
Over 2,000 illegal immigrants ‘pushed back' into Bangladesh since Operation Sindoor
More than 2,000 alleged illegal Bangladeshi immigrants are estimated to have been 'pushed back' across the border by Indian authorities since Operation Sindoor began in the early hours of May 7, following a nationwide verification exercise, Government sources told The Indian Express.
During the same period, they said, a similar number of immigrants showed up near the India-Bangladesh border voluntarily to cross over amid the fear generated by the crackdown.
According to the sources, the Government action is taking place along the Bangladesh border in Tripura, Meghalaya and Assam. Gujarat was among the first to begin the round-up and has accounted for nearly half of all those who have been 'pushed back', they said. Delhi and Haryana, too, have sent back immigrants in large numbers with the rest being rounded up from Assam, Maharashtra and Rajasthan, the sources said.
'It is an ongoing process and all states which have cities with significant economic activity are rounding up such illegal immigrants after verification of their documents. A focused effort began in this direction following the Pahalgam attacks in April. Since Operation Sindoor, it has picked up pace. Gujarat was the first off the blocks followed by Delhi and Haryana. More states will begin sending soon. The instructions from the Ministry of Home Affairs are clear in this regard and the states, too, are cooperating,' a senior Government source said.
According to the source, these alleged illegal immigrants are being ferried to the borders in IAF aircraft from various locations and handed over to the BSF to be held in makeshift camps along the border. They are provided food and some Bangladeshi currency, if needed, and 'pushed back' into their country after a few hours of detention, the source said.
Referring to the action happening along the border in Tripura, Meghalaya and Assam, a security establishment officer said, 'There is a perception that these states have been chosen because they are BJP-ruled. But that is not true. BJP is a small minority in Meghalaya. These states were chosen because of the ease in pushing back from these states. In West Bengal, because of the nature of the border, which often passes through the middle of villages or even houses, and the familial connections on either side, there was fear of law and order issues cropping up.'
According to another official, just under 2,000 Bangladeshi immigrants have showed up on the border voluntarily to cross over. 'Because of largescale reporting in the media about a crackdown, many illegal immigrants from Bangladesh are voluntarily leaving the country for the fear of being detained,' the official said.
According to sources, the operation has been running smoothly so far with the Border Guards Bangladesh (BGB) 'cooperating' with their Indian counterparts.
'It is because most of those who have been rounded up are not resisting deportation. Barring those who came to India decades ago, most are willing to go back. Once rounded up and taken to the border, they call up their relatives in Bangladesh who come to pick them up. Most of them know that once they are rounded up, they will end up in detention centres or jails. A majority of them are poor labourers with no means to fight a legal battle. They prefer to go back to their families,' another security establishment officer said.
Sources, however, said they expect some official unease in Bangladesh once the numbers swell to 10,000 or 20,000 a week. 'This is only a temporary solution. Such exercises, albeit on a much smaller scale, have been carried out in the past as well, even under the UPA government. But these illegal immigrants often come back once the heat lowers. That is why the Government is pushing for biometric capture of all such immigrants who are being pushed back and integration with larger immigration data,' an official said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
33 minutes ago
- Hans India
Rishi Sunak Supports RCB in IPL and Calls Virat Kohli His Favourite Player
Rishi Sunak, the former Prime Minister of the UK, said that RCB is his favourite cricket team in the IPL. He likes the team because his wife is from Bangalore. When he got married, his wife's family gave him an RCB jersey. Since then, he has been a fan of the team. He said he even watched and supported RCB while living at Downing Street in London. Kohli is His Favourite Player Sunak said his favourite cricket player is Virat Kohli. He called Kohli a great player and said he has a bat with Kohli's signature on it. This bat was given to him as a gift by an Indian leader. Sunak said it is one of his most loved cricket items. IPL Helped Cricket Grow Sunak also said that the IPL has changed cricket for the better. He said many players now want to join the IPL during their careers. He gave an example of Jacob Bethell, an English player who played well in a recent match. Sunak said that playing in the IPL helped Bethell become better. He also hopes that English players in RCB, like Phil Salt and Liam Livingstone, will help the team win the title.


