Democrat Dwight Evans won't seek re-election in U.S. House
U.S. Rep. Dwight Evans of Pennsylvania speaks during a news conference the U.S. Capitol building in February 2022. On Monday, the Democrat said he would not run for another term. File Photo by Leigh Vogel/UPI | License Photo
June 30 (UPI) -- Democratic U.S. House member Dwight Evans said Monday he won't run for election again in 2026 after representing Philadelphia in the chamber since 2016.
Evans, 71, suffered a stroke last year and has missed several months of votes.
Until his announcement, he said he intended to run again in Pennsylvania's heavy Democratic Third Congressional District in Philadelphia.
"Serving the people of Philadelphia has been the honor of my life," Evans said in a statement. "And I remain in good health and fully capable of continuing to serve. After some discussions this weekend and thoughtful reflection, I have decided that the time is right to announce that I will not be seeking re-election in 2026. I will serve out the full term that ends Jan. 3, 2027."
He succeeded Chaka Fattah, who resigned after being indicted on federal corruption charges.
"I am deeply proud of what I have been able to accomplish over my 45 years in elected office -- from revitalizing neighborhoods block by block to fighting for justice, economic opportunity, investments in infrastructure and education," he said. "I cannot express the gratitude that I have for the trust that voters put in me as their voice in both state and federal office. It has been a privilege of a lifetime to serve as their advocate in government."
Evans was elected as the Democratic chairman of the House Appropriations Committee in 1990, serving 20 years.
Evans said he has remained "rooted in his neighborhood" throughout his career, and lived just blocks from where he grew up in the city.
He was a public school teacher and community organizer with the Urban League until he began working in government at 26 in 1980. He was elected to the state's House of Representatives.
State Sen. Sharif Street on Monday posted on X his intention to run for Evans' seat, writing "I'm in."
Two state representatives, Chris Raab and Morgan Cephas, told WCAU-TV they are considering seeking the seat.
The U.S. House currently has a breakdown of 220 Republicans and 212 Democrats with three vacancies after the death of three Democrats.
Longtime Rep. Jan Schakowsky, an 81-year-old Democrat from Illinois, said earlier this year she wouldn't run again.
Republican Mark Green of Tennessee said he will retire after the budget policy bill goes through Congress.
Another Republican, Don Bacon of Nebraska, plans to retire at the end of the 119th Congress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Rep. Greg Steube says passing Trump megabill in the House will likely ‘be a challenge'
Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) said on Monday passing President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in the House will likely 'be a challenge.' 'I do think you're gonna have some challenges on the House side. We can only lose three votes,' Steube told NewsNation's Blake Burman on 'The Hill.' 'You've got 218 you got to get to, we can only lose three, if we lose four the bill's dead, and you've got things in here that moderates don't like, and you've got things in here that conservatives don't like. So, it is certainly going to be a challenge.' House moderate Republicans and hard-line conservatives have recently expressed rising opposition to the Senate's version of the 'big, beautiful bill' only days before the lower chamber is set to consider the legislation. Democrats have already expressed their own vehement distaste for the bill, with members like Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) calling it a 'big bad betrayal bill' and Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) saying it is an 'evil bill.' 'If Republicans pass this big bad betrayal bill, they are quite literally ensuring that more poor Americans will DIE so that billionaires and giant corporations can get a tax cut,' Jayapal said in a post on the social platform X Monday. Former close Trump ally Elon Musk said Monday he would support primary challengers to any Republicans who backed Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' Musk said on X.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats fail to overturn ruling that tax cuts in GOP megabill don't add to deficit
The Senate voted along party lines Monday that making the expiring 2017 tax cuts permanent as part of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' could be scored as deficit neutral and therefore comply with the Byrd Rule, allowing the bill to pass with a simple-majority vote. Democrats failed to defeat the ruling by the Senate chair, which Republicans control, that the chamber's 940-page One Big, Beautiful Bill Act does not violate the 1974 Congressional Budget Act by using a controversial 'current policy' baseline to score the extension of President Trump's expiring tax cuts as not adding to the deficit. If the tax portion of the bill were scored on a 'current law' baseline, which assumes the 2017 Trump tax cuts would expire at the end of 2025, then it would add an estimated $3.5 trillion to federal deficits between 2025-34 and would add to deficits after 2034 — beyond the 10-year budget window allowed by the Byrd Rule. Scored this way, the Republican bill would fail the rule, which governs what legislation is eligible to pass the Senate with a simple-majority vote on the reconciliation fast track, and Republicans would be forced to rewrite large parts of the measure. But when scored with a 'current policy' baseline, the Congressional Budget Office projects the tax cuts in the Finance Committee's section of the bill would increase deficits by not more than $1.5 trillion between 2025-34 and would not increase on-budget deficits after 2034. Democrats argued a current policy baseline had never been used before in a budget reconciliation bill, and had never been used to score an extension of expiring tax cuts as not adding to future deficits, and therefore was not in compliance with the Senate's Byrd Rule. And Democrats highlighted over the weekend that most of the Republican reconciliation package uses a 'current law' baseline to project the cost of the legislation. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) accused Republicans of 'deploying fake math and budgetary hocus-pocus to make it seem like their billionaire giveaways don't cost anything.' Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) accused Republicans of 'going nuclear' to blow up the Senate rules so they can make Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent. 'This is the nuclear option. It's just hidden behind a whole lot of Washington, D.C., lingo,' Wyden said on the floor. Wyden pointed out through a parliamentary inquiry that the Finance portion of the bill used two different baselines, current policy and current law. Senate Democrats had tried to schedule a meeting with Republican Budget Committee staff and with the parliamentarian to discuss whether using a current policy baseline violated Senate precedent and the Byrd Rule, but Republicans 'flat-out refused' to participate in such a meeting, according to a person familiar with the conversations. Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Monday morning that Republicans are not overruling the parliamentarian and asserted the parliamentarian has said it is up to him as Budget chair to set the baseline. And he argued Democrats in the past have supported the use of a current policy baseline to project the cost of legislation, although it hasn't been done before for a budget reconciliation package. He noted former Democratic Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad (N.D.) used a current policy baseline for a past farm bill. Republicans also point out former President Obama's budget office supported using a current policy baseline to score the extension of the expiring tax cuts from the George W. Bush era at the end of 2012. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said on the floor Monday that former Obama Director of the Office of Management and Budget Jeff Zients supported using the current policy baseline for the 2012 fiscal cliff deal. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Los Angeles Times
35 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Newsom pushes major housing reform through California Legislature
SACRAMENTO — California lawmakers stood around Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday and celebrated the passage of the state budget and 'transformative' housing legislation at the state Capitol. Between mutual praise and handshakes in front of television news cameras, there was little acknowledgment of the power dynamics that played out behind the scenes: Democratic lawmakers once again gave into the demands of the soon-to-be termed out governor. 'We've seen multiple situations now where it's clear that the Legislature is one place and the governor is in another, whether that's bills that have passed overwhelmingly and been vetoed, or it's dragging the Legislature along on budget bills,' said Lorena Gonzalez, leader of the California Labor Federation. 'At some point the Legislature needs to legislate.' Newsom took a rare step earlier this year and publicly supported two bills to lessen environmental review standards to speed up the construction of housing in California. Despite vowing to supercharge home building, Newsom previously backed only smaller-scale policies and construction has stagnated. In his recently published book 'Abundance,' journalist Ezra Klein argued that California's marquee environmental law stands in the way of housing construction — a critique that struck a chord with the governor. Newsom, who is considering a 2028 presidential run, this year was hellbent on proving that he's the kind of Democrat who can be part of the solution and push through the government and political logjams. When a pivotal bill designed to streamline housing construction recently stalled in the state Senate, Newsom effectively forced it through despite the concerns of progressive lawmakers, environmental interest groups and labor unions. The governor did so by ensuring that a state budget bill included a 'poison pill' provision that required lawmakers to pass the housing legislation in order for the spending plan to go into effect on July 1. Newsom called the bills the 'most consequential housing reform that we've seen in modern history in the state of California' on Monday evening. 