Migrant families protest after US-Mexico reunion event cancelled
Families separated by the US-Mexico border staged a demonstration Saturday on both sides of the boundary, where US President Donald Trump's aggressive anti-migrant policies forced the cancellation of a Mother's Day reunion event.
The American military last week set up a zone in Texas on the US southern border where troops are authorized to detain people crossing illegally.
The establishment of the zone led American officials to cancel the "Hugs, Not Walls" event, which has been held annually since 2016 by the Border Network for Human Rights advocacy group.
The event scheduled for Saturday, one day before Mother's Day, was meant to bring together undocumented migrants in the US with their family members in Mexico.
"We have been doing this since 2016 without any problems, and now we have been banned from using this section of the border," Irma Cruz of the Border Network told AFP, calling the move "devastating."
The group urged the 100 families that had signed up for the reunion event to join a protest in the Mexican border city of Cuidad Juarez. It also called on families in El Paso, the Texas city across from Cuidad Juarez, to demonstrate too.
"There are so many mothers on both sides without their children, unable to hug them," Cruz said.
"We chose this day precisely to draw attention to the fact that this is a humanitarian crisis," she added.
Matilde Rosales, who has not seen her sister Isabel in person in eight years, said the event's cancellation was a "heavy blow."
She called on Trump to reconsider his border policies and allow the event to go ahead.
"It's five minutes, but it's a lot for us," she said, wiping tears away.
Standing about 100 meters (110 yards) away from each other on either side of the Rio Bravo river, the family members waved and used binoculars to catch a glimpse of each other.
Alejandro Ordaz, 46, traveled more than 800 kilometers (500 miles) from the city of Torreon to hug his mother, who has lived in the United States for 20 years.
"I hope to God that one day I will be able to hug her again," he told AFP.
str-jla-jbr/acb
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
3 hours ago
- E&E News
Democrats scrambling to convince GOP to save green credits
Senate Democrats are ramping up pressure on Republicans to try to protect swaths of their 2022 climate law as the GOP races to advance their party-line megabill. The situation has Democrats trying to influence legislation they have no intention of supporting. Whether they succeed is another question altogether. 'I have been talking nonstop with [Republicans] and companies,' said Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.). 'I believe we are picking up support. … We have a lot of executives weighing in. We have a lot of senators starting to get concerned about the fact energy prices are starting to rise and the consequence of walking away [from clean energy tax credits] will reduce choices and reduce competition.' Advertisement Wyden said he's zeroing in on Southern senators because of the interest in renewable energy sources. Texas, for example, is a leader in renewable energy production. 'They made a lot of headway under the law I wrote in 2022,' Wyden said of renewables, expressing confidence Republicans understood the importance of preserving the 'technology neutral' credits. It's part of an effort by Democrats as they try to find their footing in the current political landscape, balancing fighting President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans on cuts to Medicaid while trying to find common ground elsewhere. There may be an opening. Some Republicans have indicated their discomfort with accelerating the demise of some green energy subsidies, though one Southern Republican vocal about protecting some climate law credits, Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, said Monday he hadn't heard a word from Democrats. The House-passed budget reconciliation bill included a sharp phase down of federal incentives for wind, solar, hydrogen and other energy sources — while sparing biofuels and nuclear power. It also added strict requirements barring companies associated with China from accessing tax credits, a provision which many consider unworkable. Wyden called changing that provision 'hugely important.' In recent weeks, Senate tax writers have been trying to hash out their portion of the legislation, with the self-imposed July 4 deadline fast approaching. The Finance text could be released later this week or early next. That means it's crunch time for Inflation Reduction Act defenders to make their case. Several Senate Democrats told POLITICO's E&E News on Monday they felt encouraged by the conversations they've had in recent weeks. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) planned a breakfast about the topic for Tuesday morning, Punchbowl News reported Monday, saying he's enlisted utility companies in the effort. The outlet said Schumer was focusing on 16 Senate Republicans whose states would be disproportionately targeted if the credits disappeared. 'There's such a vulnerability — the impacts are so deep and devastating — and that's one of the reasons I'm pushing it,' Schumer told the outlet. 