science for all: 64% of carnivores' homes facing high human pressure
The authors of the study, an international team from institutes around the world, downloaded the latest range maps for every living carnivore from the IUCN Red List and retained 257 strictly terrestrial species for their analysis. Then, they combined each range map with the 2018 Human Footprint layer, a grid of 1 sq. km cells that scored eight kinds of human activity, from population density to railways, on a 0 to 50 scale. Scores of 4 or higher marked land that had been heavily altered by human activities.
They overlaid three global datasets on this grid: Protected Areas listed by the IUCN, Indigenous peoples' lands managed by native communities, and wilderness areas (large tracts with almost no human pressure).
When they analysed these composite maps, they found that 64% of all carnivore habitats worldwide are currently in high‑pressure hotspots. The pattern was the same for species already on the IUCN threatened list and those still considered stable.
They also found Indigenous peoples' lands shelter 26% of global carnivore range, wilderness areas 16%, and Protect Areas 10% — and together they cover about 35% of carnivore habitat, meaning most carnivore territory lies outside areas set aside for nature.
More specifically, most canids, felids, mongooses, and mustelids each had far less than 40% of their ranges in any protected category. Unsurprisingly, already shrinking animal populations had the biggest share of their habitats in high‑pressure zones, confirming human activity is a major driver of their decline. Statistical tests also indicated carnivores generally occupy larger, unprotected areas outside conservation lands.
'[W]e found that the overlap between Protected Areas and wilderness areas is minimal in the Indo-Malay region, covering only 0.2% of the area, while the highest overlap occurs in the Neotropic region at 7%,' the team wrote in its paper.
Taken together, the study showed that most carnivores live where people are changing the landscape fastest, and formal reserves alone are not large or connected enough to keep these predators safe. While Indigenous territories are critical havens, they also face growing pressures.
From the Science pages
Question Corner
Where is the centre of the universe? Find out here
Flora and fauna
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
7 hours ago
- Hans India
AI model trained to respond to online political posts impressive
Researchers. who trained a large language model to respond to online political posts of people in the US and UK, found that the quality of discourse had improved. Powered by artificial intelligence (AI), a large language model (LLM) is trained on vast amounts of text data and therefore, can respond to human requests in the natural language. Polite, evidence-based counterarguments by the AI system -- trained prior to performing experiments -- were found to nearly double the chances of a high-quality online conversation and 'substantially increase (one's) openness to alternative viewpoints', according to findings published in the journal Science Advances. Being open to perspectives did not, however, translate into a change in one's political ideology, the researchers found. Large language models could provide 'light-touch suggestions', such as alerting a social media user to the disrespectful tone of their post, author Gregory Eady, an associate professor of political science and data science at the University of Copenhagen, said. 'To promote this concretely, it is easy to imagine large language models operating in the background to alert us to when we slip into bad practices in online discussions, or to use these AI systems as part of school curricula to teach young people best practices when discussing contentious topics,' Eady said. Hansika Kapoor, research author at the department of psychology, Monk Prayogshala in Mumbai, an independent not-for-profit academic research institute, said, '(The study) provides a proof-of-concept for using LLMs in this manner, with well-specified prompts, that can generate mutually exclusive stimuli in an experiment that compares two or more groups.' Nearly 3,000 participants -- who identified as Republicans or Democrats in the US and Conservative or Labour supporters in the UK -- were asked to write a text describing and justifying their stance on a political issue important to them, as they would for a social media post. This was countered by ChatGPT -- a 'fictitious social media user' for the participants -- which tailored its argument 'on the fly' according to the text's position and reasoning. The participants then responded as if replying to a social media comment. 