Trump supporter charged with making threats against US lawmaker
Geoffrey Giglio, a Trump supporter who has previously been questioned by at least four federal law enforcement agencies over similar conduct, was charged this week with threatening a member of US Congress, transmitting interstate threats and making anonymous harassing communications, according to a federal complaint.
The charges stem from violent and profane messages Giglio allegedly left for US Representative Eric Swalwell, a California Democrat and frequent Trump critic.
According to the complaint, Giglio left a voicemail for Swalwell in March warning, 'If you want to keep fighting, then we will come get you.' He referenced a .308 caliber rifle, saying, 'I'll just set up behind my .308 and I'll do my job,' and ended the message with sexually explicit remarks about Swalwell's wife.
In a follow-up call to Swalwell's office in mid-June, after already being questioned by the FBI, Giglio told a staff intern, 'Tell Eric Swalwell that we are coming and that we are going to handle everyone. We are going to hurt everyone,' according to the complaint.
The complaint also details threats Giglio made to Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat, and to an FBI agent investigating the matter. In a message to Benson, he said, 'We are coming for you,' using explicit language and threatening to 'put her in a hole.' Giglio acknowledged sending the message during a June 3 interview with the FBI, the complaint said.
On June 26, the day before his arrest, Giglio sent several hostile messages to the FBI agent, writing, 'Now I'm coming for you.' the complaint said.
Giglio was arrested in California but was not charged over the threats to Benson or the FBI agent, the complaint said.
The US Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California, which is prosecuting the case, and the FBI declined to comment. A public defender listed in court records as representing Giglio did not respond to requests for comment. The offices of Swalwell and Benson also did not immediately respond.
The White House condemned the threats against Swalwell. 'As a survivor of multiple assassination attempts, the president takes these matters extremely seriously,' said White House spokesperson Harrison Fields. 'Anyone engaging in such behavior will be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law.'
The complaint cites a 2024 Reuters investigation that identified Giglio as a persistent source of threats against public officials, including judges, lawmakers and state election officials. Despite multiple investigations by federal agencies, including the FBI and the Secret Service, Giglio had not previously been charged, as his messages often stopped short of the legal threshold for prosecution under the First Amendment, according to the Reuters report.
The arrest comes amid the most sustained wave of US political violence since the 1970s, including two assassination attempts against Trump last year and the murder in June of a former Democratic speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives and her husband.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
4 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump demands CEO of US chipmaker Intel resign ‘immediately'
President Donald Trump on Thursday demanded the resignation of the new chief executive of US chipmaker Intel, after a Republican senator raised national security concerns over his links to firms in China. 'The CEO of Intel is highly conflicted and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem,' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, a day after Senator Tom Cotton said he had written to Intel questioning Lip-Bu Tan's connections to Chinese firms. In a statement issued Thursday, Tan said the company was 'engaged with the Trump administration to address the concerns raised' and ensure officials 'have the facts.' Intel is one of Silicon Valley's most iconic companies, but its fortunes have been eclipsed by Asian giants TSMC and Samsung, which dominate the made-to-order semiconductor business. In Cotton's letter, posted on his website, the senator alleged that Tan controls dozens of Chinese companies and holds stakes in hundreds of advanced manufacturing and chip firms in China. 'At least eight of these companies reportedly have ties to the Chinese People's Liberation Army,' Cotton wrote. The Republican senator also cited Tan's previous leadership of Cadence Design Systems, which he said recently 'pleaded guilty to illegally selling its products to a Chinese military university.' Cotton further claimed that while serving in that role, Tan transferred 'its technology to an associated Chinese semiconductor company without obtaining licenses.' In response, Tan said there has been 'a lot of misinformation circulating' about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems. 'I want to be absolutely clear: Over 40+ years in the industry, I've built relationships around the world and across our diverse ecosystem,' he said. 'And I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards.' Tan added that the United States has been his home for over four decades and said he is 'profoundly grateful for the opportunities it has given me.' He also expressed full alignment with Trump's commitment to 'advancing US national and economic security' and said he is proud to lead a company 'so central to these goals.' The Malaysia-born tech industry veteran took the helm at Intel in March, announcing layoffs as White House tariffs and export restrictions complicated market conditions. He has acknowledged it 'won't be easy' to overcome the challenges facing the company. Intel has also struggled to keep pace with Nvidia, which has surged ahead as the world's dominant AI chipmaker. While Intel's core business has long centered on traditional computing chips, that market has steadily been eclipsed by the rapid rise of artificial intelligence.
