logo
Trump's Truth Social, Rumble Escalate Legal War With Brazil Supreme Court

Trump's Truth Social, Rumble Escalate Legal War With Brazil Supreme Court

Newsweek4 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
An escalating international free speech clash is reigniting tensions between U.S. tech platforms and the Supreme Court in Brazil.
Rumble Inc. and Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG), parent of Truth Social, have filed an amended federal lawsuit in their action against Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes after he ordered Rumble block a U.S. citizen, court papers show.
The new order from Moraes, issued July 11, demanded Rumble block the U.S. citizen, identified in legal fillings as a political commentator in Florida ("Political Dissident B") or face daily fines of 100,000 reais (about $20,000 USD) from July 13, the papers said.
Rumble and TMTG accuse Justice Moraes of judicial overreach by ordering the blocking of a U.S.-based user's account on Rumble, demanding the preservation of the account's content, and requiring disclosure of identifying user data to Brazilian authorities.
A spokesperson for the law firm representing Rumble, Boies Schiller Flexner, told Newsweek: "Brazil is claiming that it is combating foreign disinformation and extremism, but the issue isn't whether Brazil can regulate content within its own borders. It's that this one judge—Justice Alexandre de Moraes—is attempting to enforce Brazilian censorship standards on U.S. platforms, against U.S. citizens, for speech that occurred entirely in the United States."
President of the Superior Electoral Court, Judge Alexandre de Moraes, speaks during the inauguration of the Center for Combating Disinformation and Defense of Democracy in Brasilia, Brazil, March 12, 2024. President Donald Trump speaks during...
President of the Superior Electoral Court, Judge Alexandre de Moraes, speaks during the inauguration of the Center for Combating Disinformation and Defense of Democracy in Brasilia, Brazil, March 12, 2024. President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Bahrain's Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa in the Oval Office of the White House, Wednesday, July 16, 2025. More
Eraldo Peres/Alex Brandon/AP Photo
He said the new filing brings the July 11 order before U.S. courts. "It raises urgent legal questions—not only about Moraes's violation of U.S. law and treaty with Brazil, but also about whether a foreign judge can secretly compel U.S. platforms to suppress constitutionally protected speech. The court will have to grapple with these issues, and we believe the amended complaint presents them in a clear and compelling way."
Rumble has been blocked in Brazil since February following an order by the same judge.
Why It Matters
The amended complaint, filed July 14 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, marks a significant escalation in a months-long legal battle.
Over the past several years de Moraes has emerged as one of the most forceful figures in Brazil's digital landscape, launching a sweeping crackdown on what he describes as online threats to the country's democratic institutions. His orders have resulted in the removal or suspension of hundreds of social media accounts, most of them affiliated with conservative and right-wing figures or causes.
With freedom of speech, digital sovereignty, and cross-border law enforcement all in play, this case may well define the boundaries of online speech for years to come.
What To Know
The American citizen at the center of the new escalation, Political Dissident B, "has been previously targeted by Justice Moraes through suspensions of his accounts on social media platforms, retaliatory criminal proceedings in Brazil, the invalidation of his Brazilian passport, and asset freezes," lawyers for Rumble said.
The new order "represents the first instance in which Justice Moraes has targeted Rumble for the account of this U.S. citizen," they added.
This amended suit supplements an original complaint filed in February 2025, which challenged Justice Moraes's earlier orders against a Brazilian political dissident living abroad.
A U.S. judge ruled then that the Brazilian orders could not be enforced on American soil.
Now, the plaintiffs assert the latest actions reveal a broader, systematic effort by Moraes to suppress political discourse on U.S.-based platforms.
Both platforms said they will not comply, labeling the order "invalid and unenforceable."
Rumble and TMTG's legal response leans heavily on the Declaratory Judgment Act and First Amendment protections, arguing that extraterritorial censorship violates American constitutional rights and norms of international comity.
Who Is Justice Alexandre de Moraes?
Rumble has been suspended in Brazil since February 2025, on Justice Moraes' orders, for allegedly refusing to comply with court orders.
To many on the Brazilian left, de Moraes is hailed as a guardian of democracy, credited with helping to stave off an alleged coup attempt following the contentious 2022 presidential election. Supporters view his actions as a necessary response, that Brazil is combating coordinated disinformation campaigns that threaten national stability and that platforms like Rumble and Truth Social have facilitated foreign interference and extremism.
Critics on the right accuse de Moraes of overstepping, attempting to impose Brazil's censorship standards globally, that he represents the dangers of judicial overreach. Detractors accuse him of weaponizing his authority to silence political dissent and suppress conservative voices, raising alarms about censorship and authoritarianism in the name of public order.
Justice de Moraes is a controversial figure, known for aggressive rulings aimed at curbing misinformation in Brazil. Earlier this year, he ordered X temporarily blocked in Brazil and threatened further restrictions on noncompliant platforms, sparking concerns from civil liberties advocates.
The U.S. government has taken notice. According to the Financial Times, the Justice Department informed Brazilian authorities in May that such foreign orders are unenforceable in the United States. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also threatened Magnitsky sanctions against de Moraes over alleged abuses of judicial power.
What People Are Saying
A spokesperson for the law firm representing Rumble, Boies Schiller Flexner, told Newsweek: "The First Amendment protects speech on American soil. Brazil has no legal authority to compel U.S.-based companies to restrict speech by U.S. citizens under U.S. law, much less through secret orders sent directly to company headquarters in Florida. That's why Rumble and Trump Media brought this suit. Moraes is putting Rumble in the situation of having to violate U.S. law to comply with his illegal order.
E. Martin De Luca, Lead Attorney & Partner at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, representing Rumble said in a LinkedIn post on July 16 that the amended filling was "triggered by a new order of Justice Alexandre de Moraes of Brazil's Supreme Court that is the most blatant defiance of both U.S. and Brazilian law yet."
When the original lawsuit was filed, Rumble CEO Chris Pavlovski said: "This is a landmark battle for free speech in the digital age."
Rumble called the U.S. courts order barring the Brazillian court's order to block "Political Dissident A", "a complete victory for free speech" that "sends a strong message to foreign governments that they cannot bypass U.S. law to impose censorship on American platforms."
What Happens Next
The amended complaint is now before U.S. District Judge Mary Stenson Scriven, who previously blocked enforcement of de Moraes's orders due to improper diplomatic service. Judge Scriven will decide whether this latest request, focused on a U.S. citizen's account, raises new legal issues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

