Gujarat Science City welcomes three African penguin chicks
1
2
3
Ahmedabad: The Aquatic Gallery at Science City marked a milestone on Friday by introducing three
African penguin chicks
— Daisy, Kiara, and Balloo — to their enclosure. The successful breeding of these endangered birds in the facility marks the first such feat in the state's history.
"The breeding programme, led by the expert husbandry team at the Aquatic Gallery, began in June 2024 with the first egg laid and hatched in July after a 38-day incubation. In a rare and heartening development, the penguin pair laid a second clutch of two eggs in Oct, which hatched in Nov — resulting in two female chicks and one male chick," said a senior Science City official.
You Can Also Check:
Ahmedabad AQI
|
Weather in Ahmedabad
|
Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad
|
Public Holidays in Ahmedabad
Experts associated with the process said that to achieve the results, they designed a nesting environment that mimicking the penguins' natural habitat, providing them with safety and privacy. The adult penguins were also placed on specialized diet to support the mating and chick-rearing period.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed!
IC Markets
Start Now
Undo
The African penguin (Spheniscus demersus), native to South African and Namibian coastlines, faces significant threats in the wild. With fewer than 19,800 mature individuals remaining, the species is classified as critically endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Captive breeding programmes like this one play a crucial role in global conservation efforts.
Officials hope that visitors, particularly children, will gain valuable knowledge about these endangered species, ultimately contributing to conservation awareness.
Mona Khandhar, principal secretary of the science and technology department, who attended the unveiling ceremony, said the birth of the chicks is a proud moment not only for
Gujarat Science City
but also for the entire state.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
Certain people are mosquito magnets, and turns out THIS is the reason why
A recent study reveals that some individuals are more attractive to mosquitoes due to high levels of specific fatty acids on their skin. These carboxylic acids, produced by skin bacteria, create a unique body odor that mosquitoes find irresistible. Researchers identified 'mosquito magnets' who consistently attracted more mosquitoes, highlighting the complexity and redundancy of the mosquito's scent-detection system. Ever wondered why the mosquitoes always seem to find you, even in a room full of people? When a female mosquito is on the hunt for some fresh blood, she has certain preferences, just like you ask the barista for a slim oat milk latte with a shot of vanilla. Yes, mosquitoes are picky. Female mosquitoes pick the human species by tracking our CO2 exhalations, body heat, and body odor. But some people seem to be mosquito magnets than others. Many believe this is due to things like blood type, blood sugar, eating garlic or bananas, or being a woman or child. However, most of these ideas lack strong scientific proof, says Leslie Vosshall, a scientist at Rockefeller Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Behavior. Vosshall and Maria Elena De Obaldia, a former postdoc in her lab, looked at the popular theory to explain varying mosquito appeal: individual odor variations connected to skin microbiota. They found that certain fatty acids emanating from the skin may create a heady perfume that mosquitoes can't resist. The findings are published in the Cell journal. 'There's a very, very strong association between having large quantities of these fatty acids on your skin and being a mosquito magnet,' Vosshall, the Robin Chemers Neustein Professor at The Rockefeller University and Chief Scientific Officer of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, said in a statement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo A tournament no one wants to win To understand the mechanism of this selection, the researchers conducted a three-year study. The eight participants were asked to wear nylon stockings on their forearms for six hours daily, over several days. The worn nylons were then tested against one another in a round-robin style 'tournament' using a custom-built plexiglass olfactometer. In each round, mosquitoes were given a choice between two nylons, and researchers observed which one they preferred. They placed Aedes Aegypti mosquitoes, the primary vector species for Zika, dengue, yellow fever, and chikungunya, in the main chamber and observed as the insects flew down the tubes towards one nylon or the other. For Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, the most compelling was Subject 33, who was four times more attractive to the mosquitoes than the next most-attractive study participant, and an astonishing 100 times more appealing than the least attractive, Subject 19. The samples in the trials were anonymous, so researchers didn't know which participant wore which nylon. Yet, they noticed that something was unusual about Subject 33, because insects would swarm towards that sample. 'It would be obvious within a few seconds of starting the assay. It's the type of thing that gets me really excited as a scientist. This is something real. This is not splitting hairs. This is a huge effect,' De Obaldia said. The researchers grouped participants into high and low mosquito attractors and looked for what set them apart. Chemical tests revealed 50 compounds that were more common in the skin oil (sebum) of those who attracted more mosquitoes. They also found that these people produced much higher levels of carboxylic acids, substances that skin bacteria use to create unique body odour in humans. To double-check their results, the team ran a second study with 56 new participants. Once again, Subject 33 attracted the most mosquitoes, and continued to do so over time. 