'An evidence-based counterargument (relative to an emotion-based response) increases the probability of eliciting a high-quality response by six percentage points, indicating willingness to compromise by five percentage points, and being respectful by nine percentage points,' the authors wrote in the study. Eady said, 'Essentially, what you give in a political discussion is what you get: that if you show your willingness to compromise, others will do the same; that when you engage in reason-based arguments, others will do the same; etc.' AI-powered models have been critiqued and scrutinised for varied reasons, including an inherent bias -- political, and even racial at times -- and for being a 'black box', whereby internal processes used to arrive at a result cannot be traced. Kapoor, who is not involved with the study, said that whilst appearing promising, a complete reliance on AI systems for regulating online discourse may not be advisable yet. The study itself involved humans to rate responses as well, she said. Additionally, context, culture, and timing would need to be considered for such regulation, she added. Eady too is apprehensive about 'using LLMs to regulate online political discussions in more heavy-handed ways.' Further, the study authors acknowledged that because the US and UK are effectively two-party systems, addressing the 'partisan' nature of texts and responses was straightforward. Eady added, 'The ability for LLMs to moderate discussion might also vary substantially across cultures and languages, such as in India. Personally, therefore, I am in favour of providing tools and information that enable people to engage in better conversations, but nevertheless, for all its (LLMs') flaws, allowing nearly as open a political forum as possible,' the author added. Kapoor said, 'In the Indian context, this strategy may require some trial-and-error, particularly because of the numerous political affiliations in the nation. Therefore, there may be multiple variables and different issues (including food politics) that will need to be contextualised for study here.' Another study, recently published in the 'Humanities and Social Sciences Communications' journal, found that dark personality traits -- such as psychopathy and narcissism -- a fear of missing out (FoMO) and cognitive ability can shape online political engagement. Findings of researchers from Singapore's Nanyang Technological University suggest that 'those with both high psychopathy (manipulative, self-serving behaviour) and low cognitive ability are the most actively involved in online political engagement.' Data from the US and seven Asian countries, including China, Indonesia and Malaysia, were analysed. Describing the study as 'interesting', Kapoor pointed out that a lot more work needs to be done in India for understanding factors that drive online political participation, ranging from personality to attitudes, beliefs and aspects such as voting behaviour. Her team, which has developed a scale to measure one's political ideology in India (published in a preprint paper), found that dark personality traits were associated with a disregard for norms and hierarchies.
Time of India
18 hours ago
- Time of India
Researchers train AI model to respond to online political posts, find quality of discourse improved
Researchers who trained a large language model to respond to online political posts of people in the US and UK, found that the quality of discourse improved. Powered by artificial intelligence (AI), a large language model (LLM) is trained on vast amounts of text data and therefore, can respond to human requests in the natural language. Polite, evidence-based counterarguments by the AI system -- trained prior to performing experiments -- were found to nearly double the chances of a high quality online conversation and "substantially increase (one's) openness to alternative viewpoints", according to findings published in the journal Science Advances. Being open to perspectives did not, however, translate into a change in one's political ideology, the researchers found. Large language models could provide "light-touch suggestions", such as alerting a social media user to the disrespectful tone of their post, author Gregory Eady, an associate professor of political science and data science at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark, told PTI. "To promote this concretely, it is easy to imagine large language models operating in the background to alert us to when we slip into bad practices in online discussions, or to use these AI systems as part of school curricula to teach young people best practices when discussing contentious topics," Eady said. Hansika Kapoor, research author at the department of psychology, Monk Prayogshala in Mumbai, an independent not-for-profit academic research institute, told PTI, "(The study) provides a proof-of-concept for using LLMs in this manner, with well-specified prompts, that can generate mutually exclusive stimuli in an experiment that compares two or more groups." Nearly 3,000 participants -- who identified as Republicans or Democrats in the US and Conservative or Labour supporters in the UK -- were asked to write a text describing and justifying their stance on a political issue important to them, as they would for a social media post. This was countered by ChatGPT -- a "fictitious social media user" for the participants -- which tailored its argument "on the fly" according to the text's position and reasoning. The participants then responded as if replying to a social media comment. "An evidence-based counterargument (relative to an emotion-based response) increases the probability of eliciting a high-quality response by six percentage points, indicating willingness to compromise by five percentage points, and being respectful by nine percentage points," the authors wrote in the study. Eady said, "Essentially, what you give in a political discussion is what you get: that if you show your willingness to compromise, others will do the same; that when you engage in reason-based arguments, others will do the same; etc." AI-powered models have been critiqued and scrutinised for varied reasons, including an inherent bias -- political, and even racial at times -- and for being a 'black box', whereby