American Airlines sent a plane from the US to Italy that was too big for its destination airport and wasn't allowed to land
An American Airlines flight to Naples, Italy, changed course to Rome on Tuesday morning.
The airline sent a bigger variant of the Boeing 787 than usual, and cited "operational limitations."
Passengers were bused from the Italian capital to Naples, which takes over two hours.
A transatlantic American Airlines flight diverted, and passengers were transported by bus, after the carrier seemingly sent a plane that was too big for its destination.
Monday's Flight 780 departed Philadelphia at 7:42 p.m. and was supposed to land in Naples, Italy, at 10 a.m. local time.
However, data from Flightradar24 shows how seven hours later, the Boeing 787-9 abruptly turned around over the Tyrrhenian Sea, west of the Italian mainland.
It was only about 70 miles away from Naples International Airport before it diverted north to Rome Fiumicino Airport.
An American Airlines spokesperson told Business Insider that the flight diverted due to "operational limitations."
Historical flight data shows that the airline usually sends a Boeing 787-8 on flights to Naples.
While these two Dreamliner variants are pretty similar, with the same wingspan, the 787-9 is actually 20 feet longer.
Documents from Boeing and the International Civil Aviation Organization show how this means the two planes have different requirements for rescue-and-firefighting services (RFFS).
The 787-8 is small enough to land at an airport with a Category 8 RFFS, but the 787-9 needs a Category 9 RFFS airport.
Data from AviationWeek's Acukwik indicates that Naples Airport falls under the former classification.
Aviation enthusiast @xJonNYC, who first shared the incident on X, reported that the airport authority said 787-9 planes can't land in Naples.
The Naples and Rome airport authorities didn't immediately respond to requests for comment sent by BI outside Italian working hours.
After landing at Rome Fiumicino Airport around 9:45 a.m., passengers were transported to Naples by bus, the airline spokesperson told BI.
"We apologize to them for this disruption to their journey," they added.
The two airports are around 145 miles away by road, which would take more than two hours.
Meanwhile, the 787-9 departed Rome two-and-a-half hours later, operating Flight 111 to Chicago, per Flightradar24.
This wasn't the only time this week that a diversion forced passengers to travel the remainder of their journey by bus.
On Wednesday, a Ryanair flight diverted after a thunderstorm caused severe turbulence that injured eight people, three of whom were taken to a local hospital.
Passengers were put on a bus from Memmingen, Germany, to Milan, a roughly four-and-a-half-hour journey.
Do you have a story to share about a recent flight diversion? Contact this reporter at psyme@businessinsider.com.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'I burst into tears': How airline carry-on bag confusion triggered legal row
Determined to avoid baggage fees for his holiday to Pisa, Benjamin Till trawled several different shops armed with a tape measure in search of the right suitcase. Eventually, he found a case within the dimensions EasyJet allows for a free underseat bag - or so he thought. When Mr Till arrived at London Gatwick Airport in December 2023, he discovered those measurements included wheels, meaning his bag was deemed slightly too big. He protested, but eventually paid £48 to bring the bag on board. He says he was told to remove the wheels for the way back - which he did. But at the gate on his way home, he was told the suitcase was still too large, so he sat on the floor, unpacking his dirty underwear and souvenirs into a bin bag. "I don't mind admitting that I actually burst into tears because it was so humiliating," he says. An EasyJet spokesperson told the BBC its ground crew had to ensure non-checked bags were within maximum dimensions "to safely and securely fit", and that rules were made clear to customers when they booked. Stories of passengers caught out by baggage rules they feel are inconsistent or confusing are common, with many customers complaining or seeking clarity from budget airlines on social media. Different airlines have varying rules on the acceptable size and weight of an underseat personal item or an overhead cabin bag, with some charging customers to bring the latter. For people who fall foul of these rules, some airlines charge hefty fees to upgrade a bag from a free personal item to an overhead cabin bag at the airport gate, or to stow an oversized cabin bag in the hold. Passenger