'Some subjects were in the study for several years, and we saw that if they were a mosquito magnet, they remained a mosquito magnet. Many things could have changed about the subject or their behaviors over that time, but this was a very stable property of the person,' De Obaldia added. What's the science behind Humans produce two classes of odors that mosquitoes detect with two different sets of odor receptors: Orco and IR receptors. To test whether they could make mosquitoes that couldn't detect humans, researchers created genetically modified mosquitoes missing one or both key scent receptors. The orco mutants remained attracted to humans and were able to distinguish between mosquito magnets and low attractors, while IR mutants lost their attraction to humans to a varying degree, but still retained the ability to find humans. 'The goal was a mosquito that would lose all attraction to people, or a mosquito that had a weakened attraction to everybody and couldn't discriminate Subject 19 from Subject 33. That would be tremendous. And yet that was not what we saw. It was frustrating,' Vosshall added. These findings support another study by Vosshall, which showed how complex and reliable the mosquito's sense of smell is. Female Aedes aegypti mosquitoes depend on blood to survive and reproduce, so their scent-detection system has multiple backups to make sure they can always find a human host. 'Without blood, she can't do either. That's why she has a backup plan and a backup plan and a backup plan and is tuned to these differences in the skin chemistry of the people she goes after,' Vosshall says. Mosquitoes have such a strong sense of smell that it's hard to imagine they'll ever stop targeting humans. However, one possible solution is to change the bacteria on our skin. For example, covering the skin of someone who attracts lots of mosquitoes (like Subject 33) with skin oils and bacteria from someone who doesn't (like Subject 19) might help hide them from mosquitoes. Trump's Health Secrets EXPOSED? Nearly HALF of America Thinks Prez is HIDING Medical Truths | WATCH 'We haven't done that experiment. That's a hard experiment. But if that were to work, then you could imagine that by having a dietary or microbiome intervention where you put bacteria on the skin that are able to somehow change how they interact with the sebum, then you could convert someone like Subject 33 into a Subject 19. But that's all very speculative,' Vosshall added. One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
Time of India
19 hours ago
- Time of India
Giant snakes that eat humans— The real life serpent monsters
Giant snakes, including reticulated pythons, green anacondas, Burmese pythons, and African rock pythons, are real predators capable of attacking humans. These powerful constrictors inhabit regions like Southeast Asia, the Amazon, and Florida, posing a threat due to their size and strength. While attacks are rare, they can be fatal, emphasizing the importance of caution and awareness in snake-prone areas. When someone says 'giant snake,' your brain probably jumps straight to a movie scene — you know, a huge slithery beast lurking in the jungle, ready to snatch a person like it's grabbing a snack. Sounds like fiction, right? Well... not always. The truth is, some snakes out there are big enough, strong enough, and occasionally bold enough to go after humans. It's creepy. It's fascinating. And yeah, it's 100% real. Why are we so obsessed with giant snakes? Because they're equal parts terrifying and amazing. These creatures are ancient, powerful, and totally alien in how they move and hunt. They've inspired myths and monsters for centuries, and it's easy to see why. They're real-life predators, living in wild places most of us never see — and that mystery only adds to their legend. Reticulated Python These guys are the world's longest snakes. A reticulated python can stretch out over 20 feet, and a few big ones have even passed the 30-foot mark. That's longer than a school bus! They live in Southeast Asia — places like Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines. And here's the kicker: they're not just long, they're strong. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 오스템 임플란트 받아가세요 임플란터 더 알아보기 Undo These snakes don't use venom. Instead, they wrap themselves around their prey and squeeze the life out of it. Literally. Once the prey stops moving? Gulp — in it goes, whole. And yes, humans have ended up on the menu. There have been actual cases where full-grown adults were found inside these pythons. Inside. Let that sink in. Green Anaconda If the reticulated python is the longest, the green anaconda is the heaviest. Found in the Amazon and swampy parts of South America, this beefy beast can weigh more than 500 pounds. That's like trying to wrestle a grand piano. Anacondas spend a lot of time in water, where they sneak up on prey like caimans (mini-crocodiles), capybaras (giant rodents), and sometimes even jaguars. So yeah, humans? Not impossible. There are stories — still debated — of green anacondas attacking people. With the kind of strength and size they've got, it's definitely within the realm of possibility. You do not want to go swimming where one of these monsters is chilling. Burmese Python Originally from Southeast