'A lot of conversations' Schumer has said he wants to apply pressure to his Republican colleagues, understanding that peeling away just a few votes might sink the whole effort. 'There are a whole number of Republicans, particularly those that have a lot of clean-energy investments in their states, who really didn't like what the House did,' Schumer told POLITICO last month. 'And the question is: Will they be able to put enough pressure on [Majority Leader John] Thune, or even vote [with us] on some amendments?' Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin, who was in the House during the last Congress, said the wooing of Republicans has been front and center. 'We certainly have had a lot of conversations with the auto industry and a lot of conversations with our Republican colleagues who care about the auto industry,' she said Monday. Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) also said he was involved in conversations with Republicans. Asked how the conversations were going, he said, 'I don't know yet.' Asked who he was talking to, he said, 'Why would I say that?' Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) said he was 'hopeful' about the future of the climate law credits' fate, given Republicans are big believers in producing more energy. 'I don't know what the White House is thinking, but if you kill these tax credits, you are not going to be able to grow the economy the way they want to grow the economy. … You need energy,' he said. 'They seem to understand that part.' 'We're besieged' Utah Sen. John Curtis, who has been among the Republicans pushing for changes, said there's been considerable pressure from industry for about a month. 'I think it's fair to say we're besieged by people wanting to talk to us about the tax credits … more than we can possibly see,' he said. Curtis said he's been hearing from Democrats, too. Tillis was unmoved by any pleas from Democrats. 'I have not heard a bit from them,' he said. 'I don't know why they would think it's relevant. They have no interest in voting with it.' But Tillis did seem to think the utilities would have an interest in weighing in. 'They are in the mix in some of these, too,' he said, specifically pointing to 'investor-owned utilities in particular.' Several groups — including the American Critical Minerals Association, the Battery Materials & Technology Coalition, Clean Energy for America, the Conservative Energy Network, Impact Capital Managers, Securing America's Future Energy and the Solar Energy Industries Association — fired off a new letter to Senate Republicans Monday. SAFE is also running an ad campaign. And even though nuclear and biofuels fared much better in the House bill compared to other energy sources, boosters are pushing for more flexibility. Last week, a group of House Republicans led by Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-Va.) sent a letter to Senate GOP leaders urging them to make major changes to the bill they had voted for. But House GOP hard-liners want the IRA repeals to go even further. A new House Freedom Caucus missive Monday urged the Senate to 'hold the line' on the tax credits. 'The House is very different from the Senate. Senators spend a lot of time talking to their major employers,' Wyden said. 'There was a lot of awareness that we avoided mandates,' Wyden said about the 2022 climate law. 'We created opportunities to encourage innovation. The more you reduce carbon, the bigger your tax savings. We did a lot of groundwork.'
Associated Press
4 hours ago
- Associated Press
One year from World Cup opener, FIFA leaves questions unanswered on tickets and security
NEW YORK (AP) — A year from the largest World Cup ever, there has been no announcement on general ticket sales, prices for most seats, location of a draw or security arrangements as FIFA has mostly avoided disclosing details of an event set for 16 stadiums across the United States, Mexico and Canada. There is uncertainty about whether fans from some nations will be welcome — 11 of the venues are located in the U.S., where all matches will be played from the quarterfinals on. Security is a concern, too. At the last major soccer tournament in the U.S., the 2024 Copa America final at Miami Gardens, Florida, started 82 minutes late after spectators breached security gates. 'That was certainly a reminder and a wake-up call if anybody needed it that those types of things are going to be used in terms of the ultimate assessment of whether this World Cup is successful,' said former U.S. defender Alexi Lalas, now Fox's lead soccer analyst. U.S. President Donald Trump's travel ban on citizens from 12 nations exempted athletes, coaches, staff and relatives while not mentioning fans. Vice President JD Vance made what could be interpreted as a warning on May 6. 'Of course everybody is welcome to come and see this incredible event. I know we'll have visitors probably from close to 100 countries. We want them to come. We want them to celebrate. We want them to watch the game,' he said. 