Which countries recognise Palestine as a state - and what exactly does that mean
All eyes have been on Gaza as conditions worsen in the enclave. Israel controls all aid flow into the strip and denies any responsibility for the mass starvation, which has only increased in recent weeks.
The increasingly dire situation has prompted some countries, including the UK, to consider officially recognising the State of Palestine.
French President Emmanuel Macron announced last week that France would recognise Palestinian statehood at the UN General Assembly in September.
Canada also announced plans to recognise Palestine in the near future.
Palestine has long existed as a 'quasi-state'. It has no capital or internationally agreed boundaries.
This means that recognising it is a major symbolic move from other countries, which are becoming increasingly outraged at Israel's operations in Gaza.
Palestine currently consists of two separate territories – the West Bank and Gaza – governed by separate Palestinian groups.
Hamas has ruled Gaza, the site of Israel's ongoing war, since 2007. The Fatah-dominated Palestinian Authority governs the West Bank.
They were initially connected by land under the United Nations' partition plan in 1947, but Israel has absorbed much of that land in successive wars since then.
Although nominally governed by Palestinians, much of what is formally part of the West Bank is under Israeli control, with military checkpoints and segregated roads.
The Palestinian Authority controls just 17% of the West Bank, although this accounts for most of the area's Palestinian population.
Israeli settlements, which break international law, have been set up in the West Bank, gradually encroaching on Palestinian territory and carving gaps between Palestinian cities, towns and villages.
Once opposed by Israel's governments, the settlements received backing and military protection from the current administration of Benjamin Netanyahu.
Any peace agreement would likely require the removal of the 500,000 Israeli settlers from the West Bank, similar to Israel's withdrawal from Gaza in 2005.
It may also include other transfers of people and land between the two sides.
Of course, however, there are people in Palestine who hope for a Palestinian state across all of the land currently consisting of Israel and Palestine, much like Israelis who hope for the same for themselves.
The two-state solution is an approach which has been flouted for decades as a way to stop the conflict and tensions between Palestine and Israel.
It would mean both Israel and Palestine are recognised as their own states, ruling independently. It's supported by many countries, including the Palestinian Authority, but Israel is vehemently against it.
Israel's opposition to the two-state solution has made it a non-starter for years, but the idea is being floated again as other countries recognise Palestine.
Israeli academic Yossi Mekelberg told Metro: 'It's not a hopeless case. My argument, time and time again, is that the two-state solution is not the remedy for everything.
'The remedy needs to be for everyone to enjoy the same political, civil and human rights – Israelis and Palestinians. The question is, which solution can best guarantee this?'
The Palestinian Authority, formed in the 1990s, already operates in many ways like a state. It has 80 embassies globally and is represented at the UN as a non-member observer state.
Diplomatic recognition would give Palestine more authority internationally and send a signal to Israel that the world is not okay with how they have operated in Palestine.
'It's been nearly two years since the beginning of this. What happened on October 7th, of course, put most of the world on Israel's side. It was a terrible massacre. But since then, what Israel is doing in Gaza has shifted public opinion – and rightly so,' Mekelberg added.
'We shouldn't forget or ignore October 7th, but what's happened since has made the Israeli government look much worse.
'The fact that it took so long for the international community to come together when 60,000 people, many of them civilians, children, non-combatants, were killed, and now the starvation of so many people when there's so much food on the border.
'If there is any humanity left in the world, they should react to this. They should respond and ensure a ceasefire and end the war, send the hostages back, and reconstruct Gaza.
'If you ask me, why are countries reacting now, I'd ask you: Why did they not react sooner?'
