Judge to decide on suspension of Sceilg Mhichíl permits
A High Court judge will decide this week whether to lift a suspension on boating permits for ferries to and from the UNESCO heritage island Sceilg Mhichíl, saying the case requires top priority as "people's livelihoods are at risk".
The permits have not been issued while legal proceedings are before the courts in the form of a judicial review of the tendering process.
At the High Court, Mr Justice Garret Simons said he was "staggered" by the assertion made by lawyers for the Office of Public Works that it would need six months to prepare the case. He ordered it to be heard next month.
Two companies, which were unsuccessful in their applications for the 2025 season, have made a judicial review application, resulting in a delay to the granting of permits.
The season runs from May to the end of September.
The OPW ran a competition in late 2024 to award 15 boating permits for summer 2025 serving the monastic island, which was chosen as a film location for the Star Wars movies, The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi.
However, in April 2025, two unsuccessful participants in the competition brought High Court proceedings challenging the outcome.
The OPW said that under Irish and EU law, it was then precluded from issuing permits for the 2025 summer season until legal proceedings were resolved.
Skellig Michael Boat Trips and Atlantic Endeavour Limited both dispute the process underpinning the granting of the licences, alleging it to be "deficient" and "without transparency" and have been granted permission for the challenge.
At the High Court, David Dodd BL, for the plaintiffs, told Mr Justice Simons that nobody wanted to prevent boats from visiting the island.
He said permits could be granted by the court in an interim fashion, as the issuing of a one-season permit was not a "contract", as contended by the OPW.
He said his clients are happy for the suspension to be lifted.
Mr Justice Simons asked Andrew Beck SC, for the OPW, why it would take six months to prepare for what the judge described as "the most straightforward case of competition for licences".
Mr Beck said there was discovery of documents needed, amendments to make and a possible issue around cross-examination.
Mr Justice Simons said he was "staggered" that the case would take up to six months to get on and that there were "livelihoods" at stake.
The judge said the court would give the case "top priority", adding that the court had "gone out of its way" to facilitate an early trial.
Mr Justice Simons said he would rule on Thursday of this week on whether to lift the suspension of the permits.
He adjourned the substantive hearing of the judicial review to 21 July.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Minister dampens optimism over Wexford SETU campus – ‘I'm not aware that there's money ready to go for this'
A legal challenge taken by the principal landowner against Wexford County Council's compulsory purchase of lands at Ballynagee – stretching from Whiterock to Killeens – was rejected at the High Court, clearing the way for the local authority to move forward with the purchase and plans for the establishment of a new South East Technological University (SETU) campus. However, in a questionable performance on South East Radio's Morning Mix with Alan Corcoran on Thursday morning, Minister Lawless rowed back on previous assurances given by predecessor, Tánaiste Simon Harris, regarding funding for the campus and stated that it was still a long way off becoming a reality. Initially the Minister seemed poorly briefed on the cause of the latest delay and the outcome of the latest court proceedings. 'It's good news that it was refused in court,' he said. ' A judicial review was taken. It's one challenge with building infrastructure like this, there's always someone can object. That is there right, but it's not their right to hold up society for a number of years. The process is too slow. We're trying to address that with the Planning Act. I'm not making a comment on this particular case in saying that, however.' In this instance, of course, it was not an objection but a challenge to a Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) taken by landowner Mr Scott Mernagh. Additionally, the purchase had not been subject to a full judicial review. Mr Mernagh's application to take this action was refused by the High Court. The Minister then stated that 'the ball is back with Wexford County Council' who he imagines will move 'full steam ahead' with the CPO. He also spoke of a need for 're-engagement' between SETU and the Higher Education Authority (HEA). However, the most worrying aspect of Minister Lawless' interview came when the subject of funding was broached. On several occasions, Tánaiste Simon Harris gave assurances that money would be in place for the construction of a 'state-of-the-art college campus' as soon as the acquisition of the site was completed. 'The state is not in the habit of purchasing assets to leave them lying idle,' he said at the time. However, having taken over the role of Minister for Higher and Further Education from Patrick O'Donovan in January, Minister Lawless was not quite so definite. 'I don't promise money,' he said. 'My own approach has always been 'steady as she goes' . ADVERTISEMENT 'If the right proposal comes in, I'd be hopeful that the funding will be there, but I think we're putting the cart before the horse to talk about money before we even have a proposal on the table. Let's see what's proposed first and then we'll look at the money.' When host Alan Corcoran pointed to the numerous assurances given by the Tánaiste, Minister Lawless was non-committal. 'I'd have to go back and look at it,' he said. 'I'm not aware of what promises were made. I don't know if any money was ring-fenced or not. I'm not aware that there's money ready to go. That would be premature. The CPO process held things up, but the council is in a position to progress that at this stage.' When asked if this is still some way off from becoming a reality, Minister Lawless responded: 'I'll tell you straight. I've come into this department and this is a project on the list, but there's no site, no plan and no planning permission. It is probably a bit off still at this stage, being honest. SETU need to come into the HEA with a full spec plan. 'I will make this a priority and I will work with the players involved, but colleges are autonomous. The college is welcome to come to the HEA with plans and we will engage and discuss them. There'll be parts we'll agree on and parts we won't agree on. 'Let's see where this goes,' he concluded. 'I think, though, it would be premature to make promises regarding funding on a site that is not even owned yet.'
