What options for Hezbollah after govt's decision to disarm it?
The government has decided to task the army with setting a plan to disarm Hezbollah.
AFP looks at how the government's decision may be implemented, and whether the Iran-backed militant group can still block it.
- Why is the move important? -
Tuesday's announcement was the first time a Lebanese government has announced it would disarm Hezbollah, the only armed faction that kept its weapons in the aftermath of the 1975-1990 civil war.
Hezbollah has kept its arms in the name of resistance against Israel, which occupied Lebanon's south until 2000.
The decision effectively strips Hezbollah's weapons arsenal of political legitimacy, breaking with past government statements that recognized the "resistance" alongside the Lebanese army.
The balance of power in Lebanon has shifted after a recent war between Israel and Hezbollah left the group badly weakened, and after the fall of the group's close ally Bashar al-Assad in neighboring Syria.
Unprecedented Israeli strikes on Hezbollah backer Iran in June have further weakened its stance.
Previous moves to limit or do away with Hezbollah's weapons and logistical network have led to major political and security crises.
In May 2008, when the Lebanese government decided to shut down the group's wired communications network, clashes erupted with Hezbollah using its weapons against political opponents in Beirut and beyond. The violence killed at least 65 people.
The group's arsenal has remained a divisive issue in Lebanon, with opponents demanding the state control all territories and the government have the sole power to declare war and peace.
- What can Hezbollah do? -
Hezbollah on Wednesday rejected the government's decision, calling it a "grave sin" and saying it will treat it "as if it did not exist".
But the armed group has few choices, which all appear to come at a great cost.
Hezbollah could escalate politically by having the four ministers affiliated with it and its allies resign. It could also disrupt the work of parliament, or incite chaos by mobilizing its armed supporters to the streets.
Any domestic unrest blamed on Hezbollah would likely have major repercussions for the group's image among Lebanese.
"Hezbollah, as much as possible, would want to reduce the chance of itself entering a confrontation with the army, because it knows that the entire country would be against it except for its supporters," said David Wood, a senior Lebanon analyst at the International Crisis Group.
"It would be an absolute disaster for its image," he added.
Hezbollah lawmaker Ali Ammar dismissed the possibility of any confrontation with the army, saying the two forces "understand" each other.
Hezbollah could relaunch attacks against Israel, but this option could easily prove devastating with the country still reeling from last year's war.
"Going into war right now, again, will be very devastating to Hezbollah because it does not have a supply line. It lost a lot with the collapse of the Syrian regime," said military analyst Riad Kahwaji.
"Its intelligence capabilities, its logistical capabilities have all been severely affected."
The war with Israel saw much of Hezbollah's senior leadership killed and a large part of its military arsenal destroyed, as did swathes of Beirut, Lebanon's south and other areas.
Receiving weapons shipments from Iran via Syria has become more difficult as Lebanese and Syrian authorities have tightened border controls, and funding has come under stricter oversight.
Hezbollah could agree to disarm, but a Lebanese source had told AFP it "would not do so without something in return".
Tehran's position may also affect any decision.
The Lebanese group may "play for time", according to Atlantic Council researcher Nicholas Blanford.
"They can't fully disarm. I think that's impossible for Hezbollah."
- How will Lebanon be affected? -
Lebanon is under intense Arab and Western pressure to disarm non-state actors, a key demand to secure international support as it emerges from years of political and economic crises.
"We must choose: either collapse or stability," President Joseph Aoun said last week.
Should Hezbollah insist on keeping its arsenal, Beirut will find itself in a difficult position.
"If Hezbollah is determined to keep the weapons, this would be very difficult for the Lebanese government to force it to give them up," said Blanford.
"If they can't do it politically," the researcher said the government would not "send the Lebanese army against Hezbollah".
"So it has to be a question of a compromise and some kind of agreement, which is not going to be easy."