Norway
Algeria
Bahrain
Indonesia
Iraq Libya
Malaysia
Mauritania
Morocco
Somalia
Tunisia
Turkey
Yemen
Sahrawi Republic (Western Sahara)
Afghanistan
Bangladesh
Cuba
Jordan
Madagascar
Malta
Nicaragua
Pakistan
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
Serbia
Zambia
Albania
Brunei
Djibouti
Mauritius
Sudan
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Slovakia
Egypt
The Gambia
India
Nigeria
Seychelles
Sri Lanka
Namibia
Russia
Belarus
Ukraine
Vietnam
China
Burkina Faso
Comoros
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Cambodia
Mali
Mongolia
Senegal
Hungary
Cape Verde
North Korea
Niger
Romania
Tanzania
Bulgaria
Maldives
Ghana
Togo
Zimbabwe
Chad
Laos
Sierra Leone
Uganda
Congo
Angola
Mozambique
São Tomé and the Príncipe
Gabon
Oman
Poland
DR Congo
Botswana
Nepal
Burundi
Central African Republic
Bhutan
Rwanda
Ethiopia
Iran
Benin
Kenya
Equatorial Guinea
Vanuatu
Philippines
Eswatini
Kazakhstan
Azerbaijan
Turkmenistan
Georgia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Tajikistan
Uzbekistan
Papua New Guinea
South Africa
Kyrgyzstan
Malawi
East Timor
Paraguay
Montenegro
Costa Rica
Lebanon
Ivory Coast
Venezuela
Dominican Republic
Brazil
Argentina
Bolivia
Ecuador
Chile
Guyana
Peru
Suriname
Uruguay
Lesotho
South Sudan
Syria
Liberia
El Salvador
Honduras
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Belize
Dominica
Antigua and Barbuda
Grenada
Iceland
Thailand
Guatemala
Haiti
Sweden
Vatican City
Saint Lucia
Colombia
St Kitts and Nevis
Mexico
Barbados
Jamaica
Trinidad and Tobago
The Bahamas
Ireland
Spain
Canada
Prime Minister Netanyahu advocates an autonomous Palestine with no military capability, and its security controlled by Israel, something unacceptable to most Palestinians.
This has been Israel's position for 30 years, but the country has grown more wary of the prospect of a Palestinian state since October 7. More Trending
For Israelis, the bloodshed of that day confirmed their worst fears regarding what they believe to be the Palestinians' intentions.
Earlier this week, the far-right Israeli minister of finance, Bezalel Smotrich, said something which encapsulates what many Israelis hope for the region.
'The re-establishment of Israeli settlements in Gaza is no longer wishful thinking, but part of what has become a realistic work plan. Gaza is an inseparable part of the Land of Israel,' he said.
Israelis believe they have a God-given right to the region, despite Palestinians having lived there for thousands of years.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: 'More than 48 Palestinians killed' while waiting for flour delivery in Gaza Strip
MORE: What's stopping Keir Starmer from recognising Palestine as a state?
MORE: I offered to trade my £600 camera – all for a bag of flour
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
18 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Vance: UK and US have ‘disagreements' over Gaza but share common goal
JD Vance said the US and UK have 'disagreements' over how to respond to the crisis in Gaza but share a 'common' goal to end the war as he met David Lammy for talks on the Middle East and Ukraine. Appearing alongside the Foreign Secretary on Friday, the vice-president confirmed Washington had 'no plans' to recognise Palestine – which Britain has pledged to do unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire. Mr Vance, who has previously accused the UK of retreating from democratic values, struck a more positive chord as he spoke of his 'love' for the country during a visit to Chevening, Mr Lammy's grace-and-favour retreat in Kent. He heaped praise on his 'good friend' the Foreign Secretary, and said Britain and the US should work together to 'bring greater peace' to the world as the two countries 'have a lot in common'. However, he made clear that there were differences of opinion between the two administrations on how to address the war and humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Asked by reporters at the top of a bilateral meeting with Mr Lammy what he thought of the UK's plans to recognise Palestine, Mr Vance said: 'Obviously, the United Kingdom is going to make its decision. 'We have no plans to recognise a Palestinian state. I don't know what it would mean to really recognise a Palestinian state given the lack of functional government there.' He said both sides wanted to 'solve that problem' of the crisis in Gaza, but 'may have some disagreements about how exactly to accomplish that goal, and we'll talk about that today'. 'There's a lot of common objectives here. There is some, I think, disagreement about how exactly to accomplish those common objectives, but look, it's a tough situation,' he said. 'Of course, we're not going to know exactly how to solve a very complicated problem.' Despite coming from differing political backgrounds, Mr Vance and Mr Lammy are said to have developed a personal rapport, bonding over their difficult childhoods and Christian faith. Mr Vance visited Chevening while on holiday in the Cotswolds with his family, who joined him and the Foreign Secretary to go carp fishing at the countryside estate on Friday. 'Unfortunately, the one strain on the special relationship is that all of my kids caught fish, but the Foreign Secretary did not,' the vice-president said. 'It is great to be here… my wife and I love this section, this area of the UK and we were actually here a couple of years ago… so we love this country. 