Australia regulator and YouTube spar over under-16s social media ban
SYDNEY: Australia's internet watchdog and YouTube exchanged barbs on Tuesday after the regulator urged the government to reverse a planned exemption for the Alphabet-owned video-sharing platform from its world-first teen social media ban.
The quarrel adds an element of uncertainty to the December rollout of a law being watched by governments and tech leaders around the world as Australia seeks to become the first country to fine social media firms if they fail to block users aged under 16.
The centre-left Labor government of Anthony Albanese has previously said it would give YouTube a waiver, citing the platform's use for education and health.
Meta to introduce teen accounts for Facebook
Other social media companies such as Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok have argued such an exemption would be unfair.
eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said she wrote to the government last week to say there should be no exemptions when the law takes effect.
She added that the regulator's research found 37% of children aged 10 to 15 reported seeing harmful content on YouTube - the most of any social media site.
'This is not a fair fight where our kids are concerned, vis-a-vis social media sites,' Inman Grant told the National Press Club in Sydney.
She said social media companies deployed 'persuasive design features' like recommendation-based algorithms and notifications to keep users online and 'YouTube has mastered those, opaque algorithms driving users down rabbit holes they're powerless to fight against'.
YouTube, in a blog post, accused Inman Grant of giving inconsistent and contradictory advice, which discounted the government's own research which found 69% of parents considered the video platform suitable for people under 15.
'The eSafety commissioner chose to ignore this data, the decision of the Australian Government and other clear evidence from teachers and parents that YouTube is suitable for younger users,' wrote Rachel Lord, YouTube's public policy manager for Australia and New Zealand.
Inman Grant, asked about surveys supporting a YouTube exemption, said she was more concerned 'about the safety of children and that's always going to surpass any concerns I have about politics or being liked or bringing the public onside'.
A spokesperson for Communications Minister Anika Wells said the minister was considering the online regulator's advice and her 'top priority is making sure the draft rules fulfil the objective of the Act and protect children from the harms of social media'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
16 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PPP hardens stance on 'draconian powers' for taxman
The Pakistan Peoples Party has refused to vote in favour of new "draconian" powers for taxman to arrest people in tax fraud cases, resulting in a new round of negotiations between the two key partners of the alliance just hours before the approval of the budget from the National Assembly. On behalf of the government, Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar has reached out to the top PPP leadership who was hopeful to resolve the issue before the approval of the budget. The government was hopeful that after adding some more safeguards, the PPP may vote for the arrest powers amendment in the Finance Bill today (Thursday) The sources told The Express Tribune that the top leadership of the PPP conveyed to the government on Wednesday it would not vote to give arrest powers to the Federal Board of Revenue in spite of inclusion of new safeguards to have a check on these powers. The government cannot get the budget passed from the National Assembly without the support of the PPP. On June 12, the government proposed in the budget that the FBR can arrest people in tax fraud cases. During discussions on the budget in the National as well as Senate standing committees on finance the additional safeguards were introduced to stop the misuse of these powers. These safeguards had been proposed by the PPP. Despite the additional safeguards, the FBR cannot be trusted; a senior PPP negotiator told The Express Tribune on condition of anonymity. The real issue was the trust on the FBR, he added. The development surfaced a day before the approval of the budget by the National Assembly, which is scheduled to approve it on Thursday (today). The sources said that on behalf of the government Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar contacted top PPP leadership. "I am back in Islamabad and we will resolve it soon Insha'Allah," said Ishaq Dar while talking to The Express Tribune. Dar was in the United Arab Emirates where he reached an understanding with the UAE rulers to address the serious issue of denying visas to Pakistani government officials. Dar said that he was in contact with the President Asif Ali Zardari and the other PPP leadership. The matter regarding the arrest powers will be addressed before the approval of the budget, said the Deputy Prime Minister. During deliberations on the budget, the chairman National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance Syed Naveed Qamar had termed the powers to arrest as "draconian". A few members of the committee equated the FBR with the National Accountability Bureau. On the complaints from the businesses, the Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had also constituted a committee to include checks on these powers. Tax fraud has been defined as: "knowingly, intentionally or dishonestly doing any act or abets any action to cause loss of tax under this Act, including: using or preparing false, forged and fictitious documents including return, statements, annexures and invoices; false claim of input tax credit based on fictitious transactions; issuance of any tax invoice without supply of goods; tampering with or destroying of any material evidence or documents required to be maintained; generating fake input through manipulation of return filing system of the Board and making fake entries in the sales tax returns or in the annexures; and making fictitious compliance of section 73, including routing of payments back to the registered person, or for the benefit of the registered person, through a bank account held by a supplier or a purported supplier." Upon committing any of the above offences, the FBR will have the authority to arrest the individual without first seeking a warrant from any court of law, according to the proposed powers. When contacted, FBR spokesman Dr Najeeb Memon said that the updated bill has already been submitted in the National Assembly by its standing committee on finance and the decision now rests with the assembly. Unlike in the past, when