See rare glimpse inside secretive Russian drone factory
See rare glimpse inside secretive Russian drone factory

CNN

time26 minutes ago

  • CNN

See rare glimpse inside secretive Russian drone factory

See rare glimpse inside secretive Russian drone factory A secretive Russian drone factory has allowed state media inside its walls as the country escalates its nightly drone attacks on Ukrainian towns and cities. CNN's Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Matthew Chance has more from Moscow. 00:58 - Source: CNN Vertical World News 17 videos See rare glimpse inside secretive Russian drone factory A secretive Russian drone factory has allowed state media inside its walls as the country escalates its nightly drone attacks on Ukrainian towns and cities. CNN's Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Matthew Chance has more from Moscow. 00:58 - Source: CNN China cracks down on fake "Lafufu" Labubus Fake Labubu plush toys, dubbed "Lafufu," have gained popularity due to shortages of the original dolls made by China's Pop Mart. 02:05 - Source: CNN Child flees Israeli strike on Gaza refugee camp Video shows a child running away as Israeli munitions struck near a UNRWA school in Bureij Refugee Camp behind her. 00:36 - Source: CNN Jair Bolsonaro denies coup charges as police raid home Police in Brazil raided the home of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro and enforced a ruling from the country's Supreme Court that Bolsonaro wear an electronic ankle tag. Bolsonaro is being accused of plotting to overturn the results of the 2022 presidential election. 01:17 - Source: CNN Taiwan conducts 10-day military drill The Taiwanese government is preparing for a war they hope will never happen. For the first time this year, Taiwan combined two major civil defense exercises, with the drills lasting ten days. These drills have included urban combat, mass casualty simulations, emergency supply drops and cyber defense that could be enacted if an invasion was to occur. CNN's Senior International Correspondent, Will Ripley, reports. 01:44 - Source: CNN Surgeon shows humanitarian crisis in Gaza's hospitals A surgeon working in southern Gaza says babies are arriving at hospital so malnourished that 'skin and bones doesn't do it justice.' He also describes what appears to be a disturbing pattern in the gunshot wounds of children arriving from food distribution sites. CNN's Nada Bashir reports. 02:55 - Source: CNN Brazil's Lula tells Christiane Amanpour: Trump 'Was not elected to be emperor of the world' Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva tells CNN's Christiane Amanpour in an exclusive interview it was 'a surprise' to see President Donald Trump's letter posted to Truth Social, threatening Brazil with a crippling tariff of 50% starting August 1st. Lula says that he initially thought the letter was 'fake news.' Watch the full 'Amanpour' interview on CNN. 01:33 - Source: CNN Gaza's only Catholic church hit by Israeli strike Gaza's only Catholic church was struck by an Israeli tank, killing three and injuring many more, church officials said. It became internationally recognized after reports emerged that the late Pope Francis used to call the church daily. CNN's Nada Bashir reports 00:53 - Source: CNN Prince Harry recreates his mother's historic landmine walk Following in his mother's footsteps, Prince Harry visited Angola's minefields just as Princess Diana did 28 years ago. The Duke of Sussex was in Angola with The Halo Trust as part of the group's efforts to clear landmines. 00:39 - Source: CNN Massive fire destroys Tomorrowland's main stage Tomorrowland's main stage went up in flames just days ahead of the festival's opening in Boom, Belgium. 00:38 - Source: CNN How Trump's image is changing inside Russia Once hailed as a pro-Kremlin figure, President Donald Trump's image is changing inside Russia. It comes after Trump vowed further sanctions on the country if a peace agreement with Ukraine is not reached in 50 days. CNN's Chief Global Affairs Correspondent is on the ground in Moscow with the analysis. 01:41 - Source: CNN Who are the armed groups clashing in Syria? Dozens were killed in Syria this week after clashes between government loyalists and Druze militias in the southern city of Suwayda, prompting Syrian forces to intervene. That, in turn, triggered renewed Israeli airstrikes. 01:57 - Source: CNN Syrian anchor takes cover from airstrike live on TV An airstrike on the Syrian Ministry of Defense was captured live on Syria TV, forcing the anchor to take cover. Israel has been carrying out airstrikes on Syria as part of its commitment to protect the Druze, an Arab minority at the center of clashes with government loyalists. 00:30 - Source: CNN Video shows machine gun fire near Gaza aid site A video from social media shows machine gun fire spraying the ground near an aid distribution site in southern Gaza as crowds of Palestinians lie on the ground for safety. Although the source of the gunfire is not seen in the video, multiple eyewitnesses say it shows the Israeli military opening fire on Palestinians as they waited for food on Saturday. In a statement, the IDF said, 'The details of the video are under review.' 01:02 - Source: CNN Analysis: Moscow's reaction to Trump's 50-day peace deadline President Donald Trump has vowed further sanctions on Russia if a peace deal is not reached in 50 days. CNN's Chief Global Affairs Correspondent breaks down the Russian reaction and perspective on Monday's announcement from Moscow. 01:13 - Source: CNN Trump attends FIFA Club World Cup final CNN's Patrick Snell reports on President Trump's visit to MetLife Stadium for the FIFA Club World Cup Final between Paris Saint-Germain and Chelsea. 00:52 - Source: CNN Top Russian diplomat is in North Korea. What does this mean? Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov is in North Korea for a three-day visit. CNN's Will Ripley explains why this could be a sign of deepening relations between Moscow and Pyongyang. 01:16 - Source: CNN

Brazil's Message To The American People Is Going Super Viral
Brazil's Message To The American People Is Going Super Viral

Buzz Feed

time38 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Brazil's Message To The American People Is Going Super Viral

Brazil's former president Jair Bolsonaro is on trial for allegedly attempting to overturn his 2022 election loss with a coup plot. He faces up to 40 years in prison if convicted. After Bolsonaro lost the election, his supporters stormed Brazil's Congress, Supreme Court, and presidential palace. Sound familiar? It's kind of like Brazil's version of January 6. Sooo, Brazil's Supreme Court has raided Bolsinaro's home, put him on an ankle monitor, and banned him from social media and foreign contacts. Meeeeeanwhile, Trump has been defending Bolsonaro on TruthSocial, posting a letter saying, "I'll be watching the WITCH HUNT of Jair Bolsonaro, his family, and thousands of his supporters, very closely. The only Trial that should be happening is a Trial by the Voters of Brazil — It's called an Election. LEAVE BOLSONARO ALONE!" Trump also posted a letter to current Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, threatening to impose a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods and calling the trial of Bolsonaro a "Witch Hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY!" "I want to say something to the American people: If Trump was Brazilian and if he did what happened at Capitol Hill, he'd also be on trial in Brazil. And possibly he would have violated the Constitution. According to justice, he would also be arrested if he had done that here in Brazil." People in the replies are saying some sort of version of this: "America is not a serious country anymore." This person commented, "We're a joke to the rest of the planet. We're like the parent in the grocery store who will never discipline their child who is screaming and throwing literal shit at other customers." Another person shared this picture: And this person asked, "Can we deport trump to Brazil and put him in trial there instead?"

