Nearby Sculptor galaxy revealed in ultra-detailed galactic image
WASHINGTON, June 18 (Reuters) - The Sculptor galaxy is similar in many respects to our Milky Way. It is about the same size and mass, with a similar spiral structure. But while it is impossible to get a full view of the Milky Way from the vantage point of Earth because we are inside the galaxy, Sculptor is perfectly positioned for a good look.
Astronomers have done just that, releasing an ultra-detailed image of the Sculptor galaxy on Wednesday obtained with 50 hours of observations using one of the world's biggest telescopes, the European Southern Observatory's Chile-based Very Large Telescope.
The image shows Sculptor, also called NGC 253, in around 4,000 different colors, each corresponding to a specific wavelength in the optical spectrum.
Because various galactic components emit light differently across the spectrum, the observations are providing information at unprecedented detail on the inner workings of an entire galaxy, from star formation to the motion of interstellar gas on large scales. Conventional images in astronomy offer only a handful of colors, providing less information.
The researchers used the telescope's Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer, or MUSE, instrument.
"NGC 253 is close enough that we can observe it in remarkable detail with MUSE, yet far enough that we can still see the entire galaxy in a single field of view," said astronomer Enrico Congiu, a fellow at the European Southern Observatory in Santiago, and lead author of research being published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.
"In the Milky Way, we can achieve extremely high resolution, but we lack a global view since we're inside it. For more distant galaxies, we can get a global view, but not the fine detail. That's why NGC 253 is such a perfect target: it acts as a bridge between the ultra-detailed studies of the Milky Way and the large-scale studies of more distant galaxies. It gives us a rare opportunity to connect the small-scale physics with the big-picture view," Congiu said.
Sculptor is about 11 million light-years from Earth, making it one of the closest big galaxies to the Milky Way. A light-year is the distance light travels in a year, 5.9 trillion miles (9.5 trillion km).
Like the Milky Way, it is a barred spiral galaxy, meaning it has an elongated structure extending from its nucleus, with spiral arms extending from the ends of the bar. Its diameter of about 88,000 light-years is similar to the Milky Way's, as is its total mass. One major difference is Sculptor's rate of new star formation, estimated to be two to three times greater than that of the Milky Way.
Nearly 30% of this star formation is happening near the galaxy's nucleus in what is called a starburst region, as revealed in colorful emissions shown in the new image.
The observations have given information on a wide range of properties such as the motion, age and chemical composition of stars and the movement of interstellar gas, an important component of any galaxy.
"Since the light from stars is typically bluer if the stars are young or redder if the stars are old, having thousands of colors lets us learn a lot about what stars and populations of stars exist in the galaxy," said astronomer Kathryn Kreckel of Heidelberg University in Germany, a study co-author.
"Similarly for the gas, it glows in specific bright emission lines at very specific colors, and tells us about the different elements that exist in the gas, and what is causing it to glow," Kreckel said.
The initial research being published from the observations involves planetary nebulae, which are luminous clouds of gas and dust expelled by certain dying stars. Despite their name, they have nothing to do with planets. These nebulae can help astronomers measure the precise distances of faraway galaxies.
The researchers marveled at the scientific and aesthetic value of the new view of Sculptor.
"I personally find these images amazing," Congiu said. "What amazes me the most is that every time I look at them, I notice something new - another nebula, a splash of unexpected color or some subtle structure that hints at the incredible physics behind it all."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: Experts discover trendy diet loved by millions no better than other weight loss plans
Intermittent fasting—a trendy eating pattern beloved by celebrities and A-listers—is no better than regular dieting, a major review has suggested. Hollywood stars like Jennifer Aniston, Nicole Kidman, Cameron Diaz and Mark Wahlberg have jumped on the trend since it shot to prominence in the early 2010s. It sees dieters cram all their meals into a strict daily time window, or in extreme examples, skip some entirely. But now, in a major review of data on the diet, a team of international researchers found the benefits from fasting were essentially 'trivial' compared to normal dieting. Neither eating meals in a specific time window—like in an eight hour period—or doing fasting for five days of the week and then eating normally for two were found to be any better for losing weight. In fact, alternate day fasting—where people fast for 24 hours on alternate days—was only found to help people lose more weight, with dieters slimming down 2.84lbs (1.29kg) more, on average. However, this difference didn't meet what the researchers said was the minimum clinical threshold of 4.4lbs (2kg). But they did say this type of intermittent fasting was found to lower cholesterol levels. Time restricted fasting, which involves a 16 hour fast followed by an eight-hour eating window, was found to slightly increase cholesterol levels. No benefit was found for blood sugar levels or 'good' cholesterol levels in any of the fasting diet strategies. In the study, researchers analysed the results of 99 randomised clinical trials involving 6,582 adults, aged 45 on average, to compare intermittent fasting with calorie reducing diets. Writing in the BMJ, the scientists said while their data suggested intermittent fasting was better for losing weight than not dieting at all, it didn't stand out compared to a basic calorie-counting diet. 'Minor differences were noted between some intermittent fasting diets and continuous energy restriction, with some benefit for an alternate day fasting strategy with weight loss in shorter duration trials,' they added. 'All intermittent fasting strategies and continuous energy restriction diets showed a reduction in body weight when compared with an ad-libitum diet (allowing yourself to eat at any time). 'Of three intermittent fasting diets alternate day fasting showed benefit in body weight reduction compared with continuous energy restriction.' Independent experts, not involved in the research, said the findings were unsurprising. Professor Naveed Sattar, an expert in cardiometabolic medicine at the University of Glasgow, said: 'Overall, the results do not surprise as there is nothing magical about intermittent fasting for weight loss—beyond being another way for people to lower their calorie intake. 'Whether it is sustainable over the longer term is worth examining. 'For those who need to lose much more weight, other options are now clearly available.' Meanwhile, Dr Amanda Avery, an expert in nutrition and dietetics at the University of Nottingham, added: 'The pros and cons of intermittent fasting have been debated for some time now. 