Opposition chief takes the lead
Their choice: Jae-myung's supporters attending an election campaign event in Suwon, Gyeonggi province. — AFP
A NEW Gallup poll indicates that South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung is the clear frontrunner to become the country's next president, with less than a week to go until the elections.
South Koreans go to the polls on June 3, capping months of political turmoil triggered by ex-leader Yoon Suk-yeol's ill-fated effort to suspend civilian rule in December.
The Gallup poll released yesterday put Democratic Party leader Jae-myung as the clear frontrunner, with 49% of the respondents stating they saw him as the best candidate.
Trailing behind is conservative former labour minister Kim Moon-soo of the ruling People Power Party at 35%.
In third place is Lee Jun-seok of the Reform Party – running a campaign targeting South Korean youth – with 11%.
The poll, conducted by Gallup Korea over the phone, surveyed 1,004 respondents over the weekend, with a stated margin of error of 3.1 percentage points.
The poll suggested the Democratic Party leader would win handily in almost all of the country, securing the most populous regions of capital Seoul, Incheon and Gyeonggi.
Third place Jun-seok has faced growing pressure from conservatives to abandon his presidential bid to stop left-leaning Jae-myung from winning.
But the 40-year-old has remained firm, declaring that his name will be 'clearly visible' on the ballot on election day.
Around 5% of those polled said they had no preference or that they did not know who would be the best candidate.
The survey is one of the last to be released before next week's vote, with further polls in the run-up banned.
Conservative candidate Kim shot to public attention in the aftermath of Yoon's martial law debacle, when he declined to bow in apology to the public for failing to prevent the suspension of civilian rule.
After trailing behind Jae-myung for weeks, he is slowly catching up.
A poll by Next Research released on Monday suggested the gap between the two candidates had narrowed to just nine percentage points nationwide, and in Seoul to a mere 3.2 points.
Jae-myung lost the 2022 presidential elections to Yoon by the smallest margin of any vote in the country's history.
Yesterday's poll indicated Jae-myung would win even if he faced a unified conservative candidate.
And Jun-seok at a press conference yesterday vowed there would be 'no candidate merger' with 'those responsible for the emergency martial law'.
'I will fight to the end and win,' he said.
Heo Jin-jae, research director at Gallup Korea, said the fact that the election was now a 'three way race' – with a third candidate polling in double digits – was noteworthy.
But, he added, 'even if Kim Moon-soo and Lee Jun-seok successfully unified their candidacy, I believe it will not be easy for them to win.' — AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sinar Daily
2 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Number of naturalisations in Germany hits record level
Based on a survey by the paper, a total of 249,901 people received German citizenship in 13 federal states last year. 08 Jun 2025 07:03pm Naturalisation became possible after five years instead of the previous eight, or after three years in cases of those who were especially well integrated. (Photo by Guillaume SOUVANT / AFP) BERLIN - A record number of foreigners were naturalised in Germany last year - the highest level since the beginning of standardised data collection in 2000, the Welt am Sonntag newspaper reported recently, German Press Agency (dpa) reported. Based on a survey by the paper, a total of 249,901 people received German citizenship in 13 federal states last year. In 2023, the nationwide figure for all 16 states was 200,095, which was also a record at the time. On June 27, 2024, a reform of the citizenship law came into effect, allowing immigrants to obtain German citizenship more quickly. The measure also allowed dual citizenship, a key factor for many foreigners living in Germany. - Photo illustrated by Sinar Daily On June 27, 2024, a reform of the citizenship law came into effect, allowing immigrants to obtain German citizenship more quickly. The measure also allowed dual citizenship, a key factor for many foreigners living in Germany. Naturalisation became possible after five years instead of the previous eight, or after three years in cases of those who were especially well integrated. The new coalition of the conservative and Social Democratic parties eliminated the three-year fast-track naturalisation, but has kept the five year plan. "Many people who came to us during the large migration movements in 2015 and 2016 are now applying or have already applied," Helmut Dedy, chief executive of the German Association of Cities, told the paper. He added that the fact that applicants no longer always have to renounce their previous citizenship is motivating more people to apply for German citizenship. People applying for citizenship must pass a multiple-choice "Living in Germany" test, which quizzes prospective citizens on their knowledge of German history, culture, society and law. They must also show German proficiency to the B1 European language standard, which is basic intermediate proficiency. - BERNAMA More Like This
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Restive Indian state Manipur orders curfew after fresh violence; internet also shutdown due to ethnic tensions
