Revealed: Experts discover trendy diet loved by millions no better than other weight loss plans
Intermittent fasting—a trendy eating pattern beloved by celebrities and A-listers—is no better than regular dieting, a major review has suggested.
Hollywood stars like Jennifer Aniston, Nicole Kidman, Cameron Diaz and Mark Wahlberg have jumped on the trend since it shot to prominence in the early 2010s.
It sees dieters cram all their meals into a strict daily time window, or in extreme examples, skip some entirely.
But now, in a major review of data on the diet, a team of international researchers found the benefits from fasting were essentially 'trivial' compared to normal dieting.
Neither eating meals in a specific time window—like in an eight hour period—or doing fasting for five days of the week and then eating normally for two were found to be any better for losing weight.
In fact, alternate day fasting—where people fast for 24 hours on alternate days—was only found to help people lose more weight, with dieters slimming down 2.84lbs (1.29kg) more, on average.
However, this difference didn't meet what the researchers said was the minimum clinical threshold of 4.4lbs (2kg).
But they did say this type of intermittent fasting was found to lower cholesterol levels.
Time restricted fasting, which involves a 16 hour fast followed by an eight-hour eating window, was found to slightly increase cholesterol levels.
No benefit was found for blood sugar levels or 'good' cholesterol levels in any of the fasting diet strategies.
In the study, researchers analysed the results of 99 randomised clinical trials involving 6,582 adults, aged 45 on average, to compare intermittent fasting with calorie reducing diets.
Writing in the BMJ, the scientists said while their data suggested intermittent fasting was better for losing weight than not dieting at all, it didn't stand out compared to a basic calorie-counting diet.
'Minor differences were noted between some intermittent fasting diets and continuous energy restriction, with some benefit for an alternate day fasting strategy with weight loss in shorter duration trials,' they added.
'All intermittent fasting strategies and continuous energy restriction diets showed a reduction in body weight when compared with an ad-libitum diet (allowing yourself to eat at any time).
'Of three intermittent fasting diets alternate day fasting showed benefit in body weight reduction compared with continuous energy restriction.'
Independent experts, not involved in the research, said the findings were unsurprising.
Professor Naveed Sattar, an expert in cardiometabolic medicine at the University of Glasgow, said: 'Overall, the results do not surprise as there is nothing magical about intermittent fasting for weight loss—beyond being another way for people to lower their calorie intake.
'Whether it is sustainable over the longer term is worth examining.
'For those who need to lose much more weight, other options are now clearly available.'
Meanwhile, Dr Amanda Avery, an expert in nutrition and dietetics at the University of Nottingham, added: 'The pros and cons of intermittent fasting have been debated for some time now.
'This review can hopefully end the debate with the conclusion that if someone chooses intermittent fasting and overall a nutritionally balanced diet is still achieved, then it could be used as one of the options to support weight loss.'
Experts have long been divided over the effectiveness of intermittent fasting as well as its potential long term health impacts.
Some have even warned that it may raise the risk of strokes, heart attacks or early death.
One study earlier this year also suggested intermittent fasting could trigger type two diabetes.
Around two in three adults in the UK are obese or overweight, giving the country one of the highest obesity rates in Europe.
Obesity itself increases the chances of person suffering serious health conditions that can damage the heart, such as high blood pressure.
Last year, a sobering report also suggested Britain's spiralling obesity levels have fuelled a staggering 39 per cent rise in type 2 diabetes among people under 40, with 168,000 Brits now living with the illness.
