States Sue Trump Admin Over Termination of EV Charging Station Funding
The Trump administration is being sued by a coalition of 16 states and the District of Columbia over claims it is withholding billions of dollars in funding approved by Congress to build electric vehicle (EV) charging stations, according to a federal lawsuit announced on April 7.
The
It centers on the $5 billion in funding allocated under the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program in 2022 to facilitate electric vehicle charging infrastructure in the states.
That funding was established through the Biden administration's Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, amid a push towards achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 and making at least
Congress required the $5 billion funding to be distributed among the states over fiscal years 2022 through 2026.
So far, an estimated $3.3 billion had already been made available, according to the lawsuit.
Related Stories
4/30/2025
5/6/2025
Shortly after taking office in January, President Donald Trump issued an
The order stated that America is 'blessed with an abundance of energy and natural resources that have historically powered our Nation's economic prosperity,' but that, in recent years, 'burdensome and ideologically motivated regulations' have impeded the development of those resources, while also limiting the generation of reliable and affordable electricity, reducing job creation, and increasing energy costs.
Following Trump's directive, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), an agency under the Department of Transportation (DOT),
The lawsuit challenges the FHWA's authority to terminate the funding and claims its actions deprive the states of billions of dollars in appropriated funds and violate the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the Separation of Powers Doctrine, and the Take Care Clause, among others.
'This infrastructure is critical to the success of plaintiff states' environmental, public health, and transportation programs—projects Congress actively chose to support in enacting the [Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act] and establishing the NEVI Formula Program. The harms to plaintiff states will continue and become increasingly damaging if unabated,' the states wrote in the suit.
The lawsuit asks the court to declare Trump's directives unlawful, to vacate the administration's actions, and permanently stop it from withholding the funds.
Department of Transportation and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy and Federal Highway Administration Administrator Gloria Shepherd are listed as defendants.
In a
'President Trump's illegal action withholding funds for electric vehicle infrastructure is yet another Trump gift to China—ceding American innovation and killing thousands of jobs,' they said. 'Instead of hawking Teslas on the White House lawn, President Trump could actually help Elon—and the nation—by following the law and releasing this bipartisan funding.'
The attorneys general of Arizona, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Wisconsin, and Vermont joined the lawsuit.
The Epoch Times has contacted the Department of Transportation and Tesla for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
Van Hollen on Abrego Garcia's return to US: ‘A victory for the Constitution'
Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) celebrated the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported and detained in El Salvador's CECOT prison, calling it 'a victory' for the rule of law. The Trump administration doubled down on the deportation, accusing Abrego Garcia, who illegally immigrated to the U.S. from El Salvador in 2011 but was later protected from removal to his home country, of having gang ties. His legal team has denied these allegations and urged for his return to the U.S. On Friday, Attorney General Pam Bondi, after months of fighting against Abrego Garcia's return in court, announced that he was transported back to U.S. soil to face criminal charges stemming from a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee. 'This is a victory for due process. It's a victory for the Constitution. It should not have taken this long. I mean … the Trump administration dragged its feet for a very long time and ignored a 9 to 0 order from the Supreme Court,' Van Hollen said during a Friday appearance on MSNBC. 'But it's important that Abrego Garcia now come home and have his due process rights upheld in a court of law,' he added. The Maryland lawmaker visited Abrego Garcia while he was detained overseas to check on his well being and champion his release from El Salvadoran custody, which White House officials originally said would never happen. Van Hollen on Friday said that the court battle Abrego Garcia will now face should have been launched prior to his removal. 'If they're now going to take this case into the courts, as they should have, you know, from the beginning, before they just took him off the streets of Maryland and deposited him in a gulag in El Salvador, then that is — that is the due process that we've been fighting for,' he said. 'And, again, not just for his case, but for others. And — and I think that Americans understand that everybody deserves to have their rights, you know, respected. That's what the Constitution is for.' Abrego Garcia's attorney said on Friday that the criminal case is just another attempt to persecute his client. 'This shows that they were playing games with the court all along. Due process means the chance to defend yourself before you're punished, not after. This is an abuse of power, not justice,' attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg previously told The Hill in a statement. 'The government should put him on trial, yes—but in front of the same immigration judge who heard his case in 2019, which is the ordinary manner of doing things, 'to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador,' as the Supreme Court ordered.'
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TD Cowen Initiates Coverage of Target (TGT) With Hold Rating
On Wednesday, June 4, TD Cowen analysts began coverage of Target Corporation (NYSE:TGT), giving it a 'Hold' rating and setting a price target of $105. The analysts noted that the company's strong core business is supported by innovative and exclusive products. They also highlighted Target Corporation's (NYSE:TGT) digital fulfillment strategies, which are profitable and have potential for scaling. The analysts pointed out that the company has a 5-year revenue compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.4%, higher than Walmart's 5.4%. A woman purchasing groceries at a Target store, with a cart full of products. Despite this, TD Cowen analysts noted some challenges that Target Corporation (NYSE:TGT) is facing in the near term. These include pressure from competitors on comparable sales and cost inefficiencies that are anticipated to continue throughout the year. The analysts mentioned tariffs and lower consumer confidence as factors contributing to the company's current challenges. They pointed out that these could affect Target Corporation's (NYSE:TGT) performance in the short term. While we acknowledge the potential of TGT as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 11 Stocks That Will Bounce Back According To Analysts and 11 Best Stocks Under $15 to Buy According to Hedge Funds. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Evercore Raises Walmart (WMT) Price Target, Keeps Outperform Rating
On Wednesday, June 4, Evercore ISI analysts raised the price target on Walmart Inc. (NYSE:WMT) from $105 to $107 and kept an 'Outperform' rating. The decision came just before the company's annual Shareholders' Day store tours and executive meetings planned for Thursday and Friday. The analysts noted that Walmart Inc. (NYSE:WMT) has gained 10% year-to-date. This compares to a 1% rise in the S&P 500. This strong performance is due to the company's efforts to grow its market share, increase customer traffic, and improve margins. A manager standing in a hypermarket, pointing out items available for wholesale. According to the analysts, Walmart Inc.'s (NYSE:WMT) ability to handle tariff changes and grow its marketing, membership, and fulfillment services is expected to play a vital role in the medium to long term. They also mentioned that a potential Flipkart IPO could affect the stock. The analysts look forward to learning more about Walmart Inc.'s (NYSE:WMT) plans to gain market share and drive traffic, while also growing earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) faster than sales. They also noted that the company is moving toward higher-margin businesses like membership programs, advertising, third-party services, and automation. While we acknowledge the potential of WMT as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 11 Stocks That Will Bounce Back According To Analysts and 11 Best Stocks Under $15 to Buy According to Hedge Funds. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
