
Iran's desire for nuclear weapons has only been spurred on by US strikes – no matter what Trump says
We have entered a new rogue order. The rules-based order that underpins international relations, helped the birth of modern Israel and held back annihilation during the Cold War, has finally been blown away.
It crumbled with the 2003 US -led illegal invasion of Iraq, which paved the way for Russia's illegal colonial war in Ukraine and now Israel's attacks on Iran, enhanced by American bunker busters and stealth bombers.
Israel 's aim, to end Iran 's nuclear weapons programme, has not been underwritten with any hard evidence that Iran posed an immediate threat.
And leaked US intelligence reports suggest that rather than 'obliterating' Iran's nuclear facility in Fordow, Trump's strikes over the weekend may have only hampered Iran's nuclear ambitions by a few months. The US president decried the leaks as 'fake news', but satellite imagery had already raised doubts about the efficacy of the mission.
Ironically, those states that have always been thought of as 'rogue' – notably Iran, North Korea, sometimes Cuba, one day even Yemen or Eritrea – will now conclude that they need to get hold of a nuke, and fast.
The tearing up of international order began in the early 2000s with the doctrine of pre-emption, in which Israel pioneered so-called 'targeted killing' of alleged terrorists posing an imminent danger. It was co-opted by the West after 9/11 and included extra-judicial killings by the US, the UK, and other allies around the world – often of their own citizens and always without trial. Alleged terrorists were blown up, frequently using drones, and many innocent civilians were killed along with them.
Ami Ayalon, a former Israeli admiral, was responsible for gathering intelligence and often drawing up the lists of people to kill.
In 2012, he revealed how damaging the idea can be in The Gatekeepers, a startling documentary featuring five other former heads of Israel's internal security service.
'There's a concept, 'the banality of evil',' he said. 'When you start doing it en masse, 200, 300 people die because of the idea of 'targeted assassinations'. Suddenly, the processes become a kind of conveyor belt. You ask yourself less and less where to stop.'
But the US and Israel's pre-emptive strikes on Iran over the last 12 days have not prompted Tehran to give up on its intent to rid the Middle East of the Jewish state.
Iran knew the US was likely to strike against its stockpile of uranium that had been enriched using centrifuges to 60 per cent purity.
According to The New York Times, citing Israeli officials, 400kg of this uranium material – which can, in theory, be spun to weapons-grade 90 per cent purity, were moved away from danger before the US airstrikes on the nuclear site of Fordow. The UN 's nuclear watchdog the IAEA thinks this is likely too.
'The Iranians are not dumb. They have had years to plan for this and there's no reason on earth why they would not have moved their uranium. It would have only taken a couple of trucks,' a senior Israeli military officer told The Independent.
Low-tech stealth is often highly effective. Pakistan is said by Western intelligence agencies to hide its nuclear warheads in plain sight by keeping them on the move in lorries floridly disguised as ordinary freight 'jingle trucks'.
Israel is widely assumed to have nuclear weapons that it won't confirm it has. Its allies, like the UK and the US, will never confirm whether they really exist. This has meant that it has remained outside all international non-proliferation talks and treaties.
Iran will now believe it has every incentive to develop a nuclear weapon of its own to protect itself against the kind of conventional attacks that the US and Israel launched to pre-empt its creation of a nuclear weapon – and to topple its government.
The US has targeted the traditional world order in other ways. In February this year, it cut through the fabric of international law by putting sanctions on the International Criminal Court after Israeli leaders were indicted for alleged war crimes in Gaza.
The court 'abused its power by issuing baseless arrest warrants targeting Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former minister of defense Yoav Gallant,' the Trump White House said.
The continued support of the US to Israel during the Israeli bombardment of Gaza, in which Israel has killed at least 50,000 people, according to Palestinian officials, in the face of condemnation by the UN will have further undermined the idea of a rules-based international order.
And the lesson of Ukraine will not be lost on Iran, North Korea, or any other state contemplating nuclear armament.
At the time of the Soviet Union's collapse in 1991, Ukraine inherited a substantial nuclear arsenal, including approximately 1,900 strategic warheads, 176 intercontinental ballistic missiles, and 44 strategic bombers. It had the third biggest nuclear arsenal on Earth.
But it signed up to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty in 1994 and by 1996 Ukraine had returned all nuclear warheads to Russia.
Eighteen years on, Russia invaded Ukraine and went on to launch a massive assault in 2023 aimed at toppling its pro-European government democratically elected the year before.
Now that the West has torn up the doctrines of international law with illegal invasions, there is one sobering conclusion to be drawn: If Iran had nukes and if Ukraine had 'The Bomb', no one would have invaded or attacked them.
