran rebuilt its nuclear enrichment programme, U.S. President Donald Trump said: "Sure."


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Iran's desire for nuclear weapons has only been spurred on by US strikes – no matter what Trump says
We have entered a new rogue order. The rules-based order that underpins international relations, helped the birth of modern Israel and held back annihilation during the Cold War, has finally been blown away. It crumbled with the 2003 US -led illegal invasion of Iraq, which paved the way for Russia's illegal colonial war in Ukraine and now Israel's attacks on Iran, enhanced by American bunker busters and stealth bombers. Israel 's aim, to end Iran 's nuclear weapons programme, has not been underwritten with any hard evidence that Iran posed an immediate threat. And leaked US intelligence reports suggest that rather than 'obliterating' Iran's nuclear facility in Fordow, Trump's strikes over the weekend may have only hampered Iran's nuclear ambitions by a few months. The US president decried the leaks as 'fake news', but satellite imagery had already raised doubts about the efficacy of the mission. Ironically, those states that have always been thought of as 'rogue' – notably Iran, North Korea, sometimes Cuba, one day even Yemen or Eritrea – will now conclude that they need to get hold of a nuke, and fast. The tearing up of international order began in the early 2000s with the doctrine of pre-emption, in which Israel pioneered so-called 'targeted killing' of alleged terrorists posing an imminent danger. It was co-opted by the West after 9/11 and included extra-judicial killings by the US, the UK, and other allies around the world – often of their own citizens and always without trial. Alleged terrorists were blown up, frequently using drones, and many innocent civilians were killed along with them. Ami Ayalon, a former Israeli admiral, was responsible for gathering intelligence and often drawing up the lists of people to kill. In 2012, he revealed how damaging the idea can be in The Gatekeepers, a startling documentary featuring five other former heads of Israel's internal security service. 'There's a concept, 'the banality of evil',' he said. 'When you start doing it en masse, 200, 300 people die because of the idea of 'targeted assassinations'. Suddenly, the processes become a kind of conveyor belt. You ask yourself less and less where to stop.' But the US and Israel's pre-emptive strikes on Iran over the last 12 days have not prompted Tehran to give up on its intent to rid the Middle East of the Jewish state. Iran knew the US was likely to strike against its stockpile of uranium that had been enriched using centrifuges to 60 per cent purity. According to The New York Times, citing Israeli officials, 400kg of this uranium material – which can, in theory, be spun to weapons-grade 90 per cent purity, were moved away from danger before the US airstrikes on the nuclear site of Fordow. The UN 's nuclear watchdog the IAEA thinks this is likely too. 'The Iranians are not dumb. They have had years to plan for this and there's no reason on earth why they would not have moved their uranium. It would have only taken a couple of trucks,' a senior Israeli military officer told The Independent. Low-tech stealth is often highly effective. Pakistan is said by Western intelligence agencies to hide its nuclear warheads in plain sight by keeping them on the move in lorries floridly disguised as ordinary freight 'jingle trucks'. Israel is widely assumed to have nuclear weapons that it won't confirm it has. Its allies, like the UK and the US, will never confirm whether they really exist. This has meant that it has remained outside all international non-proliferation talks and treaties. Iran will now believe it has every incentive to develop a nuclear weapon of its own to protect itself against the kind of conventional attacks that the US and Israel launched to pre-empt its creation of a nuclear weapon – and to topple its government. The US has targeted the traditional world order in other ways. In February this year, it cut through the fabric of international law by putting sanctions on the International Criminal Court after Israeli leaders were indicted for alleged war crimes in Gaza. The court 'abused its power by issuing baseless arrest warrants targeting Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former minister of defense Yoav Gallant,' the Trump White House said. The continued support of the US to Israel during the Israeli bombardment of Gaza, in which Israel has killed at least 50,000 people, according to Palestinian officials, in the face of condemnation by the UN will have further undermined the idea of a rules-based international order. And the lesson of Ukraine will not be lost on Iran, North Korea, or any other state contemplating nuclear armament. At the time of the Soviet Union's collapse in 1991, Ukraine inherited a substantial nuclear arsenal, including approximately 1,900 strategic warheads, 176 intercontinental ballistic missiles, and 44 strategic bombers. It had the third biggest nuclear arsenal on Earth. But it signed up to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty in 1994 and by 1996 Ukraine had returned all nuclear warheads to Russia. Eighteen years on, Russia invaded Ukraine and went on to launch a massive assault in 2023 aimed at toppling its pro-European government democratically elected the year before. Now that the West has torn up the doctrines of international law with illegal invasions, there is one sobering conclusion to be drawn: If Iran had nukes and if Ukraine had 'The Bomb', no one would have invaded or attacked them. Trump may say that Israel and Iran 'don't know what the f*** they're doing' – but both have learnt that in the new rogue order only the dangerous will survive.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Ed Husic breaks ranks to criticise Israel and express alarm over ‘fraying of rules-based order' following US strikes
The Labor MP, Ed Husic, has suggested the Israeli strikes on Iran that sparked the latest Middle East conflict were not justified, breaking ranks from his senior colleagues to criticise the Netanyahu government. The former cabinet minister also expressed alarm about a 'fraying of the rules-based order' after the US bombed Iran, departing from the government's explicit support of Donald Trump's intervention. 'It's up to us and other countries like ours to argue [for the international rules-based order] … if it means standing up to the US and arguing our case we should do so,' Husic told ABC's Afternoon Briefing on Wednesday. The Albanese government was careful not to criticise Israel after it launched a wave of missile strikes on Iran on 13 June, repeatedly referencing the country's right to defend itself against Tehran's potential nuclear threat. After a statement on Sunday from an unnamed government spokesperson noted the strikes, the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, and the foreign minister, Penny Wong, also endorsed the US' subsequent bombings of three Iranian nuclear facilities, arguing the targeted strikes were necessary to prevent the regime developing a nuclear weapon. International law experts condemned both sets of attacks as unlawful under the UN charter. Israel and Iran have since agreed to a ceasefire, although the truce appears fragile with Trump condemning both sides for violating it. Husic - the first Muslim cabinet minister - said the situation was complex, arguing there was 'no black and white … all I see is grey'. He said Iran was no 'cleanskin', highlighting the regime's support for terrorism through proxies, its detention of academic Kylie Moore-Gilbert and refusal to not develop nuclear weapons. But that, he said, did not justify its attack on Iran. 'Did that give Israel the license to act, the Netanyahu government the license to act unilaterally, to begin bombing Iran? I don't think it did,' Husic said. 'If regional neighbours acted in the way that the Netanyahu government did in terms of launching unilateral action, the Israeli government would rightly be outraged.' The comments marks Husic's latest intervention since his dumping to the backbench, after he criticised his own government's response to Israel's blockade of aid into Gaza. While he did not explicitly back the view of international law experts and the grassroots Labor against War group when asked if the US bombings were lawful, Husic was critical of the US' 'unilateral action'. 'We've seen in times past where, if you don't build international support in taking action, particularly in the Middle East, how that ends up. And the US has paid a heavy price for that,' he said. Husic referenced the stance of the late former Labor leader Simon Crean, who opposed sending Australian troops to the Iraq war. Asked if the relationship with the US needed to be reviewed, Husic said Australia's historic connection with its ally doesn't mean 'we have to agree with everything that they do'. 'We should stand on the basis of our national interests,' he said. 'My big concern in terms of what we've been seeing is a fraying of the rules-based order. 'That means something to middle-order powers like ours, because you can't simply have strong nations decide that they'll do what they want without regard to international opinion by virtue of their strength.'