logo
5 takeaways from US-China trade truce

5 takeaways from US-China trade truce

Yahoo13-05-2025

U.S. and Chinese trade negotiators agreed over the weekend to lower mutually imposed triple-digit tariffs in a significant de-escalation of the ongoing trade war between Washington, D.C., and Beijing.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday after talks in Switzerland that 'substantial progress' had been made between the two countries.
China and the U.S. agreed to suspend their reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to continue negotiations.
The U.S. dropped its baseline tariff rate on Chinese goods from 145 percent to 30 percent, which includes a 20 percent import tax Trump imposed during his first term and another 10 percent import tax levied in February as a response to fentanyl imports.
China agreed to lower its tariff to 10 percent from 125 percent.
Analysts say the U.S. baseline 30-percent tariff likely stacks on top of pre-existing Section 301 tariffs for an effective rate of up to 55 percent for some sector-specific goods.
The U.S. and China released a positively-toned joint statement after weekend talks about the importance of 'a sustainable, long-term, and mutually beneficial economic and trade relationship.'
Analysts are viewing the de-escalation as a halftime break in initial negotiations. Here are five takeaways on the preliminary arrangement and what it means politically and economically.
The preliminary agreement is another major course correction on trade from the Trump administration.
While the stock market leaped up on news of progress in the talks, yields in the bond market also jumped, suggesting further financial uncertainty resulting from another substantial policy change from the Trump administration.
The triple-digit reduction in the overall tariff rate on China follows a series of similar about-faces. Moves on tariffs have played double duty as both economic policy and bartering chips in bilateral trade talks.
'What this agreement doesn't mean is that tensions between the US and China won't continue to flare or that Trump is done causing economic uncertainty with the use of his favorite go-to tool, tariffs,' consultants for Beacon Policy Advisers wrote in a Monday analysis.
Other recent U-turns on trade have included the cancellation, reinstatement, and subsequent reinstallation of the de minimis tariff exemption on China for commercial shipments worth $800 or less; broad-based 25-percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico, most of which then reverted to terms of the pre-existing U.S.-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement (USMCA); and a 90-day pause in Trump's country-specific 'reciprocal' tariffs, which involved a novel calculation based on trade deficits with the U.S.
Bessent acknowledged the limited the scope of the early truce, but insisted it was an important step to a broader deal.
'We got a lot done over two days, so I would imagine in the next few weeks we will be meeting again to get rolling on a more fulsome agreement,' Bessent said on CNBC's 'Squawk Box.'
'We had a plan, we had a process, and now what we have with the Chinese is a mechanism to avoid an upward tariff pressure, like we did last time,' Bessent said.
The deal struck by Bessent, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng is limited to the reciprocal tariffs that China and the U.S. imposed on each other and comes without any industry-specific policy changes.
Neither China nor the U.S. made any concessions to get the other sides' tariffs dropped. Those particulars would constitute the meat of any forthcoming trade deal after the initial posturing.
Trade experts on Monday emphasized the relatively modest scale of what has been agreed to so far.
'The new tariffs on China are 30 percent on about 1.2 [percentage points] of U.S. trade [and] 20 percent (the fentanyl IEEPA case) on 0.3 [points] of U.S. trade, so a 'just pay it' cost of just over 0.4 [percentage points] of U.S. GDP,' Council on Foreign Relations senior fellow Brad Setser wrote in a commentary.
Setser noted the economic pressure the reduced tariffs will still have on the semiconductor sector.
The deal follows another preliminary trade agreement announced last week between the U.S. and the United Kingdom that many saw as especially beneficial to U.K. automakers.
'The agreement announced today to reduce tariffs on UK car exports into the US is great news for the industry and consumers,' Mike Hawes, chief executive of British industry group SMMT, said in a statement last week.
Top Democratic lawmakers, who are no fans of Trump's sweeping tariff agenda, nonetheless accused the president of backing down without a win.
'Sadly, it looks like China once again got the better of Trump. Another example of Trump chaos. He has one policy one day, one the next. Who knows what it'll be tomorrow,' Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) posted on the social media platform X.
With the massive reciprocal tariffs scaled back to just 10 percent, attention is focusing on the tariff related to the synthetic opioid supply chain announced on March 3.
The Trump administration levied that tariff because it said that China 'has not taken adequate steps to alleviate the illicit drug crisis.'
'The 30 percent tariff on China's exports is still much higher than tariffs on other countries and is still higher than at the turn of this year,' Principal Asset Management chief strategist Seema Shah wrote in an analysis. 'Trade with China is still more expensive than it was six weeks ago, suggesting a sustained negative impact on consumer spending power [and] company profit margins.'
Wang Xiaohong, the Chinese security tsar in charge of fentanyl, was reportedly at the trade talks over the weekend in Switzerland, suggesting inroads into that issue are already being made.
Activity at U.S. ports has dwindled as a result of the tariffs, with shipments being canceled and workers being furloughed.
Port of Los Angeles director Gene Seroka told a radio station last week that they were bracing for a 35-percent drop in volume.
'It's the first arrival of container ships where the tariff was applied just last month,' he said.
Business lobbies say that the tariff reduction amounts to the reversal of 'embargo-level' tariffs.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said it welcomed news that 'both China and the U.S. will pull back from embargo-level tariffs.'
'Even with this China agreement, tariffs are much higher overall than they were at the beginning of the year, and many businesses … are dealing with growing costs and disruptions,' the group said in a Monday statement.
Stocks surged Monday morning on news of the deal, with the S&P 500 index of reaching its March 25 level — the day before stocks started cratering after the announcement of Trump's auto tariffs, and then snowballed on April 2 after the announcement of dozens of country-specific import taxes.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed with a gain of 1,160 points Monday, rising 2.8 percent on the day The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite closed up more than 4.4 percent.
West Texas Intermediate crude oil prices were more than a $1.20 per barrel, or 1.97 percent, as of 1:35PM U.S. eastern time. The DXY dollar index popped more than 1.5 percent in midday trading, and the VIX volatility index below 20 for the first time since late March.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive: Trump's tariff deal ‘quietly' added 10% raise which nobody is complaining about anymore, says his former commerce secretary
Exclusive: Trump's tariff deal ‘quietly' added 10% raise which nobody is complaining about anymore, says his former commerce secretary