'Just on a personal note, I have to say that I really have become a good friend, and David has become a good friend of mine, and so it's great to spend some time here with him… you've been a very, very gracious host to me and the whole family.' Asked about the criticism he has previously directed at the UK over issues like freedom of speech, he claimed his concerns related more widely to 'the entire collective West'. In February, Mr Vance claimed that a 'backslide away from conscience rights has placed the basic liberties of religious Britons' under threat, and attacked the use of laws to enforce buffer zones around abortion clinics. More recently, the vice-president has appeared to take aim at Britain's international standing as well as its home affairs. A real pleasure to welcome my friend @JDVance and his family to Chevening. Before beginning our bilateral, the Vice President gave me fishing tips, Kentucky style. The special relationship makes the UK and the US stronger, safer and better off. — David Lammy (@DavidLammy) August 8, 2025 As the UK and France led European efforts to secure a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia, he questioned the level of security that could be offered by 'some random country that hasn't fought a war in 30 or 40 years'. He later denied the comments had related to either the UK or France following a backlash from British politicians and ex-soldiers. Speaking on Friday, Mr Vance said: 'I've raised concerns about free speech in the United States of America. 'I think the entire collective West, the transatlantic relationship, our Nato allies, certainly the United States under the Biden administration, got a little too comfortable with censoring rather than engaging with a diverse array of opinions. 'So that's been my view. Obviously, I've raised some criticism and concerns about our friends on this side of the Atlantic, but the thing that I say to the people of England, or anybody else, to David, is many of the things that I worry most about were happening in the United States from 2020 to 2024. 'I just don't want other countries to follow us down what I think is a very dark path under the Biden administration.' Mr Lammy said 'commonalities and differences' in political debate were part of the 'joy of living in a democracy like ours'. 'But, you know, there are areas where there are actually joint concern, we both have a joint concern about outcomes for working people, that is the truth of it,' he said. 'And we have also discussed issues like irregular and illegal migration and how we deal with those issues. 'So there are commonalities and there are differences and that is the joy of living in democracies like ours.' Earlier on Friday, Sir Keir Starmer said Israel was 'wrong' to approve plans to occupy Gaza City and urged the country's government to reconsider its new offensive to stop 'more bloodshed'. The Prime Minister's intervention came after his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu met his war cabinet and approved plans for a major escalation in the conflict early on Friday. Sir Keir has pledged to recognise a Palestinian state by September unless Israel meets a series of conditions towards ending the war in Gaza.
South Wales Guardian
18 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Kneecap apology to fans as Vienna concert cancelled due to ‘safety concerns'
It comes after the group were banned from entering Hungary in July ahead of their scheduled performance at Sziget Festival on August 11. The group, known for their provocative lyrics and championing of the Irish language, have had several shows cancelled in recent months, including TRNSMT festival in Glasgow and at the Eden Project in Cornwall. They have said there is a smear campaign against them because of their support for Palestine and criticism of Israel's actions in Gaza. In a social media post on Friday the group said: 'Our planned show in Vienna on September 1st is cancelled.' The social media post added: 'To the 3500 people we were looking forward to seeing at our first headline show in Vienna, we are sorry: this is out of our hands. 'All tickets will be refunded. 'Yet again, it is clear that this is political distraction and a further attempt to silence those who call out genocide against the Palestinian people. 'But as always, we will fight on for what is right.' A note on the venues website said: 'Racoon Live Entertainment GmbH hereby cancels the planned Kneecap show on September 1, 2025, at the Gasometer Vienna due to acute safety concerns raised by the responsible authorities.' Kneecap, comprised of Liam Og O hAnnaidh, Naoise O Caireallain and JJ O Dochartaigh, were formed in Belfast and released their first single in 2017. They hit headlines in April when footage emerged that appeared to show a band member saying 'Kill your local MP' at one gig and and 'Up Hamas, up Hezbollah' at another. In May, O hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara, was charged with a terrorism offence relating to allegedly displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a London gig in November 2024. O hAnnaidh and his bandmates were cheered by hundreds of supporters when they arrived at Westminster Magistrates' Court on June 18. Musicians including Nadine Shah and Gurriers have said they will attend court to support the group when O hAnnaidh returns on August 20. Kneecap have apologised to the families of murdered MPs and said they have 'never supported' Hamas or Hezbollah, which are banned in the UK. They were also investigated over their set at Glastonbury Festival in June, but Avon and Somerset Police said they would be taking no further action in July.
