
QXO Announces Pricing of Upsized Concurrent Offerings of Common Stock and Depositary Shares
The gross proceeds from the Common Stock Offering will be $800 million (assuming the underwriters do not exercise the option to purchase additional shares of Common Stock) and the gross proceeds from the Depositary Shares Offering will be $500 million (assuming the underwriters do not exercise the over-allotment option to purchase additional Depositary Shares). QXO intends to use the net proceeds from the Offerings to repay indebtedness under the Company's senior secured term loan facility, which will strengthen the Company's position with respect to future acquisition opportunities.
Holders of the Depositary Shares will be entitled to a proportional fractional interest in the rights and preferences of the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, including conversion, dividend, liquidation and voting rights, subject to the provisions of a deposit agreement. The Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock will accumulate dividends (which may be paid in cash or, subject to certain limitations, in shares of Common Stock or in any combination of cash and Common Stock) at a rate per annum equal to 5.50% on the liquidation preference thereof, which is $1,000 per share plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, payable when, as and if declared by QXO's board of directors (or an authorized committee thereof), on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each year, beginning on August 15, 2025 and ending on, and including, May 15, 2028. Unless earlier converted, each outstanding share of Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock will automatically convert, for settlement on or about May 15, 2028, into between 49.4740 and 60.6060 shares of Common Stock (and, correspondingly, each Depositary Share will automatically convert into between 2.4737 and 3.0303 shares of Common Stock), subject to certain anti-dilution and other adjustments. Other than during a fundamental change conversion period (as defined in the prospectus supplement relating to the Depositary Shares Offering), at any time prior to the mandatory conversion settlement date, a holder of 20 Depositary Shares may cause the bank depositary to convert one share of Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, on such holder's behalf, into a number of shares of Common Stock equal to the minimum conversion rate of 49.4740, subject to certain anti-dilution and other adjustments. Currently, there is no public market for the Depositary Shares or the Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock. QXO has applied to list the Depositary Shares on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol 'QXO.PRB.'
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and Morgan Stanley are acting as lead joint bookrunning managers for the Offerings. Baird, Citigroup, Oppenheimer & Co., Raymond James, RBC Capital Markets, Stifel, Truist Securities, Wells Fargo Securities and William Blair are acting as joint bookrunning managers for the Offerings. BofA Securities, BMO Capital Markets, Credit Agricole CIB and Wolfe | Nomura Alliance are acting as co-managers for the Offerings.
Each Offering is being made by means of a prospectus supplement under QXO's effective registration statement on Form S-3ASR, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC').
This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities, nor does it constitute an offer, solicitation or sale of any securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale is unlawful. Each Offering may be made only by means of a prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus. Copies of the final prospectus supplements and accompanying prospectuses related to the Offerings can be obtained from Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Attention: Prospectus Department, 200 West Street, New York, NY 10282, by telephone at 1-866-471-2526 or by email at prospectus-ny@ny.email.gs.com or from Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Attention: Prospectus Department, 180 Varick Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10014.
About QXO
QXO is the largest publicly traded distributor of roofing, waterproofing and complementary building products in the United States. The company plans to become the tech-enabled leader in the $800 billion building products distribution industry and generate outsized value for shareholders. QXO is targeting $50 billion in annual revenues within the next decade through accretive acquisitions and organic growth.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about beliefs, expectations, targets or goals, the use of proceeds of the Offerings and the expected closing date of the Offerings, are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on plans, estimates, expectations and/or goals at the time the statements are made, and readers should not place undue reliance on them. In some cases, readers can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terms such as 'may,' 'will,' 'should,' 'expect,' 'opportunity,' 'intend,' 'plan,' 'anticipate,' 'believe,' 'estimate,' 'predict,' 'potential,' 'target,' 'goal,' or 'continue,' or the negative of these terms or other comparable terms. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties and readers are cautioned that a number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described herein include, among others:
an inability to obtain the products we distribute resulting in lost revenues and reduced margins and damaging relationships with customers;
a change in supplier pricing and demand adversely affecting our income and gross margins;
a change in vendor rebates adversely affecting our income and gross margins;
our inability to identify potential acquisition targets or successfully complete acquisitions on acceptable terms;
risks related to maintaining our safety record;
the possibility that building products distribution industry demand may soften or shift substantially due to cyclicality or dependence on general economic and political conditions, including inflation or deflation, interest rates, governmental subsidies or incentives, consumer confidence, labor and supply shortages, weather and commodity prices;
