US court ruling to end 'parole' a setback for future asylum seekers
CHNV humanitarian parole program
, potentially returning 532,000 people to their home countries, could have far-reaching repercussions, not just for immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, but for future asylum and parole efforts including those for Indians, immigration attorneys warn.
The acronym CHNV refers to Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans. It's used in the context of a
US Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) parole program that has been terminated.
Immigration attorneys point to the ruling as a harbinger of a more aggressive
immigration rollback
. 'We can immediately expect this ruling to be cited by the
Trump
administration in litigation for every baseless, improvident, and even unlawful immigrant protection program termination going forward,' said Brian Murray, senior partner of Murray Osorio.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Nvidia's AI Growth Story Deepens
Seeking Alpha
Read More
Undo
Experts said even asylum seekers who cite political, social, economic and religious persecution in their home countries as a pretext to gain quicker residency and citizenship could feel the strain. This includes Indian nationals, whose numbers, according to the latest Annual Asylees Annual Flow Report of the Department of Homeland Security, rose 855% from 4,330 in FY21 to 41,330 in FY23.
(Join our
ETNRI WhatsApp channel
for all the latest updates)
'Even Indian and South Asian asylum seekers, though not direct beneficiaries of parole in large numbers, are indirectly affected,' said
Tushar Kumar
, advocate at the Supreme Court of India. 'Many of them are held at the southern US border or released on limited
humanitarian grounds
pending adjudication. Should the current precedent be extended, they may face longer detentions, reduced access to discretionary relief, and a heightened evidentiary burden to establish grounds for asylum, constricting access to justice.'
Live Events
Deepak Ahluwalia, managing partner of Singh Ahluwalia, warns that entire populations depending on mass parole may now be forced to navigate slower, more restricted immigration pathways. 'Populations relying on mass parole programs and potentially vulnerable Indian or South Asian nationals fleeing political or religious persecution could face barriers to entry. The current administration is ripping each fabric of our immigration policy—little by little.'
The court's decision allows the federal government to dismantle the CHNV program, which had enabled thousands of migrants to live and work legally in the US. Experts say a powerful precedent, one enabling administrations to end group-based parole programs wholesale, has now been set.
'Future administrations might feel they have the authority to change or completely cancel humanitarian parole programs without needing to assess individual cases,' said Samuel McTyre, principal at McTyre Gutierrez PLLC.
McTyre added that the human and economic toll of the decision would be significant.
'This termination could result in painful family separations and the forced return of individuals to potentially dangerous environments. The CHNV program enabled migrants to work legally, contributing to vital sectors such as healthcare, construction, and hospitality. Revoking their work authorisation could lead to considerable labour shortages and broader economic disruptions.'
Experts estimate a potential annual loss of approximately $5.5 billion to the US economy.
Kumar believes that the decision also risks putting the US at odds with its international obligations. 'The essence of non-refoulement lies in the guarantee that no person shall be returned to a territory where they face threats to life or liberty.'
Kumar also flagged the domestic operational consequences, saying 'Over time, this will deepen the burden on asylum officers and immigration judges, who are already confronting backlogs exceeding 2 million cases.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
19 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Putin's midnight ultimatum: Trump forced into 15-minute deadline for late-night chat
Trump Putin late-night call: Donald Trump aimed to set up a meeting between Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky to discuss ending the Russia-Ukraine war. Putin gave Trump a tight 15-minute window for a call late at night in Moscow. The White House confirmed progress towards peace talks. Russia signals caution on confirming the Putin-Zelensky meeting plans. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Vladimir Putin Set Tight 15-Minute Deadline for Donald Trump's Late-Night Call Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads White House Confirms Progress Toward Peace Talks Possible Meeting Location: Budapest? Russia Signals Caution on Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky Meeting Plans Trump Wants Putin and Zelensky to Meet Alone First US Envoy Highlights Early Signs of Russian Concessions Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs : After hours of peace talks at the White House with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and several European leaders, US president Donald Trump wanted to call Russian president Vladimir Putin to organize a meeting with the Zelensky on ending Russia's war with Ukraine, as per a report. But Putin gave Trump a strict 15-minute window to make the call before going to bed as it was late night in Moscow, according to a Daily Beast an interview on Fox News' The Ingraham Angle, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent explained that it was very late in Moscow and Putin told Trump he could either call immediately or wait until the next day, but Trump chose to call that night, taking the opportunity within the short time frame, as per the said, 'Look, it was very late in Moscow,' adding, 'President Putin was open to meeting with President Zelensky and as you know President Trump is very persuasive, they had just met,' as quoted by Daily host Laura Ingraham asked if Putin was staying up to wait for the call from Trump, Bessent responded, saying, 'Well, the president gave him the option, 'I could call or send a message' and Putin said 'Well, I will be up for 15 more minutes or you can call tomorrow'. And I think Putin wanted the call that night. So that showed he was eager to hear what the president had to say,' as quoted in the READ: Iran flexes firepower: Massive missile drill aims warning at US and Israel after June war Meanwhile, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt revealed that during Putin's pre-bedtime phone call with Tthe US president, he agreed to 'begin the next phase of the peace process—a meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky," as quoted by Daily even wrote on his social media site Truth Social that the meeting between Putin and Zelensky would happen 'at a location to be determined,' as quoted in the report. While, the Washington Post pointed out the Hungarian capital Budapest could be a possible option, which would be followed by a trilateral meeting of the two presidents joined