
The traditional 9-to-5 is being replaced by the ‘infinite workday'
Microsoft's latest Work Trend Index has found that the traditional nine-to-five workday is becoming obsolete, and is being replaced by the 'infinite workday' instead.
The Work Trend Index found that the average American employee receives 50 work-related messages outside of standard business hours, 40 percent who are online at 6am are reviewing emails, nearly 30 percent check emails after 10pm, and one in five review work correspondence on weekends.
Want to take your career in a new direction? Discover 5 jobs hiring across the U.S.
Research Intern, J.L. Partners, New York
Policy Analyst, First Nations Education Steering Committee, Greater Vancouver
Engineer Policy Advisor (GOVEX), New Mexico Public Regulation Commission, Santa Fe
Police Crime Analyst, City of Danville, VA, Danville
Government Partnerships Broker, CivicReach, Raleigh
This shift represents a fundamental transformation in how Americans work, with potential ramifications for everything from overtime regulations to employee wellbeing initiatives.
The pandemic's lasting impact
While the pandemic didn't directly create an out-of-hours work culture, it made it more normal, particularly in jobs that would have never been done remotely before.
The shift to a more flexible attitude to working hours was necessary as adults juggled childcare or caregiving responsibilities during the traditional workday.
However, this trade-off has now become embedded in workplace culture, several years after restrictions have become a distant memory, and mandatory RTO policies are paradoxically exacerbating the problem rather than solving it.
This is because workers now feel pressure to demonstrate their productivity and commitment by working additional hours, particularly those who are desperately trying to cling onto whatever remote working privileges they have left.
After all, how can any boss argue with an employee looking for workplace flexibility when they are visibly online well into the night?
Another pandemic hangup that is affecting how we work is the amount of meetings we've become accustomed to.
While camera-on video calls became a necessary evil during the pandemic, the default option to 'jump on a call' when an email chain would suffice means workers are spending much of their in-office hours on calls or in meetings that leave little time for focused work.
In fact, 57 percent of meetings are arranged on the fly without a calendar invitation.
Most meetings take place between 9am and 11am and 1pm and 3pm, and Tuesdays are the day when most meetings take place (23 percent).
However, being trigger-happy when it comes to sending emails en masse isn't the solution either.
Microsoft's research uncovered that the average worker receives 117 emails daily and mass email threads with 20-plus participants are up 7 percent in the past year. One-on-one emails are on the decline (down 5 percent in the last year).
This means evenings and weekend hours are increasingly becoming the only times real tasks can be accomplished.
Microsoft's research found that 29 percent of workers are diving back into their inbox at 10pm and 50-plus messages are sent and received outside of core working hours.
Additionally, 20 percent of workers are actively working over the weekends and check their emails before noon on Saturdays and Sundays. Around 5 percent will also check their email after 6pm on a Sunday in anticipation of the working week.
Hanging in the balance
This transformation raises important questions about existing labor protections and overtime regulations.
And while some off-hours work represents legitimate flexibility which allows employees to attend to personal responsibilities during traditional business hours, Microsoft's research also suggests that many workers are experiencing genuine work expansion rather than redistribution.
One solution could lie in HR departments implementing screen time monitoring to get a better overview of working patterns, but this kind of intervention could also create a toxic work culture where anyone not working overtime could be viewed less favourably by management and lead to even more burnout.
As such, when off-hours work becomes the norm, it creates what the report refers to as an 'infinite workday' where employees never truly disconnect.
The death of the nine-to-five workday may be inevitable, but how America manages this transition will determine whether it leads to greater work-life integration or simply longer working hours disguised as flexibility in the long run.