Asia, Burmese pythons have made themselves way too comfortable in Florida's Everglades. They're an invasive species there now, causing all kinds of problems for local wildlife. These snakes can grow over 20 feet long and weigh more than 200 pounds. They're stealthy, powerful, and crazy good hunters. While attacks on humans are rare, they've happened. Especially with kids or smaller adults. And in Florida, where people live close to the wild, close encounters aren't all that unheard of. African Rock Python Over in Africa, this python reigns supreme. African rock pythons are massive (up to 20 feet long!) and have a rep for being aggressive. They don't mess around. Unlike a lot of snakes that try to avoid humans, these ones are known for being bold. There have been multiple documented attacks — some fatal — in areas where people and snakes live close together. Basically, if it can fit in their mouth and they can squeeze it to death, it's dinner. Why would a snake even try to eat a human? It's not like snakes wake up craving people. But here's why it happens: Size match: Big snakes can only eat prey they can fit in their mouths. So they're looking for things about their width. Unfortunately, that can include children or smaller adults. These snakes are opportunistic. If the right moment presents itself — like someone alone, maybe asleep or distracted — they might go for it. We're in their space! As people build homes or farms near forests, rivers, and swamps, snake encounters go up. And sometimes, nature bites back. How do they even catch a human? Usually, it's a sneak attack. These snakes are masters of camouflage. They'll lie in wait, completely still, until something (or someone) gets close. Then — strike! They bite, grab on, and wrap their bodies around the prey. Within seconds, it's a deadly squeeze fest. Once the prey is still, they slowly start swallowing it whole, head first. It's not quick — but it's effective. Most of the time, they'll go for people who are asleep, too small to fight back, or near water where the snake can ambush them. Can they really kill people? Yep. They absolutely can. And sadly, there are real, confirmed cases of people being killed — and even eaten — by giant snakes. Remember, they're not venomous. It's all muscle. Once they start squeezing, it cuts off blood flow and air. People can pass out in minutes. If no one's around to help, it can turn fatal quickly. How to stay safe around giant snakes If you live or travel in places where big snakes might be hanging around, here's how to avoid becoming a snack: Don't wander alone in the jungle or swampy areas — especially at night. Be careful near rivers and lakes where big snakes love to hide. Keep an eye on kids and pets in snake-prone areas. Watch for signs — like snake tracks, shed skin, or slither marks. If you see a huge snake, don't play hero. Back away. Slowly. In case of an attack — fight to create space. Yell. Get help fast. Giant snakes like the reticulated python, green anaconda, Burmese python, and African rock python aren't just the stuff of nightmares — they're very real. They're rare, but deadly when things go wrong. So whether you're trekking through the Amazon or flipping channels on Animal Planet, just remember: nature's monsters don't always need CGI. Sometimes, they're out there… waiting in the tall grass.
Scroll.in
a day ago
- Scroll.in
The enigmatic wild ancestors of domestic tabbies
The Afro-Asiatic wildcat (Felis lybica) is the world's most widely distributed wildcat, but experts and information on the species are scarce. The species' range is immense, stretching across most of Africa, Southwest and Central Asia, India, China and Mongolia. But Arash Ghoddousi, lead author for F lybica 's 2022 IUCN species conservation assessment, says the study team found 'few people [who] knew anything about the cats'. That seeming lack of human curiosity is surprising, considering the domestic tabbies we keep as pets and lavish billions of dollars on annually are descended, and still closely related to, the Afro-Asiatic wildcat. One researcher who has shown intense interest is Marna Herbst, now a regional ecologist for South African National Parks. Previous research on F lybica had been based on opportunistic sightings and scat and stomach analysis. Herbst changed that, spending roughly four years and 10-12 hours nightly observing the cats in the harsh unforgiving landscape of the southern Kalahari Desert for her PhD research, published in 2009. She was the first (and remains the only) scientist to conduct such a long-term study on the species documenting its behaviors and population genetics. Searching for the wildcat Herbst carried out her study in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, a known African wildcat habitat straddling the borders of South Africa and Botswana. The small wildcats there were assumed to be far enough from urban areas to still be genetically pure, not having interbred with domestic cats (deemed one of the wild species' greatest risks). Sighting the little wildcats relatively often, Herbst hoped they would also be relatively easy to catch, collar and track. They weren't. Twenty years later, she recalls the challenges. The small cats are shy and elusive, taking cover in fox or aardvark holes and under tree roots; on farms, they hide amid tall, dense corn stalks. Adding to her difficulties, the cat is nocturnal and practically impossible to study in its habitat without aid of radio telemetry. To accomplish that, they must first be caught. Herbst recalls that in trying, she captured lots of other stuff. Jackals in particular were attracted to the