'But when the time is up they'll have to go home. Otherwise they'll have to talk to Secretary Noem,' he added, speaking alongside Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem. Back in U.S. for first time in 32 years The 1994 World Cup sparked the launch of Major League Soccer with 12 teams in 1996, and $50 million in World Cup profits seeded the U.S. Soccer Foundation, tasked with developing the sport's growth. MLS now has 30 teams, plays in 22 soccer specific stadiums and has club academies to grow the sport and improve talent. Next year's tournament will include 104 games, up from 64 from 1998 through 2022, and the 11 U.S. stadiums are all NFL homes with lucrative luxury suites and club seating. It also will be the first World Cup run by FIFA without a local organizing committee. 'The legacy initiative of 2026 is around how we ensure that soccer is everywhere in this county,' U.S. Soccer Federation CEO JT Batson said. 'How do we ensure that every American can walk, ride their bike or take public transit to a safe place to play soccer? How do we make it to where every school in America has soccer accessible to their students? And how do we make it to wherever every American can truly see themselves in the game?' Interest in soccer has vastly increased in the U.S., with England's Premier League averaging 510,000 viewers per match window on NBC's networks last season and the European Champions League final drawing more than 2 million viewers in each of the past five years on CBS. However, CBS broadcast just 26 of 189 Champions League matches on TV in 2024-25 and streamed the rest. MLS drew about 12.2 million fans last year, second to 14.7 million in 2023-24 for the Premier League's 20 teams, but MLS has largely disappeared from broadcast TV since starting a 10-year contract with Apple TV+ in 2023. Apple spokesman Sam Citron said the company does not release viewer figures. In a fractured television landscape, different deals were negotiated by FIFA, UEFA, MLS, the NWSL, the USSF and the five major European leagues. 'You basically have over 2,800 game windows per season aired in the United States and so that requires distribution largely on streaming platforms like Paramount+ or ESPN+, but it's difficult for new fan adoption and it makes reach kind of challenging,' said Gerry Cardinale, managing partner of RedBird Capital Partners, which holds controlling interests in AC Milan and Toulouse and owns a non-controlling stake of Fenway Sports Group, parent of Liverpool. 'Kids today are getting weaned on Premier League football and Serie A football, and when you watch that as a product, it's hard for MLS to compete.' 1994 World Cup set attendance record The 1994 World Cup, a 24-nation tournament, drew a record 3.58 million fans for 52 matches. Ticket prices ranged from $25-$75 for most first round games and $180-$475 for the final at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena, California. FIFA, which has about 800 people working at an office in Coral Gables, Florida, says it will announce information on general tickets in the third quarter. It wouldn't say whether prices will be fixed or variable. Hospitality packages are available on FIFA's website through On Location. For the eight matches at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, including the final on July 19, prices range from $25,800 to $73,200 per person. Variable ticket pricing possible FIFA appears to be using variable pricing for this year's Club World Cup, played at 12 U.S. stadiums from June 14 to July 13, and some prices repeatedly have been slashed. Marriott Bonvoy, a U.S. Soccer Federation partner, has been offering free tickets to some of its elite members. Asked about Club World Cup ticket sales and team base camp arrangements, Manolo Zubiria, the World Cup's chief tournament officer, hung up four minutes and five questions into a telephone interview with The Associated Press. Brendan O'Connell, the publicist who arranged the interview, wrote in an email to the AP: 'The guest was not prepared for those questions.' FIFA's media relations staff would not make FIFA president Gianni Infantino available to discuss the tournament. Ahead of the 1994 World Cup, FIFA announced in May 1992 the draw would take place at Las Vegas on Dec. 18 or 19, 1993. FIFA has not revealed plans for this year's draw but appears to be planning for Las Vegas on Dec. 5. Regular ticket sales began in February 1993 for the U.S. soccer family and general first- and second-round sales started that June. Fans submitted lottery applications in October 1993 for games from the quarterfinals on. Teams could train away from World Cup cities While not detailing ticketing plans for next year's tournament, FIFA is spreading it beyond the host cites and lists about 60 possible base camps for teams to use, paired with hotels. Some are fancy — The Greenbrier Resort in White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia — and some more Spartan — the Courtyard by Marriott Mesa at Wrigleyville West in Arizona. Thousands of arrangements must be coordinated. Major League Baseball is drawing up its schedule to ensure that the four teams whose ballparks share parking lots with World Cup stadiums — in Arlington, Texas; Kansas City, Missouri; Philadelphia; and Seattle — won't play home games on the dates of tournament matches. Boris Gartner, CEO of La Liga North America, a joint venture of the Spanish soccer league and Relevent Sports, said the 2026 World Cup should be viewed as just another step in the sport's long-term growth in the United States. 'If you have a clear understanding of the market and the audience, a clear understanding of the value that these properties bring to media companies, and you mix content with a commercial strategy, with the right media distribution strategy, this is something that will continue to grow over the next two decades,' he said. 'If more people are watching the NWSL, more people are going to be interested in soccer that could potentially end up watching a Bundesliga game or La Liga game.' ___ AP soccer:
CNN
5 hours ago
- CNN
The Mexican flag has become a defining symbol of the LA protests
Mexico's red, white and green flag has become a defining symbol of the protests in Los Angeles. Demonstrators have waved flags from Mexico and other Latin American countries, as well as US flags, to express solidarity with immigrants and denounce the Trump administration's raids, provoking the ire of Trump's supporters. Los Angeles has been roiled in protests since Friday, when ICE officers raided several workplaces in the city's garment district. While the protests began peacefully, they have since led to dozens of arrests and some violent clashes. President Donald Trump deployed thousands of National Guard troops and Marines, outraging Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who in a complaint defined the mobilization of the California guardsmen an 'illegal takeover' and on social media called the potential use of the Marines 'a blatant abuse of power.' The Mexican flag has long been a mainstay at immigration-related demonstrations, particularly in LA, which has deep cultural and economic ties to Mexico and is seen as the capital of the Mexican diaspora in the US. More than 3.4 million people of Mexican heritage or born in Mexico live in Los Angeles County, according to Census data, more than any other county in the US. But images and video showing flag-waving protesters facing off with police have drawn anger from Republican officials. 'They were literally out there protesting, carrying a foreign flag. That is absolutely insane. They're not just peaceful protesters. These are illegals,' Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin told CNN's Dana Bash, while defending Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard to LA. 'Insurrectionists carrying foreign flags are attacking immigration enforcement officers,' Vice President JD Vance posted on X Saturday. The Department of Homeland Security has shared on social media several photos and videos of the protests where, amid chaotic scenes, the Mexican flag is featured prominently. Trump's deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller described the protesters on social media as 'foreign nationals, waving foreign flags, rioting and obstructing federal law enforcement attempting to expel illegal foreign invaders.' Waving a foreign flag – or even destroying an American one – is legal under freedom of expression rights protected by the Constitution's First Amendment. Raul Hinojosa-Ojeda, associate professor of Chicana, Chicano and Central American Studies at UCLA, said invoking flags to demonize protesters is a 'well-documented move on the part of the Trump administration, knowing that every single demonstration of this type brings out the Mexican flag.' The current Mexican flag was officially adopted by the country in 1968, though variations have been used since Mexico's war of independence from Spain in the early 1800s. The brandishing of it and other Latin American flags to defend the rights of immigrants in the US has a long and complex history. The Mexican flag was a lightning rod during the 1994 movement against California's Proposition 187, which sought to bar undocumented immigrants from accessing education, health care and social services. The flags, waved by protesters to show pride, were seen by many as symbols of anti-American defiance. In LA, some have argued waving the Mexican flag risks undermining the protesters' cause by alienating people and shifting attention away from immigration policy. Waving the Mexican flag 'transforms what should be a debate about American constitutional rights and due process into a conversation about foreign loyalty and cultural assimilation,' Mike Madrid, a Republican strategist focused on Latino voting trends wrote in the Sacramento Bee. But the waving of foreign flags speaks to the generations of people from Mexico and other Latin American countries who have called the US, and particularly California, home, Hinojosa-Ojeda said. 'The flags mean their families. The flags mean their communities. It's not about having an international invasion,' he added. The flags are a 'mechanism of pride and identity that is under attack,' Hinojosa-Ojeda added. Antonio Rodriguez, an organizer with the Brown Berets immigration advocacy group, said the Mexican flag at the protests is a symbol of unity, not division. 'I don't necessarily think just because somebody has pride in their culture that they're un-American,' Rodriguez said. 'Waving a Mexican flag, for us, is showing pride in our culture and our family.'
