Trump is driving the Nato agenda - but he may still leave the alliance hanging when it needs the US the most
Many expected this Nato summit to be the most significant since the Cold War ended.
And as we enter the final day of the conference, it was clear they were right.
With escalating pressure in the Middle East, the looming backdrop of war in Ukraine and an increasingly volatile US president, tensions on the global stage are the highest they have been in recent history.
Britain's decision to purchase 12 new F-35A jets - to be formally announced by the prime minister at a press conference today - is a big one. Ministers dubbed it the 'biggest strengthening of the UK's nuclear posture in a generation', primarily because it restores a nuclear role for the RAF for the first time since the Cold War.
The aircraft, which the MoD estimates will cost £70-80m per jet, are expected to carry US B61 bombs - the primary thermonuclear gravity bomb in the United States Enduring Stockpile. It is a massive show of force in the face of growing questions over Britain's defensive capabilities. But, notably for Britain to use these tactical weapons, the approval of the US would need to be sought.
It's a clear win for Trump: not only is Britain massively ramping up its nuclear capabilities, it is also doing so in a way that gives the White House more influence over it.
It comes amid a backdrop of a much wider mission to win over the US president, with Nato countries increasingly bending over backwards to secure the approval of the unpredictable White House.
Nato's collective agreement to ramp up defence spending to 5 per cent – doubling its previous target of 2.5 per cent - is yet another example of this. It is a huge jump for a group of nations which are, collectively, fairly strapped for cash (and many of them, such as Spain and Portugal, already fall short of the current target).
Meanwhile, world leaders are also throwing all their soft power at winning the approval of the US president. Just yesterday, Trump shared a series of obsequious texts from Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte.
'Mr. President, dear Donald, Congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran, that was truly extraordinary, and something no one else dared to do. It makes us all safer,' Rutte wrote. 'You are flying into another big success in The Hague this evening. It was not easy but we've got them all signed onto 5 per cent!
'Donald, you have driven us to a really, really important moment for America and Europe, and the world. You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done,' he added. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win.'
Rutte's tactics, while perhaps slightly more embarrassing now they've been revealed to the world, are not dissimilar to Sir Keir Starmer presenting the US president with a handwritten letter from the King offering him an unprecedented second state visit.
The incentive to win over the US comes from a clear understanding that Nato cannot properly function without US military muscle, which, alongside Germany, is the biggest contributor to alliance funds.
It comes after Trump's repeated threats to pull out of the alliance if it does not properly pull its weight on defence spending.
Now that Nato countries are putting real muscle behind their promises to Trump, the question over whether this will result in true commitment from the US president continues to hang over the summit.
Just yesterday, the day after Britain committed to reaching the 5 per cent target and Starmer reaffirmed his belief that Trump is a reliable ally, the US president declined to commit to Article 5 - the principle of collective defence and a key pillar of the alliance.
While he appeared to recommit to the concept the following day, saying 'we are with them all the way', his ability to shift from one position to another at a time of such global tension raises serious doubts over whether or not Nato's huge increase in its defensive capability will have any real impact when it comes to securing a solid commitment from the US.
MoD sources insisted that Britain wants to put itself in a strong position on the world stage because of the broader global situation. The UK wants to be well prepared, they said, so that even if Trump left office tomorrow, the country would still be in a strong position.
But, even so, there's no denying that this arms race is being pushed faster and faster by Trump. Rutte was clear: the US president has pushed the West to a very significant moment.