the possibility that regional or global barriers to trade or a global trade war could increase the cost of products in the building products distribution industry, which could adversely impact the competitiveness of such products and the financial results of businesses in the industry;
seasonality, weather-related conditions and natural disasters;
risks related to the proper functioning of our information technology systems, including from cybersecurity threats;
loss of key talent or our inability to attract and retain new qualified talent;
risks related to work stoppages, union negotiations, labor disputes and other matters associated with our labor force or the labor force of our suppliers or customers;
the risk that the anticipated benefits of our acquisition of Beacon Roofing Supply, Inc. (the 'Beacon Acquisition') or any future acquisition may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected;
the effect of the Beacon Acquisition or any future acquisition on our business relationships with employees, customers or suppliers, operating results and business generally;
unexpected costs, charges or expenses resulting from the Beacon Acquisition or any future acquisition or difficulties in integrating and operating acquired companies;
the risk that the Company is or becomes highly dependent on the continued leadership of Brad Jacobs as chairman and chief executive officer and the possibility that the loss of Mr. Jacobs in these roles could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations;
the possibility that the Company's outstanding warrants and preferred stock may or may not be converted or exercised, and the economic impact on the Company and the holders of common stock of the Company that may result from either such exercise or conversion, including dilution, or the continuance of the preferred stock remaining outstanding, and the impact its terms, including its dividend, may have on the Company and the common stock of the Company;
challenges raising additional equity or debt capital from public or private markets to pursue the Company's business plan and the effects that raising such capital may have on the Company and its business;
the possibility that new investors in any future financing transactions could gain rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of the Company's existing stockholders;
risks associated with periodic litigation, regulatory proceedings and enforcement actions, which may adversely affect the Company's business and financial performance;
the impact of legislative, regulatory, economic, competitive and technological changes;
unknown liabilities and uncertainties regarding general economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, tax and geopolitical conditions; and
other factors, including those set forth in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
Forward-looking statements should not be relied on as predictions of future events, and these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. Forward-looking statements herein speak only as of the date each statement is made. QXO does not undertake any obligation to update any of these statements in light of new information or future events, except to the extent required by applicable law.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Entrepreneur
3 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
How to Oust a Difficult Co-founder Legally and Smoothly
There are a number of reasons that a co-founder may want to part ways with another co-founder. There are also legal considerations to keep in mind when co-founders separate. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Imagine this. Jean and John, who met at a startup incubator, founded a company together. But as they grew, Jean realized that she and John weren't aligned on many things, including what the company's future should look like. Neither John's goals nor his behavior reflected the company's mission, so Jean ousts John from the business. Reasons for a co-founder's departure There are a number of reasons that a co-founder may want to part ways with another co-founder. 1. Lack of dedication A startup that wants to scale for a big exit typically requires founders who dedicate long hours for little pay (at least at the beginning). While some founders, like Jean, are willing to do that, some, like John, are not. Jean was willing to put in as many hours as it took to meet her responsibilities. John, on the other hand, arrived late and left early, demonstrating that he wasn't dedicated to his role — or the company. 2. Difficult to work with Some founders are simply difficult to work with. They're not collaborative, they're closed off to others' input or they belittle or micromanage their employees. While in the office, John's attitude was one of superiority. He felt that certain tasks were below him and that others should do the "heavy lifting." He criticized his employees at every opportunity, lowering morale and eventually pushing a very dedicated, key employee out of the company. 3. Lack of alignment with vision While a dream team of co-founders might be committed and great as colleagues, they might have different visions about the company's future. For example, they may disagree on a pivot other founders believe is necessary. Jean wanted to focus on R&D to ensure ongoing innovation, but John was focused on expanding the company. In addition to his behavior, this lack of alignment caused so much tension that Jean started the process of terminating her co-founder. Related: So Your Co-Founder is Threatening to Quit Unless You Give Them More Equity. What Should You Do? Legal considerations In addition to mistakes that can be made during the termination process, there are several legal considerations to keep in mind when co-founders separate. 1. Complying with employment law Founders are almost always employees by law. When terminating an employee, keep in mind — and meet — the legalities of termination, including filing certain paperwork and notices, and meeting deadlines for paying the final paycheck, for example. When the tension between Jean and John began, Jean documented each instance so she had relevant backup at the time of John's termination. 