Family pleads for the release of a Nepali student abducted by Hamas
Bipin Joshi, now 25, was among 17 Nepali students studying agriculture in southern Israel during the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack that ignited the war in Gaza.
Joshi had worked hard in a government competition to earn a spot to study in Israel, his 17-year-old sister Pushpa Joshi said Thursday in Kathmandu. He arrived in southern Israel just three weeks before the attack. It was his first time out of Nepal.
'Bipin Joshi is an innocent agriculture student,' Pushpa Joshi said. 'He is a student who has a long life ahead of him, who is just 25 years now.'
Militants killed 10 of the Nepali students in the attack and injured six. Joshi saved multiple lives by tossing a live grenade out of the bomb shelter where they were hiding, his sister said, before he was abducted and taken to Gaza.
His family hasn't had a sign of life from him since Israel obtained security footage from a hospital in Gaza showing Joshi, so they know Joshi was taken alive to Gaza, but have no information about him since then.
Pushpa, who was 15 when her brother was kidnapped, lives with their parents in a town in western Nepal. She travels eight hours each direction on buses to Kathmandu regularly to lobby officials to secure her brother's release. She has met the country's prime minister and president several times.
Nepal's government says it has repeatedly sought help from Qatari and Egyptian officials to get Joshi freed.
'He is alive and we believe from the bottom of our hearts that he for sure is going to come back all safe and sound,' Pushpa said. 'We have big hopes that he will be back.'
Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 hostages in the Oct. 7 attack. They are still holding 53 hostages, around 20 them believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israeli forces have rescued eight living hostages from Gaza and recovered dozens of bodies, including five over the past week.
In the ensuing conflict, more than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to the Health Ministry in Hamas-run Gaza.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed 'doubts' about whether several hostages are still alive. None of the previously released hostages have seen Bipin Joshi recently during their captivity.
His parents are constantly monitoring news about the Gaza conflict, and get their hopes up whenever they see signs of a hostage release. 'News is always on, all day from the morning to night, at our house,' Pushpa Joshi said.
They also are in contact with families of other Nepalis who were killed or injured in the attack, though Joshi is the only Nepali hostage.
Pushpa said her brother is her best friend, and that they would often learn, sing and dance together while their parents were at work.
'In rainy season like now, we used to get wet in the rain and dance,' she said.
He studied diligently to earn the scholarship to study agriculture in Israel, she said. The exchange program at Kibbutz Alumim was close to the Gaza border in a major agricultural area.
Nepalese go to Israel for both education and employment, to learn the country's advanced agricultural techniques. Agriculture is the backbone of Nepal's economy, and the primary source of income for more than 60% of the population.
—-
Associated Press writer Melanie Lidman contributed from Jerusalem.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How important is Gaza City to Hamas?
Gaza City presents a challenge. In 2024, it was largely cut off from central Gaza because the IDF held the Netzarim corridor. The IDF left that area in January 2025 and never retook it fully. Israel is once again targeting Gaza City in operations in Gaza. For many observers of the war, this might seem like a surprise. Some will wonder, wasn't Gaza City taken from Hamas at the beginning of the war? Others may wonder why it wasn't taken in the past? These are good questions. Why is the capital of Gaza still in the hands of Hamas? Why has Israel spent 22 months chipping away at the periphery, losing hundreds of soldiers, while 50 hostages remain in Gaza, and Hamas apparently has the privilege of controlling Gaza City and other parts of Gaza throughout the war? Hamas likely expected Israel to take Gaza City at the beginning of the war. Instead, what happened was that the IDF cut off Gaza City and northern Gaza from central Gaza in the first days of the ground offensive in late October 2023. Then, the IDF spent a month pushing into neighborhoods and suburbs of Gaza City, but never taking the city itself and holding it. Many of these areas were cleared quickly, and then the tanks and infantry left. This was the raiding strategy and tactic that Israel's commanders apparently believed would work early in the war. By mid-November, reports from the IDF claimed that they had broken through ten of the 24 battalions of Hamas in Gaza. The IDF claimed at the time that it had basically shattered Hamas in northern Gaza and dismantled the Hamas battalions there. However, it appears that the Hamas units were not destroyed. There was a brigade in Gaza City and another brigade in northern Gaza. By November 2024, a year after the battalions were supposedly defeated, the IDF had to enter Jabaliya in Gaza for the third time and clear it. Thousands of Hamas members remain, and 70,000 people had to be evacuated in November and December 2024. During the new operation, Gideon's Chariots launched in May 2025, the IDF once again vowed to retake Gaza. Politicians said that whole areas would be destroyed in this new operation. However, once again, Hamas was left in control of Gaza City as the IDF basically retook areas in Gaza in June and July 2025 that it had taken in 2023 