Proposed federal cuts could severely impact the Ohio Alliance to End Sexual Violence
Sexual assault examination kit. (Photo from the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance)
Proposed federal cuts could significantly hinder the Ohio Alliance to End Sexual Violence's statewide efforts to help survivors.
The Trump administration recently proposed a 29% cut to the Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) program funding in the fiscal 2026 budget request.
'OVW really is the main federal body to provide a really unique and dedicated focus for victims of sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence, stalking, all of these forms of gender-based violence,' said Ohio Alliance to End Sexual Violence Director of Public Policy Emily Gemar. 'A cut to OVW grants would be significant.'
The Ohio Alliance to End Sexual Violence is a statewide nonprofit coalition that supports Ohio's 36 rape crisis centers, provides housing for survivors and offers legal services.
Potential reductions in funding could lead to survivors potentially not having access to life-saving interventions, Gemar said.
'When someone has experienced a traumatic crime like sexual assault, and they call a rape crisis center hotline, someone needs to answer,' she said. 'When they flee an abuser in the middle of the night, they need a safe place to go. When they take the courageous step to go and seek medical treatment in their local emergency department, an advocate has to be there, and sexual assault forensic nurse examiner has to be there.'
The proposed 29% reduction comes a couple months after the U.S. Department of Justice rescinding more than 360 federal grants in April — impacting many community based agencies that do crime prevention and serve crime victims.
'Our folks who serve victims of sexual assault, domestic violence, stalking, dating violence, they would all be impacted by less federal funding streams to go around,' Gemar said. 'We already are not a robustly funded field.'
Ninety percent of Ohio alliance legal team is funded by the Legal Assistance of Victims Program administered by the federal program.
'What we were seeing across the state is that survivors need help navigating the legal system,' said alliance Director of Advocacy & Legal Services Becca Getson. 'We want to make sure that they have their rights represented.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The alliance has saved survivors about $74,000 in legal fees in 2025 through May 1, Getson said.
'We were able to provide that base to provide legal representation directly to the survivors, and they don't have to then pay an attorney to be able to do very basic things like get a protection order (or) help them through a potential custody issue,' she said.
The Legal Assistance of Victims grants funds both of the alliance's attorneys and their legal services specialist, so cuts to Office on Violence Against Women could potentially eliminate the alliance's legal clinic, Getson said.
'(Survivors) wouldn't have an attorney,' she said. 'This will have a detrimental impact across the state, knowing that survivors aren't able to get that kind of justice that they're looking for, that they deserve to have.'
According to a new poll, 87% of likely Ohio voters are in favor of federal funding for violence prevention programs and victim services and 74% agree the Trump administration and justice department should reinstate funding for victim services, community violence prevention programs, and youth outreach.
The poll was commissioned by the Alliance for Safety and Justice and conducted by McLaughlin & Associates.
'Elected officials on both sides of the aisle stood for safety in supporting violence prevention programs and victims services,' Shakyra Diaz, chief of shared safety for Alliance for Safety and Justice, said in a press release. 'The recent cuts take us backwards, undermine public safety, and Ohio voters do not want that.'
Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Undocumented students seek to challenge end of Texas in-state tuition
The Brief Undocumented students in Texas are seeking to challenge a court ruling that ended their access to in-state tuition rates. This comes after the U.S. Department of Justice and the state of Texas agreed to end a 2001 law that allowed in-state tuition for certain undocumented students. The students argue that ending the program could increase tuition costs by up to 810%, potentially forcing many of them to drop out of college. DALLAS - A group of undocumented students are asking a federal judge to allow them to challenge the court's ruling that ended their access to in-state tuition. The filing comes in response to a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice against Texas over a 2001 law that allowed undocumented students who had lived in the state for more than three years and graduated from a Texas high school to attend public universities at the in-state rate. What they're saying The students are hoping for a chance to argue their case for the Texas Dream Act after and agreement was reached between the Department of Justice and the state to end the program on the same day the lawsuit was filed. Court documents state the average cost for SAT members to attend a college or university in the state will increase by up to 810% compared to their current rates. "Such an increase puts college out of reach for many students--some of whom have already spent years in college and will not afford to complete their program," SAT's attorneys said. The filing highlights several students across the state that may not be able to complete their degree if the Texas Dream Act is ended. One such student pursuing a Master of Science degree at the University of North Texas has been paying out of pocket for the program since 2020. "She has been able to afford her education because she was able to pay reduced tuition rates," court documents state. "However, she cannot afford to pay out-of-state tuition and will likely be forced to drop out of her program." Dig deeper For