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Netanyahu's new plan for Gaza City will be the end of him
Last night, from my apartment in Tel Aviv, which overlooks Hostages Square – a rallying point for relatives of the Israeli captives – I watched the protesters against Benjamin Netanyahu, whose calls for an immediate ceasefire have become a permanent fixture. When news broke of his plan to take over Gaza City and further extend the war, the commotion increased. My dog Pippa – who is half Corgi, half Jack Russell – insisted we go down. It wasn't quite the mass demonstration one would expect, more an expression of the depleted energy levels of a fatigued Israeli public. But there was a palpable combination of anger and resolve – and it felt like it could be the beginning of something. Could Netanyahu's reckless decision to 'demilitarise' and occupy the Gaza Strip, involving a fresh round of ferocious fighting, prove to be the trigger for a fierce and sustained backlash? Could this be what eventually forces him out of office? If so, it will have been a long time coming. First, there was the debilitating trauma of the October 7 Hamas terror attack in 2023 – undoubtedly the worst calamity and darkest day in Israel's history. Then came the profound humiliation and dejection of learning with horror about the more than 200 hostages held in Gaza tunnels. Shortly after came Netanyahu's intransigent and depraved refusal to take responsibility and be held accountable for what had happened under his watch and, to a large extent, as a result of his policies. Then there was his rancorous dismissal of the IDF chief of the general staff, his acrimonious firing of the head of the Shin Bet Security Agency, the repeated protraction of the war with different pretexts, the war's expansion into Lebanon, Syria and Iran, and his current attempt to force out the attorney general. It has all helped create an aura of an ongoing national crisis. And still, none of that drove a million people onto the streets. But now comes the confluence of a decision to extend the war indefinitely by occupying Gaza with a cynical, politically and morally corrupt decision to codify the exemption of thousands of ultra-Orthodox Jews from military service. The question is, where is the Israeli public now? When will all these trajectories converge to form a critical public mass that says: Enough is enough, this will not pass, not in our name? If you ask the demonstrators in Tel Aviv last night, where I was, the answer is 'now'. But if you looked around, there were thousands, not hundreds of thousands – and that is not nearly enough. Any March of Folly -type decision to take full military control of Gaza City will not be accepted or tolerated by the public, especially if it involves the inevitable sacrificing of the hostages and suffering casualties in a war that seems less and less sensible. Families of those being held are opposed, and army reservists are failing to sign up in disgust. Netanyahu's latest move has vindicated those – a majority of Israelis, according to polls – who believe the war had no clear and coherent political objectives, that his military means were never aligned with strategic goals, that the war was protracted artificially and needlessly for political survival, and that what the public believed to be a just war was upended and Israel turned into an ostracised villain in the eyes of the world. It is important to understand the Israeli psyche in order to understand the absence of a broader public outcry. A majority of Israelis may detest Netanyahu – but the inclination, incentive, impetus and energy to protest during a war was always relatively low. It is 'un-Israeli' to do so. There have been several stages in the evolution of the public mood regarding the war. Initial shock turned into fury and anger toward Netanyahu. But this never matured into mass demonstrations because Israelis are patriots, the military is a people's military and when there's a war, you don't protest. That's the default political-cultural reaction. The one constant feature was the willingness and persistence in protesting for the release of hostages held by Hamas, a movement that grew with Netanyahu's callous disregard for their fate. October 7 2023 was a day of infamy – on such a scale that the public at large was devastated into paralysis. The hostility, animosity and disdain for Netanyahu reached record numbers in the immediate aftermath of the indelible catastrophe. It is important to remember that October 2023 followed a year of mass demonstrations against Netanyahu's illiberal constitutional coup and his open war against the judiciary and 'deep state elites'. First, there was a natural desire for retribution and revenge, manifested in a massive retaliation. Consistent polls throughout 2024 and into the first half of 2025 showed that 70 per cent thought Netanyahu is responsible for the debacle, 70 per cent thought he should resign, 65 per cent wanted an early election. As Netanyahu, commensurate with his constitutional coup, refused to be held accountable, tried to dump the entire responsibility on the military which 'failed me', the intelligence organisations that were surprised, deep state elites that 'weakened Israeli society' (his words) and was increasingly perceived as prosecuting and protracting the war for political expediency, the public grew restive, furious and frustrated. Now, the conditions seem ripe for a public uproar. This will be fuelled by the knowledge that the IDF is adamantly opposed to this pseudo-plan to occupy Gaza. The next few days will be critical. If the IDF chief of staff, Lt-General Eyal Zamir, continues to divulge his reservations, the public may wake up. On the other hand, never discount the power of fatigue and resignation.
