logo
METI may list undersea cables and satellites as critical for economic security

METI may list undersea cables and satellites as critical for economic security

Japan Times16-04-2025

The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry plans to add new items, including undersea cables and satellites, to come under the purview of the economic security policy amid an increasingly uncertain geo-economic climate.
The ministry's panel of experts discussed these new items as part of its revised economic security strategy on Tuesday. As major global powers — the U.S. and China — become more protectionist, securing resources for key industries has become vital for economic security.
Under the Economic Security Promotion Act, the government implements a range of measures to secure vital supply chains, from providing subsidies and low-interest loans to coordinating regulations, stockpiling essential goods, setting up critical infrastructure, and protecting advanced technologies.
Among the technologies proposed for inclusion under the policy are rockets, fusion energy and parts and materials used for nuclear power. The ministry plans to incorporate them in a revised action plan after an approval from the expert panel in late May or June.
'We need to make Japanese products, technologies and infrastructure indispensable,' a ministry official who briefed reporters said. 'Japan needs to be an irreplaceable presence to the world.'
For certain core industries, the ministry emphasized the need for Japan to be self-sufficient so that it is able to manufacture technologies from start to finish without a dependence on other countries.
Citing an example, the trade ministry official stressed the need for Japan to develop the capability to lay undersea cables on its own in addition to manufacturing them.
Currently, 99% of Japan's international communications — from wired internet to smartphone networking — rely on undersea cables. Although Japan's NEC is one of the world's top three manufacturers of undersea cables, holding about 30% of market share, Chinese companies have been rapidly growing their influence.
In the space sector, Japan has strengths in specific rocket components such as sensors, but still lacks full launch capability. The government aims to secure domestically produced parts and strengthen the country's ability to carry out independent space launches.
Taking into consideration the rapid growth of generative artificial intelligence, the government is making an all-out effort to support and advance the AI ecosystem. It also underlined a focus on improving efficiency by bringing power supply sources and AI data centers — which consume large amounts of electricity — closer together.
The ministry also plans to draft measures to prevent Japan's core technologies in Japan from leaking to other countries, which can occur through cyberattacks, joint research with foreign facilities and the actions of company executives or departing employees.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. declines to label China a currency manipulator, but blasts its transparency policies
U.S. declines to label China a currency manipulator, but blasts its transparency policies

Asahi Shimbun

time38 minutes ago

  • Asahi Shimbun

U.S. declines to label China a currency manipulator, but blasts its transparency policies

WASHINGTON--The U.S. declined to label China a currency manipulator in a new Treasury report released Thursday but accuses Beijing of standing out among America's major trading partners for lacking transparency in its exchange rate policies. Treasury's semi-annual report to Congress — called Macroeconomic and Foreign Exchange Policies of Major Trading Partners of the United States— comes as the Trump administration seeks to strike a trade deal with China, averting a trade war that has been brewing between the two nations. A Treasury official told reporters previewing the report that the U.S. could in the future find evidence that China is manipulating its currency and will make a determination in the fall whether China has been manipulating the renminbi, also known as RMB. During President Donald Trump 's first term, the Treasury, which was then led by Secretary Steve Mnuchin, labeled China a currency manipulator in 2019 — before then the U.S. had not put China on the currency blacklist since 1994. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the administration 'has put our trading partners on notice that macroeconomic policies that incentivize an unbalanced trading relationship with the United States will no longer be accepted.' 'Moving forward, Treasury will use all available tools at its disposal to implement strong countermeasures against unfair currency practices,' he said. The decision not to sanction China for currency manipulation comes after Trump said Thursday that his first call with China's Xi Jinping since returning to office was 'very positive,' announcing that the two countries will hold trade talks in hopes of breaking an impasse over tariffs and global supplies of rare earth minerals. 'Our respective teams will be meeting shortly at a location to be determined,' Trump wrote on his social media platform after the call, which he said lasted an hour and a half. Trump has lowered his 145% tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% for 90 days to allow for talks. China also reduced its taxes on U.S. goods from 125% to 10%. The back and forth has caused sharp swings in global markets and threatens to hamper trade between the two countries.