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Exclusive: Trump's tariff deal ‘quietly' added 10% raise which nobody is complaining about anymore, says his former commerce secretary

Wilbur Ross, former Commerce Secretary and a key architect of Trump's first-term trade policy, describes Trump's current tariff strategy as a deliberate evolution: moving faster, hitting harder, and using broader executive powers to impose tariffs for both economic and diplomatic leverage. The Trump administration's use of tariffs has sparked debate over the ultimate goals of its economic strategy. However, a former Cabinet member and key trade advisor to the President has suggested there is an underlying logic to the approach. Since winning the Oval Office, President Trump has announced an evolving range of policies. with economic sanctions spinning higher on some trade partners while others have been granted pauses. Many of the announcements have not come through official White House channels; for example, Trump threatened a 50% tariff on the EU in April in a bid to get European negotiators to the table—by posting on his social media site, Truth Social. Indeed, Trump has come under scrutiny from Beijing, arguably the most critical region for the U.S. to make a deal, who claim America's tariff tactics have been 'coercion and blackmail' when instead it should 'convey information to the Chinese side…through relevant parties.' But Wilbur Ross, Trump's Commerce Secretary in his first administration, says there's a clear tactic at play beneath Trump's bluster. The 87-year-old banker turned D.C. power player said there is an 'art' to Trump's dealmaking, as White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has suggested; Ross told Fortune in an exclusive interview: 'Well, everybody's reaction to [tariffs] was first shock and amazement, but the actual retaliatory measures that they put in were fairly modest—even China didn't match in dollar for dollar. 'There's a real reason for that, I think the other countries, as they've thought about it, have recognized that while they have to talk very bravely for their domestic political constituencies… They also recognize that at the end of the day, they can't afford a tit-for-tat escalating trade war with us.' And this was a fact Trump was relying on, continued Ross: 'One of the earliest things he put in was that 10% tariff on everything from everywhere. 'Nobody is even complaining about that anymore. When you think about it, in the normal course, getting quietly to do a 10% tariff on everything from everywhere was a huge achievement, even if he didn't get anything else. But because he followed it with these much more extreme things, it makes the 10% look like it's not such a big bother. 'But it's a huge number, and he's been collecting it every day.' Indeed, imported goods alone into the U.S. in 2024 stood at $3.36 trillion—even before tax, duties, and levies were collected (worth $82 billion) and before imported services are added to those figures. Even 10% of near-$3.4 trillion is an eye-watering sum to add to federal budgets, though some items like autos and steel are even higher. Indeed nations like China, Canada, and Mexico are all already subject to more than the baseline 10% universal tariff. When Ross spoke to Fortune in a previous exclusive interview earlier this year, he said President Trump would be all the more confident in his second term because he now better understands the inner workings of Washington, D.C., and has a stronger mandate courtesy of a solid election sweep. And President Trump's tactics, which have included everything from threatening a 25% hike on Apple's iPhones specifically to raising sanctions to more than 150% on China at some points, reflect the path Ross expected. After all, as Secretary, Ross was one of the key allies in Trump's team when renegotiating America's position on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). At the time, Trump was a fierce critic of the deal with Mexico and Canada and wanted to withdraw from the agreement and begin negotiating from there. Ross felt the better tactic was to threaten such action and keep an exit as a last resort, an opinion that Trump eventually came around to agreeing with. Likewise, having been appointed in 2017 Ross oversaw the tariff action in the first Trump administration which included sanctions on Chinese goods as well as aluminum and steel more widely. 'He has started out on a much more adventurous path than last time,' Ross told Fortune this week. 'Broader in scope and more extreme in terms of the numbers themselves.' Trump has three objectives, he adds: shrinking trade deficits, producing revenue to offset his 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' and achieving other diplomatic purposes such as the flow of fentanyl into the U.S. and global defense spending. 'He has a much more fulsome, much more complicated agenda than before,' Ross explains. 'It's also different in…that last time I was very careful to set the groundwork to do public hearings, stakeholder meetings, to do written reports, to set a whole record so that under the Administrative Procedures Act we would be relatively safe from people trying to knock it out in court. 'This time, they did a very different thing. They went in mostly just by his say so using the IFA, the Emergency Powers Act, and they ran into a snag at the Court for International Trade.' This snag may alter the course of tariff reaction on the account of businesses, he added, because their investment timelines may shift based on when the tariffs are legally approved. But Ross added: 'Most people are operating under the assumption that sooner or later, he'll get something like what he was looking for…and therefore, while it's slowed down a bit, [I] don't think it will derail [trade talks] because [foreign governments] also know there are other ways he could punish them rather than just the tariffs. 'So it's a bump in the road, but I don't think it's a huge pothole that would wreck the car.' This story was originally featured on