Trump may say that Israel and Iran 'don't know what the f*** they're doing' – but both have learnt that in the new rogue order only the dangerous will survive.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
20 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Keir Starmer to speak to nation after warning 'prepare for war in the UK'
The Prime Minister will take part in meetings at the NATO summit in the Hague. Keir Starmer is to give a press conference today - just a day after a UK Government document warned we must "actively prepare" for war. The Prime Minister will take part in meetings at the NATO summit in the Hague. A National Security Strategy dossier said the years ahead will be a test for the UK and that there will be a need for a WW2 -like spirit in the country. The document said the threat of nuclear weapons will be "more complex than it was even in the Cold War". It went on: "The years ahead will test the United Kingdom... The direction it takes – and the decisions we take – will reverberate through the decades. "We will need agility and courage to succeed, but we should be optimistic. "We remain a resolute country, rich in history, values and in our capabilities. But most of all, there is the determination of the British people themselves. "After all, we do not need to look too far into our history for an example of a whole-of-society effort, motivated by a collective will to keep each other safe. "We can mobilise that spirit again and use it both for our national security and the rebuilding of our country." Labour Defence Secretary John Healey said the Prime Minister trusts that Trump's America would come to the aid of NATO allies. He told Times Radio: "Do I trust President Trump and the US's commitment to Article 5? Yes. "So does our Prime Minister, and he does because in the Oval Office on his visit to the White House, President Trump gave him that commitment in public." Starmer has caused for Israel and Iran to maintain the pause in hostilities. In a conversation with the French and German leaders at on Tuesday, he "reflected on the volatile situation in the Middle East," according to a Downing Street spokeswoman. The leaders agreed that "now was the time for diplomacy and for Iran to come to the negotiating table", the spokeswoman added. It comes as intelligence reports in the US suggested that the American attack on Iran's nuclear programme over the weekend have only set it back by a few months, rather than destroyed it as Donald Trump previously suggested.


Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Why the Iran nuclear intelligence report is causing such controversy
Early US intelligence assessments appear to have challenged Donald Trump's claim that his bombing campaign 'totally obliterated' Tehran's nuclear weapons programme. The Pentagon's Defence Intelligence Agency, according to sources, suggests the attack had only set back Iran's ability to produce the bomb by a matter of months. The result was a furious reaction by the president and his top officials, accusing the media of pushing fake news. Yet there remains a string of questions that analysts must still answer before firm conclusions can be reached. For example, one of the sources cited by the Washington Post, who was familiar with the initial DIA report, said its conclusions were 'low confidence' in nature. This is spy speak for conclusions drawn from scant or fragmented evidence, or indicating concerns with sourcing. The dossier reportedly said that centrifuges used to enrich uranium that could be used in weapons remained intact. Other findings included that entrances to two of the facilities were sealed off but that underground structures had not been destroyed, and that enriched uranium had been moved to other locations. Sir Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6, said it was too early to make a concrete assessment of damage to facilities buried so far underground. 'Has someone shot their mouth off and I mean, what would they know?' he said. 'Nothing from overhead is going to tell you what the consequences of the attack are because it's deep underground.' Early assessments of damage include analysis of satellite imagery. Commercially available pictures show six deep holes around Fordow, one of the most fortified sites, buried inside a mountain, with debris spread around the site. One source said the assessment also included signals intelligence, based on communications between Iranian officials. Mr Trump referred to intercepts when he spoke with journalists on Thursday morning. 'Two Iranians went down to see it and they called back and they said, 'This place is gone,'' he said. But it could take weeks or months for Iran to conduct its own full damage assessments and for their information to filter into communications channels. Sir Richard, who led the Secret Intelligence Service from 1999 to 2004, said it was unlikely Iran had managed to get people inside the facilities to assess damage 'because of the problems of radiation and leaks'. He said the fact that it had come out in the public domain so rapidly raised another red flag. 'It does sort of politicise the whole thing as well,' he said. 'I mean, it does remind me of some of the stuff around Iraq going way back, and some of those reports that came out, and the arguments about them and the difficulty of sourcing, I just don't think people really know.' Classified briefings for both chambers of Congress had been expected on Tuesday but were cancelled. A Senate briefing is now expected on Thursday, when top members of Mr Trump's national security team will have returned from the Nato summit in the Hague, and one for the House will follow the next day. Chris Coons, a Democratic senator, said the intelligence community needed time to make a detailed assessment. 'This is the key to the question, what's next? If, in fact, there had been a successful destruction of all of Iran's dangerous nuclear enrichment program, I've said that would have been a significant accomplishment,' he told reporters in the Netherlands for the Nato summit. 'But if this pushes Iran and some of its partners to accelerate their enrichment program, it may have created a more dangerous situation in the region. 'The intelligence community needs the time without political interference to assess the impact and to deliver that assessment to Congress and the president.' Officials continued to point out the limited nature of the findings so far. 'This is a preliminary, low-confidence report and will continue to be refined as additional intelligence becomes available. We are working with the appropriate authorities to investigate the unauthorised disclosure of classified information,' said a senior DIA official. The initial Israeli intelligence assessment of the attacks is more optimistic, stating the attacks caused 'very significant' damage. However, Mossad has not yet reached a full conclusion. 'A professional battle damage assessment takes time,' an Israeli official told Axios. 'Israeli intelligence services haven't arrived at any bottom lines for now,' the official added. 'But we don't think there was any bug in the operation, and we have no indications the bunker-buster bombs didn't work. Nobody here is disappointed.'