confusion has prompted the European Union's largest consumer group to push for fairer and more consistent hand luggage rules, and caused one government to start cracking down on airlines over bag charges. The EU is now looking at changing its laws - changes which would also affect UK passengers who are travelling to or from an EU destination using an EU-based airline. On Thursday, EU transport ministers proposed standardised sizing for free underseat baggage on EU airlines, among other air travel and passenger rights' changes - meaning this could become EU law if their position is accepted by the European Parliament. Budget airlines say their baggage policies comply with the law while keeping fares low, but they have been facing mounting pressure and calls for change. EU transport ministers proposed that passengers should be guaranteed one free personal item, measuring up to 40x30x15cm (including wheels and handles) - or which could reasonably fit under a plane seat. These rules would apply to EU-based airlines (such as Ryanair, Wizz Air and EasyJet), including when they are carrying passengers from a non-EU country like the UK to an EU country and vice-versa, but not third-party airlines. New rules would add clarity to an EU court ruling from 11 years ago, which stated hand baggage should not be subject to an extra fee, provided it met "reasonable" weight and dimensions, but did not say what reasonable was. Currently, Ryanair allows a free carry-on bag of 40x20x25cm, while EasyJet's dimensions for a free bag are a more generous 45x36x20 cm, including wheels and handles. The ministers' proposal was silent, however, on the issue of whether airlines could charge for overhead cabin bags – meaning that if their proposal was adopted into law, the current situation would not change and airlines could keep charging for that kind of hand baggage, which some in Europe have lobbied to stop. The European Consumer Organisation, BEUC, an umbrella group for 45 independent consumer organisations from 32 countries, believes Thursday's proposals do not go far enough, and legitimise "charging for reasonably sized hand luggage". In November, five airlines were fined a total of €179m (£150m) in Spain for "abusive" practices, including charging for hand luggage. Spain's Consumer Rights Ministry said at the time that it planned to ban charging extra for carry-on luggage and other policies. The airlines had said they would appeal the decision. Regarding charges for overheard cabin bags, Ryanair said it fully complied with EU law in its policy, which allows one small bag on board free of charge. "If airlines were forced to include additional carry-on bags as part of the basic fare, it would reduce choice and drive up air fares for all passengers, which would harm consumers," the airline said. Industry group Airlines For Europe said charging different amounts depending on baggage "allows passengers to choose the exact services that best suits their needs". Hand luggage dimensions should be universal, says Jane Hawkes, a consumer expert specialising in travel. "I don't really see why it can't be, and why they can't come to a voluntary agreement as to what those requirements should be for your baggage," she tells the BBC. "There have to be restrictions, obviously, but a one-size-fits-all kind of approach would make it a lot simpler for passengers," she says. BEUC said policymakers should define what "reasonable" size and weight was "to avoid surprises at the airport and ultimately reduce the number of disputes costing consumers and airlines time and money". Ms Hawkes suggests passengers make sure they measure their bag after it is packed, as it may expand when it is full and go over the limit. She adds that consumers should not just be swayed by the fare price, as "if you've got an airline that encompasses [baggage] without you having to pay extra costs to start with, then that might be more of a better option for you". Mr Till would welcome a one-size-fits-all approach to underseat bags. "It's just really, really unfair and ridiculous and there should be one size that goes across all of the airlines," he says. He also criticises the permitted size of underseat cabin bags, saying "it was such a tiny, tiny size of luggage that you were allowed that it had taken me so long to find something that was so small". Still, he was grateful for the inexpensive air fare, and the place he had to stay in Italy, because "otherwise I wouldn't be able to come to this beautiful country". Ryanair fine over 'potentially oversize' cabin bag Rip Off Britain: Why is my hand luggage allowance shrinking?