chicken-baited cage traps. But over time, she succeeded in catching and collaring numbers of the elusive cats. Another hazard of low-budget research on a noncharismatic species: Herbst's hand-me-down 4×4 vehicle, in which she spent countless hours alone rumbling in the dark over roadless terrain, took a terrible beating. But those nights rewarded her with sights few ever see, encountering the park's big cats, including the famed black-maned lion (Panthera leo leo), cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) and leopard (P pardus). Once in the dark, while sipping coffee inside her 4×4, she was startled by a full-grown hyena that nonchalantly sniffed the side-view mirror. They're 'much bigger than you think', she says. Over time, Herbst came to know the Afro-Asiatic wildcat as 'a really special little species that plays a vital role in ecosystems'. Small cat, big adaptability You could be forgiven for mistaking an Afro-Asiatic wildcat for a family pet. They're the size of a large domestic cat (F catus), but with longer legs. Their coloration varies by region from reddish, sandy and tawny brown, to greyish. They sport faint tabby stripes or spots, more pronounced in humid areas, and paler and darker in drier climes. Their tails are slim and tapered with a dark tip. A distinguishing feature, Herbst says, is the pinkish-orange tint of their ears. Afro-Asiatic wildcats are highly adaptable to landscape (especially bush and steppe), season and prey availability. They prefer hunting small rodents but dabble in reptiles and invertebrates. Herbst recalls male cats taking down spring hares roughly the same size as they were. Cats with waterholes in their territories became bird-hunting specialists. One female was great at hunting sandgrouse as they came to drink. The stomach of an Afro-Asiatic wildcat from Oman contained beetles, grasshoppers, lizards, mammal fur and a date pit. The species is mostly solitary and roams widely. In the United Arab Emirates, a collared cat had a larger home range (52.7 square kilometers or 20.3 square miles), far larger than that reported in the more optimal habitat (around 3.5 km² or 1.4 mi²) of the Kalahari, where food and water are relatively easy at hand. Ghoddousi says the wildcat's remarkable adaptability to various habitats, tolerance of different elevations and climates, plus its capacity to coexist with larger predators make it very special – allowing it to spread over two continents. Because they're so widely distributed, with incidental sightings reported from many locations, the species is considered relatively stable and 'of least concern'. But Ghoddousi warns this might not reflect the species' true state in the wild. Due to lack of research, and therefore lack of data, the real-world trend for far-flung Afro-Asiatic wildcat populations remains unknown. Ghoddousi says the big risk is that, as global change escalates, the species could slip away before science notices and conservationists can take action. Ranging over such a wide area, the Afro-Asiatic wildcat goes by many regional names. It's the African wildcat to some, the Asiatic wildcat to others, and the Indian desert cat to still others. Scientifically, the Afro-Asiatic wildcat is divided into three evolutionarily similar subspecies. The first, F lybica lybica, occurs in Eastern, Western and Northern Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. The second, F lybica cafra (the topic of Herbst's PhD), occurs in Southern Africa. The third, F lybica ornata, is found in Southwestern and Central Asia, Pakistan, India, Mongolia and China. The precise boundaries of subspecies' ranges are unclear. Until 2017, these three subspecies were lumped together with the European wildcat and considered subspecies of F silvestris. But further investigation demanded a split: Now, populations that roam from the steppes and bush of Africa and Asia are classified as F lybica, while the European wildcat is classified as a separate species (with its bushy tail and more distinctive coat markings, F silvestris occurs in fragmented populations across Europe, Turkey and the Caucasus. These geographically separated cat populations mixed things up genetically at various points in time, due to natural changes or, sometimes, thanks to people. Thousands of years ago, this long-term and complex intermingling process birthed the first domestic cat. Domestication Paleogeneticist Claudio Ottoni wouldn't describe himself as a cat person, and his work takes place far from the wild. But under his microscope, the ancient lives and movements of the Afro-Asiatic wildcat come to life, revealing hints to the tantalising mystery as to how it long ago threw in its lot with humanity to evolve into today's domestic cat species. Paleogeneticists, it turns out, find the small wildcat just as elusive as field biologists. Compared with other domesticated animals, hypotheses about early cat domestication remain grounded in scant evidence and open questions. Ancient cat bones are scarce, and distinguishing differences between wild and domestic skeletal features is challenging. But Ottoni has been a dogged researcher, puzzling for years over perplexing data, embracing and developing a hypothesis, then revising the shape of that hypothesis as new technology and data become available to move toward a more robust theory. An early theory, published in 2017, was that farmers in southwest Africa had domesticated cats and brought them to Cyprus in the early Neolithic period (at least 7,000 years ago) to control rats and mice that damaged stored grain. This origin story was based on clues found in the DNA of 352 