2. Is your relationship buttoned up? Make sure you are not giving an ousted co-founder leverage. Breaking promises or not protecting the company legally in its founding documents on IP assignments or confidentiality obligations means that they now have valuable IP the company needs. 3. Do you have the legal right? It's critical to ensure that a co-founder has the legal right to terminate another co-founder. If they do not, they should take the necessary steps to secure those rights; it might not be as simple as telling them they are fired. For example, the company's bylaws might allow a co-founder to be terminated only if the board votes to do so. The ousting founders need to make sure they can — and do — get board support. When John's performance began to decline, Jean consulted with the company's board to ensure the board was informed from the outset. More legal considerations: What NOT to do While there are considerations to make so as not to run into legal issues, there are also considerations for what NOT to do. 1. Don't think about a separation agreement A legally binding separation agreement can get you a release of claims, potentially non-disparagement terms and other benefits for the company, including agreements to not sue. Investors will want to see this if at all possible in diligence. It's worth some money to get this. As soon as John's performance started suffering and other employees began complaining about his behavior, Jean consulted an employment attorney to prepare the paperwork necessary for a separation agreement, enabling the process to be completed without worrying about a potential lawsuit. 2. Forget to cut off access to systems To prevent an ousted co-founder from accessing company information post-termination, ensure that they can no longer access the company's systems. Disgruntled employees with access to company data can cause major problems. Once John was officially "out," all access to company information was cut off; Jean knew that, if given the opportunity, John would have tried to access certain data once he exited the company. 3. Bash the ousted founder to employees, investors and other stakeholders Sometimes in trying to explain the ousted founder's departure, founders will resort to speaking negatively about them; this opens the company to defamation liability. It can also reflect badly on the company and the founding terms. Finally, it can lead to the ousted founder becoming more hostile toward the company. Despite their differences, Jean maintained reasonable levels of professionalism. Although the process was stressful for her, her team and ultimately the company, John's ouster and the reasons behind it remained within the executive leadership team. Related: 4 Sane Strategies for Maintaining Healthy Co-Founder Relationships Ramifications of skirting the law All of this advice hinges on the remaining founders meeting the requirements to legally terminate a co-founder. When they don't, there are ramifications. 1. Incurring penalties and legal claims First, by not complying with employment laws, penalties can be incurred, and legal claims are given to the ousted founder; these can add up. For example, in California, if all wages aren't paid on the final day of employment, the ousted founder is entitled to a penalty equal to one full day of wages for every day until they are fully paid (up to 30 days). Jean's diligence in consulting a startup attorney prepared her for the separation. In addition to the separation agreement, Jean presented John with his final paycheck at the termination meeting. 2. Post-termination negotiations If you don't button up your relationship with the founder prior to termination, you will be stuck post-termination negotiating for what you need. At this point, you are unlikely to have much leverage. 3. No separation agreement If you fail to get a separation agreement, investors may push on you in diligence to get one later; this is often difficult. Also, you may subject the company to claims that would have been released if money was offered as severance at the outset. Note that a founder may sign a separation agreement quickly if it's offered with a positive message and incentives. The absence of an up-front offer can result in litigation, and demands may increase. The bottom line While there are myriad factors that contribute to the ousting of a company founder, it behooves those on the company side to make appropriate preparations to avoid legal troubles. Ready to break through your revenue ceiling? Join us at Level Up, a conference for ambitious business leaders to unlock new growth opportunities.

Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Fund manager panel raises eyebrows with market forecasts
This article is based on TheStreet's Stock & Markets Podcast. Hosted by the veteranWall Streetinvestor Chris Versace, the weekly podcasts are available early to members of TheStreetPro investing club. Tennis, anyone? The beloved racket sport received a mention during the July 2 edition of TheStreet Stocks & Markets Podcast. Chris Versace, lead portfolio manager of TheStreet Pro portfolio, spoke with Todd Campbell, co executive editor at and Helene Meisler, market technician and equity trader on a wide of topics, including tariffs, the S&P 500, and, yes, even tennis. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter "What a crazy ride it's been and what might be coming next.," Versace said at the outset. "At the beginning of the year, expectations were pretty good. The market was moving nicely higher January, February. And then we hit a skid mark." "We continued to fall, especially once we got to Liberation Day in early April," he said, referring to the day President Donald Trump announced his tariff regime. "And then slowly but surely, some of the uncertainties that were weighing on the market started to dial back a little bit." Lo and behold, Versace said, "we exit the first half of the year, the S&P 500 at a new record high, potentially." Meisler worked in a tennis analogy when discussing "down and out" stocks like Pepsi (PEP) and UPS (UPS) , which were both climbing recently. "I always fear that this little rally we're having in those down and outs that I love so much is going to be like the grass court