Denham Springs High School student hurt in crash that left 2 dead, school officials confirm
BATON ROUGE, La. (Louisiana First) — A spokesperson for Livingston Parish Public Schools confirmed Wednesday that a Denham Springs High School student was one of the people injured in a deadly crash early Tuesday morning.
Counselors are available for students and faculty at the high school.
The Livingston Parish Sheriff's Office said two victims were killed and three others were hurt in the single-vehicle crash on Linder Road. An investigation is ongoing.
Baton Rouge man dead after two-vehicle crash in Acadia Parish
Cardi B wants Trump to return deported uncle in exchange for ruining her shoes at Super Bowl
'More female and less white': Missouri AG accuses Starbucks of violating anti-discrimination laws
5 JOANN stores in Louisiana expected to close amid second bankruptcy filing
LSU's Olivia Dunne named grand marshal of New Orleans' Endymion parade for 2025
Baton Rouge organizations partner to teach families heart-healthy ways to enjoy meals
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rob Gronkowski Reflects On Aaron Hernandez Allegedly Pleasuring Himself During Team Meetings: 'Pretty Epic'
NFL star and Super Bowl champion Rob Gronkowski is opening up about his former New England Patriots teammate, Aaron Hernandez. On a podcast, Gronkowski, 36, spoke with the hosts about a rumor that Hernandez displayed questionable behavior during team meetings, specifically by pleasuring himself. According to Gronk, however, he reportedly never saw a problem with Hernandez's alleged behavior, describing his actions as "epic." Rob Gronkowski Talks About Aaron Hernandez Allegedly Pleasuring Himself In Meetings On the "Bussin' With The Boys" podcast, Gronkowski discussed Hernandez, who played three seasons in the NFL, and a rumor suggesting he used to masturb-te during team meetings. Advertisement 'That's a possibility, that one,' Gronk said while laughing. 'I may or may not have seen it live. I'm not going to confirm or deny. The outgoing personality continued, 'I mean, I love crazy sh-t though, so I didn't mind things like that. I was like, 'Wow, that was pretty epic.' I was a wild man myself, so nothing fazed me.' Rob Gronkowski Says He And Hernandez Were The 'Best' Tight Ends In The NFL MEGA Elsewhere, during the podcast, Gronkowski reflected on his and Hernandez's productivity on the football field. The two tight ends were a dominant force on the Patriots in 2011, combining for 169 receptions, 2,237 receiving yards, and 24 touchdowns. Advertisement 'We were the best combination at the tight end position of all time,' he said. 'And that second year proves it. I mean we had like what—2,300 yards combined and like [24] touchdowns between just him and I, including playoffs and regular season. That's unheard of.' Rob Gronkowski Was 'Sad' To Hear About Hernandez's Legal Troubles MEGA Despite their on-field success, Gronkowski admitted he "didn't see" Hernandez's life unfolding the way it did. In 2013, Hernandez made headlines when he was arrested for the murder of Odin Lloyd, a professional football player who was dating the sister of Hernandez's fiancée. Advertisement Hernandez was convicted of first-degree murder in 2015 and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Amid all of that, Hernandez was also indicted for a double homicide in Boston, where two men were killed in a drive-by shooting. In 2017, Hernandez died by suicide. On the podcast, Gronkowski called Hernandez's legal troubles "sad" before saying he felt "disappointed" in his former teammate. "Like, why would you do that? We got the whole world in front of us. Especially you and I as a tandem, we've got the best team out there, everything. So, it was shocking," he said. Advertisement He continued, 'It's unfortunate what happened. 'Cause the talent was just through the roof. And if we could have kept our tandem going, we could have been just truly unstoppable.' Hernandez's Brother Shares More About Their Upbringing MEGA In the years after Hernandez's death, major studios, including Netflix and Hulu, released documentaries and limited scripted series about his life. These productions explored various allegations concerning the NFL star, including his sexuality and his upbringing with an allegedly abusive father. In his book, "The Truth About Aaron: My Journey To Understand My Brother," Hernandez's brother, Jonathan, opened up about the childhood abuse they suffered, explaining its severe impact on his brother's development. Advertisement 'I wanted to tell his story so that people could understand who my brother was,' Jonathan said at the time. 'He had a lot of things happen, both good and bad. People think they know about my brother, but they really don't. They know what they saw in the news, but they don't know all the struggles he faced.' 'Our father would hit us for anything from a bad grade to disrespectful behavior to sheer clumsiness,' he wrote in his book. Later, Jonathan detailed a time when he threatened to call child protective services on his father, but quickly changed his mind after his father challenged him. 'He handed me the phone before saying, 'Call them. As soon as you hang up the phone, I will beat you boys harder than you've ever been beat before. They will have to pull me off of you after they break down the door,'" he wrote. Hernandez's Brother Asked The NFL Player If He Was Gay MEGA Jonathan also recounted an instance where he reportedly saw his brother in bed with two men while at a bachelor party. Advertisement 'I asked Aaron if he was gay,' he wrote. ''If you are, I don't care,' I said. 'I love you. You are my brother.'" However, according to Jonathan, the former tight blew up when he asked him the question. 'Don't you ever ask me that again,' Jonathan said his brother replied. 'If you say that again, I'll f-cking kill you.''