'This was too important to play chance,' Newsom said, adding that he worried reforms would have fallen prey to the same opposition as prior years if he allowed the 'process to unfold in the traditional way.' Democratic lawmakers for years have tried to cut through the thicket of regulations under the California Environmental Quality Act, known as CEQA, and faced stiff opposition from powerful labor groups. These groups, notably the State Building and Construction Trades Council, have argued that any relief offered to developers should be paired with wage and other benefits for workers. The legislation Newsom signed Monday sidestepped those demands from labor. Assembly Bill 130, based on legislation introduced by Assemblymember Buffy Wicks (D-Oakland), exempts most urban housing projects from CEQA, requiring only developers of high-rise — taller than 85 feet — and low-income buildings to pay union-level wages for construction workers. Senate Bill 131 also narrows CEQA mandates for housing construction and further waives the environmental restrictions for some residential rezoning changes. The bill, led by state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco), additionally designates a host of non-residential projects — health clinics, childcare and advanced manufacturing facilities, food banks and more — no longer subject to CEQA. Experts in development said the new legislation could provide the most significant reforms to CEQA in its 55-year history, especially for urban housing. CEQA generally requires proponents to disclose and, if possible, lessen the environmental effects of a construction project. The process sounds simple but often results in thousands of pages of environmental assessments and years of litigation. CEQA creates substantial legal risk for homebuilders and developers and past efforts to alleviate its burdens fell short, said Dave Rand, a prominent Southern California land-use attorney. The bills signed Monday provide relief for the vast majority of housing, he said. High-rise and affordable housing construction often already require union-level pay. 'The worst cog in the wheel has always been CEQA,' Rand said. 'It's always been the place where projects get stuck. This is the first clean, across-the-board, objective, straightforward exemption that anyone can figure out.' He said clients are eager to take advantage of the new rules, which take effect immediately. 'There's over 10 projects we're going to push the go button on with this exemption probably Tuesday,' Rand said. For non-housing projects, the changes do not amount to a comprehensive overhaul but are still meaningful, said Bill Fulton, publisher of the California Planning & Development Report. In the past, state lawmakers have passed narrow, one-off CEQA waivers for projects they supported, such as increased enrollment at UC Berkeley in 2022. SB 131 continues the Legislature's penchant for exempting specific kinds of development from CEQA rules, he said, though the nine categories of projects affected provide more expansive relief than prior efforts. 'They're cherry picking things that they want to speed through,' said Fulton, who has termed the phenomenon 'Swiss cheese CEQA.' Observers said Newsom's actions were the strongest he's taken to force large-scale housing policies through the Legislature. For years, the governor has made audacious promises — on the campaign trail in 2017, Newsom famously promised to support the construction of 3.5 million new homes by the end of this year, a goal likely to fall millions short. But he's been more likely to work behind the scenes or swoop in and praise bills once they've passed rather than publicly shape housing policy, said Chris Elmendorf, a UC Davis law professor. Elmendorf, who supports the new laws, called Newsom's arm-twisting and willingness to challenge entrenched interests, 'an incredible about-face from his MO with respect to the legislative process on controversial housing and environmental issues for the last six, seven years.' The governor has jammed his policy priorities on other topics through Legislature before, including climate legislation, infrastructure and oil regulations, with mixed results over the years. Newsom's term ends in early 2027. His endorsement of the meaningful housing policies, and his strategy to propel one through the state Senate, became a bellwether of his strength at the Capitol as his time in office wanes. Wicks said Newsom 'put a ton of skin in the game' to force the proposals through. 'He went all in on pushing for taking on these sacred cows like CEQA because I think he recognizes that we have to tackle this problem,' Wicks said. Wicks' legislation had cleared the Assembly before the proposal became part of the state budget process, which added pressure on lawmakers to pass the bills. She described herself as 'cautiously optimistic' as it moved through the Capitol and said her house understood the need for reform. Wiener's legislation was slower to gain traction. Just last week, the inability of the Senate and the governor's office to reach an agreement on the proposal held up the announcement of a budget deal. Then Newsom tied the proposal to the budget, essentially requiring lawmakers to pass the bill or risk starting the fiscal year on July 1 without a spending plan. During the debate on SB 131, Sen. Henry Stern (D-Calabasas) said the legislation had 'significant issues' but that he would vote in favor of the measure because of assurances that those would eventually be addressed. 'I think nature and abundance can live side-by-side. In fact, they must,' Stern said. 'We don't want to live in a moonscape California. Want to live in a livable one.' Despite the concerns, lawmakers passed both bills on Monday. Gonzalez was critical of legislators, saying 'nobody is voting their values.' She compared the Legislature going along with Newsom's plan to Republicans in Congress. 'California Democrats are crying foul that legislators and senators are passing things that they don't even know the effect of that aren't in line with their constituents that are just being shoved down their throats by Donald Trump,' Gonzalez said. 'And those same legislators in California are allowing that to happen to themselves.'
