logo
A familiar metric: White House says to expect Iran decision within ‘two weeks'

A familiar metric: White House says to expect Iran decision within ‘two weeks'

Yahoo5 hours ago

When it comes to a possible U.S. military strike in Iran, Donald Trump has raised more questions than he's answered. Last week, the president and his team went out of their way to say that the United States had 'nothing to do with' Israel's attack on Iran. This week, Trump declared, 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' before demanding the country's 'unconditional surrender.'
No one seems able to say with confidence what the Republican intends to do, why he'd do it, or even when we might learn of his decision. I've found myself periodically checking his social media platform, looking for some kind of poorly written 'Bombs Away' message, followed by an unhealthy number of exclamation points.
Evidently, I can stop hitting refresh — for two weeks.
At her latest briefing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt acknowledged the 'speculation' about the White House's policy, which led her to read a prepared statement from the president. It read, 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.'
It's difficult to say with confidence whether these negotiations exist or whether they'll succeed, but the fact that Trump and his team has rolled out another 'two week' timeline represents a remarkable failure of self-awareness.
Last week for example, the president said U.S. trading partners should expect letters on unilateral tariff rates in 'two weeks.' Shortly before that, the president was asked about Vladimir Putin's alleged interest in 'peace.' He replied, 'I can't tell you that, but I'll let you know in about two weeks.'
Last month, Trump was asked about tariff rates on pharmaceutical products. 'I'll know in the next two weeks,' he said.
Alas, we can keep going. Where's Trump's health care plan? It'll be ready in 'two weeks.' What about a possible minimum-wage increase? That, too, will be unveiled in 'two weeks.' On everything from tax policy to infrastructure, immigration to reproductive health, the president's detailed solutions are always just 'two weeks' away.
By now, most observers are probably familiar with how the game is played: The Republican is asked for his position on an issue; he dodges the question by saying he'll make an announcement 'in two weeks'; and then he waits for everyone to forget about his self-imposed deadline.
Except, we don't forget. Instead, we shake our heads in exasperation because of the cynical assumptions at the heart of this unfortunate rhetorical trick, which no one falls for anymore.
In this latest example, a reporter felt compelled to remind Leavitt of the familiarity of the administration's latest timeline.
If recent history is any guide, she and Trump will keep using it anyway, indifferent to the embarrassment.
This post updates our related earlier coverage.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blue state GOP lawmakers urge major healthcare change for illegal immigrants
Blue state GOP lawmakers urge major healthcare change for illegal immigrants

Fox News

time15 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Blue state GOP lawmakers urge major healthcare change for illegal immigrants

EXCLUSIVE: Colorado congressional Republicans are asking the state to stop allowing illegal immigrants to enroll in the state's Medicaid program, Health First Colorado. The program's availability to those in the country illegally who meet other requirements for coverage started this year, and the Republicans pitched changes in a letter to Democratic Gov. Jared Polis Wednesday. On Health First Colorado's website, it says, "Don't let immigration status stop you from applying for health coverage," citing state law. "Other Democrat-run states like California and Minnesota are beginning to walk back their policies that offer free and subsidized health care to illegal immigrants even without the One Big Beautiful Bill Act being law because they know that these policies are expensive, bad deals for their Medicaid beneficiaries," the letter from representatives Gabe Evans, Jeff Crank and Lauren Boebert states. "It is disheartening to see Colorado continue to double down and prioritize individuals who are unlawfully present even in the face of adverse impacts on Americans who need Medicaid the most, and we urge you to reverse course," the Republicans added. As the letter notes, Colorado is one of seven states that offer public healthcare coverage that does not factor in one's immigration status. California, Minnesota and Illinois are making reforms to their Medicaid offerings, according to The Wall Street Journal. Minnesota and Illinois are ending the availability as part of budget deals, and California is navigating different options, like a possible enrollment freeze, as its legislature hashes out a budget. In California, a recent poll revealed nearly 60% oppose Medicaid for illegal immigrants despite the law going into effect last year. The lawmakers added that the reconciliation bill includes a provision that will significantly penalize states that provide coverage to illegal immigrants because the Medicaid programs receive both federal and state taxpayer dollars. "There is a renewed urgency to revise this policy in light of the likely enactment of federal legislation to reduce the Medicaid [Federal Medical Assistance Percentage] for the expansion population from 90% to 80% for sanctuary states who use taxpayer dollars to cover illegal immigrants. As you know, this change would pose significant budgetary challenges to Colorado – but only if the state continues to pursue this policy," the letter states. A spokesperson for Polis' office told Fox News Digital in a statement that the reconciliation bill in the U.S. Senate should be completely redone from the House version. "Governor Polis is disappointed these three lawmakers are trying to gut Medicaid and kick people off private insurance, which would raise insurance costs for everyone who buys commercial insurance because of cost-shifting. Thanks to their votes — which they're trying to distract from — nearly 400,000 Coloradans would lose health care, which would also raise costs for everyone else," the statement said. "Governor Polis continues calling on the Senate to start from scratch with this terrible bill, including truly protecting Medicaid and extending critical subsidies for those who purchase plans off the health exchange so Coloradans can afford health care."