Vox
17 minutes ago
- Vox
Why Donald Trump soured on some of his own judges
Late last month, approximately 1 billion news cycles ago, an obscure federal court made President Donald Trump very, very mad. The US Court of International Trade ruled unanimously on May 28 that the massive tariffs Trump imposed after taking office again are illegal. That ruling was suspended the next day by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the tariffs will be allowed to remain in effect pending a ruling (arguments are scheduled for late July). But the appellate court's decision didn't soothe Trump. He took to Truth Social on May 29 to post a 510-word screed attacking the judges on the Court of International Trade, before turning his ire toward a more surprising candidate — Leonard Leo, the most important person in the conservative legal movement. 'I was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges,' Trump wrote, reminiscing about his first term. 'I did so, openly and freely, but then realized that they were under the thumb of a real 'sleazebag' named Leonard Leo, a bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America, and obviously has his own separate ambitions.' This breakup surprised many commentators. But not David French. 'If you're familiar with how the conservative legal movement has interacted with MAGA, you have seen this coming for a while,' French, a New York Times columnist, lawyer, and onetime member of the Federalist Society, told Today, Explained co-host Sean Rameswaram. 'You knew this was coming after 2020. Because in 2020, after Trump had really stocked the federal judiciary with an awful lot of FedSoc judges and justices…none of them, zero of them, helped him try to steal the election.' French spoke with Today, Explained about the origins of the (other) big, beautiful breakup and what it means for the Trump administration and the future of the federal judiciary. Below is an excerpt of the conversation, edited for length and clarity. There's much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify. Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Federalist Society? I am not now, but I have been a member of the Federalist Society. I was a member of the Federalist Society either all three years of law school or the first two years of law school. But it was also a very different time. I think the Federalist Society at the law school at that time, when we would have meetings, maybe 10 or 12 people would show up. Things have changed. One of the most conspicuous changes is that FedSoc has become an enemy of the president of the United States. From [2020] forward, you began to see this drifting apart between FedSoc and MAGA. When Trump comes back into office and he doubles down on being Donald Trump, all of this became very, very predictable. Because if the Trump administration's argument dovetailed with their originalist legal philosophy, they would rule for it. But if it was just simply Trump's lawless demands, they were going to reject it. And Trump is baffled by this distinction. He's baffled by it because congressional Republicans haven't drawn this line at all. When Trump's demands conflict with conservative principles, they will yield to Trump's demands every time. And the judges and justices have taken the opposite tack to such an extent that Republican-nominated judges have ruled against Trump about 72 percent of the time, which is remarkably close to about the 80 percent or so of the time that Democratic-appointed judges have ruled against Trump. You mentioned a whole host of issues where FedSoc judges have perhaps not given Trump what he wanted. Does the one that finally tips Trump off to go for it on Truth Social surprise you? It doesn't, because what really set him off was striking down tariffs. To the extent that Trump loves a policy, he loves tariffs. The Court of International Trade struck it down, and it was pointed out to him that one of the judges on the Court of International Trade that struck down the tariffs was appointed by him. He had been ranting about judges in general. Now he got specific with Leonard Leo; he got specific with the FedSoc. People like me who'd been watching this for a very long time were not wondering if this was going to happen. We were just wondering what was going to be the tipping point: Was it going to be a Supreme Court case? Was it going to be an appellate court? It turns out it was the Court of International Trade that brought us to this moment. Leonard Leo did not author a decision from this court. Why is he mad at Leonard Leo? Leonard Leo has long been a key figure in the Federalist Society and was very much a part of the first Trump administration, working closely with the administration to put forward judges. For a long time, Trump looked at his judicial nominations and waved them like a flag to the American conservative public saying, look what I did. But the more the American conservative public started loving Trump as Trump, versus Trump as what policy wins he