logo
Daily Pill May Work as Well as Ozempic for Weight Loss and Blood Sugar

Daily Pill May Work as Well as Ozempic for Weight Loss and Blood Sugar

New York Times17-04-2025
A daily pill may be as effective in lowering blood sugar and aiding weight loss in people with Type 2 diabetes as the popular injectable drugs Mounjaro and Ozempic, according to results of a clinical trial announced by Eli Lilly on Thursday morning.
The drug, orforglipron, is a GLP-1, a class of drugs that have become blockbusters because of their weight-loss effects. But GLP-1s are expensive, must be kept refrigerated and must be injected. A pill that produces similar results has the potential to become far more widely used.
'In the coming decades, 700 million people around the world will have Type 2 diabetes, and over a billion will have obesity,' said Dr. Daniel Skovronsky, Lilly's chief scientific officer. 'Injections cannot be the solution for billions of people around the world.'
The results Lilly announced came from a clinical trial involving 559 people with Type 2 diabetes who took the new pill or a placebo for 40 weeks. In patients who took orforglipron, blood sugar levels fell by 1.3 to 1.6 percent, about the same amount in that time period experienced by patients taking Ozempic and Mounjaro in unrelated trials. For 65 percent of people taking the new pill, blood sugar levels dropped into the normal range.
Patients on the new pill also lost weight — up to 16 pounds without reaching a plateau at the study's end. Their weight loss was similar to that achieved in 40 weeks with Ozempic but slightly less than with Mounjaro in unrelated trials.
Side effects were the same as those with the injectable obesity drugs — diarrhea, indigestion, constipation, nausea and vomiting.
This was the first of seven large clinical trials of orforglipron to report results. Some of the others are testing the drug for weight loss in people without diabetes.
The company said it would present these new results at the annual meeting of the American Diabetes Association's Scientific Sessions in June and will publish them in a peer-reviewed journal.
Lilly added that it would seek approval from the Food and Drug Administration later this year to market orforglipron for obesity and early in 2026 for diabetes.
If the drug is approved for obesity and diabetes, Dr. Skovronsky said, the company is confident it will have sufficient amounts of the pills to meet demand. He said that he had learned the results of the diabetes study on Tuesday morning but that without even knowing them, the company had been preparing supplies. It has built factories and has already made a billion pills.
Twelve percent of American adults say they have taken a GLP-1. About 40 percent of Americans are obese, and more than 10 percent have diabetes, most of whom have Type 2, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
In a way, the very existence of orforglipron is a triumph of modern chemistry. The injectable GLP-1 drugs are peptides — small fragments of proteins. (GLP stands for glucagon-like peptide.) Peptides are digested by the stomach. So, in order to make an oral GLP-1, chemists had to find a way to make a nonpeptide that acts exactly like a peptide. Researchers at Chugai Pharmaceutical Company, a Japanese company, figured out a way, licensing their drug to Lilly in 2018.
The solution was to find a small molecule — thousandths of the size of a peptide — that sinks into a tiny pocket in the protein that is the target for GLP-1s. When it sinks into the pocket, the protein changes shape just as it does when a GLP-1 binds to the whole protein.
Finding that small molecule, Dr. Skovronsky said, was 'the holy grail.'
The result — a pill that can be taken at any time of day, with or without food — is almost unheard-of in the world of peptide drugs. Insulin, probably the most common peptide drug, has been around for more than 50 years. It is still only an injectable despite intense efforts by scientists to make an insulin pill. So is human growth hormone. So are drugs used to treat a wide variety of diseases, including arthritis and cancer.
Novo Nordisk has a GLP-1 pill, Rybelsus, but it contains the GLP-1 peptide, so it must be taken in large doses and is not as effective as the injectables because most of it is digested.
But for patients with diabetes and those struggling with obesity, a pill that can replace an injection can be transformative, for several reasons.
One is that it can make treatments attractive to those who cannot bear very idea of injecting themselves.
Dr. C. Ronald Kahn, a professor of medicine at Harvard and chief academic officer at Harvard's Joslin Diabetes Center, said he had many patients who were reluctant to inject themselves with Ozempic or Mounjaro.
A pill, he said, 'would definitely be preferred by most people.'
Dr. Sean Wharton, director of the Wharton Medical Clinic in Burlington, Ontario, has a broader hope. Dr. Wharton, who enrolled patients in Lilly's study of orforglipron for obesity, said a pill could potentially bring GLP-1 treatment to underserved populations throughout the world.
'It can be easily made in a factory and shipped everywhere,' he said. It should cost much less to make than peptides and does not require packaging in special injection pens. It does not have to be kept refrigerated.
For now, only rich countries have had access to GLP-1 drugs, and even in those countries, the drugs are available only to a small portion of people.
'Here we have a chance of a medicine being given to millions and millions of people,' Dr. Wharton said.
But that depends on Eli Lilly and how it chooses to price and distribute its drug.
'That's why I emphasize the word 'chance,'' Dr. Wharton said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Researchers find programme that could improve IVF outcomes
Researchers find programme that could improve IVF outcomes

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Researchers find programme that could improve IVF outcomes

Around one in five women of childbearing age are living with obesity, defined by the World Health Organization as having a body mass index (BMI) over 30 kg/m². Compared with women in the healthy BMI range (18.5–24.9 kg/m²), those living with obesity are three times more likely to experience fertility problems and nearly twice as likely to have a miscarriage. Many turn to in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in the hope of having a baby. Women with obesity who are planning a pregnancy are already advised that losing weight can improve their chances of conceiving. Our research suggests that structured weight loss support may also improve outcomes for those seeking IVF. Our study analysed data from 12 international trials involving 1,921 women living with obesity, all planning IVF. It compared those offered a weight loss programme before IVF with those receiving standard care, which typically does not include such support. Women who took part in a weight loss programme had a 21% higher chance of becoming pregnant overall – whether naturally or through IVF. The biggest difference was in natural conceptions: the likelihood of getting pregnant without IVF rose by 47%, meaning some women avoided fertility treatment altogether. However, despite these higher pregnancy rates and no increase in miscarriage risk, there was no clear evidence of an effect on live birth rates. This may be because many of the included studies didn't track live birth outcomes – even though this is the result that matters most to patients. IVF access paradox In the UK, publicly funded IVF is restricted to women with a BMI under 30. Similar weight-based eligibility rules exist in many other countries. These policies disproportionately affect women from more deprived backgrounds and some ethnic groups, who are more likely to be living with obesity. The paradox is clear: women with obesity are more likely to need IVF, but less likely to be eligible for it. Some can afford private weight loss programmes to meet the BMI requirement. Others resort to unproven or unsafe methods to lose weight quickly, risking their health in order to access fertility care. Our research findings suggest that offering structured weight loss programmes to women with obesity who are otherwise ineligible for IVF could help more women become pregnant – and in some cases avoid IVF altogether. This approach could also make fertility treatment more equitable. Since the cost of weight loss support is relatively low compared with IVF, including it in the treatment pathway might offer better value for healthcare providers. Weight loss options before IVF The most effective non-surgical option for significant weight loss is a class of medications called GLP-1 receptor agonists – such as Wegovy or Mounjaro – which have been shown to lead to substantial weight reduction. However, these drugs should not be used during pregnancy, while trying to conceive, or while breastfeeding, as there's little safety data in humans – and animal studies suggest potential harm to foetal development. Anyone who becomes pregnant while taking GLP-1 drugs should stop immediately and consult a healthcare professional. For women planning to conceive soon, there are other safe and effective options, including structured support groups and low-energy diet programmes. The problem is that such services are not offered as part of standard IVF care. While some NHS weight management programmes exist, access is limited, waiting lists can be long, and most are aimed at people with obesity-related health conditions rather than those seeking fertility treatment. In many other countries, insurance coverage for weight loss support is similarly patchy, meaning these services must often be funded privately – a cost that can put them out of reach for those who could benefit most. The message from this research is clear: targeted, supportive weight loss programmes before IVF don't just improve pregnancy chances – they could also reduce the need for IVF, promote fairer access to fertility treatment, and save healthcare resources. The challenge now is making sure they're available to everyone who needs them, not just those who can afford to pay. Nerys M. Astbury is an Associate Professor in Health Behaviours at the University of Oxford. Moscho Michalopoulou is a Behavioural Scientist in the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences at the University of Oxford. Pedro Melo is an NIHR Academic Clinical Lecturer in Obstetrics & Gynaecology in the Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health at the University of Oxford. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Eli Lilly accused of bribing providers to prescribe GLP-1RA drugs
Eli Lilly accused of bribing providers to prescribe GLP-1RA drugs

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Eli Lilly accused of bribing providers to prescribe GLP-1RA drugs

Despite posting record Q2 growth for its blockbuster weight loss and diabetes drug tirzepatide, Eli Lilly is facing legal challenge from a lawsuit filed in Texas that accuses the pharma company of bribing providers to prescribe its drugs. Attorney General for Texas Ken Paxton and Health Choice Alliance claim Eli Lilly 'offered illegal incentives' to medical providers in the southern state so its most profitable drugs, including popular glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) medications tirzepatide, marketed as Mounjaro and Zepbound, would be preferentially prescribed to patients. The lawsuit marks the latest legal assault by the attorney general's office, having previously sued Eli Lilly over an industry conspiracy to increase insulin prices. Health Choice Alliance has also filed previous legal action against Eli Lilly in the past. In the latest filing, Paxton and Health Choice Alliance claim that Eli Lilly's actions cost Texas Medicaid 'millions of dollars'. The claimants argue that prescriptions were covered by the government insurance programme, resulting in claims to Texas Medicaid that were 'tainted by Eli Lilly's illegal marketing and quid pro quo arrangements'. As per the filing, Lilly is alleged to have participated in two schemes to induce and influence providers. In the first, the pharma company, with the help of third parties, apparently provided free nursing services. The second scheme alleges that Lilly continues to offer reimbursement support services to get their drugs prescribed over rivals. An Eli Lilly spokesperson told Pharmaceutical Technology that it intends to 'vigorously defend against these allegations'. The spokesperson added: 'Multiple courts and the federal government have rejected claims by this same corporate relator against Lilly as meritless. In fact, the United States Government determined that 'the relators' allegations lack sufficient factual and legal support' in a prior case, explaining that federal healthcare programs have a strong interest in ensuring that, after a physician has appropriately prescribed a medication, patients have access to basic product support relating to their medication." This referred to similar kickback claims previously made by Health Choice Alliance. Lilly was originally sued by the organisation in 2017, alleged to have participated in a 'multi-tiered kickback scheme' along with other pharma companies, including Bayer. This involved offering free nursing services in exchange for preferential drug prescriptions. The case was dismissed a year later by a judge in Texas. In 2021, a court of appeals upheld the prior decision to scrap the case amid attempts to revive the lawsuit. It is also not the first time the state of Texas has accused Lilly of unlawful activities. In October 2024, the attorney general's office sued several drugmakers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) over insulin product prices. According to a statement at the time, Paxton accused manufacturers of a 'conspiracy' to artificially and willingly raise insulin prices and then pay an undisclosed amount back to PBMs in a quid pro quo arrangement. Lilly had a strong Q2 as it extended its lead over rival Novo Nordisk in the GLP-1RA treatment space. The company reported growth of 172% and 68% for Zepbound and Mounjaro, respectively. The two drugs brought in combined sales of $8.57bn in the quarter. "Eli Lilly accused of bribing providers to prescribe GLP-1RA drugs" was originally created and published by Pharmaceutical Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio

Parker Waichman LLP Files Lawsuit on behalf of Florida Woman Alleging Development of Irreversible Eye Condition, NAION, after taking Ozempic
Parker Waichman LLP Files Lawsuit on behalf of Florida Woman Alleging Development of Irreversible Eye Condition, NAION, after taking Ozempic

Associated Press

timean hour ago

  • Associated Press

Parker Waichman LLP Files Lawsuit on behalf of Florida Woman Alleging Development of Irreversible Eye Condition, NAION, after taking Ozempic