nearly 25 years, the Texas Dream Act has provided access to in-state tuition for thousands of undocumented migrant students at Texas colleges and universities. The law allowed for students without legal resident status to qualify for in-state tuition if they have lived in the state for three years before graduating from high school, and for a year before enrolling in college. They must also sign an affidavit promising to apply for legal resident status as soon as possible. The Texas Dream Act was signed into law by Republican Gov. Rick Perry with bipartisan support in the state legislature. Well before DACA provided federal protection to undocumented children, Texas was the first state to create this type of tuition program for them. Now more than a dozen states provide a similar program. The program serves around 20,000 students in Texas, according to the nonprofit organization Every Texan. Despite multiple Republican attempts to repeal the law, those efforts never made it to a full vote in the Texas house. The most recent attempt happened this session. Senate Bill 1798 passed out of committee on May 14, but was marked as "not placed again on intent calendar" on May 26. The settlement between the state and federal governments came just days after the most recent Texas legislative session ended. The Source Information in this article comes court documents filed in the District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Information on the Texas Dream Act comes from previous FOX 4 reporting.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lawyers for man mistakenly deported from US say he should be freed while DOJ pursues new charges
By Dietrich Knauth and Luc Cohen (Reuters) -Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador in March and returned on Friday, said their client should be set free while the U.S. Department of Justice pursues new criminal charges against him. The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday had asked a federal judge in Tennessee to detain Abrego Garcia while he is prosecuted on newly-filed charges of transporting illegal immigrants within the United States. The motion filed on Wednesday said Abrego Garcia had already been imprisoned without due process and he posed no danger to the community and no flight risk. 'Mr. Abrego Garcia asks the Court for what he has been denied the past several months – due process,' Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote in Wednesday's court filing. 'Mr. Abrego Garcia must be released.' Abrego Garcia on March 15 was deported to El Salvador, despite a 2019 immigration court ruling that he should not be sent there because he could be persecuted by gangs, and the incident has become a flashpoint for Republican President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration policies. The Trump administration has said Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang, an accusation his lawyers deny. Trump administration officials have accused the judiciary of interfering with the executive branch's ability to conduct foreign policy, and they portrayed Abrego Garcia's criminal indictment as vindication for their approach to deportations. A grand jury in Nashville, Tennessee, on May 21 indicted him on charges of transporting undocumented migrants from the U.S.-Mexico border to locations around the country. Abrego Garcia remains detained pending his next court hearing on Friday. His lawyer Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg has called the criminal charges "fantastical" and a "kitchen sink" of allegations.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Man, woman charged with roles in posting monkey abuse videos
June 11 (UPI) -- A Tennessee woman and a North Carolina man have been indicted on federal charges that they were involved with online groups that created and distributed videos online depicting extreme violence and sexual abuse against monkeys. In the Southern District of Ohio, a grand jury indictment, which was unsealed Wednesday, charges Katrina Favret of Tennessee and Robert Craig of North Carolina, the U.S. Department of Justice said. In October, Ronald Bedra, of Ohio, was sentenced to 54 months in prison for conspiracy of the postings. Craig is charged with creating and distributing the videos and Favret with conspiracy. They conspired to produce "animal crush videos," according to the indictment. The videos depict sadistic violence against juvenile and adult monkeys, prosecutors said. They included monkeys sodomized with a heated screwdriver and a monkey's genitals cut with scissors. They allegedly used encrypted chat applications to direct money to individuals in Indonesia willing to commit the requested acts of torture on camera. "We will punish participants of sadistic conspiracies like this one no matter their role in the crime," said U.S. Attorney Kenneth L. Parker of the Southern District of Ohio said after Bedra was sentenced. "As this case shows, even if you do not commit the torture first-hand, you will be held accountable for promoting this obscene animal abuse." The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement and the FBI were involved in the investigation. In 2019, President Donald Trump signed a bipartisan bill into law that makes animal cruelty a federal crime. The Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture Act, which was unanimously passed in the House and Senate, revises and expands earlier legislation against making and distributing videos of animal cruelty. In 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a Virginia man's conviction under a federal law banning videos of animal cruelty, saying they were protected speech. The 8-1 ruling, with Justice Samuel Alito dissenting, said the government lacked the power to ban expressions of animal cruelty when that is done in videotapes and other commercial media. The opinion said wasn't curbing government's power to punish acts of animal cruelty, but the portrayals of such acts. Depictions of animal torture should be reported to authorities.