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Passengers frustrated after Jet2 flight to Bournemouth diverted
PASSENGERS returning from a holiday in Türkiye were left "exhausted" when a flight diversion saw them having to travel for hours by coach to get home. A Jet 2 airways flight from Antalya to Bournemouth landed at East Midlands Airport in the early hours of Sunday, June 1, with travellers then waiting to travel to Bournemouth in a coach service. Passenger Fiona Western said she chose to fly to and from Bournemouth Airport for its convenience, but her return flight from Antalya was an exhausting experience. The flight was forced to divert to in the early hours of Sunday because of runway closure at Bournemouth Airport. (Image: Passengers at East Midlands Airport, Submitted) Fiona said: 'We were delayed getting on the plane and we were informed at mid-flight that we are looking like we won't be getting into Bournemouth on time and they're working hard to negotiate with airport to let us land.' Fiona, who was flying with her 16-year-old daughter and her daughter's friend, said her experience with Jet2 was 'not pleasant' and described scenes of exhausted families with little children when coach stopped for a driver's break. She said: 'This is dreadful, isn't it? You shouldn't sell a holiday that's flying into a regional airport if it shuts in the morning and there's no flexibility.' She believes Jet2 needs to take greater responsibility for timing issues. She said: 'The flights from Bournemouth are leaving later and later. Our outbound flight was delayed by about an hour, and the week before, the same thing happened. 'The people on that flight also missed the return landing. If Bournemouth has this problem, then Jet2 needs to make sure those Turkey flights leave on time.' A spokesperson from said: 'Flight LS3608 from Antalya to Bournemouth Airport diverted to East Midlands Airport in the early hours of Sunday morning due to a mandatory runway closure at Bournemouth Airport, which was of course completely beyond our control. "Our teams worked hard to look after customers, including providing coach transportation to Bournemouth Airport, however we are of course sorry for any inconvenience caused that was caused.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
TSA Says Costco Cards ‘Absolutely' Don't Count as REAL IDs While Confessing ‘Love' for Costco Hotdogs: ‘Please Stop'
The TSA warned travelers that Costco cards do not count as REAL IDs in a lighthearted Facebook post on June 4 The government agency shared the message to dispel rumors that travelers can use their Costco cards at airports REAL IDS became mandatory to fly domestically and enter federal buildings in most states on May 7The Transportation Security Administration has warned travelers that a Costco card is not a valid form of travel ID to fly. The TSA shared a message on Facebook on Wednesday, June 4, to dispel rumors that travelers can use their Costco cards at airports. 'We love hotdogs and rotisserie chickens as much as the next person but please stop telling people their Costco card counts as a REAL ID because it absolutely does not,' the government agency wrote. The post prompted a chorus of amusing responses from commenters. 'So, you're saying we should bring you a chicken?' one person replied, while another Facebook user commented, 'I'm pretty sure that the Costco card is stronger than some passports.' The need for REAL IDs rolled out nationwide on May 7, and the majority of states now require them for domestic airline travel and access to federal buildings — although Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Vermont and Washington accept Enhanced Driver's Licenses (EDL) as an alternative. The REAL ID is a form of identification that meets higher security standards set by the federal government. Congress passed the REAL ID Act in 2005 in response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, and it finally became a reality after a number of delays and pushbacks. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. REAL IDs can be obtained through the DMV, though they do require you to provide more detailed documentation as compared to previous licenses and IDs. Because of this, it's wise to check your local DMV's website to ensure you have all the required paperwork before applying for one. Generally speaking, applicants will need to bring: One proof of identity (like a U.S. birth certificate or passport), one proof of Social Security number (like a Social Security card or W-2), two proofs of state residency (like a utility bill or rental agreement) and proof of name change if applicable. Applicants will need to bring originals or certified copies of all documentation — photocopies will not be accepted. And if you don't have a REAL ID yet but still need to fly domestically? You will be notified of your non-compliance, and may be directed to a separate area of the airport to receive additional screening. The same goes for federal buildings that require identification. For more information, visit the Department of Homeland Security website. Read the original article on People
