logo
Community collaboration crucial in addressing homelessness in Abilene

Community collaboration crucial in addressing homelessness in Abilene

Yahoo21-06-2025
ABILENE, Texas () – Young professionals gathered at the Community Foundation of Abilene for an 'Abi Chat' during the Abilene Young Professionals luncheon. Networking took a purposeful turn to address homelessness through collaboration with the West Texas Homeless Network.
The West Texas Homeless Network (WTHN) is a coalition of organizations dedicated to advocating for action that realigns systems and resources to end homelessness in Abilene, rather than merely managing it. The WTHN is neither a non-profit nor a for-profit organization; instead, it focuses on helping communities prevent and eliminate homelessness through collaboration and strategic planning.
The Executive Director of Abilene Hope Haven shared why events like this are important in keeping the conversation with the public and continuing to address the needs of the Big Country Homeless community.
'We have a great network of people. We always are going to need to fill different gaps, depending on what's going on in the climate of our community. But we have a wealth of providers in the network that are really good at doing a holistic approach to those experiencing homelessness,' Horton shared.
Horton says the Abilene community's wealth of resources and willingness to work together are its strengths. Whether a person needs help with mental health, food insecurity, substance abuse, or any number of issues that homeless neighbors face, the network is ready and willing to step in.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Bedford mosquito sample tests positive for West Nile virus again. What to know.
New Bedford mosquito sample tests positive for West Nile virus again. What to know.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

New Bedford mosquito sample tests positive for West Nile virus again. What to know.

West Nile virus has been detected in a mosquito sample in New Bedford for the second time in recent weeks. The Massachusetts Department of Public Health notified local health officials about the finding, which was in a primarily bird-biting mosquito near Oak Grove Cemetery on Parker Street, according to a community announcement. The risk level for West Nile virus in New Bedford, Fairhaven and Acushnet is moderate. Preventative measures include wearing mosquito repellent between dusk and dawn, wearing long sleeves and pants during those hours, using mosquito netting on baby carriages and playpens, and emptying standing water around homes twice weekly. The Bristol County Mosquito Project conducted targeted ground-spraying Aug. 14 in the Oak Grove Cemetery area. This spraying supplements the county's normal weekly ground-spraying, which occurs seasonally from early June through September and targets parks and other locations that host large public events. Weekly sprayings take place every Thursday during the summer between 2 a.m. and sunrise in locations around Buttonwood Park, Brooklawn Park, Fort Taber, Hazelwood Park, Riverside Park, Clasky Common Park, Ashley Park, Wing's Court, Custom House Square and other parts of downtown. Residents near targeted areas may want to close their windows in the evenings before spraying. In the event of inclement weather, spraying will be moved to early Friday morning. The annual monitoring program involves crews placing traps and collecting specimens to monitor the mosquito population throughout the summer. It also helps track whether any mosquitoes are carrying Eastern equine encephalitis or West Nile virus. West Nile virus is a mosquito-borne virus that can cause illness ranging from a mild fever to more serious disease. It is most commonly spread to people through the bite of an infected mosquito. Positive mosquito samples for West Nile are not uncommon in the summer months and have been found in cities and towns across the state in recent weeks. The New Bedford Health Department recommends several precautionary measures to help protect against mosquito bites: Be aware of peak mosquito hours: Mosquitoes are most active from dusk to dawn. Consider rescheduling outdoor activities during these times or take extra precautions with repellent and protective clothing, especially if you spend a lot of time outdoors. Clothing can help reduce mosquito bites: Wearing long sleeves, long pants and socks when outdoors can help keep mosquitoes away from your skin, even though it may be challenging in hot weather. Apply insect repellent when outdoors: Use a repellent with DEET, permethrin, picaridin, IR3535 or oil of lemon eucalyptus according to the product label instructions. DEET products should not be used on infants under 2 months of age and should be used in concentrations of 30% or less on older children. Oil of lemon eucalyptus should not be used on children under 3 years of age. Permethrin products are intended for use on items such as clothing, shoes, bed nets and camping gear and should not be applied to skin. Drain standing water: Mosquitoes lay eggs in standing water. Limit breeding sites around your home by draining or removing items that hold water. Check rain gutters and drains, empty unused flowerpots and wading pools, and change water in birdbaths frequently. Install or repair screens: Some mosquitoes can enter homes. Keep them outside by ensuring tight-fitting screens on all windows and doors. For more information and the state's risk-level map, visit This story was created by reporter Beth McDermott, bmcdermott1@ with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more at This article originally appeared on Standard-Times: West Nile virus detected in mosquito sample in New Bedford Solve the daily Crossword

AI Is the New Dr Google — Across the Globe
AI Is the New Dr Google — Across the Globe