and 2024. What is happening in Gaza now? Reports in Israeli media indicate that tanks have entered the outskirts of Gaza City. These reports speak of operations in the Sabra neighborhood in the southern part of the city. There have also been operations in the Zeitoun area between Gaza City and the Netzarim Corridor. The IDF had already taken this area at least four times since the war began. There have been limited operations in Sabra as well. Israel's political echelon believes that if Hamas is pushed out of Gaza City, then Hamas might finally collapse. However, Hamas has been pushed out of other key areas such as Rafah and Khan Yunis, and it has not collapsed. Evidence shows it has lost almost all of its company, battalion, and brigade commanders, as well as most of its leadership in Gaza. However, it continues to replace its fighters, and it has fought on. Hamas mostly retreats and hides in areas where the IDF operates. In Beit Hanoun, for instance, it hid out for 20 months of war near the Israeli border before finally being defeated. It was only defeated in Beit Hanoun in July 2025 because every house there was demolished. Gaza City symbollically important to Hamas Some believe that Gaza City is of great importance to Hamas. It is symbolically important, to be sure. Militarily, it is less clear. Hamas has strongholds in the Central Camps, areas where its activists have historically grown up. Hamas is more popular among Gazans who are descendants of Arabs who fled Israel in 1948 and ended up in Gaza. The older clans of Gaza are less supportive. These older Gazans tend to live in parts of Gaza City. Will entering their areas lead Hamas to collapse? Gaza City presents a challenge. In 2024, it was largely cut off from central Gaza because the IDF held the Netzarim corridor. The IDF left that area in January 2025 and never retook it fully. How many people are in Gaza City today? Several hundred thousand? Whatever the number, fighting among them will be complex. The IDF has always asked people to leave before it enters an area. This gives Hamas time to leave as well. Will Hamas simply leave Gaza City and wait out this offensive as it has in the past? Solve the daily Crossword
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Guilt of freedom weighs on released Israeli hostage
The Middle East Israel-Hamas warFacebookTweetLink Follow Eliya Cohen is a survivor who can't yet bring himself to live again. He hid under bodies as Hamas militants hurled grenades into a bomb shelter before they took him prisoner. He lived through 505 days of captivity in Gaza, chained and sharing scraps of pita and canned beans with other hostages. And he was released to his joyful family – and to find his girlfriend alive and waiting for him. But six months after he got out of Gaza, he says he cannot begin to recover. Not while other hostages are still held there. 'I feel guilty when I eat. I feel guilty when I get showered. I feel guilty when I go to the hospital,' he told CNN in an exclusive interview with Chief International Correspondent Clarissa Ward. 'I feel guilty because I know what they are going through right now.' He recognizes he must work to heal the physical and mental wounds, but thoughts of the last 20 living hostages in Gaza weigh on him every day, he says, brethren from a family he cannot let himself forget. Cohen was at the Nova music festival with his girlfriend Ziv Abud the morning of October 7, 2023, when Palestinian militants broke through Gaza's border fence under a hail of accompanying rockets from Hamas and other groups who took part in the attack. Cohen and Abud, like many other festival goers, ran for cover. The pair hid in a concrete bomb shelter with about 30 others but were found by the attackers, who threw grenades inside. Those at the front of the bunker were killed by the explosions. As more grenades were hurled, Cohen and Abud hid under the dead bodies. It was the only protection they could find. 'I talked with Ziv a lot … trying to check if she's alive or not. And she told me, 'It's OK, at least in the sky (heaven), we will be OK,'' he said. The militants stormed the shelter and fired gunshots, killing his girlfriend's nephew and partner and wounding Cohen in the leg. He was found and put on the back of a pickup truck alongside Hersh Goldberg-Polin and Or Levy, leaving Abud behind. He thought he'd never see her again. 'I was really sure that she died. There is no chance that she survived that,' Cohen recalled. Once they reached Gaza, Cohen said a Hamas militant told him the group wanted to use the hostages to come to an agreement with Israel to release Palestinians from Israeli prisons. He didn't expect to be there for more than 500 days. For most of his captivity, Cohen said he was held in a small, dark and 'abandoned' tunnel with Or Levy, Eli Sharabi and Alon Ohel. Levy and Sharabi have been released; Ohel remains in captivity in Gaza. He said their legs were bound with motorcycle chains, making it difficult to go to the bathroom. He showered only once every two months and didn't brush his teeth for a year. The four hostages shared a piece of pita bread and a can of beans every day 'for a long time,' he recalled. 'For eight months, we slept on the floor … I dislocated my shoulder so many nights … we felt weak,' he added. What helped Cohen stay strong was the bond he built with other hostages, especially treasuring the relationship he formed with Hersh Goldberg-Polin. Goldberg-Polin was taking cover in the same shelter as Cohen when a grenade blew off his left arm. They were separated in Gaza and Cohen thought Goldberg-Polin probably wouldn't survive the injury. Two months later, they found themselves reunited in a tunnel, where they were briefly held together. Cohen instantly recognized him from his bandaged arm, and they bonded over their shared experience in the bomb shelter. Goldberg-Polin even helped Cohen learn English after he gave him a book to read. 