the government would submit the updated bill in the National Assembly, this time the standing committee securitized the budget where FBR also proposed additional revenue measures of Rs36 billion. In the budget, the government had proposed a total Rs435 billion new tax measures, which after the adjustments has now increased to Rs463 billion. The Chairman FBR Rashid Langrial said that describing the Rs36 billion additional measures as mini-budget was not correct since the Parliament has not yet approved the Finance Act. The FBR chairman had told the standing committee last week that the criminality of tax fraud has been divided into two parts. In some cases, court permission will be required before an arrest is made. He explained that crimes such as suppression of taxable supplies under the Sales Tax Act, suppression or nonpayment of withholding tax for more than three months, dealing in goods liable to confiscation and making taxable supplies without registration will require court approval for arrest. According to the proposal, an Inland Revenue officer not below the rank of assistant commissioner — or any officer authorised by the board – may initiate an inquiry upon approval from the commissioner, if there is material evidence pointing to the commission of tax fraud or an offence warranting prosecution under the act. The inquiry officer shall have the powers of a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, including summoning and enforcing attendance of any person, examining on oath, requiring discovery and production of documents and receiving evidence on affidavits. The inquiry officer must complete the inquiry within six months. During proceedings, the officer must provide the accused with a chance to be heard and confront them with details of the alleged fraud. A final report will then be submitted to the commissioner, who may either approve a full investigation, request further details, or close the matter. Upon approval, the investigation must be completed within three months. The board may authorise a commissioner — through a three-member committee notified by the chairman — to issue an arrest warrant if the tax loss exceeds Rs50 million. Arrests will only be made if the accused fails to respond to three notices, attempts to flee, or is likely to tamper with evidence.
Business Recorder
18 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Bank accounts of tax evaders to face 3-day suspension from July 1
ISLAMABAD: In a major development, the bank account of any unregistered sales tax person (tax evader) can only be initially suspended for a period of three days from July 1, 2025. The amended Finance Bill (2025-26) has relaxed sales tax law for suspension of bank accounts of unregistered sales tax persons not ready to come into the sales tax net from July 1, 2025. According to the amended Finance Bill (2025-26), the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has simplified things for barring operations of bank accounts of unregistered sales tax persons. Taxmen get more powers to target unregistered taxpayers Under revised Section 14AC (bar on operations of bank accounts), this section shall apply where the Commissioner has reasons to believe that a person is engaged in supply of taxable goods without having registration under this Act. The Commissioner has provided three consecutive opportunities of being heard to the person to obtain registration under this Act. In case the person failed to obtain registration, notwithstanding anything contained in this Act or any other law for the time being in force, the Commissioner shall have the powers to direct banking companies, scheduled banks and other financial institutions, through an order in writing, to intermittently suspend the operation of the bank account of such any person for three working days. The Commissioner shall repeat suspension specified in sub-section (2), for two more times with an interval of one week between the suspensions, says amended Finance Bill 2025. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
18 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Online payment intermediaries: Penalties revised for tax fraud, non-filing
ISLAMABAD: The amended Finance Bill (2025-26) has revised penalty regime for committing tax fraud and non-filing of monthly statements by intermediaries or courier companies collecting payments from online marketplaces. The amended Finance Bill (2025-26) has proposed many amendments in the Sales Tax Act relating to the penalty regime. The amended Finance Bill (2025-26) has relaxed penalties on the recommendations of the National Assembly and Senate Standing Committees on Finance. FBR redrafts Sec 37A: Amended Finance Bill sets conditions for tax fraud arrests The amended Finance Bill (2025-26) revealed that where any online marketplace, payment intermediary or courier fails to furnish prescribed monthly statement within due date, such person shall be liable to pay penalty of three lac rupees for first default if he fails to furnish the prescribed statement for two consecutive months and penalty of Rs one million for each subsequent default within one year. Where any online marketplace or courier allows use of its services inthe course of e-commerce by unregistered persons. Such person shall be liable to pay penalty of three lac rupees for first default and penalty of one million rupees for each subsequent default. Any person who commits or, causes to commit tax fraud asdefined under sub-clauses (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) of clause(37) of section person shall be liable, upon conviction by a Special Judge, toimprisonment for a term which may extend upto ten years or withfine which may extend to ten million rupees, or with both. Suchperson shall also be liable to pay the amount equal to the loss of tax caused as confirmed by the Special Judge from such amount reported under sub section (11) of section 37B, including one hundred percent penalty of tax loss and default surcharge under section 34 of the Act. Any person who commits or, causes to commit tax fraud as defined under sub-clauses (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k) of clause (37) of section person shall be liable, upon conviction by a Special Judge, to imprisonment for a term which may extend up to five years or with fine which may extend to five million rupees, or with both. Such person shall also be liable to pay the amount equal to the loss of tax caused as confirmed by the Special Judge from such amount reported under sub section (11) of section 37B, including gone hundred percent penalty of tax loss and default surcharge under section 34 of the Act, revised Finance Bill (2025-26). Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
