This July Fourth, my patriotism looks like two middle fingers – and that's OK
We can love this country and loathe the people in charge. We can be simultaneously proud of this country and embarrassed of the things being done in its name.
As America enters the patriotism-heavy week of the Fourth of July with an unpopular president behaving in myriad un-American ways, it's worth wondering what patriotism should look like in this moment.
Is it saluting the flag and dutifully respecting the office of the presidency, looking past the actions of President Donald Trump and his administration to celebrate our imperfect nation?
That's certainly what he would want. If nothing else, Trump in his second term has shown Americans that fealty to him is all that matters. His lackeys in Congress parrot his language and propose bills to put the King of Mar-a-Lago's face on currency or Mount Rushmore.
As Trump's un-American actions mount, we have to find our own patriotism
On Thursday, June 26, journalists were scolded mercilessly by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for having the audacity to report that Trump's recent bombing of Iranian nuclear sites might not have been as successful as the president claimed. It was as close to 'You must not question Dear Leader!' rhetoric as you can get without being in North Korea.
He suggested that reporters – you know, the Fourth Estate, the ones responsible for holding the powerful accountable – take the president's word for things, suggesting: 'Wave an American flag. Be proud of what we accomplished.'
Some will follow the administration's instructions, of course. Trump will always have his hardcore MAGA base, and that base will never deign to question his infallibility. They, like Trump, will wrap themselves tight in the American flag and use it as a shield to deflect inconvenient things like facts or criticism. They will, as Hegseth and Trump did, claim any notion that a military action fell short of its goals is a direct insult to our brave soldiers.
Opinion: From massive protests to a puny parade, America really let Donald Trump down
Patriotism in the age of Trump, for many, is standing up to the nonsense
But what of the rest of us? You know, the ones in the majority, assuming you care to believe public polling that shows Trump's favorability well underwater and negative views of his decision to bomb Iran, his stewardship of the economy and his draconian acts against migrants.
What does our patriotism, in this rather pivotal moment in American history, look like? How do we celebrate America – the right-now version of America – when democracy looks as fragile as a cracked sheet of thin ice over a warming pond?
I imagine everyone will have a different answer, and I'm not here to claim I know best. But as a critic of Trump and all he has done to mangle this country and its sense of decency, I can share my form of Fourth of July patriotism.
I still love this country. That's why I mercilessly mock the rubes in charge.
It involves still loving the heck out of this country, and celebrating the fact that, at least for the moment, I'm free to tell Hegseth to take his little flag-waving idea and his 'How dare you question our authority!' attitude and pound sand.
It involves sharing a quote from Trump talking about himself, Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in the wake of the Iran bombings: 'We feel like warriors.'
Then it involves using space in my column to mercilessly ridicule the absurdity of that quote: A warrior? You're as much a warrior as I am a duck, and buddy, my hide is featherless and my feet aren't remotely webbed. You bone-spurred your way out of the Vietnam War and quite possibly bombed Iran because people made fun of your sad birthday parade. Get over yourself.
Authoritarians are sensitive little flowers – give 'em hell
Authoritarian types like Trump hate mockery. Their fragile egos can't bear it. So I, like many non-MAGA Americans, give them the derision they deserve. In a country built on resistance to a monarchy and aristocrats, that is patriotic. In fact, it's almost definitionally American.
We can love this country and loathe the people in charge. We can be simultaneously proud of this country and embarrassed of the things being done in its name.
So my patriotism this Fourth of July week is to loudly declare that my America doesn't stand for masked federal agents grabbing migrant children and mothers and fathers off the streets and whisking them away without due process. My America is welcoming, and just, and decent. And no two-bit con-artist president is going to take away my belief that these un-American actions can and will be stopped.
Nothing less American than saying a mayoral candidate should be deported
Republican Rep. Andy Ogles sent a letter Thursday to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi declaring that Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic primary winner in New York City's mayoral race, is 'an antisemitic, socialist, communist who will destroy the great City of New York' and calling for him to be deported.
Aside from being baseless and laughably stupid, Ogles' letter and the intent behind it are as un-American as it gets. My patriotism will take the form of calling Ogles a sad, opportunistic dingbat and noting that future generations of his family will deny any connection to him, lest they be cast out of civil society or die of embarrassment.
My America ridicules powerful dummies and stands strong in protest
My America won't tolerate racists or xenophobes or clout-chasing knuckleheads who think the American dream involves trampling carelessly over others while forgetting the very things that make this country great.
My America fights back against tyranny and indecency with ridicule, peaceful public protest, voting and a unified voice.
I'm not happy with the state of America, and I'm particularly not happy with the array of malicious weirdos currently running the joint.
But I'm not going to look at the American flag and feel ashamed. That flag still represents a country I believe to be well worth fighting for, and a set of ideas I won't let a pack of grifters and warped-brain scoundrels erase.