'We were together for three days, but it felt like we were friends for 10 years,' Cohen said. Last summer, there were hopes that Goldberg-Polin would be released during the first phase of an eventual ceasefire agreement, even if it was still months away. While they were held together, Goldberg-Polin promised Cohen to tell his parents that their son was alive. It was a promise he would never be able to keep. Shortly afterwards, Goldberg-Polin and five other hostages were killed by Hamas after Israeli forces approached the tunnel they were held in. When Cohen found out in captivity, it was a shock. 'I cried a lot. I actually didn't believe it,' Cohen said. Cohen grew emotional describing his time in captivity, especially when referring to Ohel, the last remaining hostage he was held with. After Sharabi and Levy were released in February during the first phase of a ceasefire agreement signed in January, Cohen's captors told him he was next on the list. That meant leaving Ohel behind. 'It was a difficult situation … we hugged each other, and we started to cry,' he said, promising him he would fight for his release back in Israel. When Cohen returned home, he was shocked to discover that his girlfriend Abud had survived the bomb shelter and had herself been campaigning for his release ever since. 'I can't put into words how it felt,' he said. 'It was like a dream. For a week, it felt like a dream looking at her,' he said. One month later, Israel launched a wave of deadly airstrikes across the Gaza Strip, shattering the ceasefire and any hopes that Cohen would see Ohel soon. Cohen has found little reason for hope since then. Earlier this month, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed to expand his military offensive further and occupy Gaza City. The plan provoked harsh criticism inside Israel, especially from the families of the remaining 50 hostages – some dead, some alive – in Gaza, warning the move could mean they would be lost forever. After 22 months of pounding Gaza, Israel has been facing global condemnation over its actions and the starvation of Palestinians. Cohen was only able to catch a glimpse of Gaza once when he was moved from one tunnel to another, describing it as an 'apocalypse.' He said the only way Ohel and the remaining hostages would return is through a deal, and he urged Netanyahu to go back to the negotiating table. 'I believe they can bring all the hostages home in the same way I came home.'
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
FACT FOCUS: Trump says he has ended seven wars. The reality isn't so clear cut
President Donald Trump has projected himself as a peacemaker since returning to the White House in January, touting his efforts to end global conflicts. In meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders Monday, Trump repeated that he has been instrumental in stopping multiple wars but didn't specify which. 'I've done six wars, I've ended six wars, Trump said in the Oval Office with Zelenskyy. He later added: 'If you look at the six deals I settled this year, they were all at war. I didn't do any ceasefires.' He raised that figure Tuesday, telling 'Fox & Friends" that 'we ended seven wars.' But although Trump helped mediate relations among many of these nations, experts say his impact isn't as clear cut as he claims. Here's a closer look at the conflicts. Israel and Iran Trump is credited with ending the 12-day war. Israel launched attacks on the heart of Iran's nuclear program and military leadership in June, saying it wanted to stop Iran from building a nuclear weapon — which Tehran has denied it was trying to do. Trump negotiated a ceasefire between Israel and Iran just after directing American warplanes to strike Iran's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites. He publicly harangued both countries into maintaining the ceasefire. Evelyn Farkas, executive director of Arizona State University's McCain Institute, said Trump should get credit for ending the war. 'There's always a chance it could flare up again if Iran restarts its nuclear weapons program, but nonetheless, they were engaged in a hot war with one another,' she said. 'And it didn't have any real end in sight before President Trump got involved and gave them an ultimatum.' Lawrence Haas, a senior fellow for U.S. foreign policy at the American Foreign Policy Council who is an expert on Israel-Iran tensions, agreed the U.S. was instrumental in securing the ceasefire. But he characterized it as a 'temporary respite' from the ongoing 'day-to-day cold war' between the two foes that often involves flare-ups. Egypt and Ethiopia This could be described as tensions at best, and peace efforts — which don't directly involve the U.S. — have stalled. The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam on the Blue Nile River has caused friction between Ethiopia, Egypt and Sudan since the power-generating project was announced more than a decade ago. In July, Ethiopia declared the project complete, with an inauguration set for September. Egypt and Sudan oppose the dam. Although the vast majority of the water that flows down the Nile originates in Ethiopia, Egyptian agriculture relies on the river almost entirely. Sudan, meanwhile, fears flooding and wants to protect its own power-generating dams. During his first term, Trump tried to broker a deal between Ethiopia and Egypt but couldn't get them to agree. He suspended aid to Ethiopia over the dispute. In July, he posted on Truth Social that he helped the 'fight over the massive dam (and) there is peace at least for now.' However, the disagreement persists, and negotiations between Egypt, Ethiopia and Sudan have stalled. 