'This review can hopefully end the debate with the conclusion that if someone chooses intermittent fasting and overall a nutritionally balanced diet is still achieved, then it could be used as one of the options to support weight loss.' Experts have long been divided over the effectiveness of intermittent fasting as well as its potential long term health impacts. Some have even warned that it may raise the risk of strokes, heart attacks or early death. One study earlier this year also suggested intermittent fasting could trigger type two diabetes. Around two in three adults in the UK are obese or overweight, giving the country one of the highest obesity rates in Europe. Obesity itself increases the chances of person suffering serious health conditions that can damage the heart, such as high blood pressure. Last year, a sobering report also suggested Britain's spiralling obesity levels have fuelled a staggering 39 per cent rise in type 2 diabetes among people under 40, with 168,000 Brits now living with the illness. Piling on the pounds has also been linked to at least 13 types of cancer and is the second biggest cause of the disease in the UK, according to Cancer Research UK.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Feast and famine approach to dieting effective for weight loss
Fasting on alternate days may help shave off the pounds better than other intermittent fasting and calorie restriction diets, according to a new study. While scientists have called for more work to confirm the findings, a new review suggests the so-called feast and famine approach to dieting may have greater benefits when it comes to weight loss. Alternate day fasting involves a 24-hour fast on every second day, and has become more popular in recent years. Other intermittent fasting approaches to dieting have also grown in popularity, including time-restricted eating, where people only eat for a certain number of hours in the day, such at the 16:8 diet involving a 16-hour fasting period followed by an eight-hour eating; and whole-day fasting, which includes the 5:2 diet involving five days of eating and two days of fasting periods. Researchers from Scotland, the US, Canada and Germany wanted to compare fasting methods to continuous energy restriction diets by looking at all of the available evidence. They examined data from 99 studies involving more than 6,500 people. People involved in the studies had an average body mass index (BMI) of 31 and almost nine in 10 (89%) had pre-existing health conditions. The research team found that both intermittent fasting diets and calorie restricted diets led to weight loss. But compared with continuous energy restriction, alternate day fasting was the only strategy to show benefit in body weight reduction, with people on this diet losing 1.29kg more, according to the study, which has been published in The BMJ. The authors said that alternate day fasting showed a 'trivial' reduction in body weight compared with both time restricted eating and whole day fasting 'Minor differences were noted between some intermittent fasting diets and continuous energy restriction, with some benefit for an alternate day fasting strategy with weight loss in shorter duration trials,' the authors wrote. 'All intermittent fasting strategies and continuous energy restriction diets showed a reduction in body weight when compared with an ad-libitum diet 'Of three intermittent fasting diets (ie, alternate day fasting, time restricted eating, and whole day fasting), alternate day fasting showed benefit in body weight reduction compared with continuous energy restriction.' Around 29% of adults in the UK are obese. Last week the NHS' top doctor said that weight loss jabs could be as transformative as statins. Later this month GPs in England will be allowed to prescribe mounjaro, also known as tirzepatide, for the first time. Patients previously needed to access the drugs through a special weight loss service.
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Climate change impact on food ‘like everyone giving up breakfast'
The impact of climate change on food production will be equivalent to everyone on the planet giving up breakfast, a study has warned. Every additional degree Celsius of global warming will drag down the world's ability to produce food by 120 calories per person per day, or 4.4 per cent of current daily consumption, the American research found. Global warming will dramatically alter which parts of the world will be able to grow crops in the coming decades, reducing the total amount of food that can be produced. 'When global production falls, consumers are hurt because prices go up and it gets harder to access food and feed our families,' said Solomon Hsiang, a professor of environmental social sciences at Stanford University and a co-author of the study. 'If the climate warms by three degrees, that's basically like everyone on the planet giving up breakfast.' US 'bread baskets' could experience 40pc drop The researchers modelled the future farming impact in 54 different countries for six crops – corn, soybean, barley, wheat, rice and cassava. They factored in changes farmers are likely to make to adapt to the altering climate, in order to make their most accurate projections yet. Arable heartlands are predicted to be hit hardest, the study found. Production of corn in the US, for example, could drop by as much as 40 per cent by the end of this century. The UK and northern Europe could see a 10 per cent rise in corn production, but the global outcome is a net negative. 'Places in the Midwest US that are really well suited for present day corn and soybean production just get hammered under a high warming future,' said Andrew Hultgren, a study author and an assistant professor of agricultural and consumer economics at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. 'You do start to wonder if the Corn Belt is going to be the Corn Belt in the future.' But while the US and other 'bread basket' regions are major losers in the future, according to the study, other regions will become better-suited, including Russia and China. 'We will be making Russia and China richer' 'This is basically like sending our agricultural profits overseas. We will be sending benefits to producers in Canada, Russia, China,' said Prof Hsiang. 'Those are the winners, and we in the US are the losers. The longer we wait to reduce emissions, the more money we lose.' The study looked at a range of different global warming scenarios up to and including 2100 to determine the range of possible outcomes. 'Any level of warming, even when accounting for adaptation, results in global output losses from agriculture,' said Dr Hultgren. The modelling points to a 50-50 likelihood that global rice yields will increase on a hotter planet in the future because rice cultivation benefits from warmer nights. However, it is up to 90 per cent likely that yields will decline by 2100, the scientists found, The study authors wrote: 'We find that global impacts are dominated by losses to modern-day bread baskets with favourable climates and limited present adaptation, although losses in low-income regions are also substantial.'