Piling on the pounds has also been linked to at least 13 types of cancer and is the second biggest cause of the disease in the UK, according to Cancer Research UK.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Here's how to help moms lighten mental load from household tasks
Research shows moms overwhelmingly carry the mental load from household tasks, but there are ways to lighten it. While all families are different, women are most often the ones to plan meals, remember the names of their children's teachers, and take the kids to soccer practice, according to research. A study published in the Journal of Marriage and Family in December 2024, which CBS Mornings cited in a recent segment, found that mothers take on 71 percent of the mental workload that comes with running a household. Dr. Sue Varma, a board-certified psychiatrist, told CBS Mornings, 'I think the number should be higher.' Researchers found mothers take on the bulk of core daily tasks 'related to family well-being' while fathers tend to tackle 'episodic tasks related to maintenance and finances,' according to the study. Varma described what she hears from mothers when working with couples. 'The woman says, 'Not only am I organizing, planning, managing, but I'm anticipating for all the things that can go wrong because guess who's going to deal with the consequences of them. I am.'' Varma said women can also experience an 'emotional overload.' "A child is often turning to the mother in most cases, assuming it's a heterosexual couple, for comfort, and the school is calling the mother when the child is sick and who's taking time off from work? So all of it comes back down to the woman often," she said. So, what can be done to lighten moms' mental load? It starts with their partners. Varma explained the mindset of mothers: 'I don't want to have to give you a list to delegate, I want you to be a part of the conversation. For example, when the school year starts, what are some of those things that have to get done on a regular basis?' To share the mental load, fathers have to acknowledge it, initiate household tasks, contribute to regular, open communication and share in planning and decision-making, CBS Mornings reported. 'So we want to make sure we check in with [mothers] and even just to say, 'What can I do to help you? Talk to me about what you're going through and how can we prevent this as a team?' That feeling of you're with me, you're on my side. So many times, women tell me, 'I don't feel like I have a partner,'' Varma said. Varma gave some advice for women when communicating with their partners about their mental load. 'If you're going to ask your partner for more help you cannot throw the kitchen sink at them.' The psychiatrist suggested women tell their partners: 'I love it when you do all these things, when you ask me how I feel, when you ask me how my day was, when get in there and you roll up your sleeves and you're doing the dishes, when you say 'you know what, I'll do the pickup today.''
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Can YOU tell how much we drink from our faces? One of these women sinks 10 G&Ts a night, one's a weekend drinker and one's teetotal. Now they reveal exactly what it's done to them...
Are your drinking habits written all over your face? Alcohol is said to cause untold damage to your appearance. Not only can it trigger skin complaints such as psoriasis, but it's also believed to deepen wrinkles and cause puffiness and bloating. Alcohol's dehydrating effect means your skin loses fluid and nutrients, leaving it looking dull and grey.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Using ChatGPT? It might make you stupid, study finds
Using AI might make you less intelligent, a new study has revealed, with the ability to learn, think and remember all being impacted. Students who used large language models (LLM) like ChatGPT to write essays showed to have poorer memory, reduced brain activity and weaker engagement than those who used other methods, the study found. Researchers at MIT Media Lab measured electrical activity in the brain to track 54 students over several essay-writing sessions. One group used ChatGPT, another used Google and the last had no external help at all. The group who used AI had a 'measurable impact' and had a 'likely decrease in learning skills', the academics at the research laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology found. Even though 'the benefits were initially apparent', this group 'performed worse than their counterparts in the brain-only group at all levels: neural, linguistic, scoring' across a four month period. The researchers, who published their study in the paper 'Your brain on ChatGPT', deduced that those who used ChatGPT would use their brains less. These students would struggle to quote or remember the essays they had just written as well as feeling little ownership over their work. Meanwhile, the Google users demonstrated 'moderate engagement' and the group who had no external involvement showed more brain activity and original ideas in their content. If these students then tried to use ChatGPT, their brain activity, which is measured using electroencephalogram scans (EEGs), would still increase. Researchers presumed this was because the students would be trying to combine the new tool with what they already know. Where as the ChatGPT group were still demonstrating less activity even when they were tasked with writing the essay themselves. The LLM users were able to answer questions with 'reduced friction' compared to the search engine group, the users admitted. However, they said: 'This convenience came at a cognitive cost, diminishing users' inclination to critically evaluate the LLM's output or 'opinions' (probabilistic answers based on the training datasets). 'This highlights a concerning evolution of the 'echo chamber' effect: rather than disappearing, it has adapted to shape user exposure through algorithmically curated content. 'What is ranked as 'top' is ultimately influenced by the priorities of the LLM's shareholders.'