'It would be a gross overstatement to say that these countries are at war,' said Haas. 'I mean, they're just not.' India and Pakistan The April killing of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir pushed India and Pakistan closer to war than they had been in years, but a ceasefire was reached. Trump has claimed that the U.S. brokered the ceasefire, which he said came about in part because he offered trade concessions. Pakistan thanked Trump, recommending him for the Nobel Peace Prize. But India has denied Trump's claims, saying there was no conversation between the U.S. and India on trade in regards to the ceasefire. Although India has downplayed the Trump administration's role in the ceasefire, Haas and Farkas believe the U.S. deserves some credit for helping stop the fighting. 'I think that President Trump played a constructive role from all accounts, but it may not have been decisive. And again, I'm not sure whether you would define that as a full-blown war," Farkas said. Serbia and Kosovo The White House lists the conflict between these countries as one Trump resolved, but there has been no threat of a war between the two neighbors during Trump's second term, nor any significant contribution from Trump this year to improve their relations. Kosovo is a former Serbian province that declared independence in 2008. Tensions have persisted ever since, but never to the point of war, mostly because NATO-led peacekeepers have been deployed in Kosovo, which has been recognized by more than 100 countries. During his first term, Trump negotiated a wide-ranging deal between Serbia and Kosovo, but much of what was agreed on was never carried out. Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo Trump has played a key role in peace efforts between the African neighbors, but he's hardly alone and the conflict is far from over. Eastern Congo, rich in minerals, has been battered by fighting with more than 100 armed groups. The most potent is the M23 rebel group backed by neighboring Rwanda, which claims it is protecting its territorial interests and that some of those who participated in the 1994 Rwandan genocide fled to Congo and are working with the Congolese army. The Trump administration's efforts paid off in June, when the Congolese and Rwandan foreign ministers signed a peace deal at the White House. The M23, however, wasn't directly involved in the U.S.-facilitated negotiations and said it couldn't abide by the terms of an agreement that didn't involve it. The final step to peace was meant to be a separate Qatar-facilitated deal between Congo and M23 that would bring about a permanent ceasefire. But with the fighting still raging, Monday's deadline for the Qatar-led deal was missed and there have been no public signs of major talks between Congo and M23 on the final terms. Armenia and Azerbaijan Trump this month hosted the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan at the White House, where they signed a deal aimed at ending a decades-long conflict between the two nations. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan called the signed document a 'significant milestone,' and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev hailed Trump for performing 'a miracle.' The two countries signed agreements intended to reopen key transportation routes and reaffirm Armenia's and Azerbaijan's commitment to signing a peace treaty. The treaty's text was initialed by the countries' foreign ministers at that meeting, which indicates preliminary approval. But the two countries have yet to sign and ratify the deal. Armenia and Azerbaijan have been locked in a bitter conflict over territory since the early 1990s, when ethnic Armenian forces took control of the Karabakh province, known internationally as Nagorno-Karabakh, and nearby territories. In 2020, Azerbaijan's military recaptured broad swaths of territory. Russia brokered a truce and deployed about 2,000 peacekeepers to the region. In September 2023, Azerbaijani forces launched a lightning blitz to retake remaining portions. The two countries have worked toward normalizing ties and signing a peace treaty ever since. Cambodia and Thailand Officials from Thailand and Cambodia credit Trump with pushing the Asian neighbors to agree to a ceasefire in this summer's brief border conflict. Cambodia and Thailand have clashed in the past over their shared border. The latest fighting began in July after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. Tensions had been growing since May, when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a confrontation that created a diplomatic rift and roiled Thai politics. Both countries agreed in late July to an unconditional ceasefire during a meeting in Malaysia. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim pressed for the pact, but there was little headway until Trump intervened. Trump said on social media that he warned the Thai and Cambodian leaders that the U.S. would not move forward with trade agreements if the hostilities continued. Both countries faced economic difficulties and neither had reached tariff deals with the U.S., though most of their Southeast Asian neighbors had. According to Ken Lohatepanont, a political analyst and University of Michigan doctoral candidate, 'President Trump's decision to condition a successful conclusion to these talks on a ceasefire likely played a significant role in ensuring that both sides came to the negotiating table when they did.' ___ Associated Press reporters Jon Gambrell, Grant Peck, Dasha Litvinova, Fay Abuelgasim, Rajesh Roy, and Dusan Stojanovic contributed.