Parker Waichman, a national law firm, has now filed five (5) separate lawsuits where each Plaintiff alleged that he or she developed NAION after taking Novo Nordisk's Ozempic or Wegovy PORT WASHINGTON, N.Y., Aug. 13, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Parker Waichman has now filed multiple lawsuits in New Jersey state court on behalf of victims who were prescribed Ozempic or Wegovy and developed NAION, an irreversible eye condition that causes partial or complete permanent vision loss in one or both eyes. Most recently, on August 7, 2025, the Firm filed a lawsuit on behalf of a 60-year Miami, Florida resident who developed NAION after taking Ozempic. See Delgado v. Novo Nordisk Inc., Docket No: MID-L-0047-25. To most efficiently litigate these cases, Parker Waichman LLP recently joined four other law firms and filed an application to the New Jersey Supreme Court to consolidate all New Jersey state lawsuits alleging permanent vision loss from use of Ozempic/Wegovy products in Middlesex County, New Jersey. Parker Waichman continues to file additional cases and urges individuals who have suffered serious eye injuries after taking these widely prescribed GLP-1 receptor agonist medications to contact them for a free case review. These medications, originally developed to treat Type 2 diabetes, have surged in popularity for weight loss. However, recent studies have uncovered a disturbing link between semaglutide (Ozempic/Wegovy) and NAION, a condition that causes permanent vision loss by cutting off blood flow to the optic nerve. Patients who took these drugs have reported sudden blindness, optic nerve damage, and other irreversible complications, raising concerns about the failure of drug manufacturers to warn consumers and medical professionals about these risks. A 2025 study published in JAMA Ophthalmology examined nine patients who developed optic nerve disorders after using GLP-1 medications, with the majority suffering from NAION-like symptoms. Additional research from Harvard's Mass Eye and Ear Institute found that diabetic users of semaglutide were four times more likely to develop NAION, while non-diabetic users taking the drug for weight loss faced a sevenfold increased risk. Despite growing scientific evidence, Novo Nordisk continues to downplay the dangers associated with these medications, failing to include adequate warnings about the risk of permanent blindness. Parker Waichman LLP Fights for Victims Nationwide 'NAION is a devastating, and permanent, eye injury diagnosis. Studies from multiple, reputable institutions, have shown a statistically significant relationship between semaglutide (the active ingredient in Ozempic and Wegovy) and NAION. Despite this evidence, Novo Nordisk continues to deny reality by failing to warn consumers and medical professionals about this horrific injury and must be held accountable,' said Jason S. Goldstein, Senior Litigation Counsel at Parker Waichman LLP. Parker Waichman LLP is currently accepting cases nationwide for individuals who have suffered vision loss, blindness, or serious optic nerve damage after taking Ozempic or Wegovy. Victims may be entitled to compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages. Free Case Review for Affected Individuals If you or a loved one experienced sudden vision loss, blindness, or optic nerve damage after using Ozempic or Wegovy, you may have a legal claim against the drug manufacturers. Parker Waichman LLP is offering free, no-obligation case evaluations to help victims understand their rights and pursue justice. Contact Parker Waichman LLP Today For a free consultation, call 1-800-YOUR-LAWYER ( 1-800-968-7529 ) or visit to learn more about your legal options and how to protect your rights. About Parker Waichman LLP Parker Waichman LLP is a nationally recognized law firm dedicated to fighting for victims of defective drugs, dangerous products, accidents, and corporate negligence. Specifically, the Firm is quite experienced in representing eye injury victims due to the negligence of pharmaceutical companies. Representative cases include In Re Elmiron (Pentosan Polysulfate Sodium) Products Liability Litigation and Bausch & Lomb Contact Lens Solutions Prod. Liab. Litig. With a proven track record of holding pharmaceutical companies accountable, the firm has secured billions in settlements and verdicts for injured clients. Media Contact: Parker Waichman LLP Phone: 1-800-YOUR-LAWYER (1-800-968-7529) Website: View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Parker Waichman LLP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store