The latest violence was triggered on June 7 after reports of the arrest of five members of Arambai Tenggol, a radical Meitei group. -- PHOTO: AFP IMPHAL, India (AFP): An Indian state riven by ethnic tensions imposed an internet shutdown and curfew after protesters clashed with security forces over the arrest of some members of a radical group, police said Sunday. Manipur in India's northeast has been rocked by periodic clashes for more than two years between the predominantly Hindu Meitei majority and the mainly Christian Kuki community that have killed more than 250 people. The latest violence was triggered Saturday after reports of the arrest of five members, including a commander, of Arambai Tenggol, a radical Meitei group. Incensed mobs demanding their release stormed a police post, set fire to a bus and blocked roads in parts of the state capital Imphal. Manipur police announced a curfew in five districts, including Imphal West and Bishnupur, due to the "developing law and order situation". "Prohibitory orders have been issued by District Magistrates. Citizens are requested to cooperate with the orders," the police said in a statement. Arambai Tenggol, which is alleged to have orchestrated the violence against the Kuki community, has also announced a 10-day shutdown in the valley districts. The state's home ministry has ordered all internet and mobile data services in volatile districts to be shut off for five days in order to bring the latest unrest under control. Internet services were shut down for months in Manipur during the initial outbreak of violence in 2023, which displaced around 60,000 people from their homes according to government figures. Thousands of the state's residents are still unable to return home owing to ongoing tensions. Long-standing tensions between the Meitei and Kuki communities revolve around competition for land and public jobs. Rights activists have accused local leaders of exacerbating ethnic divisions for political gain. - AFP
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
US travel ban deepens despair for Afghans awaiting visas
MEHRIA had been losing hope of getting a visa to emigrate to the United States but her spirits were crushed when President Donald Trump raised yet another hurdle by banning travel for Afghans. Trump had already disrupted refugee pathways after he returned to power in January but a sweeping new travel ban on 12 countries, including Afghanistan, will go into effect on Monday. The ban changes little for most Afghans who already faced steep barriers to travel abroad, but many who had hung their hopes on a new life in the United States felt it was yet another betrayal. "Trump's recent decisions have trapped not only me but thousands of families in uncertainty, hopelessness and thousands of other disasters," Mehria, a 23-year-old woman who gave only one name, said from Pakistan, where she has been waiting since applying for a US refugee visa in 2022. "We gave up thousands of hopes and our entire lives and came here on a promise from America, but today we are suffering one hell after another," she told AFP. The United States has not had a working embassy in Afghanistan since the Taliban ousted the foreign-backed government in 2021, forcing Afghans to apply for visas in third countries. The Taliban's return followed the drawdown of US and Nato troops who had ousted them two decades earlier in response to the September 11, 2001, attacks. The Taliban government has since imposed a strict view of Islamic law and severe restrictions on women, including bans on some education and work. Hundreds of thousands of Afghans have applied for visas to settle in the United States, either as refugees or under the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) programme reserved for those who aided the US government during its war against the Taliban. Afghans with SIV visas and asylum cases will not be affected by Trump's new order but family reunification pathways are threatened, the Afghan-American Foundation said in a statement condemning the ban. Some 12,000 people are awaiting reunification with family members already living in the United States, according to Shawn VanDiver, the president of the AfghanEvac non-profit group. "These are not 'border issues'. These are legal, vetted, documented reunifications," he wrote on social media platform X. "Without exemptions, families are stranded." Refugee pathways and relocation processes for resettling Afghans had already been upset by previous Trump orders, suddenly leaving many Afghans primed to travel to the United States in limbo. The Trump administration revoked legal protections temporarily shielding Afghans from deportation in May, citing an improved security situation in Afghanistan. "We feel abandoned by the United States, with whom we once worked and cooperated," said Zainab Haidari, another Afghan woman who has been waiting in Pakistan for a refugee visa. "Despite promises of protection and refuge we are now caught in a hopeless situation, between the risk of death from the Taliban and the pressure and threat of deportation in Pakistan," said Haidari, 27, who worked with the United States in Kabul during the war but applied for a refugee visa. Afghans fled in droves during decades of conflict, but the chaotic withdrawal of US-led troops from Kabul saw a new wave clamouring to escape Taliban government curbs and fears of reprisal for working with Washington. Pakistan and Iran have meanwhile ramped up deportation campaigns to expel Afghans who have crossed their borders. The Taliban authorities have not responded to multiple requests for comment on the new travel ban but have said they are keen to have good relations with every country now that they are in power – including the United States. Visa options for Afghans are already severely limited by carrying the weakest passport globally, according to the Henley Passport Index. However, travel to the United States is far from the minds of many Afghans who struggle to make ends meet in one of the world's poorest countries, where food insecurity is rife. "We don't even have bread, why are you asking me about travelling to America?" said one Afghan man in Kabul. Sahar, a 29-year-old economics graduate who has struggled to find work amid sky-high unemployment, said the new rules will not have any impact on most Afghans. "When there are thousands of serious issues in Afghanistan, this won't change anything," she told AFP. "Those who could afford to travel and apply for the visa will find another way or to go somewhere else instead of the US."
