State criticised for purchasing land for rewilding amid housing crisis
The Irish Natura and Hill Farmers' Association (INHFA) has called into question what it said is the 'expressed policy of government ministers and our Taoiseach [Micheál Martin] to use state money in the purchasing of lands to increase the size and number of national parks'.
Vincent Roddy, the association's president, said: 'It is absolutely mind-boggling that we have people inside the Department of Housing actively looking to purchase farmland for rewilding while over 15,000 people remain homeless, including 4,600 children.
'With numbers such as this you would expect the government and this department to focus on acquiring land to build houses or maybe developing existing state land for housing,' Roddy added.
He went on to outline what he said was the impact of those land purchases for farmers and their communities.
'We are now seeing the state actively compete against farmers in the purchasing of land, which is having a detrimental effect on access to land, especially for young farmers, while also undermining economic activity in these communities,' Roddy said.
The INHFA president also claimed that this policy is 'at variance' with the Irish constitution, which Roddy said 'outlines the need to retain as many families as is economically practicable on the land'.
The wording of the constitution in this regard is: 'The State shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing that there may be established on the land in economic security as many families as in the circumstances shall be practicable.'
Roddy called for 'an immediate reassessment' of the current policy, amid 'growing concerns around food security and ongoing rural decline'.
'Through active engagement with farmers we can deliver much better outcomes in terms of economic and environmental sustainability while ensuring there is more funding available to address the housing crisis,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Extra.ie
19 minutes ago
- Extra.ie
Heather Humphreys secures Fine Gael nomination for presidency
Heather Humphreys has secured the Fine Gael nomination for President after securing enough support within the parliamentary party. Such is the level of support that Fine Gael MEP Sean Kelly cannot secure enough signatures to force a contest. The two hopefuls had announced their intention to seek Fine Gael's nomination after initial hopeful Mairead McGuinness withdrew, citing health concerns. Heather Humphreys. Pic: Sasko Lazarov/ Speaking on RTE's Morning Ireland, Mr Kelly had said he was 'enthusiastic' about the prospect of running for president. Mr Kelly said: 'I'll certainly seek the Fine Gael nomination. 'Unfortunately, Mairead McGuinness had to withdraw, and there's a process now over which we can seek nominations over the next five days. 'So I would be looking for the nomination and after that, and if I'm nominated, I would be greatly honoured to represent the party and stand for election for president.' Ms Humphreys, who held multiple cabinet positions, told the Joe Finnegan Show on Northern Sound radio: 'I have decided to go for it, and I will be seeking the Fine Gael nomination to be a candidate for the president of Ireland.' Sean Kelly. Pic: Piaras Ó Mídheach/Sportsfile Ms Humphreys said she had previously ruled herself out because she was supporting Ms McGuinness, adding: 'I wasn't going to stand against her and that's being straight about it – but as we know everything has changed.' Ms Humphreys has now secured the Fine Gael nomination and will undoubtedly be a strong contender in the election itself. Nutriband entrepreneur Gareth Sheridan, mixed martial arts fighter Conor McGregor, and Riverdance star Michael Flatley are among other hopefuls seeking a nomination. A presidential election is expected towards the end of October, as it must take place in the 60 days before the term of Michael D Higgins ends on November 11. To be eligible to run, a candidate must be an Irish citizen who is 35 or older. They must be nominated either by at least 20 members of the Oireachtas or by at least four local authorities. Former or retiring presidents can nominate themselves.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Reasons for optimism on Ukraine peace deal but pressure on Russia must continue, Taoiseach says
Taoiseach Micheál Martin said there is 'optimism' and 'promise' following Monday's landmark White House meeting , but world leaders must put more pressure on Russia to agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine . Following another 'coalition of the willing' meeting on Tuesday morning, Mr Martin again called on Russia to return an estimated 20,000 Ukrainian children who have been abducted. Earlier this month, Russia published a catalogue of almost 300 Ukrainian children which it said were available for adoption. The plight of abducted Ukrainian children was raised at Monday's White House meeting, which was the first time in American political history that so many world leaders had attended one summit. READ MORE 'I welcome that the talks in Washington also focused on the human dimension of securing a just peace for Ukraine and that the issue of abducted children and the imprisonment of civilians is getting the attention it deserves. I call again on Russia to return all the Ukrainian children abducted since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine and to release all civilians being held unlawfully,' Mr Martin said. 'At today's meeting of the coalition of the willing, I once again assured president [Volodymyr] Zelenskiy that Ireland stands with Ukraine and we will continue to support the people of Ukraine on their path towards a just and durable peace.' The online meeting of which the Taoiseach attended was convened by the French president Emmanuel Macron and British prime minister Keir Starmer . It was then followed by an online meeting of members of the European Council, which convened by European Council president António Costa. The meetings followed the Washington summit between Mr Zelenskiy Mr Trump and European leaders including European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen. Mr Martin said that reports from Mondays meeting 'suggest reasons for optimism'. 'I again thank President Trump for his initiative and commitment which has brought us closer to our objective of ending Russia's war of aggression and achieving a just and lasting peace for Ukraine,' Mr Martin said. The Taoiseach said leaders on Tuesday discussed the security guarantees 'that could be provided by Europe and the US to Ukraine following an end to Russia's war aggression against Ukraine'. 'As I said after the meeting of the coalition on Monday, Ireland stands ready to play our part – building on support we have already committed to Ukraine for non-lethal military equipment and our openness to contribute to a peacekeeping mission in line with the UN Charter,' he said. Mr Martin added: 'While the talks in Washington show promise, we must continue to exert pressure on Russia to agree to a ceasefire and engage seriously with negotiations on a just and lasting peace, including through the continued implementation of EU sanctions. The conflict cannot be allowed to continue while a path to peace is laid.' Ukraine: Possibility and peril as Trump pushes for Putin-Zelenskiy meeting Listen | 44:24
The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
Why has Sally Rooney been warned over supporting Palestine Action - and why did the UK ban it?