Meanwhile, Israel has already signaled it would not hesitate to launch destructive military operations if Lebanon fails to disarm Hezbollah, as stipulated in the ceasefire agreement that ended their latest war.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
L'Orient-Le Jour
an hour ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
US lawmaker Darrell Issa in Beirut, promises 'solution regarding Israeli withdrawal from south Lebanon'
BEIRUT — During a visit to Beirut and a meeting with President Joseph Aoun, U.S. Congressman Darrell Issa promised that the United States would find a "solution" to the ongoing Israeli occupation of Lebanese territory in southern Lebanon. "The Lebanese government wants to strengthen stability and we support its efforts in this direction," Issa is cited as saying, according to a statement released by the Lebanese presidency. "Israel must understand that Lebanon is experiencing a new beginning and we will make sure to find a solution regarding the Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon." Cabinet met on Tuesday afternoon to continue discussions on Hezbollah's disarmament and specifically the U.S. proposal for how to do so. As the ministers' meeting was adjourned, it was announced that they had approved "the objectives set out" by the American plan. Despite a cease-fire concluded on Nov. 27, 2024 between Israel and Hezbollah after more than a year of conflict, the Israeli army continues to occupy positions in Labbouneh/Alma al-Shaab, near the coastline (Sour district); Jabal Blat, near Ramieh (Bint Jbeil district); Jal al-Deir, south of Aitaroun (Bint Jbeil district); the Markaba-Houla road (Marjayoun district); Hamames Hill, near Khiam (Marjayoun district). Issa, a Republican member of Congress of Lebanese origin, said that the "Lebanese decision must be in the hands of the people," stressing the need "for legitimate institutions to lead Lebanon." "We support them, just as we reaffirm our support for the Lebanese Army," he said. Issa's Lebanese visit comes two weeks after that of U.S. envoy Tom Barrack, during which he admitted that no one could force Israel to do anything, that there were no guarantees, and that the Lebanese state had to take on the issue of Hezbollah's arms to ensure its monopoly.
L'Orient-Le Jour
an hour ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Cabinet adopts 'objectives' laid out in US proposal for Hezbollah disarmament
BEIRUT — Just half an hour after all Shiite ministers walked out of a Cabinet meeting on the state's attempts to achieve a monopoly on arms, which specifically centers around Hezbollah's disarmament, the government announced on Thursday that it had approved the "objectives set out" by a U.S. proposal on how to do so. The proposal, often described as a "roadmap" was presented to Lebanon by U.S. envoy Tom Barrack in June, amid increasing domestic and international pressure on the Lebanese government to speed up the process of establishing an arms monopoly, on which sorely needed foreign financial support has been conditioned. President Joseph Aoun has led discussions with Hezbollah, insisting on a dialogue-based approach that doesn't exacerbate existing tensions amid a shifting political landscape. However, Hezbollah, for its part, insists it will not disarm so long as Israel continues it aggression against the country and its occupation of land in southern Lebanon. Upon leaving the Cabinet meeting, Information Minister Paul Morcos read out the objectives Cabinet had adopted from the U.S. proposal: 1 : Lebanon commits to implementing the Taif Agreement, as well as the Lebanese Constitution and U.N. Security Council resolutions, in particular Resolution 1701 (2006), and to taking necessary measures to extend its full sovereignty over its entire territory, with the aim of reinforcing the role of legitimate institutions, establishing the state's monopoly over decisions of war and peace, and ensuring the exclusive possession of arms by the state throughout Lebanese territory. 2 : Ensure the durability of the cease-fire, including the end of all violations on land, air, and sea, through organized steps leading to a sustainable, comprehensive, and guaranteed solution. 3 : Gradually end the armed presence of all non-state factions, including Hezbollah, throughout Lebanese territory, both south and north of the Litani River, while providing appropriate support to the Lebanese Army and Internal Security Forces. 4 : Deploy units of the Lebanese Army in border areas and key interior regions, with adequate support for the army and the Internal Security Forces. 5 : Israeli withdrawal from the "five points," and commitment to resolve border and prisoner issues through indirect negotiations and diplomatic means. 6 : Ensure the return of inhabitants of border villages and localities. 7 : Guarantee the complete withdrawal of Israel from Lebanese territory and the cessation of all hostilities, including land, air, and sea violations. 8 : Permanent and visible demarcation of the international border between Lebanon and Israel. 9 : Permanent demarcation and definition of the border between Lebanon and Syria. 10 : Organize an economic conference with the participation of the United States, France, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and other friends of Lebanon, in support of rebuilding the Lebanese economy and in line with President Donald Trump's vision to make Lebanon a prosperous country. 11: Provide additional international support to the Lebanese security forces, especially the Lebanese Army, by giving them the necessary military resources to implement this initiative and ensure Lebanon's protection. Shiite ministers' walkout The issue of compliance with the National Pact should not arise, Morcos argued during his press conference, despite the fact that no Shiite ministers were present when Cabinet made its decision. 