Tensions Between Microsoft (MSFT) and OpenAI Reach ‘Boiling Point'
According to media reports, tensions between Microsoft (MSFT) and privately held OpenAI have reached a 'boiling point' and threaten to spill over into the U.S. courts.
Confident Investing Starts Here:
The Wall Street Journal was the first to report that executives at OpenAI are discussing the possibility of accusing Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior during their current business partnership. Microsoft first partnered with OpenAI in 2019 and has since pumped $14 billion into the start-up company behind ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence (AI) technologies.
In recent years, the relationship between Microsoft and OpenAI has soured to the point where OpenAI is now considering seeking a federal regulatory review of the terms of its contract with Microsoft for potential violations of antitrust laws, as well as a public campaign to discredit the technology giant.
Bad Blood
Such a move on the part of OpenAI would severely damage one of the most important technology partnerships in the AI field, and might even end the relationship between the two companies altogether. Analysts seem to agree that the partnership benefitted both Microsoft and OpenAI in recent years as they raced to the head of the AI technology pack.
But now, OpenAI appears to be looking for ways to reduce its reliance on Microsoft. OpenAI has announced plans to adopt Microsoft rival Alphabet's (GOOGL) Google Cloud service to meet its growing needs for computing capacity, causing tensions between the companies to intensify. Last year, Microsoft gave up its observer seat on OpenAI's board of directors to address antitrust concerns.
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Microsoft's stock has a consensus Strong Buy rating among 36 Wall Street analysts. That rating is based on 31 Buy and five Hold recommendations issued in the last three months. The average price target on MSFT stock of $518.77 implies 9.22% upside from current levels.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Instagram 近期停權、封號顯著增加，用家直指 AI 是元兇
過去數週網路上抱怨自己被無故停權、誤封帳號的 Instagram 用家顯著增加，雖然沒有直接證據，但許多人都將此歸罪於 AI 審核機制。在如今的大型網路公司中，使用自動審核系統已非常普遍。既然是機器出錯便在所難免，但當封禁的帳號達到一定數量級而且是集中出現的話，就不免讓人懷疑是否是規則本身出了問題。 lol, Instagram banned my Instagram account… the ban is actually weird. Also my basketball account got banned for absolutely no reasons, actually, it got banned for no reasons. The heck ??? I appealed but still… — HawkMania (@hawkmania4) June 16, 2025 在被封的人群中，不乏以 IG 為生計或高度依賴它開展業務的使用者。對平台的判罰許多人都提出了申訴，但得到的回應寥寥，有人覺得自己「感覺就像在對著虛空吶喊」。今年早些時候，另一社交平台 Pinterest 也曾發生過類似事件，最終他們承認大規模誤封是因「內部錯誤」造成，但至今為止 Meta 並未就 IG 的情況發表任何評論。目前在 上要求對 Meta 追責的請願已經徵集到數千個簽名，甚至有人在推動集體訴訟，不知這能不能激起 Meta 的反應呢？ 緊貼最新科技資訊、網購優惠，追隨 Yahoo Tech 各大社交平台！ 🎉📱 Tech Facebook： 🎉📱 Tech Instagram： 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 社群： 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 頻道： 🎉📱 Tech Telegram 頻道：
Business Insider
32 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Cloud Revenue Surge Sets 70% Growth Trajectory for Oracle Stock (ORCL)
Oracle's (ORCL) cloud business is growing at an impressive—and somewhat underappreciated—pace. The company reported strong fiscal Q4 2025 results, pushing its stock to all-time highs. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter At the core of the performance was Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), which grew 52% year-over-year to $3 billion. Notably, Oracle raised its FY2026 guidance, projecting OCI growth to accelerate beyond 70%, up from 50% in FY2025. This confidence is backed by a record $138 billion in Remaining Performance Obligations (RPO), signaling robust demand ahead. What stands out is that Oracle isn't merely riding the broader wave of cloud adoption—it's actively gaining ground in a highly competitive market. Despite the stock's recent rally, Oracle's expanding footprint and growing leadership in cloud infrastructure continue to support a bullish long-term outlook. Strategic Alliances Powering AI Infrastructure Strategic partnerships have played a critical role in Oracle's cloud surge, particularly its collaborations with OpenAI and Microsoft (MSFT). In June 2024, OpenAI—the creator of ChatGPT—chose Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) to help support capacity needs for Microsoft's Azure AI platform. Given the overwhelming demand for AI compute, Microsoft alone couldn't meet OpenAI's requirements, positioning Oracle as a complementary partner rather than a direct competitor. The arrangement benefits all parties and underscores OCI's growing relevance in the AI ecosystem. Oracle's role extends further through its founding stake in Stargate LLC, a joint AI venture with OpenAI, SoftBank, and MGX. The initiative plans to invest up to $500 billion in U.S.-based AI infrastructure, with a significant portion designated exclusively for OpenAI. This deepens Oracle's long-term integration into the AI supply chain. Importantly, this isn't a short-term arrangement. Oracle has entered a 15-year lease to provide compute capacity to OpenAI and committed around $40 billion to acquire Nvidia's GB200 GPUs. To meet surging demand, Oracle also plans to triple its cloud infrastructure capacity by the end of fiscal 2026. While this requires substantial capital investment, Oracle's strong cash flow positions it in a solid financial position to fund its expansion without compromising its stability. Notably, Oracle's cloud growth appears to be significantly outpacing its peers. OCI's 52% year-over-year growth bested Amazon Web Services (19%), Google Cloud (30%), and Microsoft Azure (20%). Notably, Oracle's global cloud market share was just 3% in Q1 2025, compared to AWS's 29%. Therefore, there is ample room for growth. OCI's Competitive Edge in a Growing Market Compared to other cloud providers, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) stands out for its consistent and transparent pricing model across regions, as well as its flexibility in handling high-performance workloads. A particularly notable aspect of Oracle's strategy is its approach to 'co-opetition'—collaborating with competitors to mutual advantage. This is evident not only in its partnerships, such as with Microsoft and OpenAI, but also in its product offerings. For example, Oracle Interconnect for Azure enables private, low-latency connections between OCI and Microsoft Azure, with no data transfer fees, highlighting Oracle's commitment to interoperability and customer-centric solutions. ORCL Navigates the Risks and Challenges Ahead While Oracle's recent momentum is impressive, several challenges lie ahead. One key risk is the ability to scale hardware and data center capacity quickly enough to meet growing demand; any delays or supply chain disruptions could lead to customer churn. Additionally, the significant capital expenditures required to expand OCI may place near-term pressure on margins. It's also important to recognize that the cloud infrastructure market remains highly competitive. Despite its recent gains, OCI still holds a relatively small share compared to the dominant hyperscalers, who continue to invest heavily in AI infrastructure. Sustaining competitive pricing and meaningful product differentiation over the long term will require continued innovation and operational excellence. Is ORCL Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold? On Wall Street, ORCL earns a consensus Moderate Buy rating based on 20 Buy, 13 Hold, and zero Sell ratings in the past three months. ORCL's average stock price target of $206.71 implies a downside potential of ~2.5%. Notably, the consensus price target is still adjusting to a flurry of analyst upgrades. For instance, analyst Keith Bachman of BMO Capital increased his price target from $200 to $235 following Oracle's earnings report. The analyst noted that 'While Oracle's fiscal 2026 remaining performance obligation guidance 'seems aggressive,' even if the company is close to guidance, the shares will move higher.' Oracle Emerges as AI Contender with Partnerships and Cloud Growth Oracle has made a notable pivot toward AI, driven by strategic partnerships, most notably its collaborations with OpenAI and Microsoft. Management's upbeat fiscal 2026 revenue guidance, coupled with record-high Remaining Performance Obligations (RPO), signals strong growth momentum. Over the long term, scaling its differentiated cloud infrastructure positions Oracle to capitalize on significant opportunities in a rapidly expanding market. While near-term headwinds such as elevated capital expenditures and intense competition from larger hyperscalers remain, Oracle's strong Q4 FY25 results, accelerating OCI growth outlook, and deepening AI alliances make ORCL an increasingly compelling play in the AI infrastructure space.
Forbes
36 minutes ago
- Forbes
Flexibility Was The Promise. The Infinite Workday Is The Reality.
