Anthony Albanese deflects question on whether he'll be immediately hit with proposed $3m super tax
Anthony Albanese has sidestepped a question on whether he and politicians with more than $3m in their super balances will be required to immediately pay Labor's proposed tax.
This follows comments from Employment and Industrial Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth stating that there will be provisions that mean people on defined superannuation funds won't have to immediately pay tax even if their balance is above $3m.
Labor's proposed plan is tipped to generate $2.7bn annually and hit superannuation balances over $3m with a 30 per cent tax, a doubling of the current rate.
As it stands, about 0.5 per cent or 800,000 Australians will be affected by the policy.
However unlike Australians on ordinary and self-managed super funds, long-serving politicians on defined benefit pensions like Penny Wong, Sussan Ley, Tanya Plibersek and the Prime Minister who entered parliament in 2004 will be able to defer paying the tax until after they retire.
Speaking to Sky, Ms Rishworth was repeatedly asked whether Australians on defined benefit would be required to pay their tax while still working, or whether they'd only be liable once they retire.
While she didn't directly answer the questions, she said that 'the same provisions that have been used to treat, defined benefits schemes in the past under the Coalition and under previous governments have been applied,' and that the accounts are 'treated differently'.
'What I'm saying is we have applied the exact same rules as in the past that had been how you treat defined benefit schemes to this provision as well,' she said.
'It's entirely consistent and long standing and applies across the board to defined benefit schemes which the Commonwealth has constitutional power over.'
When asked later, Mr Albanese also deflected a question on whether he would be subjected to the tax immediately, telling a journalist: 'Look it applies to us as it applies across the board, but the legislation, of course, has yet to be carried by the parliament'.
The Coalition's finance spokesman James Paterson, who has objected to the tax as it hits unrealised gains, said the government needs to be more 'open and transparent' on the plan.
He specifically called on Mr Albanese to explain the 'different treatment between different categories of retiree,' questioning whether he influenced the policy.
'Every other taxpayer, if they exceed the threshold, has to pay it in their working life but people like Anthony, on a defined benefit pension, only have to pay it after they retire,' he said.
'Now I think there is a very important question that arises out of this. Jim Chalmers has written rules which are favourable to his boss. Did Jim Chalmers ever discuss this with Anthony Albanese? Was it ever discussed in Cabinet or the Expenditure Review Committee of Cabinet?
'Did the Prime Minister exempt himself from that discussion? Did he remove himself from the room because of the significant personal conflict of interest that he has?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
20 minutes ago
- ABC News
Landmark trial to enable energy trading between solar homes and those without
Maree Tynan knew that her cottage in Mittagong, in the New South Wales Southern Tablelands 110 kilometres south of Sydney, was the place for her more or less the first time she saw it. It was more than four decades ago and, in time, her and her late partner turned what was a getaway into their permanent home. During that time, Ms Tynan has seen her fair share of changes in Mittagong and in so many other ways besides. Among them has been the extraordinary rise of rooftop solar in Australia, where one in three homes now has the technology. It's long been something she's wanted, too. "We were very keen to be part of it, but we had two major problems," recalls Ms Tynan, whose home was built in the late 1920s. "The first is it's the original roof. That is terracotta. "As you can imagine, after 100 years in a very cold climate, it is very, very fragile. "Apart from the roof, we also have a lot of trees." Faced with those challenges, Ms Tynan feared she may have been locked out of the solar market for good. That was until she came across a project aiming to connect people who don't have solar panels with those who do. "To have had rooftop solar put on, we were going to have to have the whole roof replaced," she explains. "That just seemed crazy because, yes, we'd have solar, but we'd be spending an awful lot of money. "We decided that, while ever the roof was secure and not letting rain in, we'd stick with that and we'd look for alternatives. At its heart, the project aims to enable energy trading between solar households and those without the technology. Known as WinZero, the project is centred around the Wingecarribee Shire Council. Households taking part in the so-called virtual energy network are given a smart meter and hooked up to a scheme allowing them to buy from or sell to other participants in their local area. In order to participate, they must go through small, privately-owned electricity retailer Energy Locals, which uses third party software to handle the trades. Those without panels can buy surplus solar power for a rate lower than a standard tariff over the grid. Similarly, solar householders facing ever lower — or even non-existent — feed-in tariffs can yield higher payments for their exports. Now a new study based on the Wingecarribee model is being led by Deakin University, which is hoping to widen its scope to the entire national electricity market, which spans Australia's