Why two justices could hand Republicans their own ‘Ginsburg moment' next year
Why two justices could hand Republicans their own ‘Ginsburg moment' next year

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Why two justices could hand Republicans their own ‘Ginsburg moment' next year

Are conservatives headed for their own 'Ginsburg moment'? That could be the outcome of the 2026 midterm elections if Democrats have any say in the matter. With next year's congressional elections still on the horizon, the first glimpses of the political dynamics that will shape 2026 are coming into view. Even as Donald Trump and his administration remain this week consumed by an uproar among the MAGA base over the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, issues like inflation and the White House's mass deportation raids continue to retain salience quietly in the background — quietly, but not with diminished importance, as they'll likely remain the top factors driving Americans to the polls. Then, there's the Supreme Court. It remains a sore point for liberals who watched Republicans lock Barack Obama out of the discussion over a vacant seat in 2016 and then, in 2020, watched Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death just two months before a presidential election notch a second rightward shift for the court in less than a decade. Justice Clarence Thomas, 77, is the oldest member of the bench. Some conservatives have privately begun to fret that the right-leaning justice or his 75-year-old colleague, Samuel Alito (whose wife hung a symbol honoring the January 6 conspiracy after the attack) could cause another 'Ginsburg moment' by refusing to resign while Republicans control the Senate, allowing one or both seats to fall into liberal hands. The Justices of the Supreme Coury (AFP via Getty Images) Legal commentators are somewhat torn over whether either will retire this term. Mike Davis, a former Senate GOP staffer on Supreme Court nominations and current 'viceroy' of Trumpworld, wrote that Alito was 'gleefully packing up his chambers' after the 2024 election. Ed Whelan, the Antonin Scalia chair in constitutional studies at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, also predicted in 2025 that Alito would retire in 2025, and Thomas in 2026, according to the American Bar Association Journal (ABAJournal). Others are less certain, and a source close to Alito tried to tamp down on that speculation earlier this year. "Despite what some people may think, this is a man who has never thought about this job from a political perspective," they told the Wall Street Journal. "The idea that he's going to retire for political considerations is not consistent with who he is," the source added. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivers remarks at the Georgetown Law Center on September 12, 2019, in Washington, DC (Getty Images) David Lat, who founded his own blog reporting on gossip surrounding the Court and broader legal world, also noted to ABAJournal that both justices have hired full rosters of clerks for the upcoming two terms, the latter of which will end in 2027. Under Donald Trump's first term, three Supreme Court vacancies were filled by conservative justices. Ginsberg's refusal to retire at multiple points when multiple factors were clear, including how her health challenges were affecting her work and the likelihood that Republicans would bend the rules (or shatter them) to see her seat filled with a conservative, is still looked by many as a failure of not just the justice but those liberals around her who allowed the octogenarian's desire to stay on the job conflict with political realities. Her defenders insisted that the justice's deliberations about retiring did not factor in politics at all. Critics of the Court see the justices' shroud of apoliticism as an excuse that does not match their rhetoric or actions, either on the bench or in public. The efforts by Alito's allies to dissuade speculation echoed those same defenses and rang especially hollow for the conservative justice who has shmoozed with a conservative billionaire with cases before the court and who reportedly authored his own blueprint for the eventual overturn of Roe vs Wade as far back as 1985. Thomas, meanwhile, reportedly sparked fears among conservatives that he would resign from the Court on his own way back in 2000 as he complained about the job's pay. But there's been no such murmuring as of late. If the claims are true and both justices are set on remaining on the bench, they could put Republicans in an awkward spot. The GOP's chances of protecting their newly-acquired Senate majority remain strong but have grown noticeably weaker in the past six months. The announced retirement of Thom Tillis in North Carolina puts his purple-seat state decidedly in play. Maine's Susan Collins is up for re-election, as is John Cornyn in Texas; Cornyn faces a hyper-MAGA primary challenger whom the senator has said could give up the seat to Democrats in November of 2026 if his primary challenge is successful. Rumors also continue to swirl about the possible retirement of Joni Ernst, the senator from Iowa, and her partner in the Senate delegation from the state, Chuck Grassley, is a staggering 91 years old himself. Several factors could force the Senate back into Democratic hands next year, and if the party's discussions over countering GOP redistricting in Texas by 'going nuclear' and following suit across a range of blue states is any indication, the party's members have learned not to give Republicans an inch and could block any of Trump's SCOTUS nominations going forward. In the end, the same shaky apoliticism that the justices cling to when facing any criticism from Congress or the Executive Branch could swing back to help the left, after causing so much damage at the end of the Obama era. It would be up to Democrats in the Senate to decide whether they are truly willing to take a page from the GOP's playbook.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store