season--short," she said. "And that it's not going to be lengthy like that hardcourt season we have that comes after Wimbledon." More Economic Analysis: Federal Reserve prepares strong message on long-term interest ratesMassive city workers union approves strikeAnalyst makes bold call on stocks, bonds, and gold "I'm glad you connected that," Versace said. Campbell said people won't have tariffs on their bingo cards as long as the status quo persists. "If Trump starts saying it's going to go to 50% on Canada next week because they're not making a trade deal, that's a different story," he said. "But who knows, right? It becomes guesswork now. Look, they didn't care about UK and the China deal. There's no real there there. All they cared was that it looks like we're stabilizing out at a particular rate." "So, you're saying as long as there's some potential progress and we move towards a new framework, over time, the market will wrap its head around it?" Versace asked. "Yes, because in April, May, they were expecting Armageddon," Campbell said. "Anything less than Armageddon is actually a win." "We stopped thinking about tariffs," Meisler said. "As soon as Trump dialed it back a week after liberation day, we stopped thinking about it. We started focusing on the economy. We started focusing on tax cuts and the Fed cutting." "Whatever it is that takes us down next," she added. "it's not anything we're discussing right now. Because if we're discussing it, it's priced in. If you look back a year ago, I mean, even December, how many people talked about tariffs?" Meisler steered the conversation toward an issue that she said needed more attention: the dollar. "All of a sudden, everybody is saying a weak dollar is good for multinationals," she said. "I remember when a weak dollar was bearish, but OK, now it's bullish. And I think the dollar is bottoming. I've been wrong; I can't help it. I think the dollar is making a low. And if the dollar starts going up, I'm certain the narrative is going to change: A strong dollar is good." Related: Veteran fund manager makes bold move on Costco, American Express "But whatever it is, you've got to watch that because that does have an effect on earnings 100%," she added. Campbell said the dollar has the biggest impact on the technology sector, with 59% of sales for tech companies in the S&P 500 coming from overseas. "I just think that how much of the hope that earnings revisions are going to go higher are based upon the impact of the weaker dollar on technology stocks, and what happens if the dollar does find its footing here. It's at a three-year low. More than three years, I don't know." Versace said that consensus expectations have been revised over the last few weeks to account specifically for the dollar "I think there are a lot of folks out there going, channel checks are good, yada, yada, yada, but they're not saying anything about that," he said. "So I think you're right, Helene. I think few people are really focused in on the dollar. Or if they are, they're not saying dollar." As the podcast wrapped up, Campbell encouraged listeners to remember that it's summer. "Enjoy time with family and friends," he said. "The market's going to do what the market's going to do. And just remember that good times and bad times, as we learn in April, things can change on a dime. It's just the way the market is." Related: Veteran fund manager who forecast S&P 500 crash unveils surprising update The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


Business Wire
7 hours ago
- Business Wire
WELL Health Announces Voting Results for Election of Directors
VANCOUVER, British Columbia--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- WELL Health Technologies Corp. (TSX: WELL) (OTCQX: WHTCF) (the ' Company ' or ' WELL '), a digital healthcare company focused on positively impacting health outcomes by leveraging technology to empower healthcare practitioners and their patients globally, is pleased to announce that at its annual general meeting held June 30, 2025 (the ' Meeting '), all of the nominees for election as directors of the Company referred to in its notice of meeting and information circular dated May 28, 2025 for the Meeting were elected. A total of 67,105,724 common shares representing 26.52% of the outstanding common shares of the Company were voted by proxy at the Meeting. Voting results for the election of directors at the Meeting were as follows: Resolution Vote Type Total Votes % Voted Kenneth Cawkell For Against Withheld 55,319,811 0 11,776,033 82.45% 0% 17.55% John Kim For Against Withheld 63,350,632 0 3,745,212 94.42% 0% 5.58% Sybil E Jen Lau For Against Withheld 65,493,814 0 1,602,030 97.61% 0% 2.39% Thomas Liston For Against Withheld 58,911,074 0 8,184,770 87.80% 0% 12.20% Tara McCarville For Against Withheld 58,713,637 0 8,382,207 87.51% 0% 12.49% Hamed Shahbazi For Against Withheld 49,082,859 0 18,012,985 73.15% 0% 26.85% Expand The results of other matters considered at the Meeting are reported in the Report of Voting Results as filed on SEDAR+ ( filed on July 4, 2025. WELL HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES CORP. Per: 'Hamed Shahbazi' Hamed Shahbazi Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Director About WELL Health Technologies Corp. WELL's mission is to tech-enable healthcare providers. We do this by developing the best technologies, services, and support available, which ensures healthcare providers are empowered to positively impact patient outcomes. WELL's comprehensive healthcare and digital platform includes extensive front and back-office management software applications that help physicians run and secure their practices. WELL's solutions enable more than 42,000 healthcare providers between the US and Canada and power the largest owned and operated healthcare ecosystem in Canada with more than 210 clinics supporting primary care, specialized care, and diagnostic services. In the United States WELL's solutions are focused on specialized markets such as the gastrointestinal market, women's health, primary care, and mental health. WELL is publicly traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol 'WELL' and on the OTC Exchange under the symbol 'WHTCF'. To learn more about the Company, please visit: