Iran says it held 'frank' nuclear talks with European powers
The meeting in Istanbul was the first since Israel launched an attack on Iran last month targeting key nuclear and military sites, sparking a 12-day war and leading Tehran to pull away from working with the UN watchdog.
The European diplomats were seen leaving the Iranian consulate shortly before 1100 GMT after spending several hours inside.
Israel's offensive , which killed top commanders, nuclear scientists and hundreds of others and in which residential areas and military sites were struck also derailed US-Iran nuclear talks that began in April.
Since then, the European powers, known as the E3, have threatened to trigger a so-called "snapback mechanism" under a moribund 2015 nuclear deal that would reinstate UN sanctions on Iran by the end of August.
The sanctions trigger expires in October, and Tehran has warned of consequences should the E3 opt to activate it.
Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, who attended the talks alongside senior Iranian diplomat Majid Takht-Ravanchi, wrote on X he had used the meeting to criticise the European stance on the 12-day conflict with Israel.
He said the snapback mechanism had also been discussed, adding: "It was agreed that consultations on this matter will continue."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
Why Ukraine is betting big on its interceptor drones in war against Russia
Though Russia has used drones to hit Ukraine since the beginning of the war, Moscow has taken things to a different level recently. Russia in July alone launched over 6,000 drone strikes across Ukraine including Kyiv, Kharkiv, Odesa, and Lviv leaving dozens dead and hundreds injured. read more The Ukraine war in a new phase. Though Russia has used drones to hit Ukraine since the beginning of the war, Moscow has taken things to a different level. Russia in July launched over 6,000 drone strikes across Ukraine including Kyiv, Kharkiv, Odesa, and Lviv leaving dozens dead and hundreds injured. That's the most in any month since the beginning of the war in 2022. On July 9 alone Russia launched over 700 strikes against Ukraine using its Iranian-made Shahed drones. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ukraine is now attempting to combat Russia's attacks via interceptor drones. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last month urged companies in Ukraine to boost manufacturing and production of these drones. 'I met with representatives of this production and with other manufacturers. Our request is 1,000 interceptors per day,' Zelenskyy said. But what do we know about interceptor drones? How do they work? Why are they so important to Ukraine? Let's take a closer look Interceptor drones and how they work First, let's take a closer look at interceptor drones. While drones are Unmanned Arial Vehicles (UAVs), interceptor drones are UAVs built to find, follow and destroy other drones and airborne threats. These drones are built to actively engage with threats. They work autonomously or semi-autonomously. They come with features such as advanced sensing, autonomous navigation capabilities in order to maneuver at high speeds, recognising targets automatically and precision hovering. They are also equipped with net launchers, electronic jammers, and kamikaze-style impactors. They use advanced navigation tech like AI-powered inertial navigation systems. They work by using their radar, spotters or sensors to spot incoming threats. Some are synced up with a country's air defence network. This allows them to respond to threats in real time – at a fraction of the cost of missile systems or ground-based radar systems. Once they intercept enemy UAVs, they can either ram into them – known as the Kamikaze method – use nets and even explosives to down the enemy's object. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These interceptor drones are smaller than other UAVs and faster – which allows them to intercept – as well as highly manouverable. For example, experts say the Shahed drones Russia is using can fly between 200 and 300 kilometres per hour. They are also more effective when they are autonomous. As Lyuba Shipovich, CEO of Dignitas, which helps train Ukrainian soldiers on interceptors, told The Interpreter, 'You can't expect to have 700 operators for 700 drones during a mass strike like the ones we're seeing now. AI allows us to launch swarms of interceptor drones without that limitation.' Though they are more expensive than regular drones, they do not cost nearly as much as other defensive systems. Anti-aircraft missiles, for example, can cost as much as $1 million (Rs 8.5 crore), while surface-to-air missiles can cost between $40,000 (Rs 34.98 lakh) and $100,000 ( Rs 87.44 lakh) A single interceptor drone can cost as little as $5,000 (Rs 4.39 lakh). Kamikaze interceptor drones are even cheaper, costing as little as $200 (Rs 20,000) to $2000 (Rs 2.20 lakh). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For Ukraine's armed forces that's a downright bargain. Why are they important to Ukraine Because interceptor drones can combat Russia's Shahed drones, which have become a menace in Ukraine. The Russian strategy has been to overwhelm Ukraine and demoralise its defenders through sheer numbers. In July, Russia sent 6,297 long-range drones into Ukraine. That figure is 14 times what it was in July 2024, when Russia sent around 400 drones. From June 1 to June 20, Russia hit Ukraine with 3,681 Shahed drones and fake UAVs. This completely disrupted the rhythm of Ukraine's defenders. A year ago, the monthly average was at around 600 UAVs per month. Experts say these are estimates and that real numbers may even be higher. Worse, Russia is ramping up its production of Shahed drones to nearly 100 UAVs per day. They now fly two to four kilometres above the ground – putting them out of reach of ground fire. Kyiv predicts Moscow will be looking to manufacture 30,000 long-range drones and two million FPV (first-person-view) drones this entire year. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last month urged companies in Ukraine to boost manufacturing and production of these drones. AP Which is why Ukraine is betting big on interceptor drones. Indeed, Zelenskyy even said the same at the G7 in Canada in June. 'In particular, we are working on interceptor drones to enhance protection against Shaheds', Zelenskyy said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Many Ukrainian companies are already working on this task. Wild Hornets, a non-profit group making UAVs for Ukraine, has had great success with its Sting interceptor drone against the Shahed drones. 'You can make a drone, for example, at a firm like us, fast, cheap, and en masse,' a company representative told the Kyiv Independent. 'While missiles for an S-300 are unique technologies, that maybe, seems to me, a few companies in the world can make, and more than half of those are in Russia.' Even though Ukraine has been the world's largest importer of weapons from 2020 to 2024 and is buying millions of drones, experts say it isn't doing enough. They say it needs to ramp up production even further to counter Russia. 'Russia is going to bomb our entire country with Shahed drones. They have significantly increased production and will continue to do so. If we don't act immediately, our infrastructure, our production and our defence systems will be destroyed', military and communications expert Serhiy Beskrestnov wrote on social media. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, it is important to note that these interceptor drones are no silver bullet. 'We're already using them, and we are expanding their use. But they can't replace everything. We have to understand that anti-drone air defence is a complex system,' Yuriy Ignat, a spokesman for the Ukrainian air force, told The Telegraph. 'First, they don't have a very long range – only a few dozen kilometres. Secondly, you need to scale up the depth of territory they cover. They only work locally. And they can't always fly, in bad weather, fog, and so on.' Simply put, they are an important piece of Ukraine's defence puzzle.
Mint
30 minutes ago
- Mint
German Finance Chief Plans to Ask Bessent About Quotas for Steel
(Bloomberg) -- German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil plans to bring up the issue of quotas for European steel when he meets with his US counterpart Scott Bessent. 'It's precisely in the steel industry where there are indications that there could be a quota system — exceptions on both sides of the Atlantic,' Klingbeil told reporters in Washington on Monday. 'This would be important for the German steel industry and for many jobs in Germany, and it's one of the topics I will address today.' A US-European trade deal agreed last month will raise duties on most imports from the bloc to 15%. Brussels got a partial waiver on certain industry-specific US tariffs that carry higher rates worldwide – like for automobiles – but not on others like steel and aluminum, where talks on an exemption involving quotas continue. 'I think we were too weak, we cannot be satisfied with the result that was achieved,' said Klingbeil. 'We Europeans must become stronger, focus on the internal market, and ensure that we are force to be reckoned with. Then we can counter the US with greater self-confidence, not against the US, but in dialogue with the US. That has been lacking somewhat in recent weeks.' Still, he added that an agreement does mean that the uncertainties of recent months have been removed, and that there is now planning security for companies on both sides of the Atlantic. Klingbeil, who also is his country's vice chancellor, is in the US on the invitation of Treasury Secretary Bessent, whom he met at the Group of Seven gathering in Banff, Canada, in May. 'I hope that the close relationship between myself and Scott Bessent will help us to clarify issues and gain a better understanding of the situation,' he said. 'This will hopefully lead to sensible solutions that are in the interests of the German economy.' More stories like this are available on