Oil prices jump after Israel's attack on Iran and it could lead to higher gas costs
Oil prices jump after Israel's attack on Iran and it could lead to higher gas costs

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oil prices jump after Israel's attack on Iran and it could lead to higher gas costs

Oil prices have jumped following Israel's attack on Iran as experts warn the conflict could lead to higher gas costs. The price of a barrel of benchmark U.S. crude jumped 6.8 percent to $72.65 Friday. Brent crude, the international standard, rose 7.1 percent to $74.30 a barrel. 'Gas prices will likely start to rise across much of the country later this evening in response to Israel's attacks on Iran, which have caused oil prices to surge. For now, I expect the rise to be noticable, but limited. Approx 10-25c/gal thus far, but this could change,' industry expert Patrick De Haan wrote on X. Iran is one of the world's major producers of oil and if a wider war escalates, it could slow the flow of Iranian oil to U.S. customers and elsewhere. 'Iran knows full well that Trump is focused on lower energy prices and actions by Iran that impact Middle East supply and consequently raise oil prices damage Trump politically,' Andy Lipow, president of Lipow Oil Associates consulting firm, told CNN. Past attacks involving Iran and Israel have seen prices for oil spike initially, only to fall later 'once it became clear that the situation was not escalating and there was no impact on oil supply,' said Richard Joswick, head of near-term oil at S&P Global Commodity Insights. The Secretary of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries warned industry executives not to 'raise false alarms.' 'There are currently no developments in supply or market dynamics that warrant unnecessary measures,' the organization said on X. Israel said 200 fighter jets took part in strikes on more than 100 targets in Iran overnight in an escalation that threatens to spark a wider conflict in the Middle East. Israel said Iran has launched more than 100 drones towards Israel in response - but Tehran has denied these reports, according to Iranian media. Trump firmly put the U.S. in Israel's corner after the attacks. The president said he'd given Tehran 'chance after chance to make a deal' that would have headed off the strikes by putting restrictions on the country's nuclear weapons program and complained that Iranian negotiators had never been able to come to an agreement. 'I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done,' he wrote on Truth Social. Trump also said he'd warned Iran that Israel 'has a lot' of American-made military hardware — 'the best and most lethal' — and is quite proficient in using it. 'Certain Iranian hardliner's spoke bravely, but they didn't know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse!' he added. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE,' the president wrote. The Associated Press contributed reporting Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

If Not Washington, Who Will Fund Harvard?
If Not Washington, Who Will Fund Harvard?

Wall Street Journal

time21 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

If Not Washington, Who Will Fund Harvard?

Jason Riley describes how Harvard has become a punching bag for political grandstanding ('Does the President Want to Fix Harvard or Destroy It?,'Upward Mobility, May 28). Yet the Trump administration swings at its peril. Harvard isn't a delicate orchid that will fold under political heat. It's a $53 billion juggernaut with labs, patents and partnerships that span the globe. If Washington starts revoking grants, threatening tax status or chilling academic freedom to score points with the base, Harvard isn't going to sit tight until President Trump is over. It's going to pivot—aggressively. Someone else, be it Berlin, Seoul or Abu Dhabi, will fund it. The idea that the greatest minds in medicine, energy and artificial intelligence will suddenly transfer their breakthroughs to a U.S. government-licensed trade school is laughable. In a century where data, biotech and artificial intelligence are the new oil, dismantling our own research powerhouse is like banning railroads in 1900 because the engineers read Karl Marx.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store