Al Arabiya
7 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump says would meet Putin without Zelenskyy sit-down
US President Donald Trump said Thursday he would meet with Vladimir Putin for upcoming talks on the Ukraine war even if the Russian leader had not sat down with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The statement, which contradicted earlier reports that a Putin–Zelenskyy meeting was a prerequisite for the summit, came after Trump gave Moscow until Friday to reach a ceasefire or face fresh sanctions. But asked by reporters in the Oval Office if that deadline still held, Trump did not give a clear answer. 'It's going to be up to (Putin),' Trump said. 'We're going to see what he has to say.' Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has been pressuring Moscow to end Russia's military assault on Ukraine. The Kremlin said Thursday that Putin was set to attend a summit with Trump in the 'coming days,' but the Russian leader essentially ruled out including Zelenskyy. On Thursday, Zelenskyy insisted that he had to be involved in any talks. When Trump was asked if Putin was required to meet Zelenskyy before a summit, the US president said simply: 'No, he doesn't.' Putin has named the United Arab Emirates as a potential location for the summit, though Washington has not confirmed this. The summit would be the first between sitting US and Russian presidents since Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva in June 2021. Three rounds of direct Russia–Ukraine talks in Istanbul have failed to yield any progress toward a ceasefire. The two sides remain far apart on the conditions they have set to end the more than three-year-long conflict. Trump and Putin last met in person at a G20 summit in Japan in 2019, during Trump's first term. They have spoken by telephone several times since Trump returned to the White House this year. Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said 'next week has been set as a target date,' adding that both sides had agreed on a venue 'in principle,' without naming it. However, Washington later denied that a venue or date had been set. 'No location has been determined,' a White House official said, while acknowledging that the meeting 'could occur as early as next week.' Tens of thousands of people have been killed since Russia launched its military offensive on Ukraine in February 2022. Russian bombardments have forced millions to flee their homes and devastated large areas of eastern and southern Ukraine. Putin has resisted repeated calls from the United States, Europe, and Kyiv for a ceasefire. At talks in Istanbul, Russian negotiators outlined hardline territorial demands to halt their offensive — including calls for Kyiv to withdraw from territory it still controls and to renounce Western military support. 'Time we ended the war' Reports of the possible summit came after US special envoy Steve Witkoff met Putin in Moscow on Wednesday. Witkoff proposed a trilateral meeting with Zelenskyy, but Putin appeared to rule out direct talks with the Ukrainian leader. 'Certain conditions must be created for this,' Putin told reporters. 'Unfortunately, we are still far from creating such conditions.' The former KGB agent, who has ruled Russia for over 25 years, said in June that he was ready to meet Zelenskyy — but only during a 'final phase' of negotiations to end the conflict. In his evening address on Thursday, Zelenskyy said, 'It is only fair that Ukraine should be a participant in the negotiations.' The Ukrainian leader also spoke with French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, calling for Europe to be included in any potential peace talks. 'Ukraine is an integral part of Europe — we are already in negotiations on EU accession. Therefore, Europe must be a participant in the relevant processes,' Zelenskyy said on social media after the call with Merz. He added that Ukrainian, European, and US security advisors would hold an online meeting on Thursday 'to align our joint views.' 'Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same brave approach from the Russian side. It is time we ended the war,' he said.
Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
Judge to consider the fate of an agreement on protecting immigrant children in US custody
McALLEN: A federal judge on Friday will hear a Trump administration request to end a nearly three-decade-old policy on ensuring safe conditions for immigrant children held in federal custody. US District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles will hold a hearing to consider dissolving a policy that limits how long Customs and Border Protection can hold immigrant children and that requires them to be kept in safe and sanitary conditions. The policy also allows third-party inspections of CBP facilities that hold immigrant children to ensure compliance. Advocates for immigrant children have asked the judge to keep the protections and oversight in place and have submitted firsthand accounts from immigrants in family detention who described adults fighting children for clean water, despondent toddlers and a child with swollen feet who was denied a medical exam. In its motion, President Donald Trump's administration said the government has made substantial changes since the Flores agreement was formalized in 1997. The government said it has created standards and policies governing the custody of immigrant children that conform to legislation and the agreement. Conditions for immigrant children who enter the US without a parent 'have substantially improved from those that precipitated this suit four decades ago,' the government wrote in its motion. The agreement, named for a teenage plaintiff, governs the conditions for all immigrant children in US custody, including those traveling alone or with their parents. It also limits how long CBP can detain child immigrants to 72 hours. The US Department of Health and Human Services then takes custody of the children. The Biden administration successfully pushed to partially end the agreement last year. Gee ruled that special court supervision may end when HHS takes custody, but she carved out exceptions for certain types of facilities for children with more acute needs. Advocates for the children say the government is holding children beyond the time limits set out in the agreement. In March and April, CPB reported that it had 213 children in custody for more than 72 hours and that 14 children, including toddlers, were held for over 20 days in April. As part of their court filings, they included testimony from several families who were held in family detention centers in Texas. If the judge terminates the settlement, the detention centers would be closed to third-party inspections. The federal government is looking to expand its immigration detention space, including by building more centers like one in Florida dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz,' where a lawsuit alleges detainees' constitutional rights are being violated.