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
EU brands turn to obscure customs clause to soften blow of Trump's tariffs
L'Oreal and a growing number of European fashion and cosmetics companies are exploring use of an obscure, decades-old U.S. customs clause known as the "First Sale" rule as a potential way to soften the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. While Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced a deal this week for U.S. tariffs of 15% on most imported EU goods - half the initially threatened 30% - that is still 10 times higher than the average tariff on EU imports before Trump's return to the White House. Some apparel and consumer brands are understandably wary of passing on the higher duties through price hikes to inflation-weary U.S. consumers. That's why they are looking to invoke the "First Sale" rule, which allows companies to pay lower duties by applying tariffs to the value of a product as it leaves the factory - much lower than the eventual retail price. 'It's part of the possibilities,' L'Oreal CEO Nicolas Hieronimus told Reuters on Tuesday. "We will make decisions," he added, without giving a timeframe. Brands like Italy's high-end sneakers maker Golden Goose , outerwear specialist Moncler and fashion label Ferragamo have all touted the strategy. "It's a significant benefit," Moncler executive director Luciano Santel said in a call with analysts, estimating the production cost at around half the import price. The strategy, which can only be invoked for goods clearly destined for sale in the United States and involving multiple foreign transactions, is not without risk, however. It requires a detailed paperwork trail, a firm grip on supply chains and legal structures to handle the required transactions. Consultants including KPMG and PwC have seen a surge this year in enquiries from companies into how to use this method to ease the burden of Trump's tariffs. "We've got three times more requests than usual," for mitigation strategies including the First Sale rule , said Ruth Guerra, a partner at KPMG in Paris, adding that the rule could also be combined with other measures. Paper trail To benefit from lower customs duties , a company must prove that U.S.-bound products have gone through multiple transactions. Usually that means the goods are sold from the factory gate to a middleman and then to a U.S.-based company handling the goods. All transactions must be handled at arm's length by clearly distinct entities. Usually a U.S. subsidiary is involved to avoid revealing confidential information to an external entity, PwC custom and tax lawyer Francesco Pizzo explained. "In our case the 15% tariffs will potentially translate into a 3% impact on the U.S. retail price", Golden Goose CEO Silvio Campara said, adding that the U.S. accounted for roughly 35% of its revenue. While several major textile and apparel companies have been using First Sale for a while, many had overlooked the strategy while the tariff environment remained low, said Mark Ludwig, national leader of trade and tariff advisory services at consultancy RSM in New York. "Now the cost-effectiveness is much higher," said Lucio Miranda, founder of consultancy firm ExportUSA, who expects a jump in First Sale use with interest from companies in other industries. There is no publicly available data on goods imported through the First Sale rule, but a 2009 investigation by the U.S. International Trade Commission found that 8.5% of importing entities over a year used the workaround, equivalent to 2.4% of total U.S. import value. Nearly half of that amount was linked to footwear and apparel. For French cosmetics producers, U.S. duties present a new challenge as the industry had benefited from zero tariffs. "While the agreement brings an end to uncertainty, it brings a significant threat to the French cosmetics industry," said Emmanuel Guichard, head of French cosmetics lobby group Febea. The First Sale rule is also only available to companies that can comply with a strict process which entails other risks as well. "One of the biggest problems with selecting First Sale is that only fancy people can truly afford it - both the compliance costs and the risks of audit that come with it," said U.S.-based tariff and trade lawyer Michael T. Cone. Improper use could also lead to penalties, he said, noting that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency routinely audits and denies use of the rule. "Importers must proceed with utmost caution,' he said.