long-dead felids. Researchers analysed maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA in bits of cat bone and teeth, as well as skin and hair samples found at archaeological sites. The oldest samples included a complete cat skeleton, dated to roughly 7500 BCE, found buried with a man on Cyprus, suggesting the hypothesis that domestication started here. Other samples included six skeletons, dating to around 3700 BCE, found in an elite Predynastic Egyptian cemetery. Still other examples were found in archaeological digs at the Roman-Egyptian port of Berenike on the Red Sea. Ottoni also compared the ancient cat DNA samples with modern wildcat samples from Bulgaria and Eastern Africa. Together, the DNA seemed to indicate that the domestic cat's worldwide conquest began in the Fertile Crescent (perhaps on Cyprus some 7,000 years ago), then gained momentum during Classical Antiquity about 2,500 years ago, when the Egyptian cat successfully spread throughout the Old World along land and sea trade routes. This analysis seemed to confirm that while the Afro-Asiatic wildcat was the ultimate source of the domesticated cat, its evolution and spread wasn't simple: Though the North African/Southwest Asian F lybica was a source, both the Near Eastern and Egyptian F lybica populations also contributed to the domestic cat's gene pool at several points in history. New tech, better theory Since 2017, new technology and more data have modified, added detail and complicated this storyline. While earlier work relied on mitochondrial DNA analysis, researchers were able to analyse nuclear DNA for an updated theory in 2025. This higher-resolution analysis reveals the full genetic code of individual cat specimens, including not only the maternal, but also the paternal inherited DNA. It provides 'the actual ancestry,' Ottoni says. And this new data punched an unexpected hole in the previous theory of cat domestication. For one, domestication happened thousands of years later than thought, and then was probably not due to African farmers who traveled to Cyprus. 'Evolutionarily speaking, it's a very peculiar case,' Ottoni says of the discordance between the 2017 and 2025 DNA findings. The new data showed what scientists call 'mitonuclear discordance,' where analyses using mitochondrial DNA markers yield different conclusions than those using nuclear DNA markers. Surprisingly, samples that the researchers thought were F. lybica turned out to be those of the European wildcat. So, while wildcats were indeed taken to Cyprus, Ottoni explains, this might have been an isolated attempt of Neoolithic people to domesticate European wildcats, rather than wildcats brought from Africa. The evidence now suggests that European wildcat and African wildcat distribution probably overlapped in the past, perhaps due to climatic shifts or other natural causes. Because both species are interfertile, they sporadically bred, leading to a mixed population living in Turkey. According to the updated theory, domestic cats with a lybica genome only appeared in Europe about 2000 years ago, during Classical Antiquity, Ottoni says, but then adds, 'We can't say precisely when the domestication process that led to the cat dispersal started.' Perhaps, and more likely, domesticated cats did come first from Egypt, where cats were buried in the Hierakonpolis (the ancient Egyptian royal residence). But whatever the exact origin story, we do know that 'in evolutionary terms, [the domestic cat is] one of the most successful mammal species in the world,' Ottoni says. Domestic cats today are found on every continent except Antarctica. (They were introduced to sub-Antarctic Marion Island in 1949 to control mice, but were later eradicated due to negative impacts on native birds.) Researchers have also learned that the close genetic kinship shared by domesticated and wild felids species really matters: The widespread prevalence of F catus, and its capacity to interbreed with F lybica, is among the most serious threats to the Afro-Asiatic wildcat's survival. Big challenges Hybridisation with domestic cats is widespread across the Afro-Asiatic wildcat's range, though some studies, including Herbst's work, have shown that wildcat populations in South Africa at least, especially in protected areas, appear to remain genetically pure. However, according to the 2022 IUCN species assessment, there's insufficient information on the level of hybridisation with domestic cats in other parts of the range, and therefore, this threat should not be underestimated or ignored. As such, Herbst points to responsible pet ownership as key to Afro-Asiatic wildcat survival. That includes spaying by pet owners of their domestic cats that aren't being bred, and also community spaying of feral cats (especially in urban areas bordering protected areas where wildcats live). Education is important, too, she notes. Though spaying is an important conservation measure, spayed domestic cats can still seriously impact wildcat food sources. The IUCN assessment points out that feral domestic cats compete with wildcats for prey and space, and there is also a high potential for disease transmission between them. Other threats include the risk of roadkill and poisoning and conflicts with farmers and local people due to attacks on poultry by wildcats leading to retaliatory killings. Another serious threat, Ghoddousi says, is lack of information, causing scientists to underestimate the risk a species faces. Unfortunately, that is always the case when you don't have enough data, he says. You can't make a meaningful judgment about a species status if you simply do not know.