Deccan Herald
35 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Memorial park on Operation Sindoor to come up in Gujarat district bordering Pakistan
Spread across eight hectares, the park, to be called 'Sindoor Van' (Sindoor Forest), will feature different sections dedicated to Indian armed forces.


The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
A good death, demystified
Benjamin Franklin, in 1879, observed that certainty is limited to two things - death and taxes. Time and technology have proven him only half wrong. Sigmund Freud on the other hand, had remarked that we are all convinced of our immortality. Discussing death is considered, varyingly, macabre, ghoulish, grim or in morbid taste. Serious discussions on definitions of death, of personal, moral, legal and economic issues involved in death-related-decisions, seldom occur in Indian families. Do clinicians constantly exposed to death, become insensitive, forgetting that for the bereaved family, it could be the first experience? From time immemorial, a doctor's primary avocation was 'to cure sometimes, to relieve often, to comfort always'. Until recently, there was no conflict of interest with this approach, when a doctor did his best to preserve life. However, the increasing availability of sophisticated medical technology and life support systems has changed the picture. The process of dying is now more protracted, and can be influenced to be prolonged. The importance paid to 'quality of life' should now also be paid to 'quality of death.' Understanding death Death (apoptosis) commences even in the unborn, where cells are programmed to die. Different organs die at different rates. Death is an ongoing process, not an isolated event. Saving lives is the raison d'etre for our existence as doctors, but at what cost? In the irreversibly critically ill patient, how long does one continue treatment? What is the purpose of such treatment? Today, one can keep a person biologically alive - heart, lungs, kidney and other organs functioning - but in coma, 'living' in a critical care unit setting. In 2018, the Supreme Court held that the right to die with dignity, is a fundamental right. When the patient is unable to take part in the decision-making process of medical treatment, who will be the surrogate decision maker? Even if full information is given, is it reasonable to expect a calm, unruffled calculated decision to be taken, with death hovering around? Do we factor in the patient's desire? When is enough, enough? Should management decisions be based only on irrefutable scientific evidence and available technology? Do increased 'options' compound the issue? Do we spend quality time with caregivers understanding psychological, social and spiritual needs when death is imminent? Illustrations from neurosurgical practice A 92-year-old woman with a stroke that has affected both sides is encouraged to be taken home. She also has multiple hip fractures secondary to a trivial fall. Two months have elapsed. The patient is in coma for four weeks. Morphine patches are used for analgesia. The 70-year-old son cannot stand her suffering. After a discussion, the Ryles tube feeding is stopped, to facilitate an irreversible cardiac arrest. The heart goes on beating for another 72 hours, with the elderly children going through an agonising time. How does one discuss a 'good death' with a just -married wife, when her husband has had a devastating bleed in the brain? How does one inform a retired professor of surgery that he has multiple secondaries not only in the brain but everywhere, and therapy will only postpone the inevitable? Examining 'good death' In 'good death', treatment preferences, quality of life/death and maintenance of dignity is as per the patient's desires. There is no distress or suffering for the patient, family and caregivers, and attempts are made to ensure little or no pain (through the use of morphine for instance). Death is consistent with prevailing clinical, cultural and ethical standards. Excessive, futile treatments are not used to prolong life. There is trust, support and comfort with the team and an opportunity to discuss all beliefs and fears and to bid farewell to one's near and dear. When end of life is inevitable and patients/families consent, aggressive therapies, medications and interventions are stopped but care is never withdrawn. A good death is not a single final event, but a series of social events. The team commiserates with the family, empathises, sympathises with the individual who has placed his/her life in our hands. Support is necessary throughout the dying process. Earlier understanding facilitates a good death. Dying at home is an important component of good deaths. Terminal illnesses offer time for discussion and resolution of unfinished psychological and practical business. A good death includes not being a burden to the family, leaving affairs in order and having a sense of fulfilment. A bad death is being kept alive against one's wishes, a loss of dignity, an inability to communicate one's wishes, the excessive use of medical technology and dying alone. India was ranked 67 out of 80 countries, on the 2015 Quality of Death Index, published by the Economist Intelligence Unit, signalling the urgent need to legislate on, and implement good death policies in our country. (Dr. K. Ganapathy is a distinguished professor at the Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University and past president of the Neurological Society of India and the Telemedicine Society of India. Email: drkganapathy@