Hong Kong activist Joshua Wong charged under Beijing-imposed security law for second time
Hong Kong activist Joshua Wong charged under Beijing-imposed security law for second time

Asahi Shimbun

time39 minutes ago

  • Asahi Shimbun

Hong Kong activist Joshua Wong charged under Beijing-imposed security law for second time

HONG KONG--Prominent Hong Kong activist Joshua Wong on Friday was charged with conspiracy to collude with foreign forces to endanger national security under a Beijing-imposed law that critics say has crushed Hong Kong's once-thriving pro-democracy movement. The prosecution was the second time Wong has been charged under the sweeping national security law. He was already convicted in a separate subversion case linked to an unofficial primary election and is serving a sentence of four years and eight months. The prosecution accused Wong, 28, of conspiring with fellow activist Nathan Law and others to ask foreign countries, institutions, organizations and individuals outside of China to impose sanctions or blockades, or engage in other hostile actions, against Hong Kong and China. They also said he disrupted the formulation and implementation of laws and policies by the Chinese and Hong Kong governments, and that the act was likely to have serious consequences. The alleged offense occurred between July 2020 and November 2020. The prosecution didn't elaborate on the accusations in court. The charge carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. After hearing the charge in court, Wong, who wore a blue shirt and was visibly thinner, said he 'understood' the charge. The case was adjourned to August. National security police arrested Wong in Stanley, an area in southern Hong Kong, over the national security charge and also on suspicion of 'dealing with property known or believed to represent proceeds of indictable offense,' police said in a statement. Wong rose to fame in Hong Kong in 2012 as a high school student leading protests against the introduction of national education in the city's schools. Two years later, he became world famous as a leader of the Occupy Movement. In 2016, Wong co-founded a political party named 'Demosisto' with fellow young activists Law and Agnes Chow. In the 2019 pro-democracy movement, Wong helped seek overseas support for the protests. His activism led Beijing to label him an advocate of Hong Kong's independence who 'begged for interference' by foreign forces. Demosisto disbanded when Beijing imposed the security law in 2020. The Chinese and Hong Kong governments said the law brought back stability to the city.

INTERVIEW/ David Shear: China's buildup poses threat to U.S. alliances in the Indo-Pacific
INTERVIEW/ David Shear: China's buildup poses threat to U.S. alliances in the Indo-Pacific

Asahi Shimbun

timean hour ago

  • Asahi Shimbun

INTERVIEW/ David Shear: China's buildup poses threat to U.S. alliances in the Indo-Pacific