internal processes used to arrive at a result cannot be traced. Kapoor, who is not involved with the study, said that whilst appearing promising, a complete reliance on AI systems for regulating online discourse may not be advisable yet. The study itself involved humans to rate responses as well, she said. Additionally, context, culture, and timing would need to be considered for such regulation, she added. Eady too is apprehensive about "using LLMs to regulate online political discussions in more heavy-handed ways." Further, the study authors acknowledged that because the US and UK are effectively two-party systems, addressing the 'partisan' nature of texts and responses was straightforward. Eady added, "The ability for LLMs to moderate discussion might also vary substantially across cultures and languages, such as in India." "Personally, therefore, I am in favour of providing tools and information that enable people to engage in better conversations, but nevertheless, for all its (LLMs') flaws, allowing nearly as open a political forum as possible," the author added. Kapoor said, "In the Indian context, this strategy may require some trial-and-error, particularly because of the numerous political affiliations in the nation. Therefore, there may be multiple variables and different issues (including food politics) that will need to be contextualised for study here." Another study, recently published in the 'Humanities and Social Sciences Communications' journal, found that dark personality traits -- such as psychopathy and narcissism -- a fear of missing out (FoMO) and cognitive ability can shape online political engagement. Findings of researchers from Singapore's Nanyang Technological University suggest that "those with both high psychopathy (manipulative, self-serving behaviour) and low cognitive ability are the most actively involved in online political engagement." Data from the US and seven Asian countries, including China, Indonesia and Malaysia, were analysed. Describing the study "interesting", Kapoor pointed out that a lot more work needs to be done in India for understanding factors that drive online political participation, ranging from personality to attitudes, beliefs and aspects such as voting behaviour. Her team, which has developed a scale to measure one's political ideology in India (published in a pre-print paper), found that dark personality traits were associated with a disregard for norms and hierarchies.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Satellites reveal a hidden global water crisis that could change life on Earth
For more than 20 years, satellites have been quietly watching Earth's most vital resource disappear, and the data is alarming. A new study led by Arizona State University and published Friday in Science Advances reveals that Earth's continents are drying out at unprecedented rates, threatening water security for billions and accelerating sea level rise. 'We are edging toward an imminent freshwater bankruptcy,' warned Hrishikesh Chandanpurkar, the study's lead author. 'Glaciers and deep groundwater are like ancient trust funds. Instead of saving them for times of real need, we are draining them.' Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category others Management MCA Healthcare Cybersecurity PGDM Finance Data Analytics healthcare Technology Design Thinking Project Management Operations Management Digital Marketing Artificial Intelligence Others Product Management Data Science CXO Leadership Public Policy MBA Degree Data Science Skills you'll gain: Duration: 16 Weeks Indian School of Business CERT - ISB Cybersecurity for Leaders Program India Starts on undefined Get Details What the satellites saw Researchers analyzed over two decades of data from NASA 's GRACE and GRACE-Follow On missions, which measure subtle shifts in Earth's gravity to track changes in water storage underground, in soils, snow, and glaciers. The findings stunned even veteran scientists: Drying regions are expanding by an area twice the size of California every year. 75 percent of the world's population, in 101 countries, has lived through continuous freshwater loss since 2002. Groundwater depletion now contributes more to sea level rise than melting ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica combined. Four mega-drying regions The research identifies four massive belts of continental-scale drying, all in the Northern Hemisphere: Live Events Southwestern North America & Central America: From California's farmlands to Mexico City. Alaska and Northern Canada: Accelerated melting of glaciers and permafrost. Northern Russia: Snow and ice losses across Siberia. Middle East–North Africa into Eurasia: Spanning from the deserts of the Arabian Peninsula through Ukraine and northern India to China's North Plain. These regions include some of the planet's most critical agricultural zones and densely populated cities, places where water stress could trigger food shortages, migration, and political instability. The study found 68 percent of land water loss came from groundwater alone, a largely invisible crisis. Why it matters now The researchers warn that without immediate, coordinated policies to slow groundwater pumping, improve recharge, and share water data, the crisis will deepen. 'We can't negotiate with physics,' Famiglietti said. 'Water is life. When it's gone, everything else unravels.' The findings will feed into a forthcoming World Bank report on water security and global economic stability.