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump is driving the Nato agenda - but he may still leave the alliance hanging when it needs the US the most
Many expected this Nato summit to be the most significant since the Cold War ended. And as we enter the final day of the conference, it was clear they were right. With escalating pressure in the Middle East, the looming backdrop of war in Ukraine and an increasingly volatile US president, tensions on the global stage are the highest they have been in recent history. Britain's decision to purchase 12 new F-35A jets - to be formally announced by the prime minister at a press conference today - is a big one. Ministers dubbed it the 'biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation', primarily because it restores a nuclear role for the RAF for the first time since the Cold War. The aircraft, which the MoD estimates will cost £70-80m per jet, are expected to carry US B61 bombs - the primary thermonuclear gravity bomb in the United States Enduring Stockpile. It is a massive show of force in the face of growing questions over Britain's defensive capabilities. But, notably for Britain to use these tactical weapons, the approval of the US would need to be sought. It's a clear win for Trump: not only is Britain massively ramping up its nuclear capabilities, it is also doing so in a way that gives the White House more influence over it. It comes amid a backdrop of a much wider mission to win over the US president, with Nato countries increasingly bending over backwards to secure the approval of the unpredictable White House. Nato's collective agreement to ramp up defence spending to 5 per cent – doubling its previous target of 2.5 per cent - is yet another example of this. It is a huge jump for a group of nations which are, collectively, fairly strapped for cash (and many of them, such as Spain and Portugal, already fall short of the current target). Meanwhile, world leaders are also throwing all their soft power at winning the approval of the US president. Just yesterday, Trump shared a series of obsequious texts from Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte. 'Mr. President, dear Donald, Congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran, that was truly extraordinary, and something no one else dared to do. It makes us all safer,' Rutte wrote. 'You are flying into another big success in The Hague this evening. It was not easy but we've got them all signed onto 5 per cent! 'Donald, you have driven us to a really, really important moment for America and Europe, and the world. You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done,' he added. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win.' Rutte's tactics, while perhaps slightly more embarrassing now they've been revealed to the world, are not dissimilar to Sir Keir Starmer presenting the US president with a handwritten letter from the King offering him an unprecedented second state visit. The incentive to win over the US comes from a clear understanding that Nato cannot properly function without US military muscle, which, alongside Germany, is the biggest contributor to alliance funds. It comes after Trump's repeated threats to pull out of the alliance if it does not properly pull its weight on defence spending. Now that Nato countries are putting real muscle behind their promises to Trump, the question over whether this will result in true commitment from the US president continues to hang over the summit. Just yesterday, the day after Britain committed to reaching the 5 per cent target and Starmer reaffirmed his belief that Trump is a reliable ally, the US president declined to commit to Article 5 - the principle of collective defence and a key pillar of the alliance. While he appeared to recommit to the concept the following day, saying 'we are with them all the way', his ability to shift from one position to another at a time of such global tension raises serious doubts over whether or not Nato's huge increase in its defensive capability will have any real impact when it comes to securing a solid commitment from the US. MoD sources insisted that Britain wants to put itself in a strong position on the world stage because of the broader global situation. The UK wants to be well prepared, they said, so that even if Trump left office tomorrow, the country would still be in a strong position. But, even so, there's no denying that this arms race is being pushed faster and faster by Trump. Rutte was clear: the US president has pushed the West to a very significant moment. Clearly, Trump is driving the agenda at Nato. But as his volatility continues, there is an ever-present risk that the US president leaves the alliance hanging at a time when it needs the US the most.