Opinion: Trump says we have 'too many non-working holidays.' He's right. Rest is for LOSERS!
On the Fourth of July, find your patriotism and live it
I'm not alone in feeling this way. I know that.
So in the lead-up to the booms and the colorful firework bursts and the barbecues, to the noise and sweat and the dull roar of chatter from family and friends, find your own patriotism. Speak loudly. Stand strong. And believe you have it in you to make a change.
Even if it's just throwing up a middle finger to the bastards forcing us to feel like America is upside down.
Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @rexhuppke.bsky.social and on Facebook at facebook.com/RexIsAJerk
You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
5 minutes ago
- UPI
Democrat Dwight Evans won't seek re-election in U.S. House
U.S. Rep. Dwight Evans of Pennsylvania speaks during a news conference the U.S. Capitol building in February 2022. On Monday, the Democrat said he would not run for another term. File Photo by Leigh Vogel/UPI | License Photo June 30 (UPI) -- Democratic U.S. House member Dwight Evans said Monday he won't run for election again in 2026 after representing Philadelphia in the chamber since 2016. Evans, 71, suffered a stroke last year and has missed several months of votes. Until his announcement, he said he intended to run again in Pennsylvania's heavy Democratic Third Congressional District in Philadelphia. "Serving the people of Philadelphia has been the honor of my life," Evans said in a statement. "And I remain in good health and fully capable of continuing to serve. After some discussions this weekend and thoughtful reflection, I have decided that the time is right to announce that I will not be seeking re-election in 2026. I will serve out the full term that ends Jan. 3, 2027." He succeeded Chaka Fattah, who resigned after being indicted on federal corruption charges. "I am deeply proud of what I have been able to accomplish over my 45 years in elected office -- from revitalizing neighborhoods block by block to fighting for justice, economic opportunity, investments in infrastructure and education," he said. "I cannot express the gratitude that I have for the trust that voters put in me as their voice in both state and federal office. It has been a privilege of a lifetime to serve as their advocate in government." Evans was elected as the Democratic chairman of the House Appropriations Committee in 1990, serving 20 years. Evans said he has remained "rooted in his neighborhood" throughout his career, and lived just blocks from where he grew up in the city. He was a public school teacher and community organizer with the Urban League until he began working in government at 26 in 1980. He was elected to the state's House of Representatives. State Sen. Sharif Street on Monday posted on X his intention to run for Evans' seat, writing "I'm in." Two state representatives, Chris Raab and Morgan Cephas, told WCAU-TV they are considering seeking the seat. The U.S. House currently has a breakdown of 220 Republicans and 212 Democrats with three vacancies after the death of three Democrats. Longtime Rep. Jan Schakowsky, an 81-year-old Democrat from Illinois, said earlier this year she wouldn't run again. Republican Mark Green of Tennessee said he will retire after the budget policy bill goes through Congress. Another Republican, Don Bacon of Nebraska, plans to retire at the end of the 119th Congress.
Miami Herald
6 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Ford CEO Jim Farley Has a Clever Defense for Auto Tariffs
At a June 27 appearance at the Aspen Ideas Festival moderated by author and biographer Walter Isaacson, Ford CEO Jim Farley defended that some limited, targeted import tariffs could help the Blue Oval and other Detroit automakers survive and create more industrial jobs. Still, Farley said there needs to be a balance between a "fair playing field" to promote U.S. manufacturing while keeping cars affordable, which unfortunately will require importing components from other countries like Mexico. "What I like to say is, let's create a fair playing field for the finished vehicle. For parts, let us import parts from around the world," Farley said. "Let us keep Mexico stable, and other countries. That's what we're working with the administration on." The Ford figurehead's remarks at Aspen comes four months after he criticized President Trump's tariff policies at the same time Ford announced its Q4 and FY 2024 financial results in February, where he noted that they would create "a lot of cost and a lot of chaos," as duties on Mexican and Canadian imports "would blow a hole in the U.S. industry that we have never seen." However, he has slightly softened his position, noting that some protectionist measures could help promote American blue-collar industries, such as construction, manufacturing, agriculture, and skilled trades, to the next generation of skilled workforce instead of white-collar office work. He noted that the American workforce needs "to go back to the basics to trade schools" and that "we need to have a society that doesn't look down on people like that," adding that its factory in Germany participates in an apprenticeship program where students are exposed to an industrial environment "starting in junior high school." "What happens if you [the United States] have to defend yourself?" Farley told Issacson and the crowd at Aspen. "What, is Google going to make the tanks? We've talked a lot about energy independence, but we need to start talking about industrial independence. People do not realize how dependent we are as a country on making things in other countries." Farley pointed to the rare earth mineral crisis as an example. Over the last three weeks, Ford temporarily idled factories in the U.S. due to a shortage of magnets containing rare earth minerals, which are used in many different components. "We cannot get any high-powered magnets without China," Farley said. "We shut