Looking for a new role? Browse thousands of jobs on The Hill Job Board
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geek Wire
44 minutes ago
- Geek Wire
Week in Review: Most popular stories on GeekWire for the week of Aug. 10, 2025
Get caught up on the latest technology and startup news from the past week. Here are the most popular stories on GeekWire for the week of Aug. 10, 2025. Sign up to receive these updates every Sunday in your inbox by subscribing to our GeekWire Weekly email newsletter. Most popular stories on GeekWire Reports of stricter Microsoft return-to-office policy add to post-layoff uncertainty Is Microsoft about to shake up its workforce again? A new report this week by The Verge is adding to the speculation that the company is preparing to tighten its return-to-office policy, potentially requiring most employees at its Redmond headquarters to be on-site at least three days a week starting in January. In response to an inquiry from GeekWire, a Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that the company is reviewing its flexible work guidelines, as it has in the past, but said no final decisions have been made. … Read More Photos: Inside the Allen Institute for AI's new HQ in Seattle's first mass-timber office building It was a big news week for Seattle's Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (Ai2), including the announcement of a new AI robotics initiative and a landmark grant from Nvidia and the National Science Foundation to lead the creation of the future AI backbone for U.S. … Read More
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Littelfuse (NASDAQ:LFUS) Will Pay A Larger Dividend Than Last Year At $0.75
Littelfuse, Inc. (NASDAQ:LFUS) will increase its dividend from last year's comparable payment on the 4th of September to $0.75. The payment will take the dividend yield to 1.2%, which is in line with the average for the industry. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Littelfuse's Future Dividend Projections Appear Well Covered By Earnings Unless the payments are sustainable, the dividend yield doesn't mean too much. The last dividend was quite easily covered by Littelfuse's earnings. This indicates that quite a large proportion of earnings is being invested back into the business. According to analysts, EPS should be several times higher next year. Assuming the dividend continues along recent trends, we think the payout ratio will be 19%, which makes us pretty comfortable with the sustainability of the dividend. See our latest analysis for Littelfuse Littelfuse Has A Solid Track Record The company has a sustained record of paying dividends with very little fluctuation. Since 2015, the annual payment back then was $1.00, compared to the most recent full-year payment of $3.00. This means that it has been growing its distributions at 12% per annum over that time. So, dividends have been growing pretty quickly, and even more impressively, they haven't experienced any notable falls during this period. The Dividend Has Growth Potential Investors could be attracted to the stock based on the quality of its payment history. It's encouraging to see that Littelfuse has been growing its earnings per share at 7.4% a year over the past five years. Since earnings per share is growing at an acceptable rate, and the payout policy is balanced, we think the company is positioning itself well to grow earnings and dividends in the future. Littelfuse Looks Like A Great Dividend Stock In summary, it is always positive to see the dividend being increased, and we are particularly pleased with its overall sustainability. Distributions are quite easily covered by earnings, which are also being converted to cash flows. Taking this all into consideration, this looks like it could be a good dividend opportunity. Companies possessing a stable dividend policy will likely enjoy greater investor interest than those suffering from a more inconsistent approach. Still, investors need to consider a host of other factors, apart from dividend payments, when analysing a company. As an example, we've identified 2 warning signs for Littelfuse that you should be aware of before investing. Is Littelfuse not quite the opportunity you were looking for? Why not check out our selection of top dividend stocks. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Possible Bearish Signals With Nasdaq Insiders Disposing Stock
Over the past year, many Nasdaq, Inc. (NASDAQ:NDAQ) insiders sold a significant stake in the company which may have piqued investors' interest. Knowing whether insiders are buying is usually more helpful when evaluating insider transactions, as insider selling can have various explanations. However, when multiple insiders sell stock over a specific duration, shareholders should take notice as that could possibly be a red flag. Although we don't think shareholders should simply follow insider transactions, we do think it is perfectly logical to keep tabs on what insiders are doing. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Nasdaq Insider Transactions Over The Last Year The Executive VP, Bradley Peterson, made the biggest insider sale in the last 12 months. That single transaction was for US$1.0m worth of shares at a price of US$75.38 each. So it's clear an insider wanted to take some cash off the table, even below the current price of US$94.68. As a general rule we consider it to be discouraging when insiders are selling below the current price, because it suggests they were happy with a lower valuation. Please do note, however, that sellers may have a variety of reasons for selling, so we don't know for sure what they think of the stock price. We note that the biggest single sale was only 8.7% of Bradley Peterson's holding. Over the last year we saw more insider selling of Nasdaq shares, than buying. You can see the insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year depicted in the chart below. If you click on the chart, you can see all the individual transactions, including the share price, individual, and the date! Check out our latest analysis for Nasdaq If you like to buy stocks that insiders are buying, rather than selling, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: Most of them are flying under the radar). Insiders At Nasdaq Have Sold Stock Recently Over the last three months, we've seen significant insider selling at Nasdaq. Specifically, insiders ditched US$2.1m worth of shares in that time, and we didn't record any purchases whatsoever. Overall this makes us a bit cautious, but it's not the be all and end all. Insider Ownership Another way to test the alignment between the leaders of a company and other shareholders is to look at how many shares they own. We usually like to see fairly high levels of insider ownership. It's great to see that Nasdaq insiders own 0.6% of the company, worth about US$342m. I like to see this level of insider ownership, because it increases the chances that management are thinking about the best interests of shareholders. So What Do The Nasdaq Insider Transactions Indicate? Insiders sold stock recently, but they haven't been buying. Despite some insider buying, the longer term picture doesn't make us feel much more positive. On the plus side, Nasdaq makes money, and is growing profits. It is good to see high insider ownership, but the insider selling leaves us cautious. While it's good to be aware of what's going on with the insider's ownership and transactions, we make sure to also consider what risks are facing a stock before making any investment decision. While conducting our analysis, we found that Nasdaq has 2 warning signs and it would be unwise to ignore them. Of course Nasdaq may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of high quality companies. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.