eastern seaboard. Of particular interest to researchers are consumers who don't or can't have solar panels themselves. Andrea La Nauze, an associate professor of economics at Deakin, says Australia might lead the world in the take-up of rooftop solar, but most people are still missing out. "We have the highest rate of rooftop solar in the world," Dr La Nauze says. "But there are many of us who are renters or live in apartments or for various reasons can't install solar panels. "First of all, it's expanding access to rooftop solar, which is good for the environment. "It's also hopefully good for the back pocket." As of last year, there were more than 4 million "small-scale" solar installations across the country. Under the definition in Australia, a small-scale installation can be anything up to 100 kilowatts, meaning many businesses with solar are also grouped with the category. However, most installations are on standalone homes and the vast majority of these are owned by their occupants, according to Dr La Nauze. She says virtual energy networks could be a way of bridging what is an inherent divide. By allowing customers with excess generation to sell it to those without panels, she says, both sides of the transaction might just end up winning. "Using the existing poles and wires, people who have excess energy from their rooftop solar can sell it to their neighbour or a local cafe," she says. "They can get more, hopefully, for that energy that they sell than they otherwise would. "And the cafe or the neighbour can buy energy at a lower price than their current retail contract." More broadly, Dr La Nauze says solar trading schemes could help answer a number of thorny questions hanging over Australia's energy transition. While equity in access to clean tech is one of them, she says the over-abundance of solar generation in the middle of the day is another. "We might also relieve some of the congestion that we have on the distribution network," she says. "The poles and wires in many parts of Australia are struggling because we have so much energy coming from rooftop solar in the middle of the day. "If we can encourage households and small businesses to soak up more of that power during the middle of the day, that's beneficial for the network. Michael Dello-Iacovo from Energy Consumers Australia, which is helping to fund the new trial, says the lobby group is keen to see how feasible an expanded network is. Mr Dello-Iacovo acknowledges the idea of trading might be an intimidating idea to some householders but notes the trial would be seeking to overcome this. "It ultimately comes down to the platform itself," Mr Dello-Iacovo says. "And so the platforms that I've seen for virtual energy networks … you can be as engaged as you like and there is an option to be very disengaged. "You can set up very simple trades to either sell electricity from your solar and battery or to buy electricity from someone else with solar or battery. "You can set up more specific trades and trade with an individual you know at a set price, for example. Although such networks are in their infancy, Mr Dello-Iacovo says the notional potential of "peer-to-peer" trading is enormous. He notes there are still millions of people in Australia who do not have access to solar power, making them a huge source of potential demand. "At Energy Consumers Australia, we advocate for all energy consumers," Mr Dello-Iacovo says. "And part of that means making sure everyone who wants to have access to consumer energy resources like solar and battery can have access to it. "So this trial is really exciting for us because there's a lot of potential for bringing those benefits from the energy transition to all households, not just those who are physically able to install solar and batteries." For Mittagong householder Maree Tynan, the scheme seems to be working. She acknowledges her electricity bills are generally modest anyway because she tries to limit how much power she uses. Even still, Ms Tynan says her costs are lower now. To that extent, she reckons buying other people's surplus solar power while cutting her bills is the next best thing to have some panels herself. Asked if she would be happy to keep doing it, she says: "Oh yes, I definitely will keep going while it's available." "I'd dearly love to have solar myself," Ms Tynan says. "But I can't see it happening anytime in the near future for the reasons I've explained." She says that for people in similar circumstances to her, the scheme should hold great appeal, especially if it can help save them money. "I'm very cognisant of what's happening in the world," she says. Along with Deakin University and Energy Consumers Australia, the new trial will be delivered in partnership with QuantumNRG, ReThink Sustainability and WinZero. Anyone interested in taking part in the trial can find out more information at
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Premier stands by stadium as early state election looms