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
What media sources did people use & trust before voting in 2024 General Election?
Analysis: Here's what a new study found about the media Irish voters used and trusted when getting information ahead of last year's election By Robert Brennan and Rabhya Mehrotra, DCU In November 2024, the people of Ireland went to the polls to cast their ballots in the General Election. But what media sources did people use to inform themselves before voting? How much trust do they place in these different sources? The recently published National Election and Democracy Study sheds some light on these questions, and more. Media vs social media vs WhatsApp Most people rely on RTÉ at least occasionally to form opinions before voting, followed closely by social media (such as Facebook, TikTok, Instagram) and direct information from political parties and candidates via leaflets and websites etc. Notably, social media had the most frequent response of 'Often'. Newspapers are also used regularly (including online versions and those accessed through social media), though a fifth of people said they never use them to form opinions. Messaging apps (WhatsApp, Telegram, Snapchat) are the least used, with over half of those surveyed reporting never using them. Does media use and trust differ by age? Breaking down these trends by age group reveals some noteworthy differences, 41% of Gen Z (ages 18 to 24) never use RTÉ for information before voting, but nearly three-quarters of those aged 65 or older never use social media, contrasting with only 12% of Gen Z. However, usage does not mean trust. When asked how much they trust each of these sources, an intriguing trend emerges. Overall, journalistic sources such as RTÉ and newspapers are trusted far more than non-journalistic sources like social media and messages. Trust in journalistic sources remained high across all age groups with little variation, while trust in social media peaks among Gen Z but declines steadily with age. What institutions do people trust? It is also possible to look at trust in institutions more generally. It is relatively high but varies with the An Coimisiún Toghcháin/the Electoral Commission being the most trusted and political parties the least. Interestingly the Citizens' Assembly is highly trusted. Importantly, using and/or trusting journalistic media is correlated with higher trust institutions more broadly. Despite younger voters leaning towards using non-journalistic sources, a key takeaway here is that traditional journalistic media retains high trust across all age groups when it comes to forming an opinion before voting. It is also related to higher trust in the state institutions more broadly. Dr Robert A. Brennan is a postdoctoral researcher with the Institute for Future Media, Democracy and Society (FuJo) at DCU. Rabhya Mehrotra is a Mitchell Scholar who is doing a Masters in Political Communication at DCU. She is a part of the COMDEL (FuJo).
Agriland
2 hours ago
- Agriland
State criticised for purchasing land for rewilding amid housing crisis
The Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage has been slammed for purchasing land for rewilding during the housing crisis. The Irish Natura and Hill Farmers' Association (INHFA) has called into question what it said is the 'expressed policy of government ministers and our Taoiseach [Micheál Martin] to use state money in the purchasing of lands to increase the size and number of national parks'. Vincent Roddy, the association's president, said: 'It is absolutely mind-boggling that we have people inside the Department of Housing actively looking to purchase farmland for rewilding while over 15,000 people remain homeless, including 4,600 children. 'With numbers such as this you would expect the government and this department to focus on acquiring land to build houses or maybe developing existing state land for housing,' Roddy added. He went on to outline what he said was the impact of those land purchases for farmers and their communities. 'We are now seeing the state actively compete against farmers in the purchasing of land, which is having a detrimental effect on access to land, especially for young farmers, while also undermining economic activity in these communities,' Roddy said. The INHFA president also claimed that this policy is 'at variance' with the Irish constitution, which Roddy said 'outlines the need to retain as many families as is economically practicable on the land'. The wording of the constitution in this regard is: 'The State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing that there may be established on the land in economic security as many families as in the circumstances shall be practicable.' Roddy called for 'an immediate reassessment' of the current policy, amid 'growing concerns around food security and ongoing rural decline'. 'Through active engagement with farmers we can deliver much better outcomes in terms of economic and environmental sustainability while ensuring there is more funding available to address the housing crisis,' he said.