Clearly, Trump is driving the agenda at Nato. But as his volatility continues, there is an ever-present risk that the US president leaves the alliance hanging at a time when it needs the US the most.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
21 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Pro-independence social media accounts go silent after Iran hit by airstrikes
Many accounts which used pro-independence slogans and anti-UK messaging on X went silent after June 12. Dozens of social media accounts supporting Scottish independence have gone dark since Iran was hit by air strikes, according to reports. Many accounts which used pro-independence slogans and anti-UK messaging on X, formerly Twitter, went silent after June 12, according to the UK Defence Journal. This was when a major Israeli airstrike campaign against Iranian military and cyber infrastructure took place. Iran then had severe fuel shortages and a media blackout. Labour MP for East Renfrewshire Blair McDougall told the Record: 'This is a reminder that our enemies see the chaos of nationalism as a way to weaken us. 'At a time when the SNP refuse to update their defence policy to confront the realities of threats from Vladimir Putin and other dictators, this should give pause to anyone tempted to give the SNP another five years.' Between 2022 and 2024 researchers from the American Clemson University had identified more than 80 accounts posing as users from the UK. They identified themselves with descriptions like 'NHS nurse' or ' Glaswegian socialist'. They concluded that these accounts were probably ran by or on behalf of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Since late 2021 they had produced roughly 250,000 tweets. The messages mixed pro- independence and progressive messages with criticism of the UK Government and the monarchy. One message - viewed a million times - read: 'The people robbing this country travel by private jet not by dinghy.' According to Clemson, the accounts were responsible for at least four per cent of all Scottish independence -related posts on X in early last year. This was about four times more than the official SNP account in the same period. One of the lead researchers on the project Darren Linvill said the aim was to create the impression that support for independence was bigger than it was. He said: 'Anyone in sales will tell you the bandwagon fallacy is a powerful tool.' The accounts received hundreds of thousands of retweets, likes, and comments. But after the Israeli attacks - which reportedly hit infrastructure linked to the IRGC - the accounts which had previously posted regularly suddenly stopped doing so. Within two days of the strikes Iran only had five per cent internet access.
Economist
25 minutes ago
- Economist
The alluring fantasy of a quick win in Iran
AFTER THE elation, the doubt. President Donald Trump said that 'Operation Midnight Hammer', had 'totally obliterated' Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities. But now an early intelligence assessment leaked on June 24th suggests the nuclear programme has only been set back by months and that some enriched uranium may have been spirited away. The report is an early 'low-confidence' assessment that both the Trump administration and Israeli sources eschew. But it illuminates a bigger problem. Mr Trump wants a quick-fix to the Iran nightmare with a single, clarifying mega-strike, a ceasefire and then prosperity. Instead America faces years of uncertainty over Iran's capabilities and intentions. As a result Mr Trump's assumption—that he can have a one-day Middle East military triumph and then quickly secure a lasting deal—may be badly misplaced.
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
M&S checkout operator hit by claims of fraud
A payments provider used by Marks & Spencer has become embroiled in a fraud scandal after it was accused of covering up fake transactions by some customers. Worldline, one of the world's largest payments groups, had its shares temporarily suspended on Wednesday after investors took fright at allegations it had processed some payments on behalf of scammers and had poor money-laundering controls. Shares in the French group plunged by nearly 40pc – knocking €300m (£256m) off its share price – because of the allegations, which claimed the business turned a blind-eye to a network of dubious customers. Worldline is one of the world's largest payments processors and moves payments around the financial system for UK high street giants including M&S, JD Sports and Aldi among others. There is no allegation that any of these Worldline customers knew or were involved in the claims or are accused of any wrongdoing. Risky strategy The Worldline claims were made by a consortium of 21 European newspapers, which alleged in its investigations that millions of euros worth of the French firm's revenues could be linked to 'high risk' customers. According to the allegations, the company is accused of ignoring red flags to take on clients from the 'internet's shady corners' as it took a risky strategy in its push to grow its revenues. In response, Worldline said it has strengthened its controls over the past two years, including terminating €130m worth of contracts with customers in breach of its compliance rules. 'Wherever the group identifies indications of non-compliant situations, additional checks are immediately undertaken, potentially leading to termination of the client relationship,' Worldline said. 'Worldline's Executive Management and Board of Directors are fully committed to strict compliance with regulation and risk prevention standards and to strictly enforce related rules and procedures with zero tolerance.' Worldline was accused of turning a 'blind eye' to some customers' dubious business practices, as it scrambled to boost its revenues by taking advantage of the higher rates paid by the shady clients, the investigation says. According to the claims, internal documents show Worldline processes hundreds of millions of euros worth of payments on behalf of such high-risk clients, including €50m in 2019 alone. Worldline had just two employees responsible for overseeing its money laundering processes, despite having hundreds of high-risk customers, the investigation added.