China's dream to establish a Sinocentric order in East Asia and the Indo-Pacific poses a grave security threat to the United States and its allies, according to a former U.S. assistant secretary of defense and expert on Asian affairs. 'The Chinese want to diminish America's alliances with East Asian countries in the short to medium term and--I'm sure--eliminate them in the long term,' David Shear told The Asahi Shimbun in a recent interview. He said the Chinese military buildup gives China an increased ability to drive wedges, or attempt to drive divisions, between the United States and its allies. Shear said China has been deploying its naval forces throughout the region partly to ensure the security of sea lanes through the Indian Ocean. According to Shear, the Chinese believe in the philosophy espoused by Alfred Thayer Mahan (1840-1914), an influential exponent of sea power. The U.S. naval officer and historian argued that naval strength is essential to protect commercial shipping fleets, which transport domestic products to overseas markets. 'The flag follows trade,' Shear said. 'The Chinese are Mahanians. They know that merchant marine and naval deployments go together.' The former U.S. diplomat also said the United States needs to beef up its shipbuilding industry with its allies to match China's quick pace of launching new, large warships. Excerpts from the interview follow: * * * Question: While China continues to be building large warships, the United States has failed to produce a sufficient number of ships. What can the United States do? Shear: We should be particularly concerned about U.S. naval shipbuilding capacity. President Donald Trump touched on this important issue in his State of the Union address. We're not producing ships fast enough. We don't have the facilities necessary to produce the number of ships we want over the next couple of years. My understanding is that we need to build 2.3 submarines per year to maintain the levels we need, particularly in the western Pacific. But we're building something like 1.5 submarines a year. We need the facilities and the skilled labor. At the end of April, John Phelan, secretary of the Navy, visited Japan to discuss defense industry cooperation, including bilateral efforts to maintain U.S. warships, with Defense Minister Gen Nakatani. Carlos Del Toro, secretary of the Navy in the Biden administration, visited Japan at least three times and had a productive discussion with the Japanese side on shipbuilding. South Korean shipbuilder Hanwha Ocean agreed to invest in a Philadelphia shipyard last year, and the Hyundai group also decided to work with a U.S. shipbuilding company in April. The United States needs to get together with our allies, particularly Japan, Australia and hopefully Britain, to address these issues. Q: How do you assess China's military activities in recent years? A: The growth of Chinese military strength and Chinese naval strength provides a revisionist Chinese Communist regime with the increased options and extra tools it wants to assert its expansive and excessive territorial claims throughout the region, including over the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea as well as in the South China Sea. For the past couple of years, we've seen the Chinese leadership use military options vis-a-vis Taiwan, drastically increasing their operations and efforts to intimidate it. The Chinese military buildup gives China an increased ability to drive wedges, or attempt to drive wedges, between the United States and its allies. We've seen intensified Chinese military activity and Coast Guard activity in the vicinity of the Senkakus and Taiwan as well as in the South China Sea. I note that the Chinese have double the number of Coast Guard cutters over 1,000 tons that Japan has. Q: What is China's objective? A: Chinese President Xi Jinping has said that he wants the 'great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation' by 2049 (the centenary of the founding of China). He wants to establish a community of common destiny, which basically means a Sinocentric order in East Asia and the Indo-Pacific. To do that, the Chinese want to diminish America's alliances with East Asian countries in the short to medium term and--I'm sure--eliminate them in the long term. This represents a threat to the security of the United States as well as of our allies like Japan. Q: Does China intend to deploy its Navy globally? A: In the short to medium term, the Chinese intention is to increase deterrence with the first and second island chains and maximize their ability to prevent the United States from intervening in a Taiwan Strait crisis. But it's clear that the Chinese have much more expansive ambitions for their Navy over the longer term, and you can see this in their posture and deployments throughout the region. They are concerned about the security of sea lanes through the Indian Ocean, from the Strait of Malacca to the Persian Gulf. China has increased deployments of warships and submarines to the Indian Ocean and built dual-use port facilities throughout the region, such as in Djibouti in Africa and Ream, Cambodia. The Chinese appear to have interests in other port facilities in Pakistan, Myanmar and even Equatorial Guinea in Africa. The flag follows trade. The Chinese are Mahanians. They know that merchant marine and naval deployments go together. Q: Can China coexist with the United States in the Pacific? A: I think the Chinese want to come to us and say, 'You take your side of the Pacific, and we'll take ours, and all the world will be at peace.' I just don't think that that is an acceptable arrangement for the United States, and I hope it's not an acceptable arrangement for the Trump administration as well. Q: Trump is trying to link national security with tariff negotiations. What is your view? A: I agree with the Trump administration that our allies need to step up more strongly to provide for their defense and contribute to the alliance. That has always been my aim as an American diplomat working with the Japanese side. But linking economic and security issues as closely as the Trump administration has is detrimental. It would be very dangerous for us to suggest that our defense commitment would diminish with the extent of the trade deficit. The Trump administration is also trying to get close to our allies geopolitically while beating them up geoeconomically. I don't think that's a good idea. Q: Is it impossible for Japan to prevent China's high-handed behavior without increasing its defense spending? A: Both the United States and Japan need to increase their defense budgets and strengthen their military capabilities to continue deterring China. But deterrence isn't the only piece to a successful approach to China. Both of us need to be engaging China diplomatically at the same time. It just doesn't pay to stop communicating with our Chinese counterparts. We need a diplomatic as well as an economic component to our strategy. It's not just a matter of military confrontation to be able to communicate with the Chinese. I would welcome increased dialogue between Japan and China, just as I welcome increased Japanese defense spending. Q: Does it mean that a combination of dialogue and deterrence is necessary? A: It's important that our approach to China not deteriorate into a mere military confrontation. That is the road to war, and to avoid taking that road, we need to have healthy diplomatic exchanges with the Chinese. In fact, our actual strategy toward China has been a combination of engagement and hedging and deterrence for decades. The question is which component of that approach you place emphasis on. We're now in a hedging and deterrence phase, but we can't abandon the engagement side. It's the only way to maintain some kind of stable situation in the western Pacific. Q: Southeast Asian countries are concerned that Trump is not interested in this region. What can change his stance? A: The best way to get President Trump to participate in the East Asia Summit and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit is to get moving on trade talks as quickly as possible. (This article is based on an interview by Atsushi Okudera, a senior staff writer.) * * * David Shear was a U.S. diplomat in charge of Japan, China and other Asian countries. A former U.S. ambassador to Vietnam, he also worked in Tokyo, Sapporo and Beijing. Shear served as assistant secretary of defense for Asian and Pacific security affairs between 2014 and 2016 under the second Obama administration. He is currently a senior adviser at the Edwin O. Reischauer Center for East Asian Studies of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store