Medscape

timean hour ago

  • Medscape

AI Is the New Dr Google — Across the Globe

Patients arriving at appointments with researched information is not new, but artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT are changing the dynamics. Their confident presentation can leave physicians feeling that their expertise is challenged. Kumara Raja Sundar, MD, a family medicine physician at Kaiser Permanente Burien Medical Center in Burien, Washington, highlighted this trend in a recent article published in JAMA . A patient visited Sundar's clinic reporting dizziness and described her symptoms with unusual precision: 'It's not vertigo, but more like a presyncope feeling.' She then suggested that the tilt table test might be useful for diagnosis. Occasionally, patient questions reveal subtle familiarity with medical jargon. This may indicate that they either have relevant training or have studied the subject extensively. Curious, Sundar asked if she worked in the healthcare sector. She replied that she had consulted ChatGPT, which recommended the tilt table test. For years, patients have brought newspaper clippings, internet research, and advice from friends and relatives to consultations. Suggestions shared in WhatsApp groups have become a regular part of clinical discussions. Sundar noted that this particular encounter was different. The patient's tone and level of detail conveyed competence, and the confidence with which she presented the information subtly challenged his clinical judgment and treatment plans. Clinical Practice It is not surprising that large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, are appealing. Recent studies have confirmed their remarkable strengths in logical reasoning and interpersonal communication. However, a direct comparison between LLMs and physicians is unfair. Clinicians often face immense pressure, including constrained consultation times, overflowing inboxes, and a healthcare system that demands productivity and efficiency. Even skilled professionals struggle to perform optimally under adverse conditions. In contrast, generative AI is functionally limitless. This imbalance creates an unrealistic benchmark; however, this is today's reality. Patients want clear answers; more importantly, they want to feel heard, understood, and reassured. Patients value accurate information but also want to feel recognized, reassured, and heard. 'Unfortunately, under the weight of competing demands, which is what often slips for me not just because of systemic constraints but also because I am merely human,' Sundar wrote. Despite the capabilities of generative AI, patients still visit doctors. Though these tools deliver confidently worded suggestions, they inevitably conclude: 'Consult a healthcare professional.' The ultimate responsibility for liability, diagnostics, prescriptions, and sick notes remains with physicians. Patient Interaction In practice, this means dealing with requests, such as a tilt table test for intermittent vertigo, a procedure that is not uncommon but often inappropriate. 'I find myself explaining concepts such as overdiagnosis, false positives, or other risks of unnecessary testing. At best, the patient understands the ideas, which may not resonate when one is experiencing symptoms. At worst, I sound dismissive. There is no function that tells ChatGPT that clinicians lack routine access to tilt-table testing or that echocardiogram appointments are delayed because of staff shortages. I have to carry those constraints into the examination room while still trying to preserve trust,' Sundar emphasized in his article. When I speak with medical students, I notice a different kind of paternalism creeping in. And I have caught it in my inner monologue, even if I do not say it aloud. The old line, 'They probably WebMD'd it and think they have cancer,' has morphed into the newer, just-as-dismissive line, 'They probably ChatGPT'd it and are going to tell us what to order.' It often reflects defensiveness from clinicians rather than genuine engagement and carries an implicit message: We still know the best. 'It is an attitude that risks eroding sacred and fragile trust between clinicians and patients. It reinforces the feeling that we are not 'in it' with our patients and are truly gatekeeping rather than partnering. Ironically, that is often why I hear patients turn to LLMs in the first place,' Sundar concluded . Patient Advocacy One patient said plainly, 'This is how I can advocate for myself better.' The word 'advocate' struck Sundar, capturing the effort required to persuade someone with more authority. Although clinicians still control access to tests, referrals, and treatment plans, the term conveys a sense of preparing for a fight. When patients feel unheard, gathering knowledge becomes a strategy to be taken seriously. In such situations, the usual approach of explaining false-positive test results, overdiagnosis, and test characteristics is often ineffective. From the patient's perspective, this sounds more like, 'I still know more than you, no matter what tool you used, and I'm going to overwhelm you with things you don't understand.' Physician Role The role of physicians is constantly evolving. The transition from physician-as-authority to physician-as-advisor is intensifying. Patients increasingly present with expectations shaped by nonevidence-based sources, often misaligned with the clinical reality. As Sundar observed, 'They arm themselves with knowledge to be heard.' This necessitates a professional duty to respond with understanding rather than resistance. His approach centers on emotional acknowledgment before clinical discussion: 'I say, 'We'll discuss diagnostic options together. But first, I want to express my condolences. I can hardly imagine how you feel. I want to tackle this with you and develop a plan.'' He emphasized, 'This acknowledgment was the real door opener.' Global Trend What began as a US trend observed by Sundar has now spread worldwide, with patients increasingly arriving at consultations armed with medical knowledge from tools like ChatGPT rather than just 'Dr Google.' Clinicians across health systems have reported that digitally informed patients now comprise the majority. In a forum discussion, physicians from various disciplines shared their experiences, highlighting how previously informed patients are now the norm. Inquiries often focus on specific laboratory values, particularly vitamin D or hormone tests. In gynecologic consultations, Internet research on menstrual disorders has become a routine part of patient interactions, with an overwhelming range of answers available online. ' Chanice ,' a Coliquio user who's a gynecologist, shared, 'The answers range from, 'It's normal; it can happen' to 'You won't live long.'' 'It's also common to Google medication side effects, and usually, women end up experiencing pretty much every side effect, even though they didn't have them before.' How should doctors respond to this trend? Opinions are clear: openness, education, and transparency are essential and ideally delivered in a structured manner. 'Get the patients on board; educate them. In writing! Each and every one of them. Once it's put into words, it's no longer a job. Invest time in educating patients to correct misleading promises made by health insurance companies and politicians,' commented another user, Jörg Christian Nast, a specialist in gynecology and obstetrics. The presence of digitally informed patients is increasingly seen not only as a challenge but also as an opportunity. Conversations with these patients can be constructive, but they can also generate unrealistic demands or heated debates. Thus, a professional, calm, and explanatory approach remains crucial, and at times, a dose of humor can help. Another user who specializes in internal medicine added, 'The term 'online consultation' takes on a whole new meaning.' The full forum discussion, 'The Most Frequently Asked 'Dr. Google' Questions,' can be found here. Find out what young physicians think about AI and the evolving doctor-patient relationship in our interview with Christian Becker, MD, MHBA, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, and a spokesperson for the Young German Society for Internal Medicine. Read the full interview here.

