‘Extra tool': SC legislature unanimously passes fentanyl-induced homicide bill
COLUMBIA, S.C. () – A bill aimed at holding drug dealers accountable for deaths related to fentanyl passed unanimously in the South Carolina Senate on Wednesday.
S.156 would allow prosecutors to charge drug dealers who distribute fentanyl that results in an overdose with 'fentanyl-induced homicide.' The penalty is up to 30 years in prison.
Victim advocates and family members of those who have died from fentanyl are encouraged by the bill's progress.
'We have written letters. We have made phone calls. We have really pushed our legislators to take action with this as quickly as possible,' said Holly Alsobrooks, co-founder of the awareness group, 'Fentanyl Kills U.'
The York County-based organization has been pushing for legal action to hold drug dealers accountable for fentanyl poisonings for nearly five years.
Indian Trail woman arrested, charged with locking boyfriend in Monroe storage unit for days: Records
The South Carolina Department of Public Health reports that fentanyl is the leading cause of overdose deaths. It is often mixed with other illicit drugs, such as cocaine or methamphetamine, risking a fatal overdose for individuals unaware they're consuming the substance.
State officials report 1,734 South Carolinians died from an overdose in 2020. Of those deaths, at least 1,100 involved fentanyl.
Lawmakers have introduced similar bills over the past two years but have failed to pass both chambers.
Alsobrooks said she's not surprised the measure has bipartisan support.
'It has been many years that this has been sitting and waiting to go,' she said. 'I think this is going to be the year that it happens because of all of the deaths and because of the pressure in the media and little groups like mine sprouting up everywhere and really just not being quiet about it.'
State Senator Brian Adams is one of the sponsors of the bill. He said the measure is a natural next step in combating fentanyl-related deaths.
'We already have laws in place for trafficking, dealing, possession with intent to distribute, and all that. We just didn't have the piece in place to go after them if somebody died from the drugs that they sold them,' Adams said. 'This would give them that extra tool.'
The Senate is considering a separate measure, S. 183, which widens the offense to 'drug-related homicide.' The bill is on hold and requires another reading before it can be brought to a vote.
A House companion bill to S. 183 is currently in committee. State Rep. Brandon Guffey of York County was recently added as a sponsor to H. 3591.
State Rep. Seth Rose, a member of the criminal law subcommittee, said he supports the effort but would like to propose amendments to prevent confusion among the courts.
'If someone distributes fentanyl and it causes the death, there's no questions that needs to be addressed,' he said. 'I think that language needs to be tightened, and we need to actually focus to be very thoughtful on what we are trying to stop.'
WATCH: Trump shouts at Zelenskyy as he and Vance berate Ukrainian leader as 'disrespectful'
Alsobrooks said she hopes to see an all-encompassing drug-induced homicide bill become law. She said the growing presence of xylazine, a drug contributing to oversedation but not responsive to Narcan, has the potential to create more issues a fentanyl-only bill would not cover.
'We want a drug-induced homicide bill to follow right behind this fentanyl-induced homicide bill so that we can cover all these drugs that are coming out because we can't keep going to Columbia for each individual drug that comes down the street,' she said.
S. 156 now goes to the House for consideration.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rep. LaMonica McIver indicted by grand jury over incident at ICE detention facility
A federal grand jury has returned an indictment charging New Jersey Rep. LaMonica McIver for allegedly assaulting law enforcement officers outside of an immigration detention facility last month, officials announced Tuesday. The three-count indictment charges the Democratic congresswoman with "forcibly impeding and interfering with federal law enforcement officers" at the facility, New Jersey U.S. Attorney Alina Habba said in a post on X. MORE: Charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver spark backlash after incident with ICE agents "As I have stated in the past, it is my Constitutional obligation as the Chief Federal Law Enforcement Officer for New Jersey to ensure that our federal partners are protected when executing their duties," Habba said. "While people are free to express their views for or against particular policies, they must not do so in a manner that endangers law enforcement and the communities those officers serve." The indictment is a standard procedural step after Habba's office charged McIver via a criminal complaint last month. McIver has vowed she will fight the charges and plans to plead not guilty. "The facts of this case will prove I was simply doing my job and will expose these proceedings for what they are: a brazen attempt at political intimidation," she said in a statement on X. "This indictment is no more justified than the original charges, and is an effort by Trump's administration to dodge accountability for the chaos ICE caused and scare me out of doing the work I was elected to do. But it won't work -- I will not be intimidated." On May 9, McIver, along with a few other members of Congress, were at Delaney Hall, a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Newark, New Jersey, to conduct oversight. Tensions escalated when a federal officer ordered Newark Mayor Ras Baraka to leave a secured area of the facility, and pushing and shoving allegedly occurred, according to prosecutors. MORE: Newark Mayor Ras Baraka arrested at ICE facility while joining Democrats to conduct 'oversight' Following the charges via criminal complaint, McIver alleged in a statement that the decision was politically motivated. "The charges against me are purely political -- they mischaracterize and distort my actions, and are meant to criminalize and deter legislative oversight," McIver said. Top House Democrats also released a joint statement last month defending McIver, vowing to "vigorously" respond to what they say is an illegitimate abuse of power. "An attack on one of us is an attack on the American people. House Democrats will respond vigorously in the days to come at a time, place and manner of our choosing," the leaders said. If convicted, the maximum penalty for the charges in the indictment ranges from one to eight years, Habba said. Baraka was arrested at the facility and charged with trespassing, though Habba later dropped the charge.