AUTHOR SALLY ROONEY could face prosecution in the UK if she delivers on promises to support Palestine Action, a group that the British government has proscribed as a terrorist organisation. Palestine Action is a direct action group that was founded in 2020. It has been protesting the UK's export of arms to Israel, as well as Israel's war on Gaza and treatment of Palestinians, through actions like demonstrations, building occupations and vandalism of properties it believes to have links to arms sales to Israel. Hundreds of people have been arrested in the UK since last month for showing their support for Palestine Action since it was designated as a terrorist association. The move by the government and the plethora of arrests that followed have sparked debate within the UK and internationally about the differences between a social movement versus a terrorist organisation, and about freedoms of expression and assembly. Rooney, the author of novels including Normal People and Intermezzo hailing from Co Mayo, has indicated that she intends to use proceeds from her work to support Palestine Action, but has been warned she could face consequences. What did Rooney say, how has the UK government responded, and why did it ban Palestine Action in the first place? What did Sally Rooney say about Palestine Action? Writing in the Irish Times at the weekend, Rooney said that she supports Palestine Action and its protesting of Israel's violence against Palestine, and that she would use proceeds from her work to support the group. 'If this makes me a 'supporter of terror' under UK law, so be it,' Rooney said. 'My books, at least for now, are still published in Britain, and are widely available in bookshops and even supermarkets. In recent years the UK's state broadcaster has also televised two fine adaptations of my novels, and therefore regularly pays me residual fees,' she wrote. 'I want to be clear that I intend to use these proceeds of my work, as well as my public platform generally, to go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide in whatever way I can. 'If the British state considers this 'terrorism', then perhaps it should investigate the shady organisations that continue to promote my work and fund my activities, such as WH Smith and the BBC.' She also criticised the Irish government for not standing with Irish activists arrested for supporting Palestine Action in the UK. Rooney has been an outspoken critic of Israel's war on Gaza and a supporter of freedom for Palestine. Advertisement Nearly two years since October 2023, Israel has around 62,000 people in Gaza, displaced hundreds of thousands of people, and flattened countless homes and buildings. With Israel strictly limiting the amount of aid allowed in to Gaza, many people are now dying of starvation, including young children. How has the UK government responded to Rooney? A spokesperson for UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer was asked in Westminster about Rooney's comments. They would not comment on her remarks specifically but set out the position that there 'is a difference between showing support for a proscribed organisation, which is an offence under the Terrorism Act, and legitimate protest in support of a cause'. Asked what Downing Street's position is in relation to anyone considering making donations to Palestine Action, the spokesperson said: 'Support for a proscribed organisation is an offence under the Terrorism Act and obviously the police will, as they have set out, they will obviously implement the law within the law as you'd expect.' Why has the UK banned Palestine Action? Among countries in Europe, the UK has been one of Israel's staunchest allies, including through being an exporter of arms to Israel, though it has also recognised the scale of devastation Israel has created in Gaza. In June, British Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said she was proscribing Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation under the UK's Terrorism Act. It followed members of the group allegedly breaking into a military airfield and vandalising Royal Air Force (RAF) aircrafts. Announcing the decision to proscribe it as a terrorist organisation, Cooper said that Palestine Action's activity has 'increased in frequency and severity since the start of 2024 and its methods have become more aggressive, with its members demonstrating a willingness to use violence'. The UK's Terrorism Act makes it an offence for a person to belong to a proscribed organisation, to show or invite support for such an organisation, to express an opinion or belief that is supportive of it, or to arrange or manage a meeting that involves supporting the organisation, furthering its activities, or hearing from a member belonging to it. A person found guilty of an offence under the relevant legislation can face imprisonment or a fine, or both. The UK's decision has received criticism internationally. UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk said that by international standards, understandings of terrorist acts should be 'confined to criminal acts intended to cause death or serious injury or to the taking of hostages, for purpose of intimidating a population or to compel a government to take a certain action or not'. 'It misuses the gravity and impact of terrorism to expand it beyond those clear boundaries to encompass further conduct that is already criminal under the law,' Türk said. Additional reporting by Press Association Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