Cefazolin Best for Cesarean Infection Prevention
Cefazolin Best for Cesarean Infection Prevention

Medscape

timean hour ago

  • Medscape

Cefazolin Best for Cesarean Infection Prevention

TOPLINE: In planned cesarean deliveries, cefazolin demonstrates superior infection prevention compared with clindamycin plus gentamicin, with significantly lower rates of inpatient antibiotic use (5.9% vs 15.2%) and readmissions (1.8% vs 3.8%). METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a retrospective cohort study at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center between 2012 and 2023, including women undergoing planned cesarean delivery. Analysis included 11,246 eligible women with 10,588 receiving cefazolin (standard regimen) and 658 receiving clindamycin plus gentamicin (alternative regimen) because of severe penicillin or cephalosporin allergies. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered within 30 minutes before incision with cefazolin dosing at 2 g (3 g for women weighing ≥ 120 kg) and the alternative regimen consisting of clindamycin 600 mg plus gentamycin 5 mg/kg. Primary outcome measures included the need for inpatient antibiotic treatment, and secondary outcomes included readmission for obstetric or gynecologic complications. TAKEAWAY: Infectious complications occurred less frequently in the cefazolin group with inpatient antibiotic treatment rates of 5.9% compared with 15.2% in the clindamycin plus gentamicin group (P < .001). Readmission rates were significantly lower in the cefazolin group at 1.8% vs 3.8% in the alternative regimen group (P = .001). Multivariate analysis revealed the alternative regimen group had higher odds of requiring inpatient antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.1; 95% CI, 1.54-2.80; P < .001) and readmission (aOR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.19-3.18; P = .008). IN PRACTICE: 'Cefazolin may be more effective than clindamycin plus gentamicin in preventing infectious complications after planned cesarean delivery. This study emphasizes the importance of careful assessment of β-lactam allergies to guide optimal antibiotic choices. For women allergic to standard regimens, alternative strategies should be considered to reduce postoperative infections and complications,' the authors of the study wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Daniel Gabbai, MD, MPH, Lis Hospital for Women's Health, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center in Tel Aviv, Israel, and published in O&G Open. LIMITATIONS: According to the authors, this study used indirect indicators of infectious complications rather than direct diagnoses of endometritis or surgical site infections. The retrospective design introduced potential selection bias, particularly due to missing data on prophylactic antibiotic use in some patients. The researchers noted that while major confounders were controlled for, unmeasured factors might have influenced the observed differences between antibiotic groups. Additionally, data on prenatal antibiotic use were not consistently available, and the 12-year study period at a single tertiary care center may limit the generalizability of findings to other institutions with different patient populations and care practices. DISCLOSURES: The authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest. This study was approved by the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Institutional Review Board (No. TLV-0284-08, July 10, 2024). This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store