Flexibility was supposed to help—so why did the workday become infinite? We used to know when the workday started. And when it ended. Now? Not so much. According to Microsoft's latest Work Trend Index Special Report: Breaking Down the Infinite Workday, 40% of employees are already online by 6 a.m. A third are still answering emails at 10 p.m. And one in five is working on weekends. This isn't a policy. It's not a leadership choice. It's not even necessarily intentional. It's just what's happening. We unhooked work from the office. In the process, we unhooked it from time. The data shows we've gained something valuable—flexibility over where and when we work. But without clear norms or personal guardrails, that freedom has stretched across the entire day. Instead of working in ways that fit our lives, too many of us are working all the time—and often on the wrong things. Alexia Cambon, Head of Research for Copilot and the Future of Work at Microsoft, captured this moment perfectly when she joined me on The Future of Less Work podcast: We now live in an infinite workday. Not because we lack flexibility, but because we haven't yet learned how to use it in ways that truly serve us. What makes this even harder is that work isn't just longer—it's faster. Email starts the day, but by 8 a.m., real-time chat takes over and the tempo accelerates. Microsoft found that the average worker now receives 117 emails and 153 Teams chats every day. Mass messages are up. One-on-one threads are down. Flexibility has opened the door for asynchronous work. But without clarity on expectations, it's also created a culture of immediate response. Everyone works on their own schedule, yet somehow, everyone expects everyone else to be instantly available. We're not just working longer hours—we're working in a constant state of interruption. Somewhere along the way, we forgot how to protect our attention. Because if flexibility really worked the way we imagined, we'd be using our best hours for our best thinking. But the data tells a different story. At 11 a.m., during what should be peak mental clarity, meetings, messages, and app-switching all spike. Workers are interrupted every two minutes. We've unintentionally allowed our most productive hours to be consumed by reactive coordination. Focus hasn't disappeared—it's just been displaced by a culture of urgency. And nowhere is that urgency more visible than in how we meet. Meetings were already a pain point in many organizations even before Covid. Back then, calendar and conference room capacity governed meeting planning. Now that digital tools have removed those limits, we simply add everyone—and move even faster. Microsoft found that more than half of meetings are unplanned, 10% are scheduled last-minute, and large meetings with 65+ people are rising fastest. We often talk about meetings as a coordination problem—but what's really breaking us is the last-minute culture that surrounds them. As Cambon put it during our conversation: The result? We spend our most valuable hours in meetings we didn't plan, reacting to decisions we didn't make, with barely any time to think. We see the result in the third work peak of the triple peak day, which is no longer a pandemic-era glitch. Evening meetings are up 16%, and a third of workers return to email after 10 p.m. Document activity (Word, Excel, PowerPoint) spikes on weekends—when the noise dies down and people finally find time to think. Flexibility, once a promise of balance, now too often means always being available. And when everyone works on their own rhythm—but still expects immediate response—the result is a system with no real off switch. Without rest. Without recovery. This is the moment when many turn to AI with hope. And yes, it can help. AI can handle the clutter: drafting emails, summarizing notes, scheduling meetings. But if we treat that freed-up time as space to do even more, we're not fixing the problem—we're accelerating it. The point of AI isn't just productivity. It's possibility: the chance to work more intentionally, to let AI do the right work to allow us to reclaim time for deep focus—or for stepping away entirely. But that only works if we're willing to reimagine the cadence of the day. To let go of always-on. To be more deliberate about when we engage, and just as deliberate about when we don't. The good news? The flexibility is already there. The tools are in place. What's missing is a rhythm that makes the most of both—one that allows for focus, restoration, and meaningful contribution. And that rhythm doesn't come from a policy. It starts with us: with the choices we make about when to engage, what to prioritize, and how to create space for what matters most. We may not control everything, but we can learn to notice what we need—and set the boundaries and signals that guard it. That might mean protecting deep work hours. Letting AI handle the noise instead of adding more to it. Redefining productivity as energy well spent, not just hours filled. And when we do this together—through team agreements, shared expectations, and mutual respect for time—we turn flexibility from pressure into possibility. The shift requires more than individual change—it calls for shared norms. As Cambon emphasized: The future of work will be shaped by technology. But to truly work for people, it will need to be defined by people.