'They participated in the session and the debate and only withdrew before the vote,' he said. Ministers Tamara Elzein (Amal), Mohammad Haidar (Hezbollah), and Rakan Nassereddine (Hezbollah) first walked out of the meeting. Minister Yassine Jaber (Amal) was absent at today's and Tuesday's meeting. The three ministers were then followed by the fifth Shiite minister Fadi Makki (not affiliated with either party). "I left the meeting after my colleagues had already departed," Makki said in a statement released afterward. "The decision was not an easy one, but I could not take responsibility for making such a significant decision in the absence of a key party to the debate." Makki clarified in statements made to L'Orient Today that he is not affiliated with the Amal Movement or Hezbollah, and that he walked out of the Cabinet meeting after ministers associated with both parties had already done so because he felt that, as the only remaining Shiite minister, 'I simply felt that I couldn't take sole responsibility for such a decision.' Haidar told L'Orient Today that the walkout of Shiite ministers from the meeting was not indicative of any resignation from government. 'We wanted to show our opposition to the government's desire to endorse the entire proposal of [U.S.] envoy Tom Barrack, but we will be present at future sessions,' he confirmed. Haidar had been absent from the Tuesday meeting, during which the arms monopoly was initially discussed, but he took the floor on Thursday to declared his opposition to Hezbollah's disarmament so long as Israeli attacks on Lebanon were ongoing. 'I am a son of this people," Haidar said. "How could I face the mother of a martyr, a father still living in a tent, or a young man who lives every day in existential anguish, and tell him that he must submit and give up the only guarantee that protects him?' "We cannot talk about disarming 'The Resistance' until the enemy has withdrawn, our prisoners have returned, the attacks have stopped, and reconstruction has begun," he continued. "Otherwise, I am sorry, but I cannot take responsibility for an unjust decision against my people, and I will never accept that the state abandons its own." A 'free service' rendered to Israel Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc, 'Loyalty to the Resistance,' issued a statement in parallel with the Baabda Presidential Palace Cabinet meeting, describing the government's decision to disarm Hezbollah as a 'free service' rendered to Israel. 'We call on the Lebanese government to correct the situation it has put Lebanon in, having bowed to American demands that serve the interests of the enemy,' the statement read. Ahead of the meeting, Minister of Internal Displacement Kamal Shehadi said that 'the Lebanese government is maintaining its decision to achieve the monopoly of arms in the hands of the state' and 'will not go back on its decision.' In an interview with the Saudi pan-Arab channel al-Arabiya, he said he believed that Hezbollah and Amaler were 'the only ones protesting this measure, now facing a majority of Lebanese who support it.'
L'Orient-Le Jour
an hour ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
What does the US proposal for Hezbollah's disarmament look like?
BEIRUT — During its second meeting convened these week to discuss a state monopoly on arms, Cabinet saw all of its Shiite ministers walk out following a refusal to discuss a plan drawn up by the United States that lays out a "roadmap" for how Lebanon should go about disarming Hezbollah, a group that was once one of the most powerful non-state actors in the world. The U.S. proposal sets the end of the year as a deadline for Hezbollah's disarmament, a timeline that Cabinet adopted during Tuesday's meeting. Instead of adopting the American plan directly, which was delivered to Lebanon through U.S. envoy Tom Barrack, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam's ministers assigned responsibility for drawing up a roadmap to the Lebanese Army, which it has been tasked to submit by the end of August. Hezbollah and its allies accused the government of "bowing to foreign pressure" and categorically refused to discuss disarmament so long as Israeli attacks against Lebanon and its occupation of several areas of the South was ongoing. Cabinet was set to discuss the U.S. proposal during Thursday's meeting, which was adjourned shortly after the walkout. According to copy of the Cabinet agenda reviewed by Reuters, the U.S. plan, drawn up by the U.S. State Department, sets out the most detailed steps yet for disarming Hezbollah. It aims to "extend and stabilize" a cease-fire agreement brokered in November, that, while ending an all-out war, has not prevented Israel from continuing its attacks against the country. "The urgency of this proposal is underscored by the increasing number of complaints regarding Israeli violations of the current cease-fire, including airstrikes and cross-border operations, which risk triggering a collapse of the fragile status quo," it said. Here is an outline of the U.S. proposal that brought Thursday's Cabinet meeting to a halt: Phase 1: The Lebanese government issues a decree within 15 days committing to Hezbollah's full disarmament by Dec. 31, 2025. In this phase, Israel would also cease ground, air and sea military operations. Phase 2: Lebanon begins implementing the disarmament plan within 60 days, with the government approving "a detailed [Lebanese Army] deployment plan to support the plan to bring all arms under the authority of the state." This plan will specify disarmament targets. Israel begins withdrawing from positions it holds in southern Lebanon and Lebanese prisoners held by Israel would be released in coordination with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Phase 3: Within 90 days, Israel will withdraw from the final two of the five points it holds, and funding will be secured to initiate rubble removal in Lebanon and infrastructure rehabilitation in preparation for reconstruction. Phase 4: Within 120 days, Hezbollah's remaining heavy weapons must be dismantled, including missiles and drones. The United States, Saudi Arabia, France, Qatar and other friendly states will organize an economic conference to support the Lebanese economy and reconstruction and to "implement President Trump's vision for the return of Lebanon as a prosperous and viable country."