could deliver, the less he started waving these other ideological flags, and the more it became all about him. And so this meant that this marriage was going to be temporary almost from the beginning, unless FedSoc capitulated. And if you know anything about FedSoc and the people who belong to it, and the people who've come up as judges, I knew they weren't going to capitulate. It's a very different culture from political conservatism. Do you think Donald Trump didn't realize that? I don't think he realized that at all. He's had this entire history politically of when Republicans disagree with him, they either fall in line or they're steamrolled. And so it's so interesting to me that he actually began that Truth Social rant that lacerated Leonard Leo and the FedSoc with this question: What's going on? Why is this happening? And I totally understand his bafflement. Because all of the political people had surrendered, or almost all of them. And so when he turns around and these judges and justices just keep ruling against him, you can understand why he would take that as, 'What's going on here? I don't get this. I don't understand this. I've been assured that these were good judges.' And so that's where you get to that real tension. Do you think this rift with the Federalist Society will affect how he appoints judges going forward? The short answer to that question is yes. The longer answer to that question is heck yes. A lot of people were worried about this because they were thinking, Okay, Trump 1.0: He has General Mattis as his secretary of defense. Trump 2.0: He has Pete Hegseth. You can do this all day long. The Trump 1.0 early nominations — sound, serious, establishment conservatives. Trump 2.0 — often MAGA crazies. The question was, 'Is this same pattern going to establish itself in Trump 2.0 on judges?' And then he appointed to the Third Circuit Emil Bove, this DOJ enforcer of his who was responsible for the effort to dismiss the Eric Adams case. He's nominated him for the Third Circuit, and a lot of people are now saying, 'Oh, now that's your harbinger right there.'
Chicago Tribune
42 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
An immigrant in Wisconsin has been released on bond after false accusation he threatened Trump
MADISON, Wis. — A man who was falsely accused of threatening to assassinate President Donald Trump and threatened with deportation to Mexico was released Thursday from a Wisconsin jail on bond, three weeks after federal immigration agents arrested him. Ramón Morales Reyes, 54, was accused of a writing a letter threatening Trump in a social media post by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem that got widespread national coverage. The post includes Morales Reyes' photo and an excerpt from the letter he purportedly wrote in English. But the claims quickly fell apart as Wisconsin authorities determined that Reyes, who doesn't speak English well or write in the language, was framed. Morales Reyes was a victim in a violent 2023 attack where his bike was stolen. According to authorities, the alleged attacker, Demetric D. Scott, forged the letter to try to clear his case. Morales Reyes was set to be a witness in Scott's July trial for armed robbery and aggravated battery. Morales Reyes was released in the afternoon after paying the $7,500 bond that an immigration judge set on Tuesday. Speaking to WISN-TV, Morales Reyes said he and his lawyer will fight his deportation. 'I believe (the lawyer) knows the history and all of you know what happened,' he said. He was later met by relatives and members of the Milwaukee-based immigrant rights group Voces de la Frontera, which has helped work on his case. Christine Neumann-Ortiz, the organization's executive director, said Morales Reyes was 'relieved' and 'very grateful for all of the support he's received.' Judge Carla Espinoza said at the immigration court hearing in Chicago that Morales Reyes was not a threat to the community. Morales Reyes, a married father of three U.S. citizen children, works as a dishwasher in Milwaukee. He was arrested by immigration agents last month after dropping a child off at school. He immigrated from Mexico in the 1980s and doesn't have legal permission to be in the U.S. This year, he applied for a U visa, which is for people in the country illegally who are victims of serious crimes. Getting such a visa can take years. Homeland Security issued a statement to reporters last week saying that although Morales Reyes was no longer considered a threat to Trump, federal attorneys would still pursue an immigration case. The government alleges that Morales Reyes reentered the U.S. numerous times without a visa. Morales Reyes had been held in the Dodge Detention Center in Juneau, about 70 miles (113 kilometers) north of Milwaukee. He was released after the federal government did not appeal the setting of his bond. Noem's social media post blaming Morales Reyes for an assassination attempt, which was circulated by Trump supporters, remains online.