A defiant Jeremy Rockliff has vowed to fight and win an early Tasmanian election, after political brinkmanship with Opposition Leader Dean Winter spiralled in parliament and produced a shock snap poll. It's not yet clear when the election will fall, with Mr Rockliff seeking to convene parliament next week to pass an emergency budget bill. Also caught up in the chaos is the billion-dollar Hobart waterfront stadium, and by extension the Tasmania Devils AFL team. After two days of lengthy debate, Mr Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion in parliament on Thursday, which by convention demands his resignation. Before the vote, he told Mr Winter, the Labor leader, that should the vote succeed, he would seek an election - just 15 months after the last state poll. "Be that on Mr Winter's head. This has been a selfish grab for power," he said on Thursday morning. Pointing to last month's budget - which forecast big deficits and ballooning debt beyond $10 billion - Mr Winter chose to stand behind his motion, unmoved by either public advocacy or behind-closed-doors efforts to talk him down. "Tasmanians were aghast at the state of the budget," Mr Winter said. "I can't stand by and let this premier ruin this state and so Tasmanian Labor needs to stand up." The vote passed 18-17, with Labor, the Greens and three independents backing the motion, including a casting vote by Labor veteran Michelle O'Byrne as speaker. Shell-shocked, Mr Rockliff then took the floor to deliver an emotion-laden speech. "This is a very sad day for Tasmania," he said. "It's a sad day because I put a lot of line, a lot on the line, for this parliament." He said he fought off internal opponents to both stand by the stadium, and to get electoral reform over the line. "I've been advised by all the hard-heads in my party not to go down that track. Why? Because it's bad for votes," he said. "Well, I've always said 'stuff votes'. "I've said it when I moved for the 35-seat house of parliament, and I'll say it for the stadium for as long as I damn well live, because I believe in it." He apologised for the botched rollout of new Spirit of Tasmania ferries and acknowledged economic challenges - but said he was up for the fight. "And you might get rid of me, mate," he said, directly to Mr Winter, "but I tell you what, they're coming for you as well, because you will always be known as a wrecker." While there will be plenty of time for campaigning in the upcoming poll, the dominant reaction among Tasmanians appears to be shock. Among those flabbergasted by the sharp escalation of politicking was former premier Will Hodgman. "An implausibly stupid decision on so many levels," the two-time election winner posted on social media. "Politically reckless, and seriously damaging to Tasmania's reputation." Brad Stansfield, a member of Mr Hodgman's staff and long-term Liberal campaigner, who now runs a PR company, said the political environment would be toxic for Mr Rockliff. "If we do end up at the point where there is an election, just to be brutally frank, the Liberals would be annihilated," he told the FontCast.
West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Premier stands by stadium as early state election looms
A defiant Jeremy Rockliff has vowed to fight and win an early Tasmanian election, after political brinkmanship with Opposition Leader Dean Winter spiralled in parliament and produced a shock snap poll. It's not yet clear when the election will fall, with Mr Rockliff seeking to convene parliament next week to pass an emergency budget bill. Also caught up in the chaos is the billion-dollar Hobart waterfront stadium, and by extension the Tasmania Devils AFL team. After two days of lengthy debate, Mr Rockliff lost a no-confidence motion in parliament on Thursday, which by convention demands his resignation. Before the vote, he told Mr Winter, the Labor leader, that should the vote succeed, he would seek an election - just 15 months after the last state poll. "Be that on Mr Winter's head. This has been a selfish grab for power," he said on Thursday morning. Pointing to last month's budget - which forecast big deficits and ballooning debt beyond $10 billion - Mr Winter chose to stand behind his motion, unmoved by either public advocacy or behind-closed-doors efforts to talk him down. "Tasmanians were aghast at the state of the budget," Mr Winter said. "I can't stand by and let this premier ruin this state and so Tasmanian Labor needs to stand up." The vote passed 18-17, with Labor, the Greens and three independents backing the motion, including a casting vote by Labor veteran Michelle O'Byrne as speaker. Shell-shocked, Mr Rockliff then took the floor to deliver an emotion-laden speech. "This is a very sad day for Tasmania," he said. "It's a sad day because I put a lot of line, a lot on the line, for this parliament." He said he fought off internal opponents to both stand by the stadium, and to get electoral reform over the line. "I've been advised by all the hard-heads in my party not to go down that track. Why? Because it's bad for votes," he said. "Well, I've always said 'stuff votes'. "I've said it when I moved for the 35-seat house of parliament, and I'll say it for the stadium for as long as I damn well live, because I believe in it." He apologised for the botched rollout of new Spirit of Tasmania ferries and acknowledged economic challenges - but said he was up for the fight. "And you might get rid of me, mate," he said, directly to Mr Winter, "but I tell you what, they're coming for you as well, because you will always be known as a wrecker." While there will be plenty of time for campaigning in the upcoming poll, the dominant reaction among Tasmanians appears to be shock. Among those flabbergasted by the sharp escalation of politicking was former premier Will Hodgman. "An implausibly stupid decision on so many levels," the two-time election winner posted on social media. "Politically reckless, and seriously damaging to Tasmania's reputation." Brad Stansfield, a member of Mr Hodgman's staff and long-term Liberal campaigner, who now runs a PR company, said the political environment would be toxic for Mr Rockliff. "If we do end up at the point where there is an election, just to be brutally frank, the Liberals would be annihilated," he told the FontCast.