Consumer confidence up in June amid ‘dark shadow' of inflation and war
Consumer confidence up in June amid ‘dark shadow' of inflation and war

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Consumer confidence up in June amid ‘dark shadow' of inflation and war

Consumer confidence improved marginally in June despite the 'dark shadow' of inflation and turmoil in the Middle East, figures show. GfK's long-running Consumer Confidence Index rose two points but remains firmly in negative territory at minus 18. Confidence in the general economy over the coming year rose five points, driving the improvement, but still remains at minus 28 – 17 points worse than last June. The forecast for personal finances over the next 12 months remained unchanged at positive two – two points down on this time last year. The major purchase index, an indicator of confidence in buying big ticket items, also remained unchanged at minus 16, seven points better than last June. Neil Bellamy, consumer insights director at GfK, said: 'Consumers have been resolute in their views on their wallets, with June's personal financial situation scores – past and future – unchanged from May. 'Yet confidence is still fragile because the dark shadow of inflation is a day-to-day challenge for so many of us. 'With petrol prices set to rise in the coming weeks following the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East, and with ongoing uncertainty as to the full impact of tariffs, there is still much that could negatively impact consumers. 'With so much volatility, now is certainly not the time to hope for the proverbial 'light at the end of the tunnel'.' Sign in to access your portfolio

Lululemon Is Cutting 150 Corporate Jobs
Lululemon Is Cutting 150 Corporate Jobs

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lululemon Is Cutting 150 Corporate Jobs

Lululemon Athletica Inc. is changing up part of its organizational structure, resulting in about 150 job cuts at its corporate headquarters. The impacted employees are part of the yoga-inspired apparel firm's store support centers. More from WWD Beyond Yoga Puts Lululemon and Athleta on Notice With Bigger Store Format Revenue Rises at Lululemon in Q1, CEO Calvin McDonald Bullish Despite Cautious U.S. Consumer Why TikTok Can't Stop Talking About Lululemon's 2-in-1 Dress and Its Styling Frenzy With Shoes: The $148 Debate, Explained 'As we continue to deliver on our strategy, we regularly assess our business operations to ensure we are well-positioned for the future. Following a recent review, we have decided to evolve some aspects of our organizational structure to operate with more agility and further invest in our growth,' a Lululemon company spokesperson said, confirming media reports of the layoffs. 'This is not a decision we made lightly, and we are committed to supporting our employees through this transition.' Despite first-quarter revenue gains, investors earlier this month were spooked when Lululemon chief executive officer Calvin McDonald warned that U.S. consumers were being more cautious in their spends. That sent shares of Lululemon down 22 percent to $258 in after-hours trading on June 5. Shares of the apparel firm have fallen further, and Wednesday's close was down 2.8 percent to $228.65. While the company did provide second-quarter guidance — net revenue in the range of $2.54 billion to $2.56 billion — and kept its top-line forecast for the year, Lululemon did cut its earnings per share to a range of $14.58 to $14.78, down from its earlier forecast of $14.95 to $15.15 in March. BMO analyst Simeon Siegel noted that the updated EPS forecast market the 'first' fiscal-year EPS lowering in the first quarter since fiscal-year 2014. 'We continue to see Lululemon as a strong, but overstretched, brand and worry about long-term domestic revenue sizing,' he said. UBS softlines analyst Jay Sole has shares of Lululemon at 'neutral.' 'A pivotal Lululemon question is if the slowdown in its U.S. business over the last 12-plus months has been temporary, driven by one-off factors, or a sign of something more fundamental. Our main takeaway from Lululemon's 1Q report is the likelihood that something more fundamental is at play has increased,' he wrote in a note. Sole also said the U.S. could slow down in the back half of this year due to the impact of tariffs on consumer spending, and he said that there's also risk that Lululemon's 'China sales growth rate decelerates, too.' This year, the company signed British race car driver Lewis Hamilton as brand ambassador, and in April teamed with the Professional Women's Hockey League for an inaugural collaboration that spotlighted fan-favorite Lululemon designs. Best of WWD Harvey Nichols Sees Sales Dip, Losses Widen in Year Marred by Closures Nike Logs $1.3 Billion Profit, But Supply Chain Issues Persist Zegna Shares Start Trading on New York Stock Exchange Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store