by Trump, as reported by Daily READ: Shocking twist: Computer Science grads face one of the highest unemployment rates today However, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov indicated that the meeting is yet to be confirmed on Putin's end, saying, 'Any contacts involving top officials must be prepared with the utmost care,' adding, 'We do not refuse any forms of work—neither bilateral nor trilateral,' as quoted in the during an interview on The Mark Levin Show, Trump shared that he wanted Putin and Zelensky to meet on their own first to clear the air, as per the Daily Beast report. The US president said, 'I thought it would be better if they met without me, just to see. I want to see what goes on,' adding, 'You know, they had a hard relationship, very bad, very bad relationship. And now we'll see how they do and, if necessary, and it probably would be, but if necessary, I'll go and I'll probably be able to get it closed,' as quoted in the READ: Apple Watch SE 3 leaks spill major upgrades — and fans can't stop buzzing about what's coming US envoy Steve Witkoff highlighted that Russia has made 'concessions almost immediately' after Trump and Putin's meeting in Alaska last week, saying, 'We stayed there for quite some time because we actually made progress on how we might get to a peace deal,' as quoted in the report. Witkoff added, 'The president began to sense in this meeting in Alaska that we had a lot of the precursors agreed to for a peace deal, so why not pursue an entire peace deal?' as quoted by Daily READ: Morgan Stanley: AI boom could add $16 trillion to markets, but workers may pay the price as 90% jobs may be impacted It was very late in Moscow, and Putin was about to go to bed, so he gave Trump a short window to make the call or wait until the next day, as per the Daily Beast wanted to organize a meeting between Putin and Ukrainian President Zelensky to move forward with peace talks, as per the Daily Beast report.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Amit Shah: PM Modi got draft reworked to bring himself under ambit
PM Modi NEW DELHI: It was Prime Minister Narendra Modi who had the draft of Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025 reworked to include himself in its ambit, home minister Amit Shah shared in a post on X on Wednesday. Sources in the government said Modi added the provision requiring a prime minister who spends 30 consecutive days under arrest or detention for an alleged offence punishable with a prison term extending up to five years or more, to resign on the 31st day, based on the reasoning that moral standards in politics must apply as much to prime ministers as they do to any chief minister or minister at the Centre and in states or Union Territories. The original draft of the 130th Constitutional amendment Bill had proposed to cover only chief ministers and ministers at the Centre and in the states. As per the Bill, introduced by Shah on Wednesday, in case the prime minister does not tender his resignation on the 31st day of his arrest, "he shall cease to hold office from the day falling thereafter". The Bill was on Wednesday referred to a joint parliamentary committee for thorough scrutiny. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Europe Travel Hack That Saves You Hundreds on Trips! Learn More Undo Dismissing the opposition's charge that the Bill was a ploy by the Modi regime to dislodge state govts by having their chief ministers and ministers removed through arrest in "motivated" cases, a senior govt functionary said that the same provisions apply to the prime minister and Union ministers. The functionary said it was high time that the PM, CM and ministers display character and conduct that aligns with constitutional morality and principles of good governance, and cited the example of govt employees who are deemed suspended if detained in custody for only 48 hours. "Why should bureaucrats/govt personnel alone bear moral responsibility in the event of detention or arrest? Ministers are also public servants and must withdraw from office if arrested for 30 days. They can always rejoin the same post after release," underlined the functionary. He added that the 30-day timeframe is enough for the affected PM/CM/minister to apply for bail and have it heard and decided, right till the last court of appeal.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
People will decide if governments can be run from jails: Amit Shah
Amit Shah NEW DELHI: Union home minister Amit Shah on Wednesday asserted that, unlike the Congress party 's approach of placing the Prime Minister above the law, the BJP 's policy ensures that the Prime Minister, ministers, and chief ministers are subject to the rule of law. "Now, the people of the country will have to decide whether it is appropriate for a minister, chief minister, or the PM to run the govt while in jail," Shah posted on X. He highlighted that Narendra Modi introduced a Constitutional Amendment Bill to bring himself under the law's ambit, while the Congress-led opposition opposed it to "remain outside the law's ambit, run govts from jail, and not relinquish their attachment to power". "The purpose of this bill is to elevate the declining level of morality in public life and bring integrity to politics," Shah said. The proposed law stipulates that no person in jail can serve as PM, CM, or minister. He noted, "When the Constitution was framed, our Constitution-makers could not have imagined that in the future, there would be political figures who would not resign on moral grounds before being arrested. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Europe Travel Hack That Saves You Hundreds on Trips! Learn More Undo " Shah pointed out that, in recent years, some CMs and ministers have immorally continued governing from jail without resigning. The bills include a provision allowing an accused politician to seek bail within 30 days of arrest. Shah contrasted this with historical actions, recalling that former PM Indira Gandhi, through Constitutional Amendment No. 39, granted the Prime Minister immunity from legal action. "On the one side, this is the work culture and policy of Congress, that they place the Prime Minister above the law through constitutional amendments. On the other side, the policy of BJP is that we are bringing our govt's PM, ministers, and CMs within the ambit of law," he said. Shah noted that BJP and NDA upheld ethical values, citing veteran LK Advani's resignation following allegations. In contrast, he accused Congress of perpetuating an "unethical tradition" started by Indira Gandhi. He referred to Congress's attempt to protect RJD leader Lalu Prasad Yadav with an ordinance, which Rahul Gandhi opposed, yet later embraced Yadav publicly in Patna. Shah claimed this exposed the opposition's duplicity. He clarified that the bills were always intended for thorough discussion in the Joint Committee of Parliament. "Yet, abandoning all shame and decency, entire INDI alliance, led by Congress, gathered to oppose it with crude behaviour to protect the corrupt. Today, the opposition has been completely exposed in front of the public," Shah said.