down plants for the last three weeks because we cannot get high-powered magnets. We can't make that stuff." As someone who graduated from a vocational high school, I see an inherent value in what Farley is saying. That's especially true as the topic of his conversation with the Steve Jobs and Elon Musk biographer turned to the Chinese EV market, where he mentioned that realizing the strength of the Chinese automotive industry was "the most humbling thing I have ever seen," adding that "seventy percent of all EVs in the world, electric vehicles, are made in China." However, I don't think that getting more people into the trades and into industrial environments is an end-all, be-all solution. As time evolves, technologies such as robotics and AI may have a larger role in industrial might; at least that is what Chinese companies like Xiaomi have been doing to scale up their car factories. Farley isn't wrong for wanting to try at least; however, there is more than what meets the eye on a topic where there is no straight solution. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Miami Herald
6 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Who is Senate parliamentarian? What to know about staffer Trump seeks to overrule
At the heart of the debate over the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' stands one little-known official: the Senate parliamentarian. The low-profile congressional official has been thrust into the spotlight after issuing a procedural decision on the GOP-backed spending bill, drawing sharp responses from some Republicans. President Donald Trump himself has even weighed in, calling for the 'unelected senate staffer' to be ignored. Who is the Senate parliamentarian? What powers do they have? And why are Republicans up in arms? Here is what to know. Who is the parliamentarian? The Senate parliamentarian is a nonpartisan advisor who makes recommendations to lawmakers regarding the interpretation of rules and precedents in the upper chamber. The role was established in 1935 amid the passage of a slew of New Deal-era laws, which 'expanded opportunities for procedural confusion and mischief,' according to Senate records. The parliamentarian is appointed by the Senate majority leader and serves at their pleasure, according to the National Constitution Center. The official's rulings are not necessarily final. The presiding officer of the Senate — typically the vice president or the president pro tempore — can simply ignore their advice, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center. This has happened a few times in recent history, including in 2017, when GOP lawmakers changed Senate rules to allow Supreme Court nominees to be confirmed with a simple majority. That said, the Senate typically adheres to the parliamentarian's guidance, according to Time. This included in 2021, when the staffer rejected Democrats' attempt to include a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants in the 'Build Back Better' bill. Currently, the office of the parliamentarian is held by Elizabeth MacDonough, who has served in the position since 2012. She was appointed by then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat. MacDonough formerly worked at the Senate library and as a trial attorney, according to the Wall Street Journal. She also advised former Vice President Al Gore during a recount dispute following the 2000 election. Why are Republicans upset? Some Republicans expressed outrage at the parliamentarian after she issued rulings on the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which is currently being considered by the Senate, following its passage in the House in May. In late June, MacDonough ruled that a series of provisions in the bill violate the Senate's Byrd Rule, which prohibits 'extraneous' provisions from being included in budget reconciliation bills. One such provision would have charged immigrants a $1,000 fee to apply for asylum in the U.S., according to The Hill. MacDonough also ruled against several provisions that affect Medicaid. One was a proposed cap on provider taxes, which states use to fund Medicaid, according to CNBC. Another would block noncitizens from accessing Medicaid in addition to other health programs, according to USA Today. In response to these proposed changes, multiple GOP lawmakers telegraphed their frustration with MacDonough. 'The WOKE Senate Parliamentarian, who was appointed by Harry Reid and advised Al Gore, just STRUCK DOWN a provision BANNING illegals from stealing Medicaid from American citizens,' Sen. Tommy Tuberville, a Republican from Alabama, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on June 26. 'THE SENATE PARLIAMENTARIAN SHOULD BE FIRED ASAP.' Rep. Greg Steube, a Florida Republican, also singled out MacDonough for criticism. 'How is it that an unelected swamp bureaucrat, who was appointed by Harry Reid over a decade ago, gets to decide what can and cannot go in President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill?' he wrote on X. He then called on Vice President JD Vance — using his power as the presiding officer in the Senate — to ignore the proposed changes. Trump appeared to concur with this view. 'Great Congressman Greg Steube is 100% correct,' he wrote on Truth Social on June 29. 'An unelected Senate Staffer (Parliamentarian), should not be allowed to hurt the Republicans Bill. Wants many fantastic things out. NO!' However, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, poured cold water on the push to sideline MacDonough. When asked by Politico about overruling her on June 26, Thune said, 'No, that would not be a good option for getting a bill done.' Meanwhile, other Republicans have defended MacDonough. North Carolina Sen. Thom Thillis, who recently announced he will not seek reelection, called her a 'straight shooter,' according to Reuters. And Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy told reporters, 'Nah, never overrule the parliamentarian.'