an hour ago
Rep. LaMonica McIver indicted by grand jury over incident at ICE detention facility
A federal grand jury has returned an indictment charging New Jersey Rep. LaMonica McIver for allegedly assaulting law enforcement officers outside of an immigration detention facility last month, officials announced Tuesday. The three-count indictment charges the Democratic congresswoman with "forcibly impeding and interfering with federal law enforcement officers" at the facility, New Jersey U.S. Attorney Alina Habba said in a post on X. "As I have stated in the past, it is my Constitutional obligation as the Chief Federal Law Enforcement Officer for New Jersey to ensure that our federal partners are protected when executing their duties," Habba said. "While people are free to express their views for or against particular policies, they must not do so in a manner that endangers law enforcement and the communities those officers serve." The indictment is a standard procedural step after Habba's office charged McIver via a criminal complaint last month. McIver has vowed she will fight the charges and plans to plead not guilty. "The facts of this case will prove I was simply doing my job and will expose these proceedings for what they are: a brazen attempt at political intimidation," she said in a statement on X. "This indictment is no more justified than the original charges, and is an effort by Trump's administration to dodge accountability for the chaos ICE caused and scare me out of doing the work I was elected to do. But it won't work -- I will not be intimidated." On May 9, McIver, along with a few other members of Congress, were at Delaney Hall, a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Newark, New Jersey, to conduct oversight. Tensions escalated when a federal officer ordered Newark Mayor Ras Baraka to leave a secured area of the facility, and pushing and shoving allegedly occurred, according to prosecutors. Following the charges via criminal complaint, McIver alleged in a statement that the decision was politically motivated. "The charges against me are purely political -- they mischaracterize and distort my actions, and are meant to criminalize and deter legislative oversight," McIver said. Top House Democrats also released a joint statement last month defending McIver, vowing to "vigorously" respond to what they say is an illegitimate abuse of power. "An attack on one of us is an attack on the American people. House Democrats will respond vigorously in the days to come at a time, place and manner of our choosing," the leaders said. If convicted, the maximum penalty for the charges in the indictment ranges from one to eight years, Habba said. Baraka was arrested at the facility and charged with trespassing, though Habba later dropped the charge.

Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
The Justice Department wants to end an agreement it reached with a Pa. bank it accused of redlining in Philly
Two years ago, the U.S. Department of Justice accused a Pennsylvania bank of redlining - avoiding lending in majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in and around Philadelphia. ESSA Bank & Trust, based in Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, denied the accusations but entered into a settlement agreement with the federal government in which the bank had to give more than $2.9 million in loan subsidies to homebuyers in formerly redlined communities. The bank also agreed to devote resources to soliciting mortgage applications from Philadelphia residents in neighborhoods it was accused of ignoring, to include Philadelphians in its program for low- and moderate-income homebuyers, to work with local groups to provide homebuyer education, and to target historically excluded neighborhoods with its advertising. On Friday, the Justice Department asked the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to allow it to end the five-year agreement three years early. The court filing is in line with other recent Justice Department moves across the country to end similar fair-housing and antidiscrimination settlement agreements. Lisa Rice, president and CEO of the National Fair Housing Alliance, said in a statement that by taking these actions, "this administration is empowering bad actors and leaving millions of our nation's most vulnerable unprotected and exposed." The Justice Department said in its motion Friday that ESSA Bank "has demonstrated a commitment to remediation," including disbursing required loan subsidies, and is "substantially in compliance" with other terms of the court order. The bank did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday. The department noted that its motion was "unopposed." But on Monday, the National Fair Housing Alliance and local civil rights organizations filed a motion asking to join the case and opposing cutting short the legal agreement. "This effort would strip West and Southwest Philadelphia communities of the hard-won protections they were promised just two years ago," Rachel Wentworth, executive director of the nonprofit Housing Equality Center of Pennsylvania, said in a statement. "For decades, banks of all kinds have used redlining to deny neighborhoods of color access to wealth and opportunity, and ending this consent order sends a devastating message to these communities." The Philadelphia-based Public Interest Law Center and the law firm Stapleton Segal Cochran LLC, which has offices in Philadelphia and Marlton, are representing the Housing Equality Center, the National Fair Housing Alliance, and POWER Interfaith, the Pennsylvania faith-based community organizing network, as they oppose the Justice Department's motion to end the agreement. Eli Segal of Stapleton Segal Cochran said in a statement that "the rule of law demands more here than vague assurances of 'substantial compliance.' It demands court-ordered action." Olivia Mania, attorney and Penn Carey Law Catalyst Fellow at the Public Interest Law Center, said in an interview that "communities in and around Philadelphia deserve access to a lending market that's free from discrimination." "This isn't just about one bank," Mania said in a statement. "It's about whether the federal government will honor its role in dismantling structural racism in the housing market - or walk away when the cameras are off. The parties should be held to the terms of the consent order to ensure real, lasting change." Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.